General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAbortion is just like any other medical and surgical procedure, a necessity to treat...
an underlying condition. I celebrate, yes, celebrate, the existence of abortion, in all its various forms, as a safer, viable, alternative to bullshit and unsafe home "remedies" that have killed and maimed women in the past.
I view it as no different than something that is, in my opinion, even more drastic, open-heart surgery, I celebrate the existence of that as well, I should, both my Grandfather in the 1980s(died in 1997) and my father in the 2010s(still alive and kicking), both benefited from it. The only thing unfortunate about it was the underlying condition that lead to the necessity of the open-heart surgery. I don't see how pregnancy is any different, in general terms.
renie408
(9,854 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)renie408
(9,854 posts)that of the conservative male who feels that abortion is wrong at all costs.
We are quick to tell those men to shut the fuck up, why not tell you the same thing?
I have had an abortion. It is not like removing a splinter. I fully support a woman's right to choose. I also fully support her right to regret that the choice had to be made. Posts like yours are insensitive and ignorant. The ignorant part I get you have no control over as you are a man. The insensitive part you can work on.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)I said absolutely NOTHING about what women should feel, that is the point.
renie408
(9,854 posts)Cause I thought your point was that abortion is a simple medical procedure with no more emotional baggage attached to it than having your tonsils out. As this was stated as an accepted fact, I felt that it implied that anyone who thinks differently was wrong.
But since you have quickly told the women who have responded to you that they are, in fact, wrong and not you; I now see the error of my ways.
In case you didn't get it, that was sarcasm.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)renie408
(9,854 posts)if you have an agenda.
But, if you have average reading comprehension, you can clearly see that sentence was a synopsis of the OP's post, not a stated opinion of mine. You will have to let me know if you are average or below on the reading comprehension, I have no way of estimating accurately from the information. The agenda I can clearly see.
I think abortion is a decision between a woman and herself. I think that the woman who says that she had an abortion and didn't think twice about it is just as right as the woman who says she had an abortion and regretted that the choice had to be made. Because this is a PERSONAL decision and no on can tell you what to FEEL about it. No one. Not you, not the MAN who wrote this post. You think abortions are GREAT and a positive choice...well, OK. Personally, I disagree. However, I am a woman and I have a daughter and I will fight tooth and nail to preserve that choice.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)renie408
(9,854 posts)Did you understand my post or not? If you did, then you intentionally misrepresented what I wrote to fit your agenda. If you didn't...well, that speaks to the reading comprehension part.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)associated with his surgery, and I don't discount those feelings, they happen to people, my Grandpa just was happy to be alive. People are complex, and when it comes to emotions, they is no right or wrong way to feel about anything related to our bodies. Also, please point me to anywhere I said that someone was wrong to feel a certain way about their own medical treatments and I will tell myself that I was wrong.
renie408
(9,854 posts)You wrote that, right? That is not stated as an opinion, it is written as a statement of fact.
If I write "Anyone who thinks that abortion is just like any other medical and surgical procedure is an insensitive moron.", a thinking person might infer that anyone who feels differently is wrong and, therefore, an insensitive moron.
Am I right or wrong to feel badly about my abortion? Can you help me with that? You seem to be the definitive expert on the subject, after all. I swear to god, if you had said, "I think abortion is no bigger deal than any other medical procedure", the most I would have written would have been "I disagree and here's why." But that is not what you wrote and, honestly, what you wrote is just absurd. This is what YOU think. Fine. Think that. You will not regret any abortions you have to have. Oh...wait...
Can you not see how the way your post was written might come off as a little insensitive?
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)it might seem cold, but I am just stating my opinion, and I was talking about it on a societal level, NOT individual level.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Neither are "wrong", both are necessary to deal with underlying condition.
The moral or emotional value you assign to it has nothing to do with procedure itself.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)You said it much more concisely that I did in my OP, thank you.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Thank you for raising this topic!
4 t 4
(2,407 posts)but I just don't think men should ever be involved in this topic- ever. That is just my thought some women might differ but men have No Business on this topic in my mind. I don't want any man to ever tell me about abortion -ever!!!
