Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 01:53 PM Dec 2013

does any government have standing to arrest bush at Mandela's funeral?

or even make a credible threat of arresting him for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Iraq and Afghan Wars?

that would remind people that his crimes have gone unpunished, and remind his victims and him that we haven't forgotten.

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
does any government have standing to arrest bush at Mandela's funeral? (Original Post) yurbud Dec 2013 OP
if they want our presidential delegation to be bipartisan send Papa instead of baby bush yurbud Dec 2013 #1
No. No government is that stupid. nt hack89 Dec 2013 #2
but one is stupid enough to take the moral equivalent of Pol Pot to a Gandhi's funeral yurbud Dec 2013 #6
I am sure President Obama knows what he is doing. nt hack89 Dec 2013 #7
Oh how I wish. Terra Alta Dec 2013 #3
If so dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #4
Um...has the ICC issued a warrant I wasn't aware of? tritsofme Dec 2013 #10
They don't need to. dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #12
Yes, they do need to and they haven't. former9thward Dec 2013 #20
The closest analogy I can give you dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #24
No legal authority has ever issued a warrant. former9thward Dec 2013 #26
You understand much less about the ICC than you think tritsofme Dec 2013 #29
No entity of legal authority or person Ranchemp. Dec 2013 #30
That would possibly discredit the memory of Mandela frazzled Dec 2013 #5
Since you've mentioned the 1995 World Cup dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #8
did Declerks body count number in the six to seven figures? yurbud Dec 2013 #14
No US President is going to allow one of his predecessors, regardless of party, to be arrested, Lurks Often Dec 2013 #9
Unless that prez gives a shit about justice. polichick Dec 2013 #13
Unless that President wants to end up in jail himself Lurks Often Dec 2013 #15
Bush did it more obviously and arguably with the least real justification yurbud Dec 2013 #19
Doesn't change what I posted, Lurks Often Dec 2013 #28
I agree--which doesn't exonerate them or Bush yurbud Dec 2013 #32
And what about President Obama? Lurks Often Dec 2013 #37
Yes, but not in the same league as Bush yurbud Dec 2013 #40
It's sickening. Pres. Obama had the world behind him... polichick Dec 2013 #21
Being a US President is the world's most exclusive club n/t Lurks Often Dec 2013 #27
So covering for war crimes is just part of the club rules? polichick Dec 2013 #34
My posts have been very clear Lurks Often Dec 2013 #36
Heaven forbid someone suggest that a U.S. prez NOT break int'l law... polichick Dec 2013 #38
That wasn't what the OP was about and I wouldn't get your hopes up about it happening. n/t Lurks Often Dec 2013 #39
Bush has got some weird thing with Africa tina tron Dec 2013 #11
you just gave the most persuasive counter argument: yurbud Dec 2013 #18
VIDEO: BUSH AFRICA DANCE yurbud Dec 2013 #41
Does it have to do with his HIV/AIDS programs there? polichick Dec 2013 #23
He's done far more good for Africa than he ever did for America. WilliamPitt Dec 2013 #25
If that country wants erased from the map, sure. n/t 1awake Dec 2013 #16
You bet. Ours does. Vox Moi Dec 2013 #17
It's a disgrace - and also strips us of even the pretense of moral authority. polichick Dec 2013 #22
Would be nice. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #31
Its an extremely unlikley event given that Blair is going too. dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #33
I doubt it. mstinamotorcity2 Dec 2013 #35

Terra Alta

(5,158 posts)
3. Oh how I wish.
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:01 PM
Dec 2013

Nothing would make me happier than to see Dumbya have to answer for the atrocities he committed.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
4. If so
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:04 PM
Dec 2013

would be for the crime of aggression which is covered by the ICC. As such any government, or its citizens, which recognise the ICC could arrest him.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
24. The closest analogy I can give you
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:33 PM
Dec 2013

was the threat in the UK of our citizens arresting visiting Israeli dignitaries, quite rightly , for either the same crime or that of collective punishment. The law was amended here to lock that out.

Soon as the ICC declares a subject to be either a war crime or a crime against humanity it covers all offenders.

former9thward

(31,997 posts)
26. No legal authority has ever issued a warrant.
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:40 PM
Dec 2013

There have been groups and individuals calling for it but they have no legal standing. It would be like someone on DU going up and trying to arrest him. Not going to happen.

tritsofme

(17,377 posts)
29. You understand much less about the ICC than you think
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:45 PM
Dec 2013

Might be good to spend some time on Wikipedia or something.

 

Ranchemp.

