Spend, Don’t Mend.
Guilt is good. Its the feature that distinguishes the rest of the population from psychopaths. Its the sensation you are able to feel when you possess a capacity for empathy.
But guilt inhibits consumption. So a global industry has developed to smother it with a 13-tog duvet of celebrities and cartoon characters and elevator music. It seeks to persuade us not to see and not to feel. It seems to work.
The 2012 Greendex survey found that people in poorer countries feel, on average, much guiltier about their impacts on the natural world than people in rich countries(1). The places in which people feel least guilt are, in this order, Germany, the US, Australia and Britain, while the people of India, China, Mexico and Brazil have the greatest concerns. Our guilt, the survey reported, exists in inverse proportion to the amount of damage our consumption does. This is the opposite of what a thousand editorials in the corporate press tell us: that people cannot afford to care until they become rich. The evidence suggests we cease to care only when we become rich.
Consumers in countries such as Mexico, Brazil, China and India, the survey tells us, tend to be most concerned about issues like climate change, air and water pollution, species loss, and shortages of fresh water
In contrast, the economy and the cost of energy and fuel elicit the most concern among American, French and British consumers.(2) The more you have, the more important money becomes. My guess is that in poorer countries empathy has not been so dulled by decades of mindless consumption.
By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 26th November 2013. http://www.monbiot.com/2013/11/25/spend-dont-mend/