Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The JFK Movie... (1973) Before There Was A JFK Movie... (Original Post) WillyT Nov 2013 OP
Had been thinking of posting this myself... villager Nov 2013 #1
Good movie. texanwitch Nov 2013 #2
Interesting. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #3
for later lame54 Nov 2013 #4
Kick !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #5
Interesting...I've never heard of it. NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #6
That's Because They Tried To Kill It Too... WillyT Nov 2013 #7
Dang... NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #8
BTW...I didn't bother to rec before. NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #9
Censorship, the poison that kills democracy. Now I will definitely watch it sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #12
Censorship? Yeah, that and ignorance. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #18
And like "JFK," is 99.999% fiction. Archae Nov 2013 #10
We Appreciate Your Concern... WillyT Nov 2013 #11
I agree with you about Oliver Stone's JFK... NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #14
I don't buy the CTs but thanks for posting arely staircase Nov 2013 #13
You Are Quite Welcome !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #15
This is worth watching too. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #16
When They Finally Release ALL Of The Facts... We'll Talk... WillyT Nov 2013 #17
Got a link? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #19
Let's not get wrapped around the axle on the 75 years hootinholler Nov 2013 #22
I do not know. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #23
At first glance one might think you have an investment in containing CT hootinholler Nov 2013 #24
Yeah, in fact I do have an investment in containing CT. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #25
Thanks, but we have been doing fine Politicalboi Nov 2013 #26
Show me proof of that.. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #27
Man... It's Got A Be Lonely Out There For An... Educator... WillyT Nov 2013 #34
Wow. Passive aggressive much perfessor? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #35
Just Because You Are Paranoid, Doesn't Mean They're Not Out To Get You... WillyT Nov 2013 #28
Cool then, same info as the Wiki entry above. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #31
And Once Again... Why The Wait ??? - It's An Open & Shut Case Don'tcha Know ??? WillyT Nov 2013 #32
I do not know. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #33
Take A Valium... And Take A Look At The Actual Numbers... You Are WRONG... WillyT Nov 2013 #37
Better you lay off the drugs WillyT The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #38
Disengagement much? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #20
Why would they hide the files? MicaelS Nov 2013 #40
kick 4 l8ter. n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2013 #21
Thanks for that WillyT zeemike Nov 2013 #29
You Are Quite Welcome !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #30
Kick !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #36
Kick !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #39

texanwitch

(18,705 posts)
2. Good movie.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 02:31 AM
Nov 2013

The President was a threat to a lot of people.

I can't think of a president rocking the boat since then.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
7. That's Because They Tried To Kill It Too...
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 04:24 PM
Nov 2013
Executive Action is a 1973 film about the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy, written by Dalton Trumbo, Donald Freed and Mark Lane, and directed by David Miller. Miller had previously worked with Trumbo on his film Lonely Are the Brave (1962). The film opened to a storm of controversy over the depiction of the assassination: in some places in the U.S., the film ran only 1 to 2 weeks in movie theaters or got pulled from them altogether. The movie was part fiction, but it would contest other reports of the assassination, including the controversial Warren Commission report of 1964, which led to attacks against the film. The trailers for the film never ran on certain television stations, including WNBC-TV in New York City. The criticism of the film and its suggestion of a Military-industrial complex conspiracy led to the film being removed totally from the movie theaters by early December 1973 and getting no TV/Video runs until the 1980s and mid-1990s, when it got legal release and distribution for TV and video. The film was originally released on November 7, 1973, almost two weeks before the tenth anniversary of the JFK Assassination.


Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Action_(film)




sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
12. Censorship, the poison that kills democracy. Now I will definitely watch it
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 04:40 PM
Nov 2013

and share it with as many people as possible.

Imagine if they had had the internet back then?

They were able to do these things without opposition.

But trying to censor a movie like this today?

I don't believe it would be possible.

 

Archae

(47,245 posts)
10. And like "JFK," is 99.999% fiction.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 04:32 PM
Nov 2013

Ok, to be fair, I will say what is real.

Kennedy was shot and killed.

Clay Shaw was put on trial by Jim Garrison.

Everything else in both those movies was fiction.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
14. I agree with you about Oliver Stone's JFK...
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 04:44 PM
Nov 2013

but I also agree with what arely said below. I want to see the movie now just because of the censorship forty years ago. No, for the most part, I don't agree with the CTs either, but I'll admit that I have never been convinced one way or the other.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
13. I don't buy the CTs but thanks for posting
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 04:41 PM
Nov 2013

the story of the movie is interesting in and of itself. I had no idea.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
17. When They Finally Release ALL Of The Facts... We'll Talk...
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 04:54 PM
Nov 2013

And BTW... why would the government hide files for 75 years on such an "open and shut" case ???

Why would they hide them at all ?

Loner, loser, shoots President. Easy peasy... why so queasy?


The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
19. Got a link?
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 05:00 PM
Nov 2013

For those files hidden for 75 years? Something academic or peer reviewed? Otherwise you sound paranoid.

hootinholler

(26,451 posts)
22. Let's not get wrapped around the axle on the 75 years
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 06:09 PM
Nov 2013

There are just shy of 1200 documents that we know of that remain to be declassified and released. The JFK records act sets their release in 2017. The CIA refused releasing them for the 50th anniversary.

If Oswald was a lone wolf, why fight the release? Why stonewall (I'm being polite, I really mean lie to) both the Warren Comission and the HSCA?

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
23. I do not know.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 06:18 PM
Nov 2013

And much unlike CTers, I do not assume there is a conspiracy based on what I do not know.


In other words, I base my decisions and beliefs on 98% of what is known over the 2% that is unknown.