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)we have mothers, sisters, daughters, wives, girlfriends, and friends who are adversely affected by this issue, so it is of great concern to me that there is as little hindrance as possible for women to be able to have abortions.
This is particularly poignant for those of us with wives or girlfriends that we can make medical decisions for them when they are incapacitated in some way, which can happen at any time, and I would like to have all options open, including abortion, if I and her doctors feel it is for the best for her health and safety.
My fiancee and I are going to try to conceive within a year, and given her preexisting conditions, it will be a high risk pregnancy. We already discussed the risks and options, and how decisions will be handled if necessary. Its always important to have these discussions out in the open.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)I have a number of friends who also have gone through abortions and I don't know one who thought it was a trivial procedure, or anyone who wouldn't have preferred just not being pregnant in the first place.
Like you, I FULLY support the woman's right to choose. But I didn't get to that belief by minimizing or denying the impact of pregnancy and abortion on a woman.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)my OP, what women feel individually should be dealt with individually, there is no need to deny or affirm those feelings on a societal level except to acknowledge that there is no right or wrong way to feel.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)who are claiming that there is virtually no significance or mpact on the woman who has an abortion. Unfortunately, while you don't believe that, you were using the same argument these people have been using -- that abortion's just like any other medical procedure.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)when it comes to individual feelings about the impact of having an abortion, some women will be emotionally affected, either negatively or positively, others or won't feel much anything, and frankly, all these experiences are valid, on an individual level, but that is also where that validity ends.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)But among my friends who have had abortions, none of them felt like it was a trivial experience, like getting a tooth pulled or tonsils taken out.
I don't understand why some people here seem to think that supporting a woman's choice requires one to believe it's an insignificant matter.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Even seemingly simple(and routine) stuff, like Tonsillitis and getting them removed can damn near kill someone, almost happened to my cousin(she almost bled out), its rare, sure, but its a risk.
Having to get teeth pulled is another issue entirely, and can lead to self image issues along with worrying about practical considerations.
The point being that I feel that, regardless of what medical issues people deal with, it does everyone a disservice to try to project your own feelings onto what other people are going through, empathize and sympathize, but don't project.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)yours are opinions. There is nothing to argue about, just like one wouldn't argue that earth is flat, unless one is totally delusional.
Deal with it.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Sick and bloody tired listening to "it was the Most Difficult Decision (tm) of My Life" mantra. No, it bloody wasn't for me and countless other women who feel nothing but RELIEF, and at least in my case feeling very happy.
Abortion IS something to celebrate. Without it I and my friends would be dead most likely.
Thank you to everyone who developed and is still working on improving all forms of abortion - some of the most safe medical procedures, both non- and surgical.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)As always.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Mine was. Open heart surgery can be fraught with emotion for everyone involved. Or, you can be like Dick Cheney, get a new heart, and not give a shit about anything that went before.
Everyone's experience is different. The procedure itself is morally neutral.
I respect and support your right to experience the emotions that accompanied your abortion--in private, without judgment. It's private and deeply personal, and I am certainly in no position to judge you over it. But my experience was different. All I experienced was relief.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)There is a lot of implication (and in some cases accusation) around DU that YOU SHOULD FEEL SHAME.
And it bothers me very much. I didn't know DU was so far to the right on this topic.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Never mind feeling happy that I have a choice, that I am free to do as pleased, that I don't have to deal with it even one more day than I absolutely have to.
Edit to add: I was at the clinic within less than an hour after realising that I was late. Thankfully, vacuum extraction before 8 weeks was on demand. It would have driven me insane to wait even a day. /shudder
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)it is not like any other condition. There is a fetus which would become a human life if not aborted. Not a reason not to abort, but the comparison is ridiculous.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)bring about new human life, that doesn't make them special, why should a fetus be treated any differently unless the woman carrying it wants it treated differently?
