General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn Case You Missed This Nugget From Snowden's Letter To Brazil...
And that's a very powerful statement. It's one that every person who hears about NSA spying ought to understand. This is not about terrorism. This is about the U.S. empire, U.S. power, U.S. hegemony, probably an increase in the spying as the U.S. empire is on the decline and it has a different world to compete in than it did after the Second World War or after the collapse of the Soviet Union. So that's the third point.
From: http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=11227
From the letter...
The letter in full: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/17/edward-snowden-letter-brazilian-people
for truth
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)But then Snowden didn't object to it when that silly White Texan was in office!
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)He hates silly black Hawaiians. That was his whole motivation.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but sings a different tune when the first Black guy is....
If it walks and quacks like a duck...
Uncle Joe
(58,354 posts)Sometimes people don't make major life altering decisions in a snap, it takes time for the dawning of realization to take place.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)or should be shot in the balls as Snowden did?
Uncle Joe
(58,354 posts)as to whether they're a hero or not.
I'm against capital punishment but you never answered my question.
"Do you believe that Snowden believes that Obama will be President for life?"
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)from the real problem? Do you support the strong armed authoritarian state? If so, how can you claim to be "politically liberal"??
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Snowden...they sure do defend his honor vigorously....
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the spurious attacks by conservatives. Conservatives love strong, authoritarian states and spit on those that speak out for freedom and liberty.
The reason conservatives attack whistle-blowers, is because they dont like to upset the big daddy authoritarian leaders, like Clapper and Alexander. Therefore, they attack the messenger, because they cant deal with the message. The message that shakes their comfortable world of denial.
You imply that Snowden is racist. Even if he is racist, that doesnt excuse the NSA from violating our Constitutional rights.
Those that would detract us from investigating violations of the Constitution, align themselves with our enemy.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Yeah REAAAAALLLL open minded!
Funny you seem to think that anyone who opposes Snowden MUST be a Conservative...even though you know many who have NEVER voted for a Republican or a Conservative or spouted Conservative talking points somehow must be one...without any evidence other than not being a Snowden fanboy!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)nice strawman.
"Oppose Snowden". What does that even mean? Snowden pulled the curtain back on the NSA. If you "oppose" that, I would love to hear your rationalizations.
Again you are trying to put words into my mouth because you cant respond to what I do say.
Here's what I think: Those that disparage whistle-blowers do so because they support the corporations or authoritarian state. I think that those that disparage Snowden specifically, do so because they cant deal with the information that possibly their "god-like" devotion to the authoritarians like Clapper and Alexander is misplaced and that they are not looking out for out best interests.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I'll cue the Jeopardy theme song while I wait for you to think of one...
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)racist. It is simply a distraction from investigating the NSA.
Your loyalty to the NSA is weird for a supposedly "politically liberal".
Conservatives hate whistle-blowers.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)just because you THINK Snowden is not just another Libertarian racist...doesn't make it so...
Oh yeah and not JUST another Libertarian Racist...buy a Hypocrite too! He thought that people who have done what he did under George W Bush should be shot in the balls. Perhaps that's what makes him the coward that he is!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)A LIBERTARIAN RACIST. I said it has nothing to do with the issue of whether the NSA is violating our Constitutional rights.
I give up trying to discuss with you.
We are in a class war and you seem to choose the side of the 1%.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)what you think I "seem to choose" is just your imagination....I think snowden is a hypocritical, racist Libertarian coward. And I have the evidence to back it up based on his statements...I don't "seem to think" it....I know it.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I find that the NSA transgression and Ed Snowden are not synonymous...I can seperate the two issues...why can't you?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)He may be all the things you claim to know for a fact. (I always discount arguments from anyone that claims that they know the facts) You only know what Bill O'Reilly told you. Your stance is the same as the Republicans. You hate Snowden and worship Clapper and Alexander. But even if he is a racist, what does that have to do with the NSA?
The main issue isnt that Snowden is a racist (as you claim to know for a fact) it's that the NSA may be taking great liberties with our security.
Those that vilify Snowden side with the conservatives and the authoritarian 1%.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)this is where you go off the rails and why your defense is sooooo strange. You cannot seperated Snowden FROM the NSA....yet you will say it is not ABOUT Snowden. Incongruous.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I'm not going anywhere...I support Democrats not Libertarians...
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Centrists like Clinton that are in bed with Wall Street, love the Patriot Act and domestic spying.
