Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:26 PM Nov 2013

African-American girl faces expulsion over 'natural hair'

ORLANDO, Fla. -

An African-American teen told Local 6 she faces expulsion because administrators at her private school want her to cut and shape her hair.

Vanessa VanDyke said she was given one week to decide to whether cut her hair or leave Faith Christian Academy in Orlando, a school she's been going to since the third grade.

But for now, she and her mother do not plan to change her hair because it is part of the 12-year-old's identity. But her natural hair style comes with a cost.

"It says that I'm unique," said VanDyke. "First of all, it's puffy and I like it that way. I know people will tease me about it because it's not straight. I don't fit in."

VanDyke said that first the teasing from other students, but now, school leaders seem to be singling her out for her appearance.

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/africanamerican-girl-faces-expulsion-over-natural-hair/-/1637132/23159400/-/ajs6jbz/-/index.html

204 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
African-American girl faces expulsion over 'natural hair' (Original Post) The Straight Story Nov 2013 OP
I wonder if this is about her hair being 'natural', Jenoch Nov 2013 #1
Her hair isn't longer or broader than what the women in the administration KitSileya Nov 2013 #5
I really don't have any idea to whom it is you refer. Jenoch Nov 2013 #13
If there are any women in the school administration, KitSileya Nov 2013 #15
Now I got it. Jenoch Nov 2013 #19
Well, that's the way her hair grows Scootaloo Nov 2013 #29
I did not read the article. Jenoch Nov 2013 #34
Well, you didn't read the article, but were fast with a "solution" Scootaloo Nov 2013 #42
I looked at the photo of the girl. Jenoch Nov 2013 #59
One solution would be not to support right wing private "Christian schools" jberryhill Nov 2013 #137
I understand your wish to not support such schools. Jenoch Nov 2013 #164
You miss the point jberryhill Nov 2013 #168
I don't know the exact motives of Jenoch Nov 2013 #195
I meant "case closed" in the colloquial sense jberryhill Nov 2013 #196
I knew what you meant. Jenoch Nov 2013 #197
Understood jberryhill Nov 2013 #200
You're right, Scootaloo! The school is using the girl's hair as a distraction TheDebbieDee Nov 2013 #145
Absolutely jberryhill Nov 2013 #158
A straight haired girl would be allowed to wear her hair loose and natural. pnwmom Nov 2013 #162
I really do not know why you are directing your comments to me. Jenoch Nov 2013 #165
Because I am answering YOU. You wondered if this was about her hair being pnwmom Nov 2013 #167
And I don't care how long this girls hair is. Jenoch Nov 2013 #194
How did I misread this: pnwmom Nov 2013 #201
Her hair is beautiful! Tansy_Gold Nov 2013 #2
School yeoman6987 Nov 2013 #10
I didn't say anything about the school Tansy_Gold Nov 2013 #12
Doesn't matter yeoman6987 Nov 2013 #20
It matters to me. n/t Tansy_Gold Nov 2013 #21
I hope you're being *intentionally* obtuse. Marr Nov 2013 #27
Hair yeoman6987 Nov 2013 #38
No, I'm saying that you're talking nonsense. Marr Nov 2013 #46
Of course it's talking nonsense, but not because Tansy_Gold Nov 2013 #48
They don't have a policy banning African American hair, pnwmom Nov 2013 #175
It does matter. Iggo Nov 2013 #30
Do they receive "charter school" money?? a kennedy Nov 2013 #52
This is OUR world, not just theirs. If you want accreditation... Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #128
School yeoman6987 Nov 2013 #130
Private schools must meet unified standards for accreditation. Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #132
Lol jberryhill Nov 2013 #160
Free Exercise jberryhill Nov 2013 #138
Damn right. People are giving them shit, too, and they keep scrubbing the page... MADem Nov 2013 #181
ps's also have rules about stuff like this elehhhhna Nov 2013 #143
What? Didn't you know Jesus was a straight haired blond? pnwmom Nov 2013 #176
when in aramaic he's described as having hair like lamb's wool elehhhhna Nov 2013 #202
Obviously! pnwmom Nov 2013 #203
They didn't ban African American students from wearing their natural hair. pnwmom Nov 2013 #174
Her hair is beautiful and so is she. tenderfoot Nov 2013 #36
Apparently their god and their christians don't like natural things! Ugly christians again. n/t RKP5637 Nov 2013 #133
No surprise.. NastyRiffraff Nov 2013 #3
she looks adorable n/t riverwalker Nov 2013 #4
agreed lame54 Nov 2013 #11
+++ 1,000,000 +++ n/t RKP5637 Nov 2013 #134
OMG! NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #6
Goddam! That is some boss hair!!! Iggo Nov 2013 #31
Can the kids sitting behind her see the chalk board? Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2013 #39
yeah there might be a practical reason Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #86
Or, you know, sit in the last row if that's an issue. justiceischeap Nov 2013 #105
Must not... make... bus... reference... n/t bobclark86 Nov 2013 #159
Yeah, I see that now... :) nt justiceischeap Nov 2013 #184
O she's darling! ogradda Nov 2013 #182
Private school and she agreed to the rules... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #7
Even private schools have rules to follow if they want to operate within the local laws The Straight Story Nov 2013 #8
I may have missed it... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #67
She's being blamed for being the victim of verbal bullies. pnwmom Nov 2013 #121
First of all, her hair is lovely Boudica the Lyoness Nov 2013 #16
Mostly because of the shite example she is setting... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #22
Um what? blogslut Nov 2013 #25
She's a black woman, so she's by definition entitled, irrational, and bitchy Scootaloo Nov 2013 #32
I see this time and time again BainsBane Nov 2013 #87
That's exactly what I just argued in another post on here, although liberalhistorian Nov 2013 #118
Aside from the fact... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #193
In other words, she's being uppity and should know her place... ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #41
Well, some Democrats haven't gotten past 1964 yet n/t Scootaloo Nov 2013 #43
I would be pissed, but these antics have been allowed to stand for a few years now... Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #69
Which word confused you? Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #53
Okay. blogslut Nov 2013 #58
The shit example of being who you are, and not following the crowd LadyHawkAZ Nov 2013 #45
She is free to do all of that... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #62
It wasn't a dress code issue until she complained of being bullied for it LadyHawkAZ Nov 2013 #107
I suggest you switch to caffeine, tough guy... Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #68
. Tansy_Gold Nov 2013 #78
Seems to me it's the parents liberalhistorian Nov 2013 #117
Entitled? gollygee Nov 2013 #135
are you going after her cause she is black, or woman? entitled? wtf? nt seabeyond Nov 2013 #171
The rule just says her hair should not be 'a distraction' muriel_volestrangler Nov 2013 #28
"Distraction" = "anything any of us dislike for any reason." It's an absolute carte blanche. (nt) Posteritatis Nov 2013 #76
Yup. My kid's hair was always a distraction to some people pnwmom Nov 2013 #163
well when we live in a world with no laws or morals or ethics, sure. La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2013 #61
Right... it must be racist... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #63
I suspect you do not understand the policing in general of black womens hair La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2013 #74
My point is that it is not necessarily racist just because the child in question is black... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #80
no matter where we sign up to work or go to school, we dont sign up for racism La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2013 #82
Yeah, I'm sure they raise a stink about white girls hair when they let it grow naturally RedCappedBandit Nov 2013 #91
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #84
You need to work on your empathy and reading comprehension. liberalhistorian Nov 2013 #115
