Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 09:36 PM Dec 2013

27million lottery winner dies broke 12 yrs later after insane spending spree

Too bad someone didn't control his money for him


http://rollingout.com/obituaries/27-million-lottery-winner-lived-feces-died-broke-12-years-hitting-jackpot/



David Lee Edwards blew $27 million and died broke 12 years after hitting the lottery. According to a report by the Daily Mail, Edwards, 58, died alone in a hospice on Nov. 30.

In 2001, Edwards hit the lottery during a time when he was unemployed while living in South Florida. But soon as he got his first check, Edwards went on an insane spending spree.

He bought a $1.6 million house in Palm Beach Gardens; paid $1.9 million for a Lear Jet; bought another home for $600,000; bought three losing race horses; invested $4.5 million in a fiber optics company and limo business; he paid his ex-wife $500,000 for custody of his teenage daughter; bought a $200,000 Lamborghini Diablo and a multitude of other cars; bought a $35,000 Hummer golf cart for his daughter; paid for a $159,000 ring; and paid $30,000 for a plasma screen TV.

In the first three months of winning the lottery, Edwards spent $3 million. At the end of his first year as a lottery winner, he had spent $12 million. By 2006, he had spent nearly all of his money.

Edwards, a felon before winning the lottery, continued to struggle with drug addiction after losing  all of his money. He lost both of his homes and was forced to live in a storage unit that was infested with human feces.

Edwards’ wife drove him to his home state of Kentucky where he lived in a hospice until he passed away.

---_---

But Edwards also had a drug problem. He and Shawna contracted hepatitis from sharing tainted needles, while she had an Oxycontin addiction. The two had multiple run-ins with authorities.

Within five years, he was broke. And once the money dried up, Shawna left him and remarried.

Edwards tried to do right by his winnings. Shortly after falling into his fortune, he had vowed to spend it right, to make it last for Shawna and his daughter.

He even hired a financial adviser, James Gibbs. Gibbs invested some of the winnings in stocks and bonds. But Edwards sold them all off.
http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2013/12/david_lee_edwards_powerball_wi.php
"If he followed my advice," Gibbs told New Times in 2007, "he'd be pulling in about $85,000 a month for the rest of his life."

