CBS internal investigation of 60 minutes: summary of findings

[spanone]

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

--From the start, Lara Logan and her producing team were looking for a different angle to the story of the Benghazi attack. They believed they found it in the story of Dylan Davies, written under the pseudonym, "Morgan Jones". It purported to be the first western eyewitness account of the attack. But Logan's report went to air without 60 Minutes knowing what Davies had told the FBI and the State Department about his own activities and location on the night of the attack.

--The fact that the FBI and the State Department had information that differed from the account Davies gave to 60 Minutes was knowable before the piece aired. But the wider reporting resources of CBS News were not employed in an effort to confirm his account. It's possible that reporters and producers with better access to inside FBI sources could have found out that Davies had given varying and conflicting accounts of his story.

--Members of the 60 Minutes reporting team conducted interviews with Davies and other individuals in his book, including the doctor who received and treated Ambassador Stevens at the Benghazi hospital. They went to Davies' employer Blue Mountain, the State Department, the FBI (which had interviewed Davies), and other government agencies to ask about their investigations into the attack. Logan and producer Max McClellan told me they found no reason to doubt Davies' account and found no holes in his story. But the team did not sufficiently vet Davies' account of his own actions and whereabouts that night.

--Davies told 60 Minutes that he had lied to his own employer that night about his location, telling Blue Mountain that he was staying at his villa, as his superior ordered him to do, but telling 60 Minutes that he then defied that order and went to the compound. This crucial point - his admission that he had not told his employer the truth about his own actions - should have been a red flag in the editorial vetting process.

...more....

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/11/26/report-lara-logan-taking-leave-of-absence-from/197066

[IllinoisBirdWatcher]

1. Any ONE of the EIGHT journalistic mistakes should have caused the Benghazi Hoax not to air.

You listed only four of them.

Probably the worst, and certainly the most public, was this one:

In October of 2012, one month before starting work on the Benghazi story, Logan made a speech in which she took a strong public position arguing that the US Government was misrepresenting the threat from Al Qaeda ...there is a conflict in taking a public position on the government’s handling of Benghazi and Al Qaeda, while continuing to report on the story.

Full 60 Minutes internal memo from Huff Post.