And the parents are free to go public and put the private school pnwmom Nov 2013 #120
That is our modern culture in a nutshell... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #141
They didn't agree contractually to having their daughter pnwmom Nov 2013 #142
"way too broad to be part of a legal contract" jberryhill Nov 2013 #151
You're right of course, they can. And the parents have every right pnwmom Nov 2013 #154
I gotta believe people aren't general familiar with these schools jberryhill Nov 2013 #157
Her hair doesn't seem that bad LittleBlue Nov 2013 #9
And that's the point. Igel Nov 2013 #50
Should a redhead be forced to color her hair brown so it won't be a distraction? pnwmom Nov 2013 #155
I think she looks just great. dipsydoodle Nov 2013 #14
Her hair is beautiful gollygee Nov 2013 #17
I think she has beautiful hair. nt Demo_Chris Nov 2013 #18
My lord, I was at least expecting something pretty wild. Kurska Nov 2013 #23
I was expecting to see a mane that required it's own desk in the classroom. n/t ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2013 #40
Sounds like the school administrators don't want to deal with the real problem. blogslut Nov 2013 #24
Keep the hair, ditch the Xtian school Blue Owl Nov 2013 #26
exactly. cali Nov 2013 #35
That's the ticket. Brigid Nov 2013 #44
Yes. Iggo Nov 2013 #57
Her hair is lovely spinbaby Nov 2013 #33
I think she rocks her do and Faith Christian Academy should be ashamed. n/t ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2013 #37
As a black woman who VERY PROUDLY wears her hair natural, I am very saddened by this story. Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2013 #47
1) WOW, now thats a fro! 2) the administrators are imbeciles. nt dionysus Nov 2013 #49
Sly Stone and Angela Davis Le Taz Hot Nov 2013 #51
Later in life, she'll wonder why she can't keep a job. FarCenter Nov 2013 #54
Somehow doubt that's going to be as much of a problem as people fretting about it like to claim. nt Posteritatis Nov 2013 #81
WTF? treestar Nov 2013 #55
Haters gonna' hate... TeeYiYi Nov 2013 #56
She is a pretty child, and I think she would look much better quinnox Nov 2013 #60
She has a right to the style that she wants. But I too think that she is far better looking bluestate10 Nov 2013 #64
I agree she will become a beautiful adult quinnox Nov 2013 #66
That's her natural hair. LisaL Nov 2013 #152
Big hair might be in again gollygee Nov 2013 #189
Is there some reason why your personal tastes are in any way relevant BainsBane Nov 2013 #89
You will find that my personal tastes are very relevant quinnox Nov 2013 #98
This is about the child's civil rights BainsBane Nov 2013 #103
OMG, it is about a religious school and their strict standards quinnox Nov 2013 #106
well, if you wanted to raise the issue of the rights of a religious school BainsBane Nov 2013 #108
Ok, lol, but you don't know who I put on ignore and maybe sometimes I just ignore without using it, quinnox Nov 2013 #113
I think you did. BainsBane Nov 2013 #149
most black women do not have naturally sleek hair , this is alittle girl JI7 Nov 2013 #112
I think she should cut her hair, if she wants to continue to attend this fine educational quinnox Nov 2013 #114
so should someone with naturally straight hair the same length be forced to cut their hair JI7 Nov 2013 #116
Yes, if the school objects to it quinnox Nov 2013 #119
what if they only object to black hair being more than a certain length ? JI7 Nov 2013 #122
Oh boy, now I see, you really are on a fishing expedition quinnox Nov 2013 #126
Well, the satanic ritual in your basement was scheduled for 8:00 pm. kwassa Nov 2013 #161
Dude, no BainsBane Nov 2013 #150
"Lots of black women have beautiful sleek hair" xulamaude Nov 2013 #198
who gives a shit whether she is beautiful or not JI7 Nov 2013 #95
Well, you certainly don't! quinnox Nov 2013 #96
The implication is... jberryhill Nov 2013 #139
This is not racism yeoman6987 Nov 2013 #148
people grow hair differently, black girls can grow their hair the same length JI7 Nov 2013 #178
My personal opinion is that "looking good" should have nothing to do with school. n/t pnwmom Nov 2013 #124
Cool hair Go Vols Nov 2013 #65
I feel the school really had to step in, because she's frightening the natives: struggle4progress Nov 2013 #70
Do they want her to straighten it, too? Ken Burch Nov 2013 #71
The video clip at the link had the mother saying they did want it ”straightened". nt DeschutesRiver Nov 2013 #75
Well...as I said...in the South "Christian school" is still a code word. Ken Burch Nov 2013 #83
So, rather than standing up to the kids that are bullying her...the school is caving in to them... Ken Burch Nov 2013 #72
My standard reply: kiva Nov 2013 #73
Ugh, all the "well, she just needs to conform" responses. (nt) Posteritatis Nov 2013 #77
Yep. But I still love the "well, I personally believe that she would look better with shorter/ Number23 Nov 2013 #85
Some really do not care BainsBane Nov 2013 #88
Absolutely. And speaking in as general terms as I can Number23 Nov 2013 #90
I see this hair issue as about race BainsBane Nov 2013 #92
those are my fav too. nt La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2013 #101
I want to throw a pan at the heads of some of these morons. pnwmom Nov 2013 #123
Just what do you think "Christian Schools" are about? jberryhill Nov 2013 #140
Which doesn't change the fact that people are lining up in this thread to advocate it. (nt) Posteritatis Nov 2013 #185
Is There A "Book Of Moron" With These Racist "Christians" ??? WillyT Nov 2013 #79
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #93
oh- come on, wtf 4 t 4 Nov 2013 #94
Hold on a minute, you left out it is a Christian Academy!!!!! 4 t 4 Nov 2013 #99
Update: Orlando private school won't expel African-American girl over hair DreamGypsy Nov 2013 #97
Nope just ask her not to wear her wig to class! whistler162 Nov 2013 #199
you're not helping 4 t 4 Nov 2013 #100
I don't see what the big deal about her hair is. It is pretty kind of reminds me of my wife's thick diabeticman Nov 2013 #102
Idiotic dress codes HockeyMom Nov 2013 #104
I went to school in the 60s and I rocked bigger hair than that Warpy Nov 2013 #109
Basically, they're blaming her for being bullied about her hair. pnwmom Nov 2013 #125
They want frogmarch Nov 2013 #110
It is natural! Are they asking her to use chemicals to straighten it? Glimmer of Hope Nov 2013 #111
Conforming - TBF Nov 2013 #127
Though, from what we can see, they have more rules about hair for boys than girls muriel_volestrangler Nov 2013 #136
Good points all - TBF Nov 2013 #188
She should try a Jewish school. Plenty of Jews have big hair. It's called a "Jewfro". meti57b Nov 2013 #129
Some people have too much time on their hands. Tigress DEM Nov 2013 #131
Thank you. ogradda Nov 2013 #183
The girl's hair is the school's distraction from the real issue of bullying! TheDebbieDee Nov 2013 #144
Exactly. It's victim blaming. Easier for the school than going pnwmom Nov 2013 #156
How very Christian of them! Coyotl Nov 2013 #146
The school or the parents? jberryhill Nov 2013 #169
Ooophs, forgot the sarcasm thingie. Coyotl Nov 2013 #170
Depends jberryhill Nov 2013 #172
ROFLMFAO Coyotl Nov 2013 #173
Yes, it is: 1 Corinthians 6:1-8 jberryhill Nov 2013 #191
Her hair looks fine and probably smells far better then the chemical reek some womens' hair give off Fumesucker Nov 2013 #147
Sickening racists malaise Nov 2013 #153
Beautiful girl with her own beautiful hair and obviously Cha Nov 2013 #166
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #177
I looked up the dress code for this school jmowreader Nov 2013 #179
Just so everyone knows, there's been some movement in this story. MADem Nov 2013 #180
She is right to fight this. It is racist. Vattel Nov 2013 #186
that girl is absolutley adorable! RedstDem Nov 2013 #187
It's a teaching moment for the school Bad Thoughts Nov 2013 #190
Muslims and homosexuals are not allowed in this school jberryhill Nov 2013 #192
This is just plain stupid. Can't believe some are still so discriminatory these days. AverageJoe90 Nov 2013 #204
 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
1. I wonder if this is about her hair being 'natural',
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:31 PM
Nov 2013