We are in a class war, and you choose the wrong side.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Conservatives and Republicans and Libertarians are the wrong side....I am none of those.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)just like they have on the Right. That's a different perspective isn't it?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)David Sirota speaks to those that still are determined to kill the messenger:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101681115
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)You think everyone who disagrees with you is a Republican.....
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)that he is just a racist Libertarian...
Supports Rand Paul
Hates Social Security
And a Gun humping NRA supporter...
What are the chances he is not also just another racist with an axe to grind?
If he doesn't matter....why do so many attempt to defend him from the fact that he is a racist Libertarian?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Maturing rapidly, thanks to events....
...Something I think that the Snowden attackers will never do...(mature, or reach 29 without somebody taking them out for being sanctimonious assholes).
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)are you worshipping an adult or a child?
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)your certainly like your boxes. Broad-stroke stereotypes that make it oh, so easy for you to draw specious correlations. Pulling the "racist" card every time someone does something you don't like is weak.
Supporting Rand Paul makes someone pretty foolish - but not necessarily racist.
Hating Social Security again is a foolish stance, but not necessarily racist.
Belonging to or supporting the NRA isn't something I would choose to do, but it doesn't necessarily make someone racist.
You don't like the guy - that's fine. Stop there and no one would argue with your choice. But you can't do that; you have to find some super-special "my reasoning tops your reasoning" argument. The only problem is that your argument is flawed. You asked, up thread, if there was such a thing as a Libertarian who isn't racist. The answer to that question is yes, not no - so everything you claim from that point forward is built on a false premise.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)or you are pretending not to...
I used that phrase to describe a technique to attempt to piss people off by making them answer irrelevant questions that tries to limit the answer the person can return. Often when they don't get their expected response...they claim you didn't answer them...Piss them off hoping they say something that can be alerted on in their frustration...
Yeah....I Know all about this...
I am still waiting to hear of one Libertarian that isn't racist...
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I haven't had ONE of you return one name of a non-racist Libertarian...
This is why YOUR premise is false...
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)It never ceases to amaze me that people compare Snowden, the gutless coward, to Daniel Ellsberg.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Link: http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2013/06/22/edward_snowden_is_eighth_person_obama_has_pursued_under_espionage_act.html
And BTW... Ellsberg Disagrees With You:
Snowden made the right call when he fled the U.S.
Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/daniel-ellsberg-nsa-leaker-snowden-made-the-right-call/2013/07/07/0b46d96c-e5b7-11e2-aef3-339619eab080_story.html
On the Road
(20,783 posts)If you think about that statement for any period of time and compare it with the size of intelligence efforts throughout US history, you will see it is just as ridiculous as his claim that he had the authority to wiretap the president.
I'm surprised he didn't leak the news about the secret FEMA camps. We could have a heads-up on that one, too.
randome
(34,845 posts)Snowden had options but none of them involved being heroic. His real persona was on display when he was 26 and wrote that leakers should be shot in the balls.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and are you trying to say that THIS administration is more dangerous than what was going on under Nixon? Were you even alive then?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
fasttense
(17,301 posts)We all know classifying information in the government is used more to protect politicians and the powers that be, to hide mistakes and cover up blunders, then to protect our nation or the people of this nation.
It's mostly a way of hiding information that the government does not want its citizens to know.
Very few classified documents should be classified at all.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)sheesh!
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)racism, which you don't have evidence of and a flimsy connection at best, maybe he didn't have the opportunity until Obama was in office. I know the playbook. When the message is seems to show a chink in the aura, then call the messenger a racist. You're not the first to use this tactic.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Fuck Ed Snowden and the horse he rode in on!
Libertarians for the most part are just racists afraid to call themselves Republicans!
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)And really why the bestiality? Horses are apolitical.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)as it SHOULD to you...
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)You're slipping. How's the blood pressure? Whatever you do don't stroke out. That would be tragic.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)how many Libertarians have you met that are not also Racist hmmmm?
Maybe its your stroke you should be concerned about?
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)you made a racist comment to point out that snowden is a racist, yet provide no proof. Now if you could have been able to omit the inference that he only did this because Obama is black', I may have not goaded you along. However you were fun to play with and you keep zinging comic gold. I appreciate your humoring me tonight.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)because I am convinced he couldn't be the only Libertarian that I ever ran across that wasn't a racist.
