General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS troops to stay in Afghanistan until 2024 and beyond
Endless Afghanistan? US-Afghan agreement would keep troops in place and funds flowing, perhaps indefinitelyBy Richard Engel, NBC News Chief Foreign Correspondent
KABUL While many Americans have been led to believe the war in Afghanistan will soon be over, a draft of a key U.S.-Afghan security deal obtained by NBC News shows the United States is prepared to maintain military outposts in Afghanistan for many years to come, and pay to support hundreds of thousands of Afghan security forces.
The wide-ranging document, still unsigned by the United States and Afghanistan, has the potential to commit thousands of American troops to Afghanistan and spend billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars.
The document outlines what appears to be the start of a new, open-ended military commitment in Afghanistan in the name of training and continuing to fight al-Qaeda. The war in Afghanistan doesnt seem to be ending, but renewed under new, scaled-down U.S.-Afghan terms.
<..>
Taken as a whole, the document describes a basic U.S.-Afghan exchange. Afghanistan would allow Washington to operate military bases to train Afghan forces and conduct counter-terrorism operations against al-Qaeda after the current mission ends in 2014. For that foothold in this volatile mountain region wedged between Pakistan and Iran, the United States would agree to sustain and equip Afghanistan's large security force, which the government in Kabul currently cannot afford. The deal, according to the text, would take effect on Jan. 1, 2015 and shall remain in force until the end of 2024 and beyond. It could be terminated by either Washington or Kabul with two years advance written notice.
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/11/19/21534305-endless-afghanistan-us-afghan-agreement-would-keep-troops-in-place-and-funds-flowing-perhaps-indefinitely
malaise
(268,903 posts)The US still has troops in Japan and Germany and WWII ended in 1945.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)malaise
(268,903 posts)Obama should bring them all home - it's a waste of human lives and money.
former9thward
(31,973 posts)Afghanistan pushed the Soviet economy over the cliff and we are headed in that direction.
Upton
(9,709 posts)http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-romney-no-timetable-end-afghan-war-231510087--election.html
I guess he just misspoke..
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Which are totally different than troops who "conduct counter-terrorism operations against al-Qaeda"
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Oh, and this is supposed to be to "train" them. Ten years apparently hasn't long enough to accomplish that
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Remember: this giggling war criminal and traitor walks free.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)I don't think we're done with Iran yet.
-Laelth
indepat
(20,899 posts)in Afghanistan? How much better millions of lives here and there will be by reason of troops being there. At what point does it become insanity to let things at home go to hell in a hand-basket to station troops so far from home at inordinate expense all the while military contractors will be larded and sated with fat ludicrously profit-laden contracts?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Who else can protect the Chinese mining companies? What? You want Chinese to have to invade?
Besides, if we never leave we can't be deemed as being defeated. Gotta keep up the idea that empire lives!
Just look at Iraq. Ever since we left the Iraqis in ruins, they have remained in chaos. Imagine what it would be like if they had let us keep troops there.