or if it is about the length and breadth of her hair.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
5. Her hair isn't longer or broader than what the women in the administration
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:38 PM
Nov 2013

wore themselves in the 90s, only they achieved it with hours of teasing and chemicals.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
15. If there are any women in the school administration,
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:57 PM
Nov 2013

and they followed the hair fashions for white girls in the 90s, they certainly had hair as broad as that girl. But hers is black hair, and black hair must be tamed - there's a huge socio-cultural movement to "whiten" black girls, and straightening their hair is one of the most important pressure points. I was pointing out the hypocrisy.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
19. Now I got it.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 01:50 PM
Nov 2013

I suppose the same could be said of the big Farrah hair of the late 70s and early 80s.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
29. Well, that's the way her hair grows
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:11 PM
Nov 2013

Did you read the article? her hair was a non-issue until her family lodged a complaint about some of the other children bullying her.

I know, on Du it's the height of style to just assume that the black person is automatically wrong. Hell, at this point Skinner ought to add a *does not apply to black people clause in the site's ToS. But no, there's really not a "Reasonable explanation" here.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
34. I did not read the article.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:17 PM
Nov 2013

You seem to have misunderstood my post. I was neither being critical of the girl nor was I supporting the school administration when I wrote that post.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
42. Well, you didn't read the article, but were fast with a "solution"
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:32 PM
Nov 2013

One that happened to paint the girl and her family as liars.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
59. I looked at the photo of the girl.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 06:29 PM
Nov 2013

I did not post a 'solution' to anything. I made no statments of fact. Nor did I denigrate anyone. You need to work on reading comprehension.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
164. I understand your wish to not support such schools.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:14 AM
Nov 2013

However, they do exist because of the 1st Amendment.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
168. You miss the point
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:31 AM
Nov 2013

These parents WANT their child miseducated by raging assholes who, absolutely have the First Amendment right to free exercise of their religion.

The free exercise of their religion includes the right to freely give this girl the boot for whatever whim their God commands.

Yes, I will absolutely defend and support the right of this school to exist and to subject this girl to whatever shame their beliefs compel.

I support their Constitutional right to say "We don't want Jews, Catholics, or girls whose hair we don't like."

What I don't get is why anyone in this entirely voluntary arrangement is complaining about it.

Case closed.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
195. I don't know the exact motives of
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:11 PM
Nov 2013

people who send their children to these schools.

Do you have a link to provide information about the case being closed?

I thought the family was possibly still attempting to keep their child in the school without having her hair styled in a different manner.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
196. I meant "case closed" in the colloquial sense
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:21 PM
Nov 2013

Private Christian schools can kick out whomever they want, for whatever reason they want.

The entire point of these schools is to provide a way for people to keep their kids away from others they deem undesirable - Jews, gays, Catholics, ANYONE except particular kinds of Protestants - and to fill their minds with toxic nonsense.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
200. Understood
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:27 PM
Nov 2013

But I took you to mean that I was somehow saying this school didn't have an unfettered First Amendment right to do as it damn well pleases.

So, yes, the school does indeed have that right.

And they are exercising it by saying their religion, apparently, doesn't like her hair. Do they have the First Amendment right to believe that? You bet.

So, when you have folks like these parents who voluntarily choose to put their child in a school which, indeed, has the unfettered right to run their school as they see fit, I just don't see the point of complaining.

Do I join a Roman Catholic church and then start agitating, "Hey, why don't we have any statues of Buddha in here?" No. The rational response is "why on earth did you join an RC church if you wanted statues of Buddha in your church?"

Within the belief system of these kinds of schools, the administration is deputized by God his very own self with the discretion to run their school and regulate student appearance as they, and they alone, see fit. It's part of the package deal of sending one's child to one of these cheesy schools.

You know, every time I spend an hour hitting my head with a hammer, I get really bad headaches. This happens about two or three times a week. So, I went to the doctor to get a prescription for something to treat my recurring headaches. You would NOT BELIEVE the condescending advice my doctor gave me when she refused to give me a prescription to treat my headaches. So, yes, it looks like the doctor doesn't care about my headaches at all, and I'm either going to have to keep getting these headaches, or else find a doctor who is willing to help me with them.
 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
145. You're right, Scootaloo! The school is using the girl's hair as a distraction
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 10:48 PM
Nov 2013

regarding the fact that they failed to protect a student from bullying.

They are using the girl's hair to "blame the victim" and deflect criticism for doing nothing about the child being bullied.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
158. Absolutely
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:50 AM
Nov 2013

She should be free to learn that gays are evil, everyone who is not Christian is going to Hell, and that women should be submissive, regardless of her hairstyle!

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
162. A straight haired girl would be allowed to wear her hair loose and natural.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:05 AM
Nov 2013

This is about the natural shape of her hair.