YMMV I guess. But as far as flailing.... I am not the one defending the cowardly, Libertarian turn coat am I?
I am pretty damn satisfied with my contention.
Would like to see your proof that he is the only non-racist Libertarian though....you don't even have to flail this time...
go!
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)I just pointed out you made a racist comment. I added other more likely reasons for not reporting under bush. I don't know what he is. I know that he brought to light that something is wrong in America for those who did not listen before. Now if you feel the need to make it all about race instead of being spied on, well then that's on you. By the way the fucking libertarian and horse fucking are indeed flailing of arms. They mean nothing and have no impact on your original statement that this is all about race.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Maybe Snowden didn't reveal the crimes at the NSA during Bush's tenure because he didn't start working for the NSA until 2009?
Snowden described his life as "very comfortable", earning a salary of "roughly US$200,000".[62] At the time of his departure from the United States in May 2013, he had been employed by consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton for less than three months inside the NSA at the Kunia Regional SIGINT Operations Center in Hawaii,
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden
That makes your whole "racist" argument appear kind of stupid.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)hates Social Security....check!
big gun humping NRA fan.....check!
and you think he is NOT a racist too?
You ever met one that wasn't? Cause I haven't....
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)you're a Liberal, right?
Hates America? Check.
Wants to destroy family values? Check.
Out to murder unborn children? Check.
Waging a war on Christmas? Check.
Wants to indoctrinate all of our children into the homosexual lifestyle? Check.
Can you see how assigning a label to someone and then using it to ascribe motivations and judge the worth of their character is wrong?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)can you prove those things about me?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)degrades the quality of a discussion board?
Can you bring some reasonable analysis to the table? Some give-and-take? Some open mindedness to certain concepts, such as "attacking the messenger doesn't do anything to refute the message?"
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I am calling Snowden a Libertarian..
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)Those things you listed about liberals are falsehoods.
Libertarian economic beliefs, stated truthfully, reveal their holders to be greedy, selfish pigs. Virtually nothing separates them from the economic policies of the worst of the teabaggers.
G_j
(40,367 posts)I'm not a fan of Libertarians, but what makes you such an authority that you know every single one of them is a racist?
Insanity...
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)His views on race are irrelevant to this situation.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and he hasn't proven anything HAS happened just that it could...
but he has cowardly tried to suck up to so far three other nations...
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)The NSA has admitted to some of the things he said, and we are told some changes will be made, but we don't know if that will actually happen.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)His motivation doesn't change the situation.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)meanwhile he has taken up residency in Russia and begged for asylum in Brazil....and he offered his knowledge of US secrets to secure that asylum (they rightfully denied that request)
And he took his job TO steal govt secrets...
he hates social security and loves the NRA and guns....
but you want to praise him as a hero....
ends don't justify the means....
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)The NSA has admitted to spying on Americans more than what most Americans find acceptable.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)the NSA is capable yes....they admit that...
but have they spied on YOU? You don't know...
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)is pretty good evidence. Why would they confess to unpopular activity if they weren't doing it?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)have they said they could do it? Yes..
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I forgot how many association leaps they admitted to, but it was more than most Americans found acceptable.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)BrainDrain
(244 posts)We of the National Security Agency would like to inform you that you have been spied upon. We have collected your private electronic correspondence without your consent and in secret. Please feel free to continue your life as if we don't exist and our activities are in no way shape or form either and infringement of your constitutional rights or an admission to breaking any laws we don't really care for anyway.
Your continued cooperation through delusional self-denial is appreciated.
Yours Truly,
The National Security Agency
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you call me delusional?
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #160)
BrainDrain This message was self-deleted by its author.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Almost as tragic, yet much more irrelevant, than petulant snark rationalized.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)about using that analogy. Because I'm seeing some walking and quacking
Your moniker is extremely interesting.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)They see their best chance now.
Lifelong Dem
(344 posts)I see where you stand.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)I don't believe Snowden was involved when "that silly white texan was in office." He began working for Dell on the NSA contract in 2009. He did work for the CIA as an IT consultant from 2007-2009, but would not have had access to the NSA document trove until acquiring his sysadmin credentials at Dell and NSA, presumbably.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)in office Yes or No?
mike_c
(36,281 posts)I mean, did you support them? Did you even know about them? Really, be honest, because if you can say that you knew about the NSA surveillance abuses that Snowden has revealed then the question becomes "why did you abet keeping them secret?"
