General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Child Labor in the USA" - Why wont the Pres Obama Admin do anything?
From TheNation.com: http://www.thenation.com/article/177152/child-labor-usa
I wonder what the back-story is.
This post is cross posted in the Progressive M. R. Group: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1269
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
tridim
(45,358 posts)...On the GOP, for killing The Childrens Act for Responsible Employment THIS YEAR.
BTW, excellent work altering the headline Ricky!!!!11
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Thank you for destroying the OP in the second reply.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)He didnt even read the article as apparently you havent either. Bet you didnt get passed the subject before you started into defense mode.
There is a lot that can be done without permission of the GOP.
Why is all I am asking. If the GOP made them, explain how. But I am guessing you arent interested in discussion.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
former9thward
(31,970 posts)Children of farmers doing tasks to help out the farm.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)chores and exploitation.
former9thward
(31,970 posts)But it is tricky because these kids are not being 'paid' as employees. Do you write a regulation that says it only applies to paid employees? Then you are saying that safety only comes into play when you are being paid.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)on this issue, and children are dying.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)It's completely Obama's fault.
Right, Rick?
It's way cool how you've decided Obama is culpable in the heading, but at the end of the article, admit you don't know the back story. Very cool.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)It's a legitimate question. The back story might give us a hint. Something influenced the decision.
By the way, I didnt write the article.
But I notice that a few of you choose to chide me rather than discuss the subject of the OP. Does that mean you approve of the Admin decision? I bet you just wont commit.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Really, that's how you intend to promote a conversation?
What I get from your OP is that you hate everything Obama, you hate his policies, you hate his actions, you hate his inactions. Is that a valid interpretation of your OP, or did I infer a little too much?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I referenced an article for The Nation Mag. Yet you ignore the magazine article and attack me and you try to paint me as an Obama hater. That's childish.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)no point in complaining about it. In the future, following the golden rule may be helpful.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)with cuteness.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Which is what the farm regs amount to
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)to back off providing protections. As a result, more children die. How can you make light of that?
There might be a reasonable answer but I havent seen it yet.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)and then drop kicks them afterward.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)you are talking about killing kittens.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)It's awful.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)sighing with relief that they are under the Obama radar
G_j
(40,366 posts)out there laughing?
What other audience could this be aimed at?
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)it's a widely-known fact that he fucking DESPISES children!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)exploited?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Tarheel_Dem
(31,231 posts)we find out he's after the kiddies too!