It's no different than discriminating against her if she were a redhead.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
165. I really do not know why you are directing your comments to me.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:17 AM
Nov 2013

I have posted nothing that would indicate I am opposed to this girl's hairstyle.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
167. Because I am answering YOU. You wondered if this was about her hair being
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:22 AM
Nov 2013

natural or long.

No, it is not. A straight haired girl would be allowed to wear her hair loose and long, in its natural state.

She's being discriminated against because of the texture of her hair, not because of how she wears it or how long it is. Straight-haired girls can wear their hair "natural" and no one cares.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
194. And I don't care how long this girls hair is.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:08 PM
Nov 2013

I don't care how she wears it. I was simply speculating on the motives of the school administrators. That's how the sentence read and you apparently read it wrong.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
201. How did I misread this:
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:38 PM
Nov 2013

"I wonder if this is about her hair being 'natural',
or if it is about the length and breadth of her hair."

I answered that it isn't about her hair being natural or about the length of her hair -- both of which wouldn't be problems if she was a straight haired white girl.

It is only about the texture of her hair.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
10. School
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:48 PM
Nov 2013

Being it is a private school, they make the rules. Mom should put her in public school and she can wear her hair the way she wants.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
20. Doesn't matter
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 01:54 PM
Nov 2013

It does not matter if the Christians who run the school are ugly. It is their school. Their rules.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
27. I hope you're being *intentionally* obtuse.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:09 PM
Nov 2013

Because you just said that, when arguing that the Christians who run that school are ugly, it's irrelevant to consider whether or not the Christians who run that school are ugly.

...

You might want to read more slowly.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
38. Hair
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:21 PM
Nov 2013

Are you saying the school does not have the right to set policy regarding hair? I pray that you are not saying that.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
46. No, I'm saying that you're talking nonsense.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:52 PM
Nov 2013

There goes that reading comprehension problem again. I said nothing about the child, her hair, or school policy. I said--

Nevermind. I'm not going to type it again when you obviously didn't process it the first time.

Tansy_Gold

(17,855 posts)
48. Of course it's talking nonsense, but not because
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 03:07 PM
Nov 2013

it didn't process the information.

It's a private school, and yes, they have the "right" to impose standards of dress, hair, shoes, whatever. So do public schools, which negates the original argument.

The sad commentary is that the parents obviously thought their daughter would get a better education in the private school rather than the public schools, and that's the crime being perpetrated against all students in public schools.

But the ugliness of character being displayed by the administration of a "Christian" school is disturbing to me even while it is not surprising.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
175. They don't have a policy banning African American hair,
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 04:17 AM
Nov 2013

or loose hair, or long hair, or natural hair.

They only have a policy banning "distracting" hair. I think blond hair is distracting. My redheaded kid's classmates (and even occasional teachers) thought her hair was something to joke about. And even when she was in college, tour groups from Asia would stop and ask to photograph her -- because of her hair.

Should natural redheads be banned from the Christian school, too, because they might get too much attention? Why not, if you can ban the natural hair of a black girl?

a kennedy

(29,647 posts)
52. Do they receive "charter school" money??
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 04:37 PM
Nov 2013

Was wondering if it is a private with no public money school....

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
128. This is OUR world, not just theirs. If you want accreditation...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:21 PM
Nov 2013

Keep your racist bullshit out of your school. I don't care if it is private.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
130. School
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:24 PM
Nov 2013

If they want accreditation? Most private do not have a need for it or want it. Catholic schools do, but many small Christian schools don't.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
132. Private schools must meet unified standards for accreditation.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:27 PM
Nov 2013

I realize that blows your argument to pieces. But that's the reality of the matter. If the school wants accreditation, they need to leave their racism at home where it belongs.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
160. Lol
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:53 AM
Nov 2013

The school exists for the purpose of teaching toxic nonsense.

Yes, children of all races should be free to learn evolution is a lie, gays are evil, non-Christians are hellbound, and women should be submissive.

Just as long as they aren't racist about it.

Oh... And by no means - No Catholics or Jews!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
181. Damn right. People are giving them shit, too, and they keep scrubbing the page...
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 05:23 AM
Nov 2013
https://www.facebook.com/fcaorlando

Dozens of posts have gone up and been taken down--I think someone will be busy tonight, playing clean-up....samples:

....@Faith Christian Academy - Sorry, but no amount of page scrubbing is going to make this go away. Your school's name and actions are now international news.

....Your BEST...your ONLY correct course of action, would be to backpedal.
about an hour ago · Like · 1

..... IT WILL TAKE A NATION OF MILLIONS TO HOLD US BACK, SWEETIE! YOUR PROBLEMS HAVE JUST BEGUN... Pick your poison! Conceed or retreat!
about an hour ago via mobile · Like

..... Congrats you fascist slimy racist pigs, your facebook page has become my new obsession!
about an hour ago · Like · 2

......Far from Christian behavior. More like backwards, and racist. Shame on you.
22 minutes ago · Like
 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
143. ps's also have rules about stuff like this
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 10:30 PM
Nov 2013

but a churchschool that purports to celebrate Christ - well, I missed the bible chapter about taming ones hair

ironic

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
202. when in aramaic he's described as having hair like lamb's wool
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 03:20 PM
Nov 2013

they OBVIOUSLY meant light colored and bouncy

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
174. They didn't ban African American students from wearing their natural hair.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 04:14 AM
Nov 2013

They didn't ban any natural hair -- just "distracting" hair, whatever that is.

Her hair may be distracting to some racist white people who don't like frizz, but that's their problem, not hers.

From my kid's experience, red hair is more of a distraction in a sea of brunettes -- and can earn some name calling.

Would the school have banned natural redheads?

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
3. No surprise..
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:32 PM
Nov 2013

that this is from the "Faith Christian Academy" in Florida.

The little girl is cute. She has big hair but it suits her. And even if it didn't, there's absolutely nothing wrong with her hair. The school allows racist bullies to "tease" her then blames her.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,325 posts)
39. Can the kids sitting behind her see the chalk board?
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:25 PM
Nov 2013

I think it's beautiful but she should throw a rubber band or two in the mix during class.

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
86. yeah there might be a practical reason
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:03 PM
Nov 2013

to all this it's really beautiful hair but it might cause problems.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
105. Or, you know, sit in the last row if that's an issue.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:42 PM
Nov 2013

Why does she have to change her hair? What if she were a white girl with frizzy hair? It happens...I've seen white girls/women with hair that big. Would the white girl have to get her hair cut or "throw a rubber band or two in the mix?"

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
7. Private school and she agreed to the rules...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:43 PM
Nov 2013

If it is outside of those boundaries then she needs to change, leave or get the rules changed.