On Tuesday, Edwards' daughter, Tiffani Lee Edwards, said that her father had died penniless and alone. And that he had left her nothing, not even a life insurance policy.
89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
27million lottery winner dies broke 12 yrs later after insane spending spree (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 OP
The house I can understand but the rest of it ...there was no "how much....for THAT?!?!?" underpants Dec 2013 #1
race horses are also very expensive to keep Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #2
$27 million is nowhere near enough wealth to justify a private jet. Nye Bevan Dec 2013 #3
Had he followed his financial adviser's advice, I don't see why it wouldn't have been justifiable. ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #5
companies own jets pipoman Dec 2013 #9
Well, I am certainly un-qualified to know, lol. Perhaps I won't get one after all =). n/t ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #10
it is very expensive... awoke_in_2003 Dec 2013 #14
If I won $27 million I would definitely spring for the JetBlue "even more space" seats Nye Bevan Dec 2013 #18
either that or charter. nt awoke_in_2003 Dec 2013 #20
note to self - no jets (If i win the lottery) Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #19
a jet is something you charter TeamPooka Dec 2013 #43
He only had 27 million. After the jet he had 25 million. Maraya1969 Dec 2013 #30
The $27.1 million was what he won AFTER taxes. Jenoch Dec 2013 #38
No, he would NOT have been out 8 million after 5 years, Tanuki Dec 2013 #59
Yes but people do not understand that basic concept. I understand Maraya1969 Dec 2013 #86
with the $1.9 million that he spent on the jet hfojvt Dec 2013 #31
Nope. Landing fees will eat that right up. MissB Dec 2013 #44
If you HAD bought a private jet, then you would not have had pnwmom Dec 2013 #74
What a moron. nt greytdemocrat Dec 2013 #4
30,000 for a plasma TV? bluestateguy Dec 2013 #6
2001 price, probably got taken by the seller also Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #8
There's missing info in this posting lordsummerisle Dec 2013 #7
after winning the money, he went on big drug binge with wife, got hepatitis Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #12
The broke, penniless and living-in-a-storage-unit part probably did it jmowreader Dec 2013 #67
Hepatitis B or C? magical thyme Dec 2013 #69
do people not consider things like property tax, maintanence costs etc ? JI7 Dec 2013 #11
"Too bad someone didn't control his money for him" TheCowsCameHome Dec 2013 #13
yep, i'm sure he got taken Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #16
On the other hand....... A HERETIC I AM Dec 2013 #21
had spent a good part of his pre lottery life in prison, didnt get the chance to develop financia Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #23
But as the article indicates, he had an advisor that had his portfolio set up.... A HERETIC I AM Dec 2013 #25
It was all his choice... Decaffeinated Dec 2013 #36
Exactly. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #63
He hired a financial advisor like everyone says to jmowreader Dec 2013 #68
The benefit of a financial advisor is only as good as . . . markpkessinger Dec 2013 #88
Everything I would want to buy wouldn't cost me more than $1 million. hobbit709 Dec 2013 #15
According to the Beatles, money can't buy me what I want Art_from_Ark Dec 2013 #56
It definitely lets you look in more places for it and helps you stay in it jmowreader Dec 2013 #70
Probably about $25k for me would do it. Kaleva Dec 2013 #83
27 million dollars is a very large amount of money, SheilaT Dec 2013 #17
from the pic, it looks like he had his house professionally decorated. that can get pricey Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #22
I could live incredibly well on $85,000 a year hfojvt Dec 2013 #32
He could have gotten that A MONTH XemaSab Dec 2013 #40
With a bit of frugal penny-pinching, I think I could probably get by on $85K/mo struggle4progress Dec 2013 #72
Coupons, yo XemaSab Dec 2013 #80
Yep! With smart use of coupons, I think I'd actually be able to get 3 million rolls of toilet paper struggle4progress Dec 2013 #82
I saw a piece about him on a lotto millionaires Packerowner740 Dec 2013 #24
Not surpring. Most people who win a substantial amount of money in the lottery end up worse off Chakab Dec 2013 #26
Is it really a majority? Mariana Dec 2013 #35
Do have a link to support your claim? Jenoch Dec 2013 #39
Here's a place to start with: CFLDem Dec 2013 #45
There were some anecdotal stories in your link, Jenoch Dec 2013 #46
Since when is science anecdotal? CFLDem Dec 2013 #47
You said 'most'. I never saw that word used in your links. Jenoch Dec 2013 #48
No I didn't. Chakab said most. CFLDem Dec 2013 #49
Do you have any links with information to support your claim? Jenoch Dec 2013 #50
It does have this: muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #66
On reading the research (link included) it appears that lottery winners do... yawnmaster Dec 2013 #55
Yeah that's pretty much the gist of it. CFLDem Dec 2013 #58
That's why I'd prefer 100 $1M winners than One $100M winner dickthegrouch Dec 2013 #71
How often do you buy lottery Jenoch Dec 2013 #73
Rarely dickthegrouch Dec 2013 #75
The odds are always so long that it doesn't Jenoch Dec 2013 #78
But it took the billh58 Dec 2013 #27
what an ugly ugly man. Schema Thing Dec 2013 #28
? I read a little more about him; he was a sometime drug addict but apparently was very El_Johns Dec 2013 #33
You can use basic mathematics when you win this type of money. Maraya1969 Dec 2013 #29
Apparently his math ohheckyeah Dec 2013 #37
OH lol. Well at least I have the idea right! Maraya1969 Dec 2013 #85
It looked like something I would do.... ohheckyeah Dec 2013 #87
$100 million makes you minimally rich; $1 Billion makes you actually rich. FarCenter Dec 2013 #34
ORLY? XemaSab Dec 2013 #41
Sure, but I'm not into private jets, multiple mansions, or plunging into tech startup investments FarCenter Dec 2013 #60
This is the funniest damn thing I've read on DU all year. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #53
It would have been slightly harder for Mr Edwards to blow through $1 billion, I suppose. n/t lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #62
I used to work closely with a state lottery in the area of public relations. Jenoch Dec 2013 #42
Maybe those who play the lottery already are self selecting exboyfil Dec 2013 #51
The 'lottery' doesn't need to use Jenoch Dec 2013 #52
. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #64
My observation is that lottery ticket buying is proportionate to... JHB Dec 2013 #65
Well, he may have ended up in the storage bin 6 years earlier if he hadn't of won. eom yawnmaster Dec 2013 #54
The story originated in the Daily Mail. Providing fodder for looking down on others is what they do. Nine Dec 2013 #57
But it's insulting to the poor to suggest that some of them have counterproductive spending habits. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #61
Out of all the things mentioned that he purchased, narnian60 Dec 2013 #76
lol d_b Dec 2013 #79
So what? Why not spend all the money? cthulu2016 Dec 2013 #77
But it was a fun ride for a while... ileus Dec 2013 #81
27-million-lottery-winner-lived-feces-died-broke-12-years-hitting-jackpot/ Number23 Dec 2013 #84
All across America people snort up bigger inheritances than that. LeftyMom Dec 2013 #89

