Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Addison

(299 posts)
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 02:47 PM Nov 2013

A Liberal Pope?

A shocking case of denial highlights the problem that Catholics – and Pope Francis – have with history.

By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian, 19th November 2013

He’s a pin-up for liberals and progressives, “the obvious new hero of the left.” So says the Guardian’s Jonathan Freedland of Pope Francis(1), and it’s true that most of the surprises have been good ones.

His statements denouncing capitalism are of the kind that scarcely any party leader now dares to breathe(2,3). He appears to have renounced papal infallibility. He intends to reform the corrupt and scheming curia(4). He has declared a partial truce in the war against sex which his two immediate predecessors pursued (while carefully overlooking the rape of children) with such creepy fervour.

It’s worth noting that these are mostly changes of emphasis, not doctrine. Pope Francis won’t devote his reign to attacking gays, women, condoms and abortion, but nor does he seem prepared to change church policy towards them. But it’s not just this that spoils the story. There is a strange omission, which puts the Pope on the wrong side even of John Paul II(5). It’s his failure so far to engage with or even acknowledge the past horrors over which the Church has presided.

. . .

http://www.monbiot.com/2013/11/18/double-erasure/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Liberal Pope?