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Again, I am totally pro-choice, but I totally reject your comparison.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)is caused by a viable fetus. Let's be clear here, some of these procedures are due to babies that will not survive after birth. Some are already dead before the procedure. I think this is very important to note.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Yes, there is a difference. That 5 week old embryo was a POTENTIAL life, my 3 year old WAS a living, breathing, talking human being. Those people in that christian hospital could not see the difference either. I would die saving my born daughter, but I would not for a 5 week old embryo.
The already born, whether child or adult, take preference over the unborn in my book.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Do you have a problem with that? Or were you speaking for yourself only?
BTW, with opinion like yours, I wouldn't let you anywhere near women who need escort to a clinic. They need to be protected from that kind of RW shit.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)It is rarely a necessity.
I am glad it is legally available and would not like to see it taken away. But it is not a necessity hardly ever. It is a choice and one women should be able to make freely and safely.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)except in the rare occasion where the health of the woman is in danger.
There is always the option to bring it to term. Necessity implies there are no other options.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)medical conditions as well, with risks and benefits to be assessed, so choices to be made.
I don't see how pregnancy is any different than treating any other medical condition, with options and choices that are to be assessed on an individual level, with advice from a doctor, and no one else.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Everyone agrees that things such as cancer or heart blockages are life threatening and need to be treated. Everyone does not agree that a pregnancy is a condition that needs to be fixed.
I have no argument with the idea that it should be assessed and decided on an individual level.
The idea that it is a necessity though, does not fly.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)if it was the human race would have ceased to exist long ago.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)if you want to go into a semantics argument fine, but think of it this way, a pregnancy happens, its the underlying condition, its also an acute condition, temporary, but with some potential health repercussions and risks that can happen later(to your body, lifestyle changes are immeasurable). There are, in general, two ways to treat it, let it run its course, or terminate it early.
How is this any different than, for example, taking Tamiflu to end the flu early? Chances are, if you are a relatively healthy person, you can fight off the infection, let it run its course, but also be miserable and have some extended side effects and consequences to that, or take tamiflu and nip the infection in the bud, so to speak. Of course, you would, with your doctor, weight the benefits and risks of both, and then make a choice. What is the difference?
Egnever
(21,506 posts)I disagree with the wording of your op.
Further posts in this thread have clarified your intent and I withdraw my disagreement.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)necessity? What?
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)each time they became pregnant and there would be no babies born.
It seems like hyperbole to me.
Bryant
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)4 t 4
(2,407 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Anyone can have an opinion on the subject, whether a male or female. It is the pregnant woman's choice of course.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)Awesome!
Lars39
(26,109 posts)Huh, learn something new everyday.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)maybe because there was never a post on this thread about denying any of those things?
A straw man or straw person, also known in the UK as an Aunt Sally,[1][2] is a common type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[3] The misrepresentation can be intentional or accidental. It is possible to unintentionally misrepresent an opponent's argument by failing to understand it in the first place and honestly communicating what one (wrongly) thinks is the actual argument. This can lead to opposition believing the creation of a straw man argument to be intended, when it may or may not be.
Pretty much fits the definition perfectly.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)You can sally your strawman all you want, denying a woman an abortion because she does not want to be pregnant makes you a forced--birther.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)No where in this thread do I ever advocate removing a womans ability to have an abortion.
My argument is a simple one despite your apparent inability to grasp it.
Abortion is not a necessity it is a choice. Period full stop.
I am glad women have the choice.
polly7
(20,582 posts)see it as something necessary ..... for their own well-being - which naturally includes their mental health and ability to pursue life goals? I guess I'm not understanding you.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)Kick that straw!
Egnever
(21,506 posts)I couldn't have put it any clearer for you.