underpants

(196,495 posts)
1. The house I can understand but the rest of it ...there was no "how much....for THAT?!?!?"
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 09:44 PM
Dec 2013

A jet doesn't come without housing and a crew.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
3. $27 million is nowhere near enough wealth to justify a private jet.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 09:53 PM
Dec 2013

Just fly first class, commercial. And the racehorses? Insane.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
5. Had he followed his financial adviser's advice, I don't see why it wouldn't have been justifiable.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:00 PM
Dec 2013

I mean, I would certainly do that if I had $85,000 every month. That's plenty to maintain a jet and actually use it to travel the world.

Please elaborate on why it wouldn't be prudent or justifiable.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
9. companies own jets
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:36 PM
Dec 2013

Often shared by a group of companies..Individuals...even extremely wealthy, usually charter or buy the equivalent of time shares..jets are enormous money sponges..

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
10. Well, I am certainly un-qualified to know, lol. Perhaps I won't get one after all =). n/t
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:41 PM
Dec 2013
 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
14. it is very expensive...
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:58 PM
Dec 2013

I work in flight training. We simulate business jets like Gulfstreams and Falcons. Putting just one pilot through a one week recurrent course (annual renewal every year) is $40k- and these things use two pilots. A simple two or three position switch could cost $2k or more (the most I have seen so far was $12k. It is a ridiculously expensive thing to own.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
18. If I won $27 million I would definitely spring for the JetBlue "even more space" seats
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:17 PM
Dec 2013

at $40 extra a pop.

Maraya1969

(23,497 posts)
30. He only had 27 million. After the jet he had 25 million.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:55 PM
Dec 2013

85,000 a month is 1,020,000 a year. After 5 years you would be out 8 million.

Plus he actually did not start out with 27 million. A big chunk of it was taken away by taxes.

Can you see now?

These things cost more money than we realize.

Tanuki

(16,447 posts)
59. No, he would NOT have been out 8 million after 5 years,
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 09:29 AM
Dec 2013

because the way the financial planner wanted to set things up, that $85,000 a month would have come from interest on the investment, without ever touching the principal. He could have lived splendidly throughout his lifetime, and left a huge estate to his heirs when he died.

Maraya1969

(23,497 posts)
86. Yes but people do not understand that basic concept. I understand
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 01:13 AM
Dec 2013

that I forget about the link to the principal and the $85k and the fact that once you start spending things worth a million bucks or so your monthly income will go down.

But these people look at money as chunks of "what I can afford". I saw it with a friend who received $345,000 from a settlement. Sure some financial adviser had had set up CD's but she would just take the CD's out when they were due and spend them. She went through that money in about 2 years.

I know you know how to handle money. It just amazes me how other people don't.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
31. with the $1.9 million that he spent on the jet
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:57 PM
Dec 2013

he could get 380 flights that cost $5,000. I mean, I don't fly a lot, but when I went to Europe in 2001 seems to me that round trip Minneapolois to Stuttgart was less than $1,500

With his own jet, he is going to need to
1) hire a pilot
2) pay for fuel
3) pay for maintenance
4) pay for storage

With those costs, even ONE flight to Stuttgart might cost more than a commercial ticket.

MissB

(16,344 posts)
44. Nope. Landing fees will eat that right up.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:00 AM
Dec 2013

My bro flies a private jet for a living. He's discussed what his employer spends on fees to land at foreign airports. It's serious coin, and $85k isn't going to cover a jet-setting lifestyle.

