General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums25 Celebs That Shocked Us When They Came Out As Gay
Eleanor Roosevelt???
http://www.rantlifestyle.com/2013/10/09/10-celebs-we-didnt-know-were-gay/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=ContentAD&utm_term=Title1&utm_campaign=4662#slide_23
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)get the red out
(13,461 posts)I'm not that up on pop culture.
Response to damnedifIknow (Original post)
GentryDixon This message was self-deleted by its author.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)You may mean well, but it makes you sound ignorant.
This is more than a matter of pedantics, and its definitely not one of political correctness. Youre more than entitled to continue using sexual preference right alongside the gay lifestyle or avowed homosexual or whatever term youd like to broadcast just how dense you really are. Just know that its simply flat-out incorrect to refer to a persons sexual orientation as a preference. More than that, its dangerous.
Having said that, sexual preference is unlike other terms in this particular social arena in that most people use it without any bad intentions. Naiveté is their only offense, and thats far easier to fix than willful ignorance. Theres a certain breeziness to sexual preference, and I have no doubt thats precisely why its so often used: People think they wont offend gays and lesbians because of the lightness of tone. Well, another persons sexual preference is none of my business, we often hear good-hearted people say. So long as nobodys getting hurt, to each his own.
Still, its a quietly toxic expression. Thats because the very construct of a preference, or the verb to prefer, implies that the individual has a choice, that there are options available and yet, all else being equal and as a matter of taste, really, the person would rather this one over that one. Think how bizarre it would sound if we were to apply the same language to any other unalterable biological trait. Suit yourself, and to each his own, we might reason, but my preference is to have hands this size, not that size. Or perhaps, Its perfectly fine to go with a darker birthmark on your leg, I just preferred to get mine on my arm, and in this lighter shade of brown, too. In fact, while were on skin color, this flawed logic would, of course, also extend to a persons opting to be black, white, Asian, or any other race or ethnicity as a preference.
Response to PeaceNikki (Reply #3)
GentryDixon This message was self-deleted by its author.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)there are now people who oppose the use of "orientation" because its origins are in the word "Orient" as in "how to get to the Orient" and want to go back to "preference" as even though it's not right, it's also not racist. That's not exactly a new fight; when I worked in student programming for a university, we had to change "student orientation" to "student acclimation weekend" because "orientation" is racist, in response to a student protest.
Any guesses on the new appropriate term?
Iggo
(47,549 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Do tell, cuz I certainly am interested and now a bit shy to guess...
Chan790
(20,176 posts)It's argumentation that the word "orientation" like other common-use words with with roots in racist terms are themselves racist even where the racist connotations have been stripped away. I actually thought it was a more common phenomena than it apparently is...I've encountered it personally a few times in the past few years but when I Googled it, I can't find any discussion of it.
So I guess orientation is safe for now.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,306 posts)'Orient' means the direction where the sun rises - 'orior' is Latin for 'I rise' (and 'occident' comes from 'occido' - 'I fall down, go down, set'). And 'orientation' then comes from using east as a direction from which you then 'orient' yourself. So, even without getting into an argument about whether knowing a region of the world by a direction is 'racist', you have a full argument as to why 'orientation' is not racist.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)but when people feel vehemently about something (like the racism of certain words (even where they're wrong)) sometimes taking the path of least resistance rather than debating things like Latin and etymology is the better option. You can explain why they're wrong later under less-heated conditions.
It was more of a heads-up that the word "orientation" was on the list of words that are starting to drawing scrutiny now.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,306 posts)So we need to point out the argument against stupidity. The path of least resistance is a bad path, in this case. Waiting until later to explain why they're wrong is too late. Do it now, with a simple explanation of what the words mean, and it won't get heated (I don't actually advocate using the word 'stupid' in the argument - just "no, that's not the case" or something).
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)I guess Teddy just wasn't her cup of tea in beddy.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)But Teddy sounds better.
Journeyman
(15,031 posts)damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)renie408
(9,854 posts)They are kidding. They have to be.
Iggo
(47,549 posts)And a Democrat.
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)Iggo
(47,549 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Should I have been?
earthside
(6,960 posts)Eleanor Roosevelt?
Cary Grant?
They never came 'out' and there isn't much real evidence that they were gay ... not that it would matter much if they were (to me anyway).
Gillian Anderson? Well read for yourself what she says in her August 13, 2012 post: http://www.gilliananderson.ws/messages/
tblue37
(65,328 posts)could use them to seduce women, each of whom thought they would be the one to "cure" him.
Those lists are silly, and they just reinforce the idea that there is something odd about being gay.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)but bisexual, a group of people that are near invisible.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)hunter
(38,310 posts)It was "Don't ask, don't tell" then. Our family was a refuge, but nobody talked.
A same-sex couple cuddling on the family sofa watching television was unremarkable.
My kids are fortunate, they live in a world where their peers are "out" or yet undecided. They've known openly homosexual adult couples all their lives.
At their age I had friends who had killed themselves, had tried to kill themselves in various ways, or had died of AIDS.
It's a better world now, at least here in "Left Coast" California.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)It's still full of fundies and, recently, teabaggers, but nowhere as bad as things were even about 10-20 years ago. The fundies are trying to pass an anti-same-sex marriage amendment to the state constitution (which they passed once and have to pass again in order to get it on the ballot) but there is an impressive array of organizations and businesses "coming out" against it. To make it a little more personal, my stepdaughter came out about a year but, despite our concerns, she has not reported any problems with her peers at school. She isn't out to everybody but she apparently has a group of supportive friends that she hangs with that are helping make school a safe experience for her, for which my wife and I are thankful.
LTR
(13,227 posts)It was mostly rumors and innuendo. Kinda like James Buchanan. So whatever the truth may be, they went to the grave with her and the people who knew her.
What is more certain is that FDR did have a long-term mistress. She was allegedly with him when he died. Either way, it didn't seem like there was a lot of romance in their marriage.
Decaffeinated
(556 posts)Sheesh.. Ads overlapping ads... bleah
Beyond that more than half of those don't even qualify for the D-list. Who cares?
Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)Austin Powers was shocked that he was gay.