But the point is that whether Snowden knew or even cared about NSA abuses while Bush was in the WH has exactly zero bearing on whether or not I and the rest of the world feel betrayed by THIS administration, whom we certainly did NOT believe would continue, expand, and defend those abuses.
You're right, it's not a straw man. It's a smoke screen. A shiny distraction that has no relevance to the actual truth of events at all.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)SNOWDEN: HOLY SHIThttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/washington/11iran.html?_r=1&hp
SNOWDEN: WTF NYTIMES
SNOWDEN: Are they TRYING to start a war? Jesus christ theyre like wikileaks
User19: theyre just reporting, dude.
SNOWDEN: Theyre reporting classified shit
User19: shrugs
User19: meh
SNOWDEN: moreover, who the fuck are the anonymous sources telling them this?
SNOWDEN: those people should be shot in the balls.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)...on private citizens without probable cause. That changes EVERYTHING.
Sheesh.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)who opposes ANY form of American govt.
I don't support Libertarians...do you?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Should I not take it?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)are you going to comply?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Suppose my dad is a Libertarian (he's not!) and he wants to give me a million. As a gift.
Should I take it?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)its against their nature...
In fact the Libertarian Snowden thinks YOU shouldn't get Social Security!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)the cash when he dies.
Should I take it?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Social Security check...that's a fact!
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)He waited till Obama was President.
It is one thing to have revealed the US spying on its own citizens. But continuing to reveal how the US has been spying internationally crosses the line. Why do we have the CIA and the NSA? To spy. And all the other major countries do it, too.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)eom
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)in which he is criticizing the US for trying to compete for economic and political power.
For some strange reason, he never found reason to criticize any Rethug for doing the same thing.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)You win the "Dumbest Post of the Day Award"
Clap, clap, clap
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)then your post would be dumbest.
But here you go:
SNOWDEN: HOLY SHIThttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/washington/11iran.html?_r=1&hp
SNOWDEN: WTF NYTIMES
SNOWDEN: Are they TRYING to start a war? Jesus christ theyre like wikileaks
User19: theyre just reporting, dude.
SNOWDEN: Theyre reporting classified shit
User19: shrugs
User19: meh
SNOWDEN: moreover, who the fuck are the anonymous sources telling them this?
SNOWDEN: those people should be shot in the balls.
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/07/06/have-we-all-been-fooled-by-edward-snowden/
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)order to NOT release it while shrub was in office (I presume your inferring that he would have sat on it to protect the White president).
So your statement is just a lot of anthropomorphized straw.
But whatever. I said what I think and I'm out.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)under the first black democrat...
he dithered!
Your hero is severely flawwed.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)history will bear out the fact that I have rarely, if ever, even commented on the issue. So, your labeling him as my hero is as big a fail as trying to advance this theory of yours that he was racially motivated.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)spied on by my government.
It's like the Klayman thing and the ruling by Judge Leon. I don't give a shit that it was Klayman that brought the suit. That doesn't negate the fact that what the NSA is doing is a treasonous violation against the 4th Amendment Constitutional rights of myself and all Americans.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)just because they CAN do it...doesn't mean they have spied on you does it? Snowden has provided NO evidence that it has happened...only that it could.
Sorry but I don't support those that leak classified information then run to China...Russia and even seek asylum in Brazil...offering to help them oppose us in trade.
I DO care that a person leaking who knows what to who knows where...He ran like the coward that he is!
Now he has made himself untouchable....even a country like Brazil holds no truck for him...
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)You have chosen to disgard that.
So, I'm out.
Have fun with your racial motivation theory. I don't really give a shit anymore.
Hopefully we'll run into each other on better ground next time.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I have a theory about most Libertarians which I believe is what Snowden is..They support legalizing Pot but are racists and want to end Welfare and Food Stamps for those who they perceive receive the bulk of those funds...Blacks (I know thats not true but try to convince a racist of it)....They are too cowardly to call themselves Republicans.
Thus where my theory points to Snowden....
"Oh, Lord. Ok, there's no reasoning with you."
You've hit the invisible wall of reason and there is NO bipartisanship here!
We used to call them Republicans.
-p
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)because that is an alertable offense apparently as I got alerted on for calling someone by their name...who's very name included that word....
So you make the call...should I or shouldn't I?
