General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAbout all these Sarah Palin threads lately:
Why are we paying that idiot the slightest bit of attention around here?
CrispyQ
(36,527 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Couldn't even finish that sentence. Nah, she's a professional troll.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)She needs to be shamed and mocked and exposed. Just the same for Glenn Beck and any others spewing psychotic rantings that smell of bigotry, anti intellectualism, and hate.
tina tron
(160 posts)spanone
(135,886 posts)Mike Daniels
(5,842 posts)What I don't understand are the networks that she constantly slams as part of the liberal media trying to cozy up to her (pretty much anyone other than FOX).
Maybe she gives a network that has her on the morning show a slight bump for that ratings period but I would imagine that bump disappears after she's off camera.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)shenmue
(38,506 posts)That's the heart of it.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)made a poor taste comparison virtually identical to one she made.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)But decided to ask anyway.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)she`s the gift that keeps on giving!
it`s like christmas every time she opens her mouth.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)in the comedy forum
This is the key to every politicians future, which channel discusses them. If we relegate her to the Comedy Channel and she gets much deserved derision there, then context provides a more imposing message than disagreement with her idiocy, making even those who agree with her begin to see her in a comedic context. So pile it on, but do it in the Humor forum, give her time of The Daily Show, then report as news that Palin is on the Daily Show again.
53tammy
(93 posts)Just because there is so much to be outraged about I would rather focus on lawmakers and policies of injustice or the environment.
spin
(17,493 posts)The_Commonist
(2,518 posts)Directing all that hatred towards her keeps us from turning on each other?
All right, maybe not.
thucythucy
(8,087 posts)their candidate for vice president of the United States only a half decade ago.
I disagree with those who say we should ignore her, and let her fade from national politics.
To the contrary: we should take every chance we get to remind Americans that this hopeless airhead, this bigoted, mean-spirited, clueless apparition of an American citizen, this quitter, this grifter, so unteachably certain in her ignorance of all things true to the American spirit, was chosen by Republicans as the VERY BEST they could come up with to replace the rapidly-aging John McCain should he be elected president and the need arise. THIS was the person they wanted one aged heartbeat away from the nuclear trigger. THIS was the person they wanted meeting foreign leaders, naming ambassadors, appointing judges, issuing executive orders, dispatching our military into harm's way, and otherwise serving as president of the United States should McCain's heart, lungs, liver, kidneys or brain give out.
Remind people of that whenever possible, and ask them with all seriousness and honesty to imagine a Palin presidency for real. Anyone who's been paying attention at all these past years should be shaken to the core by the very thought.
And then ask them: what makes you think today's Republicans are any better at judging character, or anything else for that matter, than they were five years ago?
Palin should be held up, again and again and again, as a reminder of all things Republican. She was, after all, one of their most exhalted leaders, and remains to this day the best possible representative--second perhaps only to Rush Limbaugh--of today's Republican Party.
I see Sarah Palin, and I say: you go girl! A Republican so toxic to the brand even Fox News decided to dump her!
Nope, I want her hanging around, getting in the news, spewing her nonsense for as long as possible. Hell, I want her campaigning for every Republican in sight.
She's the best thing to happen to Democrats since Herbert Hoover.
Mike Daniels
(5,842 posts)She was a non-entity at the 2012 convention and the Romney campaign kept her well beyond arms length..which is funny given they actively pursued Ted Nugent for an endorsement.
Even within the GOP the only GOP candidates that want her near them are those who are in a solidly GOP state and who are already shoo-ins for election. She's a serious liability in purple or moderate states as proven by her disasterous endorsement record for significant elections held in the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic parts of the country.
Everytime she appears at a RW freak-fest like CPAC the media coverage only reminds those who have a brain why this emotionally-arrested middle-aged "mean girl" is singularly unqualified to be allowed near any national office in the future.
She's a useful tool for regional purposes but I don't see the national organization ever allowing her to serve in anything resembling a national role again.
thucythucy
(8,087 posts)with your assessment of her role in the GOP. Even McCain staffers (or especially McCain staffers?) realize the bullet we all dodged when McCain lost the election. She is absolutely toxic to any Republican who isn't safely ensconced within the borders of TeaBagistan.
All the more reason for us Democrats to keep reminding the public of how abysmal a "public servant" she was--and what a terrible president she would have been.
A gift like this comes once in a half century. I'm in no hurry to discard it.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)An annoying little parasite, but difficult to ignore.