Stamping your feet and having a "I'll be damned if..." tantrum shouldn't be an option but it seems to be the one that the mother went with.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
8. Even private schools have rules to follow if they want to operate within the local laws
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:47 PM
Nov 2013

And they know that when they start up. If their rules are interpreted to violate those ordinances/laws than it is they who need to focus on the fact that they opened up knowing full well what the rules for that city/state are.

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
67. I may have missed it...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:14 PM
Nov 2013

Is the claim that the "distraction" part of the rules, which is the part they claim is being violated, illegal in and of itself? Or it is just the race claim?

To my limited knowledge, it's a pretty standard and intentionally subjective requirement in many schools.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
121. She's being blamed for being the victim of verbal bullies.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:06 PM
Nov 2013

But the school has already backed off, according to the update.

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
16. First of all, her hair is lovely
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 01:08 PM
Nov 2013

Please tell me where it says the mother stamped their feet and had a tantrum. Why are you attempting to defame this child's mother?

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
22. Mostly because of the shite example she is setting...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 01:58 PM
Nov 2013

... For her daughter along with her entitled attitude.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
32. She's a black woman, so she's by definition entitled, irrational, and bitchy
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:13 PM
Nov 2013

At least, by the definition Decaffeinated is relying on here.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
87. I see this time and time again
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:04 PM
Nov 2013

When it comes to African Americans with any money at all. They are denounced as entitled. I interpret this as anger that they have not "stayed in their place."

liberalhistorian

(20,816 posts)
118. That's exactly what I just argued in another post on here, although
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:02 PM
Nov 2013

you put it a lot better than I did (can't seem to get my brain working tonight). The same is true for us gals, as well as minorities. And especially true for minority women.

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
193. Aside from the fact...
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 11:21 AM
Nov 2013

... that I would feel the exact same way about a white boy and his father throwing a social media hissyfit as well about a comparable issue.

It's much easier to assume (incorrectly) that anyone who doesn't support her 100% is a sexist and a bigot. Whatever helps I suppose...

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
69. I would be pissed, but these antics have been allowed to stand for a few years now...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:27 PM
Nov 2013

Admins by and large have stopped giving a shit about the racial stuff, so what am I wasting my energy for??

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
45. The shit example of being who you are, and not following the crowd
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:38 PM
Nov 2013

or caving to peer pressure? That's your idea of entitled?

I could be wrong, but I thought we were encouraging that in youngsters these days.

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
62. She is free to do all of that...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:00 PM
Nov 2013

... at a public or private school that has dress codes and an administration compatible with her style.

It is her choice to go there. There might be a case if this was a public school and had mandatory attendance.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
107. It wasn't a dress code issue until she complained of being bullied for it
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:44 PM
Nov 2013

Admittedly I'm making a presumption here, but "distraction" usually means interference with in-class lessons or other functions related to learning, while bullying usually takes place outside of class where authority is absent. Within the admittedly limited available information, it sounds like the girl was being harassed and the school simply prefers not to take action against her harassers. Schools like these are expensive; I would imagine there's a strong desire not to offend the parents of a group of wealthy students.

The school is probably within their rights, but that makes them no less assholes. It certainly wouldn't be the first time a religious school did something awful that would have been universally condemned if done by anyone other than a religious institution.

I'd be curious to know what the nearby public schools are like- there may be a very good reason her mother chose to send her there.



liberalhistorian

(20,816 posts)
117. Seems to me it's the parents
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:01 PM
Nov 2013

of the bullies, and the bullies themselves, who have the "entitled" attitude. Of course, I realize that nowadays "entitled" is used to refer to an denigrate any minority or woman who just wants to be treated normally even if they have natural characteristics that may not fit within what the majority has deemed to be cultural "norms".

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
135. Entitled?
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:35 PM
Nov 2013

Entitled to wear her hair the way it grows out of her head? Does that fit into your definition of "sense of entitled?"

There are some things people are entitled to. If they are being bullied for their hair being the way it naturally grows, they are entitled to not be told to change to meet the desires of the bullies.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,307 posts)
28. The rule just says her hair should not be 'a distraction'
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:09 PM
Nov 2013

which is ridiculously subjective.

Faith Christian Academy has a dress code and rules against how students can wear their hair. The student handbook reads: "Hair must be a natural color and must not be a distraction," and goes on to state examples that include, but are not limited to, mohawks, shaved designs and rat tails.


It does have specifics about boys' hair - you can see a section of the handbook in the video that starts "Boy's hair must be cut to above the eyes", and goes on to say they must be clean-shaven. But their examples on girls' hair point towards 'natural' being acceptable - natural color, and not having certain designs. As they say, the 'distraction' seems to be a few pupils tried to bully here about it. So this ends up like blaming the victim.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
163. Yup. My kid's hair was always a distraction to some people
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:07 AM
Nov 2013

including some teachers, because it was red.

Comments were frequently made, including jokes about redheads and tempers that my mellow child failed to appreciate.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
61. well when we live in a world with no laws or morals or ethics, sure.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 06:47 PM
Nov 2013

in this world though, they cannot be racist and should face public censure

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
74. I suspect you do not understand the policing in general of black womens hair
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:50 PM
Nov 2013

this is a racial bias that pretends to be color-blind; when indeed it is very color specific

you'd be better off understanding the various issues around race, rather than rolling your eyes at me.

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
80. My point is that it is not necessarily racist just because the child in question is black...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:57 PM
Nov 2013

If it's causing a problem in the school, the current philosophy seems to be to remove it at any cost.

I don't really agree with it but that is what they signed up for at a PRIVATE school.

RedCappedBandit

(5,514 posts)
91. Yeah, I'm sure they raise a stink about white girls hair when they let it grow naturally
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:12 PM
Nov 2013

Give me a fucking break

Response to La Lioness Priyanka (Reply #61)

liberalhistorian

(20,816 posts)
115. You need to work on your empathy and reading comprehension.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:57 PM
Nov 2013

They didn't have a specific "rule" or policy against it, they only started this bullshit after she reported being bullied and teased due to her hair. So, instead of trying to stop the (very un-Christian) teasing and bullying, the school supported the bullies and blamed and shamed the victim, trying to make HER leave. It is the un-Christian bullies, who need to learn to live in a diverse world, who should be getting the blame and the punishment.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
120. And the parents are free to go public and put the private school
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:04 PM
Nov 2013

actions on public display.

And it worked because the school, according to the update, has already backed off.

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
141. That is our modern culture in a nutshell...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 10:25 PM
Nov 2013

Agree contractually to one thing until it doesn't suit you, cry on Facebook and cause more problems for the institution.

The rules are for other people...

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
142. They didn't agree contractually to having their daughter
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 10:28 PM
Nov 2013

bullied by classmates who picked on her for her appearance.

If her hair was a distraction, anyone's physical appearance could be a distraction. The standard was way too broad to be part of a legal contract.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
151. "way too broad to be part of a legal contract"
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:01 AM
Nov 2013

I see contracts every goshdarn day with provisions that assign complete discretion to one party or another on any particular issue.