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Goodnight Princess.
-p
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Yeah way to prove I hit a nerve..
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Wow. Your posts in this thread are truly exceptional. Do you really not see how nonsensical everything you are saying is? You're not helping your hero with that lame "racism" excuse.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Lame?
point out another Libertarian who isn't racist...
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Whether Libertarians as a whole are or are not racist is not the issue.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)to those who leak classified information...right about the time that the first Black man was elected....
He is a Rand Paul following Libertarian.
2+2 still equals 4 last I checked.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Others have posted that he did not suddenly change his mind when Obama was elected. Show that he has. You have to have the "2"s to add together if you want to get to "4".
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)He also had no problem with Bushs warrantless wiretapping program, saying:
SNOWDEN: these are the same people who blew the whole we could listen to osamas cell phone thing the same people who screwed us on wiretapping over and over and over again [sic] Thank god theyre going out of business.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)That post was simply the last straw.
The exact same behavior you're displaying here.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Because I don't support Snowden? That might be disruptive to your sensibilities....but that is all I have done...
I don't support Libertarians...I support Democrats.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)At Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:49 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
Over and Over and Over IS a Demand "Republican"!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3928371
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS:
Not just this post in particular, but this poster has been aggressively trolling throughout the thread and denigrating other DUers who are doing little more than attempting to explain things to them.
Please kick them out of this thread.
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:55 PM, and voted 5-1 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Enough.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: Agree with alerter.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: I'd go even further than kicking them out of the thread and kick them off DU if I could. From many of their other posts I think they're a returning recidivist disruptor.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Thank you.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)It was hidden because you being disruptive and crossing the line into insulting and intentional agitating.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I called him "Republican" for short....and that's what the jury saw...
Don't tell me what I know to be a fact...I was there...
and as a matter of fact...you are trolling just for bringing it up and trying to silence me by idly threatening me....
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)There, I fixed it:
apparently HE is you cannot stand by and let his reputation be sullied by the "truth."
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)hates Social Security and is a Gun Humper...
and you DOUBT that he is a racist too?
It's not much of a leap if you ask me...
but if you want to believe he is the ONLY Libertarian that isn't racist...then I guess that is your version of the "truth"
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)You posted:
nder the first black democrat...
he dithered!
Your hero is severely flawwed.
You are clearly projecting. Flip that around: VanillaRhapsody was outraged at warrantless surveillance when a rich white texan was president, but when the first black democrat does it, it's fine.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)doesn't that sort of say something about YOU then...since you are using THIS theory?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)I'm simply refuting your nonsense.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)or if you are not defending him then all you really want to do is step to me....
that makes you a troll doesn't it?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)of shrill nonsense.
Trolls seek to create an environment of shrill nonsensicality.
I would prefer the number of shrill nonsensical posts on DU to decline.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)simultaneously...
geez how long have you been on DU?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Would help you avoid using so many fallacies and would strengthen your ability to engage in good-faith debate.
Right now, you're just yelling at people.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)What does that say about you?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)doing what I just accused you of!
neverforget
(9,436 posts)and you'll see you have become what you hate the most.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)how does that work exactly????
neverforget
(9,436 posts)a service to this Country. I turned that around to show the shallowness and stupidity of that argument because the people you support are Cheney, Peter King, John Woo, etc because they agree with you. See how dumb that argument is?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I accused them of supporting one...
see how dumb your argument is?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)pathetic actually...
neverforget
(9,436 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)did it hurt?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I am neither a racist nor a Libertarian...but the chances that Snowden isn't both of those....is slim and none.
That's my point...just out of curiosity...what did you think yours was?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)This person has had me in stitches for over a day now. This is the Daily Show material.
Jack Hollis
(1 post)I am 73 years old and come from a family of democrats all the way back to the civil war but I will be damned if I ever met one so full of hate and poison as you are. You are scary as hell.
TBF
(32,053 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)I believe President Obama went through a similar process when it came to Marriage Equality.
There are lots of things I used to believe that I no longer believe...
That can happen when presented with new information.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Is that what you're saying ?
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)He is our first African American president. The likes of a Nelson Mandela, a champion of the poor, a scorner of the rich, tireless campaigner against dirty fuel and for "Clean Energy" like Natural Gas and Big Nuke plants, etc.
While Snowden is a dirty little turn coat who tried to expose some very serious goings on that we Americans probably don't have time to deal with, as our personal energy really should be spent admiring our First African American President!
