General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWorld Fights Back Against the Biggest Brother in History
from truthdig:
World Fights Back Against the Biggest Brother in History
Posted on Nov 28, 2013
By Sonali Kolhatkar
The United States vast and indiscriminate worldwide surveillance of ordinary people and heads of state has no historical precedent. Now countries around the world are fighting back using the United Nations as a vehicle for change. In a move that received little media coverage in the U.S., a United Nations committee approved without a vote a draft resolution entitled The Right to Privacy in a Digital Age. The nonbinding resolution, which will now head to the General Assembly where it has broad support, follows from a report published in June by the United Nations Human Rights Council. It detailed the negative impact of state surveillance on free expression and human rights and lamented that technology has outpaced legislation.
The remarkable U.N. draft resolution affirms privacy as a human right, on par with other globally recognized civil and political rights. Several leading advocacy groups, including Access Now, Amnesty International, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Human Rights Watch and Privacy International, signed an open letter to the U.N. General Assembly backing the resolution. The letter stresses the importance of protecting privacy and free expression in the face of technological advancements and encroaching State power.
Carly Nyst, the head of international advocacy at Privacy International, told me, This resolution could not be more important. At the moment were seeing serious threats to the protection of the right to privacy in the form of (National Security Agency) spying but also in the form of other surveillance practices that are taking place across the world. We think that voting in favor of this resolution is a really important stand for states to take so that they will no longer stand for global surveillance practices undertaken by the U.S. and others. This is a pivotal moment.
Opposition to the U.N. resolution has come primarily from a small alliance of countries that share surveillance data, known as the Five Eyes (the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand and Australia). These five countries are party to a secret treaty originally signed by the U.S. and U.K. in 1941, which came to light only in 2010. Little is known about the details of the agreement. According to Nyst, We know that there is a very, very high level of integration between the intelligence services of each of the [Five Eyes] countries to the extent that Americans are working out of Australian bases, the British are working out of New Zealand bases, etc. That information is shared, almost is standard across all five countries and there is no such thing as a no-spy deal. That means that even though they have a very high level of cooperation there are also instances in which they are spying on each other. Nyst added, Its a completely secret, covert arrangement that implicates the privacy rights of almost everyone who uses the Internet. ......................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/world_fights_back_against_the_biggest_brother_in_history_20131128
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)is our country just ignores the ones it does not like.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)SpcMnky
(73 posts)Everyone does it.
No, not everyone spy's on EVERYONE, except totalitarian police states, but we are the first to do it globally.
What are we becoming?
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)SpcMnky
(73 posts)niyad
(113,268 posts)ashamed, I would think. the biggest bully, the biggest arms dealer, the biggest warmonger, the biggest snoop, the biggest gobbler of resources. . .
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... a nation state that acts for the protection and and interest of our citizens against (and in collusion with) other nation states in a world that does not have an over-arching authority to establish and enforce a common system of justice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan%5F%28book%29
niyad
(113,268 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)China, Libertarian, Oathkeepers!
See world? Nothing to worry about!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)would be a waste of time.
People who want to raise concern about this need to quit exaggerating.
Sheri
(310 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)where would they get the money for it, with the sequester, too?
and what could they get out of it?
nothing.
It could be concerning, if they were really wiretapping political figures, or Noam Chomsky or the like. Even Glenn Beck or the like.
but not everybody. Not only would that be stupid, they'd get caught. And they'd get nothing out of it.
Sheri
(310 posts)G_j
(40,366 posts)what is "ordinary"? Is that someone who never questions authority, demonstrates or signs petitions against Monsanto..the Keystone pipeline?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)All well and good, but besides ticking off the Five Eyes gang, is there really going to be a reduction in the eyeballing because of this?