I had to train myself to do it but it was easy once I tried.

hootinholler

(26,451 posts)
24. At first glance one might think you have an investment in containing CT
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 06:51 PM
Nov 2013

Since you use the broad brush to claim you are different from them.

It's interesting that the same 98% can lead people to wildly divergent views. I assume there was a conspiracy based not just on that same evidence, but also on additional facts published since the wrap up of the HSCA that are still coming to light.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
25. Yeah, in fact I do have an investment in containing CT.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 06:56 PM
Nov 2013

I am an educator and a professional historian and I hate to see my beloved countrymen sharing their ignorance of history.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
26. Thanks, but we have been doing fine
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 07:03 PM
Nov 2013

When history tells us why JFK's secret service was called off on his car maybe we'll see your ignorance of history.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
27. Show me proof of that..
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 07:08 PM
Nov 2013

Video of a SSA shrugging his shoulders does not count. That is in the 2% category of shit we do not know.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
34. Man... It's Got A Be Lonely Out There For An... Educator...
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 09:27 PM
Nov 2013

Having been one myself... I taught my kids to not accept dogma, and to keep fighting for the truth, no matter where it leads.

To each their own I suppose;


The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
35. Wow. Passive aggressive much perfessor?
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 09:31 PM
Nov 2013

It's like you don't even try to hide it anymore.

Now I has as a sad.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
31. Cool then, same info as the Wiki entry above.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 09:03 PM
Nov 2013

The remaining 2% in 2017. Not 75 years. Information is good.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
33. I do not know.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 09:16 PM
Nov 2013

And my mind cannot make that same leap of faith as you over the remaining 2% that says conspiracy when I already have 98% that says no such critter.



The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
38. Better you lay off the drugs WillyT
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 10:48 PM
Nov 2013

"In November 1964, two months after the publication of its 889-page report, the Commission published twenty-six volumes of supporting documents, including the testimony or depositions of 552 witnesses and more than 3,100 exhibits. All of the commission's records were then transferred on November 23 to the National Archives. The unpublished portion of those records was initially sealed for 75 years (to 2039) under a general National Archives policy that applied to all federal investigations by the executive branch of government, a period "intended to serve as protection for innocent persons who could otherwise be damaged because of their relationship with participants in the case.” The 75-year rule no longer exists, supplanted by the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 and the JFK Records Act of 1992. By 1992, 98 percent of the Warren Commission records had been released to the public. Six years later, at the conclusion of the Assassination Records Review Board's work, all Warren Commission records, except those records that contained tax return information, were available to the public with redactions. The remaining Kennedy assassination related documents are scheduled to be released to the public by 2017, twenty-five years after the passage of the JFK Records Act."

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
20. Disengagement much?
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 05:24 PM
Nov 2013

Here.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission

"In November 1964, two months after the publication of its 889-page report, the Commission published twenty-six volumes of supporting documents, including the testimony or depositions of 552 witnesses and more than 3,100 exhibits.[12] All of the commission's records were then transferred on November 23 to the National Archives. The unpublished portion of those records was initially sealed for 75 years (to 2039) under a general National Archives policy that applied to all federal investigations by the executive branch of government,[13] a period "intended to serve as protection for innocent persons who could otherwise be damaged because of their relationship with participants in the case.”[14] The 75-year rule no longer exists, supplanted by the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 and the JFK Records Act of 1992. By 1992, 98 percent of the Warren Commission records had been released to the public.[15] Six years later, at the conclusion of the Assassination Records Review Board's work, all Warren Commission records, except those records that contained tax return information, were available to the public with redactions.[16] The remaining Kennedy assassination related documents are scheduled to be released to the public by 2017, twenty-five years after the passage of the JFK Records Act.[17]"


tl;dr In three years, not 75, the remaining 2% will be released. Live in good health WillyT and I will see you here on DU GDP then.



MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
40. Why would they hide the files?
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 11:14 PM
Nov 2013

Stuff that embarrasses people and organizations.

I think Oswald was just on the edge of the radar because of his erratic behavior, just enough for some files to be opened, and some legwork to be done and people in power asking and trying to figure out "What is he is really up to?", or "Who is he really working for?"

Then when he shot JFK, TPTB said a giant collective "Oh fuck, this shithead shot the President, and we're going to be blamed for it, because we didn't do something to prevent it. They're going to blame us, and our funding will be cut, some will have to be sacrificial lambs and lose their jobs and benefits and we will be shamed as failures. Let's just pretend we knew nothing, and hide, destroy or classify all the files so no one can see our failure until we're all long dead.

But, let's say so you get ALL the records open, and you find out that the CIA, FBI, USSS, and Dallas PD basically botched protecting the President. No conspiracy, simple human failures across the board, and everyone engaging in massive CYA to avoid looking like a bunch of incompetents. Would that satisfy you? Could you accept massive human error as the cause of JFK's murder?

Could you accept LHO as a desperate, pathetic, nobody who wanted to be somebody important? He wanted power, and glory. And what would be the best way to be somebody important than by Assassinating the most powerful man in the Free World? He would go down in history as something only 3 other men had done. He would be a focus of high level attention for as long as he lived. He would be interviewed almost every day. Have books, TV shows, and movies made about him. Unfortunately he didn't bargain on someone having his exact mindset, and doing to him what he did to JFK.

I truly wish he had lived, because I bet at some point he would have confessed, because he would not have been able to keep from bragging, and all this bullshit would have ended a long, long time ago.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
29. Thanks for that WillyT
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 08:48 PM
Nov 2013

I had never seen that movie...and Burt Lancaster and Robert Ryan play that kind of caricature so well....and oddly enough they are far from right wingers.
Kick and R for exposure.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The JFK Movie... (1973) ...