WillyT
(72,631 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)term and sat on it to protect that president, then only releasing it to damage a Black president.
It's just a dumb premise. Sorry.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you think that is a coincidence? I don't!
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)anything to do with race of concurrent presidents. Sorry.
But if you have any evidence to support your supposition, I'll gladly take a look.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Libertarians are Pot smoking racists...
Snowden is a Libertarian... 2 + 2 still equals 4.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)that span the political spectrum from Left to Right. You are drawing a caricature of Libertarians - a straw man, if you will - and then using it to ascribe motivations to Snowden.
That's as misguided as Republican caricatures of black welfare queens or freedom-hating Liberals.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)that I was not calling you dumb. I said your comment was dumb.
I've said some dumb things, also. We all do.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)people who did what he did should be shot in the balls...
When the first Black President is elected.....He thinks HE should leak classified information...
Coincindence? I think not....
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Keyword being "think".
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)perhaps that is where you go off the rails in the first place....taking things at face value!
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)I give a crap about is that my government is spying on me.
Whether what Snowden did was right or wrong, I'm not sure in my own mind. But I do know that what the NSA is doing is treason and that agency should be disbanded and thrown in the trash can of history.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)dionysus
(26,467 posts)going to a Chinese controlled territory and then Russia, leaking stuff on what we do to other countries, is the big no-no.
spying isn't cool, but every country that can afford an intelligence agency has one, and spies on friend and foe alike.
the ramifications of the latter are not clear, but I don't hold snowden in the "sweet bebe jesus" category that some folks here do.
truth is we don't know what information he had, or who he gave it to. I'd highly doubt china and Russia hasn't gotten it or tried to get it.
supposedly greenwald is sitting on all of it. who the hell knows.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)I was a vicious homophobe, misogynist, omnivore, Christian free-marketeer.
People change over time, and not everything everyone does has to relate to who is in the White House.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Though I see no evidence he is or ever was except for the straw man you've thrown up here.
If a black gay atheist socialist had leaked the documents instead of a straight white libertarian, I would feel the same way about both the leaker and the leak.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)SNOWDEN: save money? cut this social security bullshit
User11: hahahayes
User18: Yeah! Fuck old people!
User11: social security is bullshit
User11: lets just toss old people out in the street
User18: Old people could move in with [User11].
User11: NOOO
User11: they smell funny
SNOWDEN: Somehow, our society managed to make it hundreds of years without social security just fine
SNOWDEN: you fucking retards
SNOWDEN: Magically the world changed after the new deal, and old people became made of glass
SNOWDEN: yeah, that makes sense
User11: wow
User11: you are just so fucking stupid
SNOWDEN: yeah, [User11]. and youre quite a gem
User19: and magically, life expectancy has doubled in the last 100 years.funny how that works.
SNOWDEN: [User19], you dont think modern medicine has something to do with that? no? its social security? wow. I guess I missed that.
User11: hurr wait a second, life expectancy has shot up in recent times along with the dissolution of the communal family unit in exchange for the nuclear family
User11: gee i guess we might need to create a safety net for the sudden glut of helpless elderly????
SNOWDEN: they wouldnt be fucking helpless if you werent sending them fucking checks to sit on their ass and lay in hospitals all day
User11: you are so goddamned stupd*pid
User11: PUT OLD PEOPLE TO WORK IN THE FIELDS
SNOWDEN: my grandmother is eighty fucking three this year, and you know what? she still supports herself working as a goddamned hairdresser
Fuck old people? An objectivist view if ever there was one. The other issue is the Second Amendment:
User: the restrictions were made to appease the conservatives to get another bill passed. fucking cons.
SNOWDEN: See, thats why Im goddamned glad for the second amendment. Me and all my lunatic, gun-toting NRA compatriots would be on the steps of Congress before the C-Span feed finished.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Hint: it's not.
What you're doing here is a textbook example of the poisoning the well fallacy. His views on the president or social security have absolutely nothing to do with the NSA disclosures, and you're trying to discredit him on a completely unrelated topic.
But tell me, do you like the interstate highway system?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I cannot think of one Libertarian that turned out not to be racist...have you?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Where do you stand on the interstate highway system?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Now, the interstate highway system?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)You do understand it was built FOR the military not you or I right?
pfffffffftttttt!