Rest assured, that ANY private Christian school retains the unfettered right to expel any dang student for whatever reason they want.

I do a lot of lease contracts of internet domain names, for example. These things typically have a laundry list of things the lessee agrees not to do like, spamming, illegal porn, gambling, hosting infringing content, yadda, yadda, yadda. But at the end of the day, you can't simply list the world of existing wrongs in the face of an inventive environment of "bad things". So, ultimately, those kinds of lists are examples tacked onto a clause that says, "if we in our sole discretion don't like what you are doing, we are going to yank your lease". Those kinds of discretionary provisions are in gazillions of contracts every day.

Here's one you agreed to:

"if we think the community as a whole would be better off without you here, if you are constantly wasting the DU Administrators' time, if you seem to oppose the mission of DU, or if the DU Administrators just don't like you, we will revoke your posting privileges."

Is that enforceable? You bet. And it is a sure bet that a private Christian school can kick out anyone they damned well please. That is the very POINT, the essence, of their reason for existing in the first place.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
154. You're right of course, they can. And the parents have every right
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:32 AM
Nov 2013

to make them the subject of public scorn.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
157. I gotta believe people aren't general familiar with these schools
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:47 AM
Nov 2013

Let's get this straight.

We are talking about a school that these parents chose for the purpose of intentionally miseducating their daughter.

I guaran-damn-tee you that this school exists for the purpose of making sure this girl learns that evolution didn't happen, that gays will burn in Hell, and that women are to be submissive to their husbands.

This school and its ilk were deserving objects of public scorn LONG before this girl's parents INTENTIONALLY CHOSE to subject their daughter to the cavalcade of mind-poisoning toxic bullshit that they call a "curriculum".

If their family wants to believe in a pile of patriarchal Bronze Age mythology, I don't see how any member of this asshole parade gets my vote for "best ensemble".

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
9. Her hair doesn't seem that bad
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:47 PM
Nov 2013

A bit wild, but no worse than many of the hairdos when I went to high school. She shouldn't be forced to cut it.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
50. And that's the point.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 04:12 PM
Nov 2013

If it was a common hair style, it wouldn't be much of a distraction. Perhaps in the way and blocking other students' line of sight, but not a distraction.

Then again, it wouldn't be "unique" and so it wouldn't be part of her "identity." Any more than KS, who came in to work every week with different color hair, considered that part of her identity--this week platinum blond, the next week brown, the following week red, the week after that blue or green or yellow or purple. Then one day she came in with it mousy brown, her natural color. "Everybody's doing colors. I'm unique." The percentage of her friends dyeing their hair odd color reached a critical point and she stopped.

At my school I've sent kids to the AP for "distracting" when I thought nothing much either way of the hairstyle. One clear sign that it's a distraction is that it starts distracting kids. That means instead of learning being what's important, the all important "look at me! I'm special! I'm not like the other 7 billion people!" No, just the middle 5 billion.


As for "natural," I'd assume that means she washes it and just lets it dry. No brushing, no teasing, no shaping. I'm thinking that if she needed to do that, she'd find another hairstyle pronto.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
155. Should a redhead be forced to color her hair brown so it won't be a distraction?
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:35 AM
Nov 2013

My redheaded child stuck out in a field of brunettes and was subject to teasing -- even by the occasional teacher. What's the difference?

FYI, "natural" doesn't preclude brushing, wetting, or shaping. It means you haven't treated it with chemicals or heat.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
17. Her hair is beautiful
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 01:10 PM
Nov 2013

I hope they didn't have that rule in the 80s or great number of people would have had hair too big for them.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
23. My lord, I was at least expecting something pretty wild.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:01 PM
Nov 2013

Her hair is just a bit poofy, it isn't out of the normal at all.

She has very nice hair, it is clear these people just want to make her have a "white" hair cut.

blogslut

(37,999 posts)
24. Sounds like the school administrators don't want to deal with the real problem.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:03 PM
Nov 2013

From the article:

VanDyke said she's had her large, natural hair all year long, but it only became an issue after the family complained about students teasing her about her hair.

"There have been bullies in the school," said Kent. "There have been people teasing her about her hair, and it seems to me that they're blaming her."


The school has a bullying/tolerance problem and instead of fixing it, they choose to harass this child.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
44. That's the ticket.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:35 PM
Nov 2013


If this school is trying to stop bullying by making the bullied person change, they're doing it wrong. Kids that age will bully and tease one another about anything and everything. They need adult supervision and guidance to learn to knock it off. If the school can't provide that, a transfer to a new school that will is the answer.

spinbaby

(15,088 posts)
33. Her hair is lovely
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 02:16 PM
Nov 2013

And it suits her. However, speaking as a white woman with very curly hair that tends to frizz, if I let my hair go "natural" and unshaped, it would not be suitable for most workplaces.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
51. Sly Stone and Angela Davis
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 04:28 PM
Nov 2013

come to mind (yes, that makes me an old fart). This young lady's "do" is tame compared to the 'fro back in the day.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
54. Later in life, she'll wonder why she can't keep a job.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 04:53 PM
Nov 2013

Depending on the degree of conformity normal in her occupation.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
55. WTF?
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 04:54 PM
Nov 2013

If it is natural, they have no business regulating it!

I could see rules against dying hair purple or something.

Bald Faced Discrimination. So Christian!

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
60. She is a pretty child, and I think she would look much better
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 06:45 PM
Nov 2013

with her hair not so puffy and big. My personal opinion is big hair really doesn't look good on most people.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
64. She has a right to the style that she wants. But I too think that she is far better looking
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:09 PM
Nov 2013

with shorter hair, stunningly beautiful actually. But if long hair is part of her personal touch, so be it.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
66. I agree she will become a beautiful adult
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:13 PM
Nov 2013

She has a great look in her face, and in my opinion, the big hair distracts from it.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
189. Big hair might be in again
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 08:55 AM
Nov 2013

I spent my teenage years unable to do big hair despite it being the style. Maybe my flat hair was a distraction since everyone else had big hair and I didn't conform, but of course no one bothered me about my hair as this is not about how big her hair is but about an African American girl wearing her hair natural when African American girls and women are judged in a racist fashion based on their hair, especially when it is not chemically processed to look "white." If she wore dreadlocks, she'd probably get in trouble too despite the fact that it would be smaller, because people seem to get offended by dreadlocks.

There are times where big hair is not "in" and times where it is, but regardless of fashion, people should be able to wear their hair the way it naturally grows out of their head at any time.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
89. Is there some reason why your personal tastes are in any way relevant
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:08 PM
Nov 2013

to this child's civil rights?

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
98. You will find that my personal tastes are very relevant
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:27 PM
Nov 2013

to many of my posts. And I am not alone in this, trust me. Its called a discussion forum.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
106. OMG, it is about a religious school and their strict standards
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:44 PM
Nov 2013

Not civil rights. You seem to really have a bee in your bonnet about this, why don't you go picket in front of the school if you feel that strongly about it!