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
74. If you HAD bought a private jet, then you would not have had
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:47 PM
Dec 2013

the 85,000 a month. Buying the jet would have reduced your income.

lordsummerisle

(4,653 posts)
7. There's missing info in this posting
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:23 PM
Dec 2013

Just because he lost all of his money, why did he have to die? He was a drug addict, would he have died anyway at that point had he not won the money? What did he die of, a broken heart?
And really, $30K for a TV...?

 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
12. after winning the money, he went on big drug binge with wife, got hepatitis
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:51 PM
Dec 2013

Which isn't a death sentence, not sure exactly why he died

jmowreader

(53,194 posts)
67. The broke, penniless and living-in-a-storage-unit part probably did it
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:47 PM
Dec 2013

You ever notice these kinds of stories always pop up when one of the national lotteries crosses the $250 million threshold? Come on...bury a big chunk in the back yard, buy a reasonably-priced house and Do Not Become A Drug Addict!

JI7

(93,616 posts)
11. do people not consider things like property tax, maintanence costs etc ?
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:45 PM
Dec 2013

all those actors, corporate execs etc who get these things have money that keeps coming in.

winning the lottery is a one time thing unless they are lucky enough to win it again.



TheCowsCameHome

(40,270 posts)
13. "Too bad someone didn't control his money for him"
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 10:57 PM
Dec 2013

Others did, obviously. The airplane salesman, the car salesmen, the TV salesman, the....

He certainly didn't.

 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
23. had spent a good part of his pre lottery life in prison, didnt get the chance to develop financia
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:27 PM
Dec 2013

Financial savvy

A HERETIC I AM

(24,876 posts)
25. But as the article indicates, he had an advisor that had his portfolio set up....
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:35 PM
Dec 2013

so that it would generate $85 grand a month!

But that wasn't enough.

He sold off the assets contrary to good advice because he wanted to buy all the stuff he bought.

It is true, as another poster mentioned above, that the majority of big money lottery winners in this country declare bankruptcy within a few years. In fact, it is 3 out of 5 do so within 5 years.

But that circumstance can't be blamed on the guy who wrote him up for the jet, or the guy at the register when he spent thirty grand on a TV. Some people are just too stupid to get good advice or when they do, follow it.

A few years ago there were two large (100 million plus) Powerball jackpots won back to back, about 6 weeks apart.
The first one was won in Ohio and the people didn't come forward for weeks. When they did, the money was collected by an attorney in the name of an obscure investment trust.

The second one was won by a young 20something man in Louisiana, if memory serves. He was on Good Morning America THE NEXT DAY!

Of the two, who do you think will be broke first?

 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
36. It was all his choice...
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:28 AM
Dec 2013

If you have to blame someone put it squarely where it belongs.... On him with his bad choices and drug use...

jmowreader

(53,194 posts)
68. He hired a financial advisor like everyone says to
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:52 PM
Dec 2013

You have to wonder why the jet broker didn't try talking him out of it; they know how expensive jets are and that he really couldn't afford one with a lousy $27m lump sum.

markpkessinger

(8,912 posts)
88. The benefit of a financial advisor is only as good as . . .
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 01:21 AM
Dec 2013

. . . his or her own competence combined with the client's willingness to abide by the advisor's advice.

jmowreader

(53,194 posts)
70. It definitely lets you look in more places for it and helps you stay in it
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:04 PM
Dec 2013

Most marital fights are over money, or at least start that way. Most divorces too.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
17. 27 million dollars is a very large amount of money,
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:16 PM
Dec 2013

but it's not an infinite amount.

A very large number of lottery winners go broke within a very few years. It's quite sad. They go on spending sprees, have no sense that there is a limit to the money, and just do everything wrong.

$85,000 a month for the rest of my life. Wow. I could live incredibly well on that.

As for the jet, buying one was a really stupid idea. I suppose if you don't want to mingle the hoi-polloi, you could afford to do charters whenever you want to fly somewhere, or do one of those time share things, where you own some fraction of a small jet.

 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
22. from the pic, it looks like he had his house professionally decorated. that can get pricey
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:23 PM
Dec 2013

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
32. I could live incredibly well on $85,000 a year
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:02 AM
Dec 2013

Heck I'd even love $20,000 a year that didn't require me to work my tail off.

