General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKey Republicans beginning to admit they've lost the culture wars
Republicans beginning to admit they've lost the culture wars:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
One main concern going forward, key Hill Republicans say, is to avoid falling into more social-issue debates, which have hurt the broader party image and could affect down-ballot races for the House and Senate.
To the extent that the focus in this cycle is on the economy, its better for Republicans. I think thats probably where the stronger case for Republican change can be made, said Rep. Patrick Meehan (R-Pa.), who managed presidential hopeful Rick Santorums 1994 campaign for the Senate but remains neutral in the presidential race. I think were stronger when were talking about economics.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/as-gop-waits-for-dust-to-settle-party-leaders-sharpen-case-for-reelection/2012/03/08/gIQAJ5Cy3R_story.html
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Yeah, the Bush years were so wonderful for the average American..........
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Democratic economic policies are actually better for everyone, including rich people. The party should be playing this up, but they don't and effectively surrender the field to the GOP.
ThomThom
(1,486 posts)if you haven't taken too much money from corporations
but the trickle down, lower taxes, off shore jobs economic philosophy is failing and should be easy to prove
bluerum
(6,109 posts)they are even more delusional than I thought.
I suppose though, that if half your constituents are math challenged that might work in your favor.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)to pound on their failures in the economic social and political realms.
If only we had progressives demanding the GOP take responsibility for the abject failure of their policies.
mick063
(2,424 posts)They just need access. Folks are addicted to FOX news like crack and they will never see an argument for progressive issues there.
When you are pissed that hotel maids in New York City belong to a union and just negotiated a nice middle class living, there isn't time to talk about Bush tax breaks for the wealthy, two prolonged wars, and a zero oversight economic policy that pushed our nation into such huge debt.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)To the extent that the focus in this cycle is on the economy, its better for Republicans. I think thats probably where the stronger case for Republican change can be made, ....
Well, just yesterday .... This from Santorum:
"You hear now the media starting to say, oh well, looks like the economy is getting better, Santorum told supporters Saturday night in Springfield, Mo., shortly after the Associated Press declared him the winner of the Kansas caucuses. You know, the economy may be getting better and Republicans may lose their edge on that issue. Well, if that was the only issue in this race, that may or may not be the case, we dont know.
So ... Key party members want to talk about the economy .... a key GOP candidate pivots AWAY from economic issues, because it highlights Obama's strong suit ....
HAH ! ..... Their nides are so tightly wound in a bunch, they don't know if they're coming or going ....
Delightful ! ...
wiggs
(8,812 posts)favored by majority of americans. If you ask the public, issue by issue, how they stand you get huge majorities favoring the moderate or progressive position. This is despite round the clock pissing on anything except the Limbaugh/Hannity view of the world.
On the other hand, if you make the survey a question of party favorability then the result are more even. This is because of the last 30 years of polarization and misinformation.
It's been this way for a long time....dems have the issues but not the tactics, messaging, media infrastructure, and willingness to go low.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)As was said short/sweet in the post above: They got nothin'
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)The more we bring them up, the more we can push Republicans into going apeshit on the social issues and putting their positions on record, the more we win.
If they flip-flop on the social-issues, we can call them flip-floppers, and their fundie base will rebel. We win!
If they don't, they lose women voters, minority voters, friends of the GLBT community, etc. We win!
niyad
(132,446 posts)One main concern going forward, key Hill Republicans say, is to avoid falling into more social-issue debates,
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)That they're continuing to pretend otherwise only tips their hand, and it's a shockingly weak one.