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)So, where do you stand on it?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)where is it that you are standing exactly?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Just what I always thought.
If you're not willing to answer a basic question after the person you're debating with has given you the same courtesy, that makes you a troll.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)so I suppose that is what you call everyone that disagrees with you that huh?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)by definition...
besides...just because you didn't like the answer...doesn't mean there wasn't one...just sayin'
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you weren't asking a non pertinent question...you were asking one trying to trick me into a response...which didn't happen...that is the epitome of troll.
That makes YOU the troll not me!
So keep on Trolling yourself!
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Why can't it be a Republican vs. Democrat bias? Everyone expects Republicans to spy and cheat, I was not surprised that Bush did it, I was surprised a Democratic Constitutional scholar didn't stop it.
Southerner vs. Northerner bias?
Maybe it just took him that long to gather the information?
So Snowden made remarks in what is one of the worlds best read newspaper that didn't make an admission to what he was or was going to do; in fact he implied just the opposite. Wow, I'm surprised.
Maybe he wanted to give President Obama time to clean up the mess and when the President didn't, then he acted.
I don't know what is the truth, and until Snowden tells us, neither do you. But do I think it is about black and white? Not likely.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)how many of ^^^ those do you know who aren't also racists?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)no I don't read my link....
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/07/06/have-we-all-been-fooled-by-edward-snowden/
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Then come back and once again spout off about how Snowden didn't reveal *'s spying... as IF he had the chance. Look at a timeline. Here's a little fact... a timeline isn't biased. A timeline isn't partisan. And lastly, a timeline can't distinguish a libertarian from a fascist from a racist from a butterfly. It just shows what happened and when.
Educate thyself; it keeps you from looking silly, if not dumb.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)The only thing I care about regarding Snowden is his freedom from malicious prosecution by the US for what he did. I personally don't care about his motives or his background. What he leaked is more important.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)its not malicious if he is in fact guilty!
He is a Social Security hating...NRA supporting Libertarian...FUCK HIM!
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)i suppose racism made the president pass insurance mandates, and is making him pass the TPP, and is the reason we still torture people, and the reason he didn't prosecute the banksters, and the reason he supported Blanche Lincoln...
Marr
(20,317 posts)pacalo
(24,721 posts)& there's no doubt about it that GWB escalated the underhandedness -- it's the economic spying, social control, & power over American consumers, employees, patients, etc., that concerns me most about this mass spying.
Just Brazil....... All of it everywhere!
12ZTR
(92 posts)Spying is the ultimate in insider trading. How many large & small business conversations, including illegal deals, have been listened to so the few can benefit financially?
Ask Reps & Dems in Congress if they know anything about insider trading.
Does anyone think that they aren't being robbed at every available opportunity?
George Carlin said it well:
"By the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head with their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table has tilted folks. The game is rigged and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care! Good honest hard-working people; white collar, blue collar it doesnt matter what color shirt you have on. Good honest hard-working people continue, these are people of modest means, continue to elect these rich cock suckers who dont give a fuck about you
.they dont give a fuck about you
they dont give a FUCK about you."
I'm sure many are unable to understand the message or as the saying goes: "Let Them Die Dumb."
zeemike
(18,998 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)For any country in this day and age to express indignation about being spied upon is hypocritical.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Why is that, do you think?
mike_c
(36,281 posts)...U.S. citizens, indiscriminately and without probable cause. It is perfectly legitimate for rival nations, or governments hostile to one another, to collect intelligence regarding industrial and military capacity, troop deployments, and policy making. But hoovering up ALL the private communications of innocent private citizens is not the same thing at all. It's Orwellian.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Talk about Orwellian. How doublethink is that?
mike_c
(36,281 posts)I think all such surveillance is equally threatening, regardless of who benefits or their motives.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)We only have evidence of the NSA doing so.
Also, there is absolutely no reason to believe taht Brazil has the technical capability to duplicate the NSA's spying operations, nor the influence needed to make the major wireless carriers knuckle under to their demands.
Your argument is, frankly, quite ridiculous.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,354 posts)Thanks for the thread, WillyT.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Also from his letter.
George II
(67,782 posts)...it seems that he doesn't want "to live in a world where everything that I say, everything I do, everyone I talk to, every expression of creativity or love or friendship is NOT recorded"!
randome
(34,845 posts)Actually, I don't. He was an idiot when he said that stupid thing. And he's an idiot now for leaking information that has nothing to do with what he said was his most important concern: spying on Americans.