I am sitting here now, with my legs throbbing, needing to go back to work in another hour or so.

struggle4progress

(126,151 posts)
82. Yep! With smart use of coupons, I think I'd actually be able to get 3 million rolls of toilet paper
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 10:25 PM
Dec 2013

with that monthly budget

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
26. Not surpring. Most people who win a substantial amount of money in the lottery end up worse off
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:37 PM
Dec 2013

financially in the long run.

Mariana

(15,626 posts)
35. Is it really a majority?
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:26 AM
Dec 2013

My husband's sister and her husband won a lotto, with some others, and their share was 2 to 3 million. Five years later they were broke, up to their eyeballs in debt, and getting divorced. The thing is, no one in the family knows where the hell the money went. There were no silly spending sprees or anything like that, and they continued to work. The money was just gone, and they wouldn't tell anyone what happened to it. I suspect gambling, but I'll probably never know for sure.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
46. There were some anecdotal stories in your link,
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:20 AM
Dec 2013

but I saw no hard evidence to support your claim that MOST large jackpot lottery winners end up with no money.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
47. Since when is science anecdotal?
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:27 AM
Dec 2013
According to a 2010 study by researchers at Vanderbilt University, the University of Kentucky and the University of Pittsburgh, the more money you win in the lottery, the more likely you are to end up bankrupt.


 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
49. No I didn't. Chakab said most.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:48 AM
Dec 2013

However winning the lotto does double your chances of going bankrupt.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,211 posts)
66. It does have this:
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:11 PM
Dec 2013
Similar research from the National Endowment for Financial Education estimates that 70 percent of people who had unexpectedly come into large sums of money ended up broke within seven years.


That's 'most', but is a bit vague - "people who had unexpectedly come into large sums of money", and we don't know how the 'estimate' was arrived at. it seems to come from here:

A R E T H E R E
D A N G E R S
to Making Impulsive Decisions?
There can be. It is estimated that up to 70% of all
people who suddenly receive large amounts of
money will lose that money within a few years.

http://www.smartaboutmoney.org/Portals/0/ResourceCenter/FinancialWindfall.pdf


But that gives no idea of who did the estimating, or how, and actually says "lose that money", not "go broke". Plus it's so sloppily produced that they repeat that an other sections, cutting them in mid-sentence - twice. I'm not convinced this came from any proper research.

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
55. On reading the research (link included) it appears that lottery winners do...
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:58 AM
Dec 2013

have a higher rate of declaring bankruptcy in 3 to 5 years, but it is only an increase over the general population, and it doesn't say that most or even near most winners have that problem.

I've only quickly looked at the paper, so if I'm wrong, please let me know.

http://www.econ.pitt.edu/papers/Mark_lottery.pdf

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
58. Yeah that's pretty much the gist of it.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 08:36 AM
Dec 2013

It says the chance of bankruptcy is 2% of all lottery winners per year but that the risk goes up with the size of the winnings.

dickthegrouch

(4,527 posts)
71. That's why I'd prefer 100 $1M winners than One $100M winner
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:05 PM
Dec 2013

I understand that HUGE prizes are far more sellable, but it would be far better to have smaller prizes going to a large number of people.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
73. How often do you buy lottery
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:26 PM
Dec 2013

tickets for Powerball, Mega Millions or whatever jackpot game is sold in your state?

dickthegrouch

(4,527 posts)
75. Rarely
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:55 PM
Dec 2013

Precisely because the odds are too long.
I'd buy more frequently if I stood a better chance of winning a smaller amount.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
78. The odds are always so long that it doesn't
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:12 PM
Dec 2013

really matter all that much. People ffequently say they would rather a hunfred people each win a million dollars instead of one person winning a hundred ion dollars. The Minnesota Lottery heard that wish and created a game called 'Daily Millions' but it did not do well because not enough people bought tickets. People said they want smaller jackpots at better odds, but then they did not play. I'm sure other states made similar attempts with similar results.

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
33. ? I read a little more about him; he was a sometime drug addict but apparently was very
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:03 AM
Dec 2013

generous to friends and family with his windfall.

I don't know why you call him ugly.

Maraya1969

(23,497 posts)
29. You can use basic mathematics when you win this type of money.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 11:49 PM
Dec 2013

If you win 27 million and spend 3 million then you only have 25 million. Then if you spend 5 more million you only have 20 million. If you then spend 10 million you only have 10 million left out of 27 million.

I think people forget to count zeros.

