General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNAFTA and US Farmers—20 Years Later
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/25-3A Spanish version of this commentary originally appeared in La Jornada.
One of the clearest stories from the NAFTA experience has been the devastation wreaked on the Mexican countryside by dramatic increases in imports of cheap U.S. corn. But while Mexican farmers, especially small-scale farmers, undoubtedly lost from the deal, that doesnt mean that U.S. farmers have won. Prices for agricultural goods have been on a roller coaster of extreme price volatility caused by unfair agriculture policies, recklessly unregulated speculation on commodity markets, and increasing droughts and other climate chaos. Each time prices took their terrifying ride back down, more small- and medium-scale farmers were forced into bankruptcy while concentration of land ownership, and agricultural production, grew.
Its hard to separate the impacts of NAFTA from another big change in U.S. farm policy: the 1996 Farm Bill, which set in place a shift from supply management and regulated markets to an accelerated policy of get big or get out. Farmers were encouraged to increase production with the promise of expanded export marketsincluding to Mexico. But almost immediately, the failure of this policy was evident as commodity prices dropped like a stone, and Congress turned to emergency payments, later codified as direct payment farm subsidies, to clean up the mess and keep rural economies afloat.
Then, as new demand for biofuels increased the demand for corn, and investors turned from failing mortgage markets to speculate on grains, energy and other commodities, prices soared. It wasnt only the prices of farm goods that rose, however, but also prices of land, fuel, fertilizers and other petrochemical based agrochemicals. Net farm incomes were much more erratic.
In many ways, the family farmers who had been the backbone of rural economies really did either get big or get out, leaving a sector marked by inequality and corporate concentration. Over the last 20 years, there has been a marked shift in the size of U.S. farms, with the number of very small farms and very large farms increasing dramatically. The increase in the number of small farms is due to several factors, including urban people returning to the land (almost all are reliant on off-farm jobs to support themselves) and the growth in specialty crops for local farmers markets. The number of farms in the middle, those that are small but commercially viable on their own, dropped by 40 percent, from half of total farms in 1982 to less than a third in 2007.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)is they still vote R.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)is they still vote Clinton.
CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)Clinton created this volatility with this turd of a law:The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000.
That thing should be repealed in its entirety.
-Laelth
nolabels
(13,133 posts)Will probably give a better idea of what kind of hucksters they have actually been
No doubt not as bad as * but not the fantastic sell job it once was
Whisp
(24,096 posts)my gawd.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)~PaleoEmoProg
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)I prefer Emo Phillips.
Larry Ogg
(1,474 posts)That is until enough people wakeup and realize that the system in which we supposedly choose our leaders is nothing more than a ruling class scam in which, the ruling class decides who we vote for and who we don't.
Over the years, they have taken over the main stream media, and pump hundreds of billions of dollars into the campaign coffers of both political parties. And in exchange for their contributions of ill-gotten gain, the working class has elected a bunch of narcissistic puppets that go out of their way to pass laws that legalize even further, the predatory behavior of rich psychopaths.
And still, the majority of American workers think that if they keep on voting for one of these two predator owned political parties that things will get better.
And as a psychopath known as Adolph Hitler once said... "What luck for rulers that men do not think".
bvar22
(39,909 posts)....but Bill was Smoooooth!
Sorry, Virginia,
but there in no such thing as "Free Trade".
There is no such thing as "Free Markets",
and there certainly is no such thing as a benevolent "Invisible Hand"
that reaches down from heaven and protects the little people when "the market makes mistakes."
The RICH made that shit up and used smooth talking politicians to sell their scam
to a gullible America.
[font color=white].........................[/font][font size=4]The Graven Image[/font]
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)red team - blue team absolutism, it subjects us to very bad republican ideas that are dressed up as "bipartisan".
bvar22
(39,909 posts)..and when the Corporate Media works with "them" by branding Hillary and Obama
as the "Liberal" edge of the Democratic Party,
pretty much everyone to the Left of Reagan is pushed Off-the-Stage,
and the Big Game becomes the Center Right vs the Far Right.
You can see that being played out right here.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)The same names, the same tactics, the same results.
I just took a week off and I think it's time for another, or several. Besides, I have shit to do and there is at least some chance that what we do will make an actual difference.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)NAFTA stinks, for a whole host of reasons, but our hero, Bill Clinton, signed a law that created the volatility and speculation that is, as usual, making a few people very rich while impoverishing millions (if not billions) of people.
It was this turd of a law that did it: The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000.
That thing should be repealed in its entirety.
-Laelth