It should be clear to anyone that his main purpose in life has become to damage the country as much as possible.
Every country spies on every country in an attempt to gain advantage, economic or otherwise.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)... ahhh, fuck it.
Sid
Uncle Joe
(58,354 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)that there is more to this soap opera than the elite being caught with their hand in the cookie jar and canary feathers still clinging to their faces.
Here you've had one of the most prolific "If you don't love the President, you're a racist!" posters to spend two hours writing the same non-argument 16 times. Each of them ignoring every fact surrounding this issue while trying to change the focus by screaming about people's imagined motivations, Snowden's, yours, and anybody else that doesn't agree with this week's narrative.
We created the terrorists to replace the Communists. The Sheeple must be kept distracted and scared, otherwise they might notice where they are and see where they're headed.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)It does NO FAVORS in the ACTUAL fight against racism.
If everybody is a racist... then nobody is a racist.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Peace to you, keep poking that bear.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)So there's that.
And according to some estimates... we're gonna have two more years of bear poking.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)I really need to learn not to feed them sometimes
jazzimov
(1,456 posts)(Reuters) - Brazil says it is not considering granting asylum to Edward Snowden even after the former U.S. National Security Agency contractor offered on Tuesday to help investigate revelations that the NSA has spied on Brazilians and their president.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)believe it or not, the Brazilian government (just like everyone else) DOES have some close secrets they don't want getting out, either...
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)nobodys hands are clean in the world...
which is why im okay with international spying...
itd be naïve to not do , imho...
its the domestic parts that bother me...
indepat
(20,899 posts)goes with those)?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)gulliver
(13,180 posts)I called this out a while back. Snowden doesn't know if his Russian asylum is going to last beyond its initial one year. As he gets closer and closer to the deadline, he will sell out the United States more and more to save his own ass. In this case, Snowden is trying to enrage the people of Brazil against the United States in an effort to force the hand of its leaders. I hope all Brazilians are catching a strong whiff of rodent from his general direction.
I expect this little shit to keep putting our country down to anyone who will listen right up until they drag him screaming out of Russia on his way to prison.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)mascot was an odd Cyclopean entity. TPTB are FAR more sinister than most think.
http://vigilantcitizen.com/
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)is minimal at best...But if it is strictly economic/political, then the overwhelming majority of the data must relate to China, then...I don't think they've even been mentioned so far...
Ultimately, I think the surveillance is for the sake of surveillance...If information is an alternate 'currency', then the NSA are simply obsessive-compulsive greedy hoarders...
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)You can see it in his groveling. It's hilarious.
As if the US country is the only country to conduct espionage for political advantage.
What did Snowdenwald have to say about Brazilian espionage? As if that wasn't for political advantage?
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/brazil-admits-it-spied-on-u-s-diplomats
Crickets?
Thought so.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)then you criticize him for seeking an alternative.
I tell ya, the guy can't win.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Which has whistleblower laws by the way.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)The NSA is supposed to be doing things no one knows about. When we found out, it wasn't anything Verizon didn't already have. For the most part, they may be doing what they are supposed to do.
You have worked yourself up into such a state you can't even consider that.
There is a whistleblower statute - name another country that even has such a thing.
2banon
(7,321 posts)My god Laddie look what you have gone and done now! You've gone and let the Banshee loose!
I think it's time to whip out the fiddle and the pipes, to chase it away.... far, far away...
2banon
(7,321 posts)first of all I couldn't find quite the right image, but even so, I don't know how to embed images on du3 !
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)because the US, like every other country, is jockeying for power in the larger world?
I'm glad that Snowden brought to light the spying the US was doing on its own citizens.
I do not applaud him for his continued focus on US spies doing the international spying we always knew they were doing -- and that all the other major countries do, too.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)If we can't do so, our freedom of association and, perhaps, freedom of action soon are going to disappear.
TBF
(32,053 posts)he is 100% spot on in that letter. Snowden is a hero in my book. He's a very smart man and I imagine he knew he was taking an incredible risk doing this.
EC
(12,287 posts)every other country on earth?
hueymahl
(2,495 posts)Hero or villain, it does not really matter. The information exposed is the story. The unconstitutional acts are the story. The quasi police state is the story. The messenger is not the story.
BTW, I personally think Snowden is a hero, not that it matters.