General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs Toys 'r Us Better than a Forest?
By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 26th November 2013.
Watch the latest advertisement for Toys R Us in the US(3). A man dressed up as a ranger herds children onto a green bus belonging to the Meet the Trees Foundation. Today were taking the kids on the best field trip they could wish for, he confides to us. And they dont even know it.
On the bus he starts teaching them, badly, about leaves. The children yawn and shift in their seats. Suddenly he announces, but were not going to the forest today
. He strips off his ranger shirt. Were going to Toys R Us guys! The children go beserk. Were going to get to play with all the toys, and youre going to get to choose any toy that you want! The children run, in slow motion, down the aisles of the shop, then almost swoon as they caress their chosen toys.
Nature is tedious, plastic is thrilling. The inner-city children I took to the woods a few weeks ago would tell a different story(4), but hammer home the message often enough and it becomes true.
Christmas permits the global bullshit industry to recruit the values with which so many of us would like the festival to be invested love, warmth, a community of spirit to the sole end of selling things that no one needs or even wants. Sadly, like all newspapers, the Guardian participates in this orgy. Saturdays magazine contained what looks like a shopping list for the last days of the Roman empire(5). Theres a smart cuckoo clock, for those whose dumb ones arent up to the mark; a remotely-operated kettle; a soap dispenser at £55; a mahogany skateboard (disgracefully, the provenance of the wood is mentioned by neither the Guardian nor the retailer(6)); a papardelle rolling pin, whatever the hell that is; £25 chocolate baubles; a £16 box of, er, garden twine.
Are we so bored, so affectless, that we need to receive this junk to ignite one last spark of hedonic satisfaction? Have people become so immune to fellow feeling that they are prepared to spend £46 on a jar for dog treats or £6.50 a bang on personalised crackers, rather than give the money to a better cause?(7) Or is this the Western worlds potlatch, spending ridiculous sums on conspicuously useless gifts to enhance our social status? If so, we must have forgotten that those who are impressed by money are not worth impressing.
. . .
http://www.monbiot.com/2013/11/25/spend-dont-mend/
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)I have never shopped there and I refused to take my kids to that place when they were young. You know what? They didn't miss a darned thing.
Just too much garbage/junk/stuff in the world today.