And I don't happen to like big-ass hair, so what? Lots of black women have beautiful sleek hair, and I don't need to dig up some pics from the internet to prove my point. Sheesh.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
108. well, if you wanted to raise the issue of the rights of a religious school
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:46 PM
Nov 2013

that is a relevant political issue. Your particular tastes are not relevant to this discussion in the slightest. She is not your daughter. We've been over this before. You put me on ignore for it.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
113. Ok, lol, but you don't know who I put on ignore and maybe sometimes I just ignore without using it,
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:52 PM
Nov 2013

the old fashioned way. You never, never, know for sure...

JI7

(89,247 posts)
112. most black women do not have naturally sleek hair , this is alittle girl
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:50 PM
Nov 2013

and you think she should have to put chemicals and waste her time making her hair acceptable to certain types ?

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
114. I think she should cut her hair, if she wants to continue to attend this fine educational
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:56 PM
Nov 2013

institution of learning. She is just a child, so perhaps she should cut her hair so that it meets the standards of her religious school. I said nothing about chemicals, you did. She is too young to put chemicals in her hair, in my opinion.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
116. so should someone with naturally straight hair the same length be forced to cut their hair
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:59 PM
Nov 2013

to stay in the school ?

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
119. Yes, if the school objects to it
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:02 PM
Nov 2013

I'm sure you know and understand that religious schools are considered a notch above most public schools, and they usually are expensive. We are likely talking about an upper class family here. And there probably is a lot of competition to get in this school. Just wanted to point that out.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
126. Oh boy, now I see, you really are on a fishing expedition
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:11 PM
Nov 2013

Give me a break! That is a silly theoretical question. What, is this a KKK school in your scenario now? Jeez Louise

I will not answer these kinds of leading questions. Why not ask me when was the last time I partook in a satanic ritual in my basement??



 

xulamaude

(847 posts)
198. "Lots of black women have beautiful sleek hair"
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:50 PM
Nov 2013

and you do realize that look is achieved by the use of chemicals primarily? IOW, not natural.

(ETA - oops! missed that this bit had already been covered - sorry)

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
139. The implication is...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 10:16 PM
Nov 2013

...that if she wasn't a beautiful person, then she is not entitled to the hair she wants.

Is an ugly person entitled to their hair style?

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
148. This is not racism
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 11:34 PM
Nov 2013

If a young boy came in with hair below his collar or a white girl came in with similar hair, you can bet the school would be going through the same thing. It is fun for you guys to yell racism, but it really isn't unless you have proof the school allows the other students get away with their hair out of standards.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
178. people grow hair differently, black girls can grow their hair the same length
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 04:27 AM
Nov 2013

as those with naturally more straight hair but it will end up looking bigger just because that's how it naturally grows.

as shown below the same thing happens to many jewish and other ethnic groups if they just let their hair be natural.

the girl's hair isn't longer than most girls/women in this country. i would say it's probably shorter.

struggle4progress

(118,278 posts)
70. I feel the school really had to step in, because she's frightening the natives:
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:29 PM
Nov 2013


Just in case THAT doesn't make it clear just how disruptive this little she-devil is, I suppose I should add that, in order to avoid offending anyone, I only posted a cropped version of the picture: the full photo actually shows her holding her honor society certificate

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
71. Do they want her to straighten it, too?
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:30 PM
Nov 2013

This is part of the reason the term "Christian school" is a code word down South.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
83. Well...as I said...in the South "Christian school" is still a code word.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:00 PM
Nov 2013

maybe not still technically segregated, but still white-supremacist in mindset and still committed to the notion that everyone should look and act as "white" as possible.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
72. So, rather than standing up to the kids that are bullying her...the school is caving in to them...
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:33 PM
Nov 2013

Yet another example that supports the long-standing theory that conservatism depends of the survival of bully culture.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
73. My standard reply:
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:43 PM
Nov 2013

When someone chooses to attend or work at a religious school, they choose to accept the school's rules.

Anyone who works at/attends one of these schools with the idea they can pick and choose among those rules will often be surprised to find they cannot.

If everyone refused to attend/work at schools with these rules, such schools would either change those rules or go out of business.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
85. Yep. But I still love the "well, I personally believe that she would look better with shorter/
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:02 PM
Nov 2013

straighter hair" as if that has any damn thing to do with the subject at hand or if anyone gives a hot, flying fuck what narrow minded people think about this issue.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
88. Some really do not care
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:07 PM
Nov 2013

Got shit for it last time but his taste is more important than the child's freedom to be who she is. Contrast that with all the justifications for "choice" and "freedom" in discussions of rape porn.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
90. Absolutely. And speaking in as general terms as I can
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:12 PM
Nov 2013

gender is just one subject they struggle with.

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)
92. I see this hair issue as about race
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:13 PM
Nov 2013

It's targeting hair associated with blackness. But yeah, gender is not any better.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
123. I want to throw a pan at the heads of some of these morons.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:07 PM
Nov 2013

I am not A.A. but I've always been in competition with them in the "natural hair" department. And it kills me that this girl was considered a "distraction" because she was the victim of kids who bullied her about her hair.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
140. Just what do you think "Christian Schools" are about?
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 10:18 PM
Nov 2013

The POINT of these petri dishes of sociopathy is conformity.
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
79. Is There A "Book Of Moron" With These Racist "Christians" ???
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 07:56 PM
Nov 2013




That girl is beautiful, and that school should consider itself LUCKY to have her.


Response to WillyT (Reply #79)

4 t 4

(2,407 posts)
94. oh- come on, wtf
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:24 PM
Nov 2013

leave her alone since when is there a height requirement on hair. Just leave her alone and focus on what the real problem is with the objectors. what are they really mad about??

4 t 4

(2,407 posts)
99. Hold on a minute, you left out it is a Christian Academy!!!!!
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:27 PM
Nov 2013

Update: African-American girl won't face expulsion over 'natural hair'

Vanessa VanDyke told to cut hair or leave Faith Christian Academy

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
97. Update: Orlando private school won't expel African-American girl over hair
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:26 PM
Nov 2013

The story has been updated:

After Local 6's original story aired, school administrators changed their requests of Vanessa and her family.

"We are not asking her to put products in her hair or to cut her hair," read a statement sent to Local 6. "We are asking her to style her hair within the guidelines according to the school handbook."

The handbook does not cite large or frizzy hair, noting only, "Mohawks, shaved signs, rat tails, etc."

Kent said she and Vanessa are going to talk about their options over Thanksgiving.


Would they expel this student???





 

whistler162

(11,155 posts)
199. Nope just ask her not to wear her wig to class!
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:05 PM
Nov 2013

and wonder why someone so old is still in school!