(1,991 posts)
30. No entity of legal authority or person
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:56 PM
Dec 2013

has issued a warrant, there are plenty of individuals calling for the arrest of Booosh, but they have no legal standing to make the arrest except maybe a citizens arrest, and that would be iffy in a foreign country.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
5. That would possibly discredit the memory of Mandela
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:06 PM
Dec 2013

After all, here was a man who resisted taking action against the formerly apartheid-supporting De Klerk and even made him Deputy President in an effort at national reconciliation.

Mandela personally met with senior figures of the apartheid regime, including Hendrik Verwoerd's widow Betsie Schoombie and the lawyer Percy Yutar; emphasising personal forgiveness and reconciliation, he announced that "courageous people do not fear forgiving, for the sake of peace."[236] He encouraged black South Africans to get behind the previously hated national rugby team, the Springboks, as South Africa hosted the 1995 Rugby World Cup. After the Springboks won an epic final over New Zealand, Mandela presented the trophy to captain Francois Pienaar, an Afrikaner, wearing a Springbok shirt with Pienaar's own number 6 on the back. This was widely seen as a major step in the reconciliation of white and black South Africans; as de Klerk later put it, "Mandela won the hearts of millions of white rugby fans."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Mandela


dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
8. Since you've mentioned the 1995 World Cup
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:12 PM
Dec 2013

the entire match is on Youtube.

Other than that the film Invictus with Matt Damon covers the whole story - lovely film.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
9. No US President is going to allow one of his predecessors, regardless of party, to be arrested,
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:14 PM
Dec 2013

detained or otherwise taken into custody because it would set a precedent that would allow them to be taken into custody.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
15. Unless that President wants to end up in jail himself
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:20 PM
Dec 2013

or are you ignoring that an increase in drone strikes or the failure to have left Afghanistan is almost certainly illegal under international law as well.

I think you'd be hard pressed to find a US President since (and including FDR) who hasn't broken international law at one point or another.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
28. Doesn't change what I posted,
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:44 PM
Dec 2013

for that matter any member of Congress that authorized the use of force OR voted to fund Afghanistan would legally be considered an accessory.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
37. And what about President Obama?
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 03:57 PM
Dec 2013

since he has continued Bush's actions and in some cases escalated them, do you consider him a war criminal as well?

polichick

(37,152 posts)
21. It's sickening. Pres. Obama had the world behind him...
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:25 PM
Dec 2013

He could have done so much to clean up this corrupt gov't but he's too much part of the club.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
36. My posts have been very clear
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 03:55 PM
Dec 2013

a US President that allows a predecessor to be arrested, sets a precedent that will allow HIM to be arrested as well.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
38. Heaven forbid someone suggest that a U.S. prez NOT break int'l law...
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 03:59 PM
Dec 2013

which is what would be required in order to avoid being arrested.

 

tina tron

(160 posts)
11. Bush has got some weird thing with Africa
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:14 PM
Dec 2013

It's like he uses the whole continent for PR purposes. I've noticed this trend.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
18. you just gave the most persuasive counter argument:
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:22 PM
Dec 2013

the possibility of video of Bush dancing with black people in Africa again.

Vox Moi

(546 posts)
17. You bet. Ours does.
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 02:22 PM
Dec 2013

Nuremberg or Guantanamo?
Poetic justice would indicate kidnap, torture and force-feeding at Guantanamo.
A trial would be more in tune with the Rule of Law.

Lots of people died in Bush's war of choice. Lots of people died making the trials at Nuremberg possible. Our failure to hold Bush and friends accountable is a complete disgrace.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
33. Its an extremely unlikley event given that Blair is going too.
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 03:03 PM
Dec 2013

Blair doesn't travel anywhere now under expert advice to any countries where he would be liable arrest.

Nothwithstanding that anything is possible given that the turnout by their public will be unprecedented and security is foreseen to be complete nightmare.

mstinamotorcity2

(1,451 posts)
35. I doubt it.
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 03:13 PM
Dec 2013

Dubya would never risk going to a place where he could be arrested. It has been floated that he should be charged for War Crimes and crimes against Humanity. But if any President were going to be held accountable for crimes against humanity, Charity begins at home and then spreads abroad. America would have to stand trial for crimes against the Native American and work her way down. America will never answer to her ugliness. Ever. Or maybe I will say America won't answer in the fashion that is appropriate. To those who live with the legacy of pain, it kind of rubs you the wrong way when you hear people say well we have to put all that negative stuff behind us and move forward. Funny how people say move forward when you are treated no differently than the past. The same soup just warmed over in a different bowl. Mandela was a true Prince. A Prince in Deed and Honor. He is a hard example to follow. But I am truly glad he set the bar. It lets us know that the true goal of tolerance, peace and forgiveness is a doable thing. Arrest Dubya, we can only Dream. but don't stay in the dream bubble too long, you will run into a repug, its where they live

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»does any government have ...