Enjoy whatever blather you chose to pretend i said with this post and have a nice day
polly7
(20,582 posts)Just trying to understand, and I admit, I confuse myself at times ... On one hand, abortion shouldn't have to be seen as a necessity, simply because it is a right and a choice that women, hopefully, always will have .... on the other, women don't choose abortion unless they see it as necessary, for reasons that are their own. Thankfully, it's a personal decision that shouldn't be affected in any way by anyone else's blather. You have a nice day too.
polly7
(20,582 posts)My sister wouldn't be here today if she'd been forced to do it at 16, she'd been stocking up on pills for weeks. Unwanted/unplanned pregnancies can destroy lives very easily. The only option that matters is that the woman has the choice to do what is best for her ... and only she (and her doctor, in cases of fetal abnormality or non-viability) knows what that is.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)My problem lies in the idea that abortion is a necessity. It is a choice and I am glad your sister was able to make the choice that was best for her.
We seriously considered an abortion for our third pregnancy, it was a complete fluke and should not have happened. We had already made financial decisions based on two children that would be very difficult to overcome. In the end we decided not to abort but had we gone the other way I would have been glad that the option was there.
Some days I wonder if we made the right choice.
Once again I am glad the choice was available for your sister.
Warpy
(111,245 posts)Obviously you know nothing about the very real threat to health and life pregnancy exposes a woman to.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)May be very much the right thing, but necessity is not the right word.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)It's an option, and should remain so.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)If it's only "an option", you must have another.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)damn straight
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)of complications from back-alley abortions.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)that's why birth control and the education to use it correctly should be readily available to reduce the amount of sbortions performed
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)how many more women will stop feeing depressed. By repeating same old bullshit how "abortion is emotionally damaging" does a hell of a lot of damage to women who listen to it every day.
"You" means both generic and personal.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)Good, affordable birthcontrol is a more effective route. I think it is better to reduce the demand.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)NOTHING! NADA! ZERO!
So, how about you stop talking about abortion like it's it's something horrible and to be ashamed about. Stop spreading bullshit how "damaging" it is to women, how they out to feel "depressed", and any such bullshit.
How about you do that, and advocate for easy and free access to BC. Don't forget to advocate for BC pill for man too, as none exist at the moment.
You is both personal and generic.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)To advocate for the less invasive proceedure to reduce the need for a surgical one.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)NOTHING! NADA! ZERO!
So, how about you stop talking about abortion like it's it's something horrible and to be ashamed about. Stop spreading bullshit how "damaging" it is to women, how they out to feel "depressed", and any such bullshit.
How about you do that, and advocate for easy and free access to BC. Don't forget to advocate for BC pill for man too, as none exist at the moment.
You is both personal and generic.
There, I highlighted important parts, in case you didn't get it first time.
Unless you are admitting that you want that stigma to remain, and you want women who have abortions to suffer because of it.
Which one is it?
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts). ...
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Well said.
Sid
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)No one chooses to have open heart surgery if there is ANY other choice. Open heart surgery generally saves your life and/or improves the quality of it in a way that overcomes the pain, the debilitation, etc. of surgery.
Most abortions are elective. There is an alternative that does not result in the death of the patient, or in disability. the comparison is not only false, but insulting and ridiculous.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)either by simply being uninformed or willfully uninformed, I advise you educate yourself on this issue before commenting on it further.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)And then be embarrassed by the astonishing level of ignorance in your post.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)Pregnancy and birth are more dangerous than abortion. The choice isn't between abortion and no risk. It's between the risk of abortion (very low) and the risk of pregnancy and childbirth (much higher.)
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)I am getting really sick and tired of right-wing anti-choice bullshit.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)That there was a high chance of death when you have an abortion. And I thought, No there isn't! There's a much higher chance of death from pregnancy and birth.
But the statement was more anti-choice than I thought.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)If a patient doesn't have open heart surgery, the result is usually an early death, following progressive debilitation.
If a woman doesn't have an elective abortion, the result (to her) is NOT usually death.
I maintain that the comparison is ridiculous.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Never mind health complications associated with any pregnancy, due and post.
What's your point?
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)Google maternal death rates. Please.
REP
(21,691 posts)And, just like open heart surgery, some people will have very emotional reactions to it while most will not.
Strangers are less likely to attempt to shame heart surgery patients who didn't have a strong emotional reaction to their procedure, though.