Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 07:42 PM Nov 2013

Why did Harry Reid go nuclear? Here's why, in one image

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

http://m.dailykos.com/story/2013/11/21/1257328/-Why-did-Harry-Reid-go-nuclear-Here-s-why-in-one-image?detail=email

Why did Harry Reid go nuclear? Here's why, in one image

by Ian Reifowitz Nov 21, 2013 10:04am PST

Republicans have sought, as a rule, to use every tactic imaginable to block the initiatives and policies proposed by this president. They've done so since the night of his inauguration. The use of the filibuster by the Republican minority to block President Obama's nominees (judicial and executive branch) is part of an unprecedented ratcheting-up of the use of that tactic. As Gail Collins so wonderfully put it, we're now at a point where the nomination of a new Federal Reserve Chair cannot come to a vote until Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) decides there's been sufficient discussion of Benghazi.

Great work, Senator Reid, and kudos to the other fifty-one Senate Democrats who did the right thing today. It's a new day for the U.S Senate.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did Harry Reid go nuclear? Here's why, in one image (Original Post) G_j Nov 2013 OP
Those number are OLD. The new numbers below Tx4obama Nov 2013 #1
you're right G_j Nov 2013 #2
Probably because they posted an old image instead of an updated one. Tx4obama Nov 2013 #3
I just don't understand G_j Nov 2013 #4
That is not a first term number. The first Obama line is current total, second line is 'projected' Tx4obama Nov 2013 #5

G_j

(40,366 posts)
4. I just don't understand
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 08:39 PM
Nov 2013

how the number in Obama's first term changed.
Needless to say, the high numbers speak volumes.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
5. That is not a first term number. The first Obama line is current total, second line is 'projected'
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 08:45 PM
Nov 2013

The numbers are for ALL the time Obama has been in office.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did Harry Reid go nuc...