General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'M IN TEARS....
I'M IN TEARS....
Is the message I'm getting from young Iranians across the world, from Tokyo to Tehran to Geneva to Seattle.
#IranTalks
6:40 PM - 23 Nov 2013
http://theobamadiary.com/
Do you think that they're overjoyed?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Which is what each human life represents.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)Sanctions have taken their toll on Iran, and they are rightly worried about what this map shows.
If my country was nearly surrounded by military bases of the greatest Empire the world has ever seen, I'd welcome peace too.
-Laelth
calimary
(81,195 posts)Where'd you find it?
csziggy
(34,135 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Heather MC
(8,084 posts)I have two boys 11 and 8. And if we stayed on the Republican endless war track, there is a chance one or both of my young men, would be sucked into the war machine.
I am in tears for all the future lives President Obama has Saved.
Cirque du So-What
(25,923 posts)As bad as the invasion of Iraq was, military attacks against Iran would have several orders of magnitude worse. 'Biting off more than we could chew' doesn't even begin to describe the bloodbath that war with Iran would entail. Out of necessity, there would also have been a draft.
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)go to war over there. Every one of them decided that maybe war with Iran wasn't such a good idea after all.
calimary
(81,195 posts)I'm telling any such folks I run across - "okay fine, then. YOU FIRST!"
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)This condition will be remedied as soon as possible. I wish I was kidding.
demwing
(16,916 posts)No seriously, you should try kidding sometime
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)foreign policy. Traditionally, Republicans have a better reputation on foreign policy and Democrats have traditionally been considered strong on domestic policy. Obama's administration has been much more successful overseas than at home. I think the credit should go to Obama himself for the success in foreign policy. The last several years have been treacherous in the Middle East, but he's navigated through it expertly without starting another war over there. Well done!
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)gulliver
(13,180 posts)If there had been no Republicans left in power after they crashed the economy, the country's domestic situation would be vastly better now.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Exactly. No pukes to sabotage his foreign dealings.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)mountain grammy
(26,614 posts)Exactly what came to my mind when I read that post.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)to get into wars my whole life. I have said it a few times today, and probably sound like a broken record, but the change is refreshing.
mountain grammy
(26,614 posts)but in the last administration it was dismal, and, with the likes of McCain and Graham, has remained so. Republicans have become more beholden to the MIC than even Democrats.
Republican foreign policy is endless war and shoot first.. just like their shit domestic policy.
Fuck Republicans and their "reputation on foreign policy." It's all a myth.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)He deserves as many kudos as the international community for reaching this deal. It would have never happened under Ahmadinejad.
Good job by all.
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)There would have no deal at all if he hadn't approached the US and Europe proposing a rapprochement. It takes two to tango and Rouhani started the whole process, he did the opposite of Ahmadinejad. Pity that he only got into office this August, maybe a lot more would have been accomplished if Ahmadinejad hadn't been in power.
gulliver
(13,180 posts)By sticking to our principles and hanging tight on the sanctions, by not bombing and making ourselves look evil we made it possible for a Rouhani to come to power. It's not a vacuum.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)The US may have laid the groundwork, but if Ahmadinejad had remained in power all would have been for not.
calimary
(81,195 posts)I think about this particular dynamic every time I hear somebody rhapsodizing about how reagan saved the world and reagan brought down the Berlin Wall and reagan ended Communism and reagan ended the Soviet Union.
Well... not so fast. reagan could not have done ANYTHING OF THE SORT, were it not for some guy named Gorbachev on the other end. Were it not for some dude named John Paul II drilling holes in the underpinnings all over the Eastern Bloc. Were it not for some guy named Lech Walesa softening up the ground in Poland. If THOSE players had not been in place, none of the rest of it would have happened. I liken it to a sports team. If all you have is a strong pitcher, you're not apt to win the baseball game. You need a great catcher, a great first baseman, solid coverage on the other bases and in the outfield, and some reliable power hitters. I give a HUGE amount of credit to Mikhail Gorbachev. If reagan had been stuck with Brezhnev or Chernyenko or more of the "old guard" in the Kremlin to deal with, and not Gorbachev - with his different world view and his feet firmly planted in the modern era and reality, who started opening the windows in that stale Moscow power center and letting the fresh air in - NOTHING would have happened.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)If the Russians and Gorbachev hadn't been receptive to change, it wouldn't have happened. A nation changes from within, outside forces may influence change, but it cannot determine it without the participants being willing to enact said change.
I give the majority of the credit to Gorbachev and Rouhani for the changes they forged in their respective countries. One word of caution though, the deal with Iran is an initial step, but it remains to be seen if they follow though with their promises.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)their nuclear program. Like you said, good job by all.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)Do you think the word 'obliterate' would have been useful in these negotiations?
I wonder what the world thinks now about when Hillary said Obama was irresponsible and naive when he said he would talk to Iran back in 08 primaries - that diplomacy was the best choice.
libodem
(19,288 posts)This glorifies her. This is how evolved 21 century creatures resolve problems. Amen.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)the way it is now.
In the late 60's/early '70s there were actually "fly-drive Holy Land tours".
You would fly into Beirut, pick up your car. and drive all over the place.. Tehran, Bethlehem, Haifa, Baghdad, Cairo. Our travel agency had MANY older people (they could afford it) who loved this travel.
They NEVER felt unsafe...and would happily spend 3 weeks wandering around...
There were ski resorts in Iran, which was a very different place then.
It will never be what it once was, (for a short time) but we ban surely hope for "better"..
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)where I agree with all the comments! You all said it very well and Playinghardball, excellent snag from the Obama Diary!
Julie
Blue Owl
(50,347 posts)mountain grammy
(26,614 posts)Even the Israeli military was supporting these talks, opposing Netanyahu
http://news.yahoo.com/israeli-military-goes-off-message-iran-nuclear-talks-191858213.html
ananda
(28,856 posts)Peace on earth, good will to all!