4 t 4

(2,407 posts)
100. you're not helping
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:30 PM
Nov 2013

false advertising. It's a Christian community! That's why even though it's not ok that is why. Christians

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
104. Idiotic dress codes
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:41 PM
Nov 2013

We are all clones of one another. Florida Public School. Staff can wear city shorts, or capris to work. Sorry, don't want to. Long pants are fine with me. Flip flops are acceptable. No, thanks, I don't want a wheelchair running over my toes, or dropping a disabled kid I am holding while flip flopping around.

Worse, "FRIGID" weather" lol Greeting the cars and parents dressed only in long pants and long sleeved shirt in the "freezing cold" of 50 degree weather sends the "wrong" message to parents on dressing their kids for cold weather. lol I had a LOT of trouble with this. I should be wearing a PARKA, Hat, and Gloves. Um, NO. I only wore that in the North when it was below FREEZING, that is, below 32 degrees. I am not wearing those clothes when it is 20 degrees ABOVE freezing to send any "messages" to anybody.

Everybody has to be exactly the same. No, thank you. Let this girl wear her hair as is natural for her.



Warpy

(111,245 posts)
109. I went to school in the 60s and I rocked bigger hair than that
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 08:47 PM
Nov 2013

It took me an hour of backcombing and two cans of hairspray and would deflate by noon, but by golly I was stylish when I got there.

The only problems I can see are difficulty seeing the board if you're behind her and the presence of so many bullies at that school.

The former can be cured by a 1980s scrunchy. The latter is going to take a great deal of work and might not produce as many Republican bullies, so the school picks on her instead.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
125. Basically, they're blaming her for being bullied about her hair.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:10 PM
Nov 2013

Rather than going after the bullies, they're calling her and her hair a "distraction."

TBF

(32,047 posts)
127. Conforming -
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:15 PM
Nov 2013

1. Certain folks in positions of power like others to conform to their whims.

2. They especially like women/girls to conform (even if they are female themselves and in positions of power).

3. Even more so if you are a minority - male or female.


It gets very old very fast.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,307 posts)
136. Though, from what we can see, they have more rules about hair for boys than girls
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:37 PM
Nov 2013

The video shows there's also an explicit "boys' hair to be cut above the eyes" rule, and they must be clean-shaven (presumably they go up to grade 12). And it wouldn't surprise me in the least for there to be a "no shoulder length hair for boys" rule either - that was a rule at my school.

It was them saying it was a problem only when she pointed out the bullying that seems really wrong to me. That, and the subjective 'distraction' rule.

Tigress DEM

(7,887 posts)
131. Some people have too much time on their hands.
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 09:26 PM
Nov 2013

Worrying about a kid's hair.

Two barrettes and she'd be pulled back demur and leave the rest puffy.

Movie theater rule. If someone sitting behind you can't see the board, put on a clip or two and let there be light.

But to make someone CHANGE their style completely is ridiculous. Ask for some concessions, ok, but be reasonable. Be kind.

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
144. The girl's hair is the school's distraction from the real issue of bullying!
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 10:40 PM
Nov 2013

The girl was being bullied by her classmates over her hair. Instead of the school taking proper bully-prevention measures, school officials turned around and said, "Well, if her hair wasn't so crazy, she wouldn't be getting bullied!"

It's blame the victim ALL over again!

Also, the young lady's hair is BIG and beautiful......If (and when) you've got it, flaunt it!

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
169. The school or the parents?
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:33 AM
Nov 2013

Because within the context of what these folks believe, failure of the parents to submit to the authority of the school is reason enough to kick her out.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
170. Ooophs, forgot the sarcasm thingie.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 02:22 AM
Nov 2013

Sarcasm regarding the "Christian" school. The parent is the real Christian in attitude.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
172. Depends
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 03:16 AM
Nov 2013

There are some Christians who would opine that, in a dispute with another Christian, one resolves it with the other party without dragging in the local news team or complaining to others about it.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
191. Yes, it is: 1 Corinthians 6:1-8
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:24 AM
Nov 2013

You aren't very familiar with the culture of these kinds of schools. But there is a swath of Bible thumpers who believe it is unbiblical to take their disputes outside of their own circle because of that passage.

---
When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, .

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
147. Her hair looks fine and probably smells far better then the chemical reek some womens' hair give off
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 11:31 PM
Nov 2013

I've always disliked the smell of some chemicals used to change hair texture. Just like I don't want to be near someone who has drenched themselves in cologne I also don't want to be near someone who smells like being downwind from a Dow chemical plant.

It seems clear that the school's reaction is more to the fact that the family objected to the bullying aimed at this young woman than anything to do with her chosen hair style.





Cha

(297,154 posts)
166. Beautiful girl with her own beautiful hair and obviously
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 01:22 AM
Nov 2013

talented. Much to be proud of.. not something to be made ashamed of by insisting she cut her hair.

The way I got it.. there was no problem until she reported on bullies whining about her hair. Instead of them being told to leave her alone or else.. she's made to cut her hair.

Response to The Straight Story (Original post)

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
179. I looked up the dress code for this school
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 04:52 AM
Nov 2013

Which you will find at http://www.fcalions.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/FCA-Large-Student-Handbook-12-13.pdf.

Hair: Must be a natural color and must not be a distraction to include but not limited to mohawks, shaved designs, rat tails, etc. Boys' hair must be cut to above the eyes, mid-ear, and to the top of the collar. Boys must be clean shaven. This includes but is not limited to beards, sideburns, mustaches, goatees, etc.

Oh, and they tell you exactly where you must buy your school uniforms...kickbacks, anyone?

Oh Vanessa? You're not allowed to be unique in this school.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
180. Just so everyone knows, there's been some movement in this story.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 05:17 AM
Nov 2013

Now the school i saying she isn't going to be expelled, they are just going to insist that she "style" her hair differently--by that, I take it to mean they want her to pack it down so it isn't puffy like she likes it.

If you click on the link they've modified the story.

But wait, there's more--a few folks are hitting their facebook page and telling it like it is. I guess they keep scrubbing it, but people keep coming back and giving them a little what-for.

Oh, and here's the link to that page

https://www.facebook.com/fcaorlando

Bad Thoughts

(2,522 posts)
190. It's a teaching moment for the school
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 08:56 AM
Nov 2013

If you are different in any way, the students may bully you, and the Christian administrators can intervene by kicking those who are different out of school. I'm sure the same lesson applies to other unique people (Muslims, Homosexuals, poor people, ...).

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
192. Muslims and homosexuals are not allowed in this school
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:29 AM
Nov 2013

And it is a private school, so poor people are out too.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
204. This is just plain stupid. Can't believe some are still so discriminatory these days.
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 10:05 PM
Nov 2013

At the very least, this is yet another example of dresscodes gone nuts....and at worst, perhaps even another form of cultural prejudice or even racism.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»African-American girl fac...