You can always tell a Horse's Ass, But not much....

[catnhatnh]

There are one or more posters on the board that complain all year about threads concerning the assassination of JFK, even when new information is offered or asserted and every November when the anniversary draws news stories, and they scream loud and long that these posts belong in "creative speculation" and no where else.

Now it seems the rules have been relaxed for this brief time on the 50th anniversary which is special to those of us who invested belief that just maybe a Camelot was possible and who distrust a government that tells us "we told you every thing you need to know and maybe in another quarter century we will release more secret files (that of course completely support what we've said so far). This is appreciated. Want to no what isn't?

The same jailhouse lawyers who whine like whipped when a serious article on JFK appears in normal course now use this brief amnesty to post ridiculous satire mocking any serious discussion all over GD in total contravention to every post they've made insisting such posts be sequestered from the main board and only to insult, injure, and belittle good solid members of this board.

I would never name names but need I add a mirror for you hypocritical morons???

[Scuba]

1. Yep, noticed that.

[JesterCS]

2. personally I believe DU should

be an OPEN forum for people to discuss what they want, without fear of backlash from a few Pompous Know-it-alls.

Block me if you dont agree, but any topic should be an open and friendly atmosphere to converse in.

[RobertEarl]

3. There is an old saying:

""They are showing their asses"".

Not even funny. Make notes, newbies, and act accordingly.

[virgdem]

4. Another old saying that is so true...

"there are more horses asses in this world than there are horses"

[11 Bravo]

7. AKA "The Equine Paradox"

That was one of my Dad's favorites.

[duffyduff]

5. The problem is there is no "new" information.

The truth was known the minute Oswald was arrested and charged. Same with Jack Ruby.

[catnhatnh]

6. No the problem is posters so closed minded...

that they don't even bother to read the new stuff-like the fact that Castro quietly met for a three hour interview with a US government envoy to deny any involvement with the killing and in fact expressed admiration for JFK. So your thought processes had already stopped half a century ago-that's fine but we don't need that kind of "truth" here.

[CANDO]

9. And what new revelation came about regarding Castro interview?

That he had no involvement? That may be new information, but it seems rather irrelevant. Personally, I've been all over the map on JFK. But lately, I've learned some new information and seen the various CTs torn to shreds due to lack of evidence, or through faulty logic. The thing I never understood until recently, was that the single bullet theory isn't so whacky after all. The physical position of the front and rear seats were offset enough so that the persons sitting in them were aligned for the single bullet theory to work.

[catnhatnh]

11. "The thing I never understood until recently"...

BINGO-your not who the post is addressed to. New info that supports the Warren report? Yeah-that may happen and my opinions could be swayed.The Castro thing is not critical but is pretty interesting in considering just how seriously other governments took the events of that day.

[lonestarnot]

8. K & R!

[Logical]

10. To shorten your post....."Quit disagreeing with me!!!!!!" n-t

[catnhatnh]

12. I'll shorten it to don't piss on my cornflakes for you...

this topic is important to me and you spelled "Too" improperly in the context of your post. And posted just to be a dick...

[Logical]

13. Ahhhh, someone needs a nap! n-t

[pintobean]

14. You started a whiny thread

and called DUers horse's asses and hypocritical morons, yet he's being the dick.


Don't worry about the corn flakes.