A real sad tale though. It was his addiction that was killing him even before the money.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
37. Apparently his math
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:33 AM
Dec 2013

wasn't any better than yours.

27 million - 3 million is not 25 million but 24 million

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
34. $100 million makes you minimally rich; $1 Billion makes you actually rich.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:12 AM
Dec 2013

With $100 million, you have about $2 million after taxes each year to spend.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
41. ORLY?
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:43 AM
Dec 2013

Tell me that if 20 million fell in your lap tomorrow, you wouldn't be set for life.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
60. Sure, but I'm not into private jets, multiple mansions, or plunging into tech startup investments
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:52 PM
Dec 2013

I wouldn't even buy a $30,000 flat screen TV.

But if you buy a jet, multiple estates, racehorses, etc. you have to have a serious cash flow each year to maintain and operate them.

You also need to hire pilots, landscapers, house staff, stable hands, etc. as well as accountant, attorney, and a manager. Your payroll goes up pretty fast.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
53. This is the funniest damn thing I've read on DU all year.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 05:02 AM
Dec 2013

I'm sorry, Jeeves, you can't join our club... you're only Minimally Rich, what with the 100 Mil.


Ah, the problems of the Minimally Rich.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
42. I used to work closely with a state lottery in the area of public relations.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 12:44 AM
Dec 2013

What I learned about people who won the large amounts of money (several million dollars at once) was that if a winner was basically a good person, the money would make them better. If a Powerball winner was basically a not so good person, it woild make them worse. The large sum of money would magnify their personality traits they already possess. Saying that a lottery winner will always lose all of their money and be destitute is not factual.

exboyfil

(18,359 posts)
51. Maybe those who play the lottery already are self selecting
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:42 AM
Dec 2013

Math challenged with magical thinking. That type of behavior is then magnified by their winnings. Also dog bites man vs. man bites dog. Those who live quietly with their winnings don't make the media. Those who make a splash and lose it are a story.

I spend $2/wk on the lottery in an office pool. I do it for the camaraderie of a shared goal. I would never think of buying a lottery ticket on my own (kind of like drinking alone in my opinion).

I would love the chance to control my baser nature though.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
52. The 'lottery' doesn't need to use
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:18 AM
Dec 2013

media reports.

I infrequently buy a lottery ticket. The long odds mostly take care of it for me.

I remember that the only time the state lottery whom I used to work with only had one winner with whom they did not have a news conference. The winner complained that to get his $2M ($l00,000/year for 20 years) he had to go to 'nigger town' (Minneapolis) to get his money.

JHB

(38,213 posts)
65. My observation is that lottery ticket buying is proportionate to...
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:52 PM
Dec 2013

...the "I hate my f***ing job" factor.

Nine

(1,741 posts)
57. The story originated in the Daily Mail. Providing fodder for looking down on others is what they do.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 07:46 AM
Dec 2013

The guy made mistakes. A lot of them. He was an addict with self-destructive tendencies before he won that money, and those issues didn't disappear after he got the money. The very wealthy can be plagued with drug problems like the rest of us, and buying all that junk was probably also related to the addictive part of his psyche. And the homeless often have problems that go deeper than just poverty. Many of them probably had some measure of financial stability at some point in their lives, but untreated mental health issues, including addiction, is typically a good path to financial ruin.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
61. But it's insulting to the poor to suggest that some of them have counterproductive spending habits.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:32 PM
Dec 2013

This case study shows definitively that for some people, literally no amount of money is enough to mitigate inability to budget and spend rationally.

For some, the cure for poverty isn't just more money.

narnian60

(3,510 posts)
76. Out of all the things mentioned that he purchased,
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:05 PM
Dec 2013

the thing that bugs me the most is the Hummer golfcart.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
77. So what? Why not spend all the money?
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:07 PM
Dec 2013

I think the lottery is idiotic, and government hostility toward the people, but from the perspective of a winner... yeah. Spend up all the money. Whatever.

That is the dream being marketed.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
84. 27-million-lottery-winner-lived-feces-died-broke-12-years-hitting-jackpot/
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 11:25 PM
Dec 2013

That is the most bizarre URL I've ever seen.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
89. All across America people snort up bigger inheritances than that.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 01:23 AM
Dec 2013

Oddly enough that's rarely news.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»27million lottery winner ...