Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 04:39 PM Dec 2013

In Case You Missed This Nugget From Snowden's Letter To Brazil...

Item number three is Edward Snowden wrote a letter to the people of Brazil about what was happening to them. It was an appeal for asylum as well. But to me the core of the letter was what he said to the people of Brazil is don't kid yourself. The mass spying that is taking place in Brazil is not about stopping terrorism; it's about the United States getting economic advantage, political advantage, and in the end it's about power.

And that's a very powerful statement. It's one that every person who hears about NSA spying ought to understand. This is not about terrorism. This is about the U.S. empire, U.S. power, U.S. hegemony, probably an increase in the spying as the U.S. empire is on the decline and it has a different world to compete in than it did after the Second World War or after the collapse of the Soviet Union. So that's the third point.


From: http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=11227

From the letter...

American Senators tell us that Brazil should not worry, because this is not "surveillance," it's "data collection." They say it is done to keep you safe. They're wrong. There is a huge difference between legal programs, legitimate spying, legitimate law enforcement — where individuals are targeted based on a reasonable, individualized suspicion — and these programs of dragnet mass surveillance that put entire populations under an all-seeing eye and save copies forever. These programs were never about terrorism: they're about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They're about power.


The letter in full: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/17/edward-snowden-letter-brazilian-people


258 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Case You Missed This Nugget From Snowden's Letter To Brazil... (Original Post) WillyT Dec 2013 OP
K&R! G_j Dec 2013 #1
Actually it is about control of the Internet... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #2
Yeah he is a racist. MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #5
Well seems funny to me he was all about the spying when the White guy was in office VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #12
Do you believe Snowden believes that Obama will be President for life? Uncle Joe Dec 2013 #34
Do you think someone who leaks classified information is a hero? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #36
It depends on what the classified information was and to some degree the motivation for doing so Uncle Joe Dec 2013 #41
What a stupid question What in the world is that question supposed to box me into? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #57
Your implied racism imputed to Snowden? WinkyDink Dec 2013 #116
Yes...he is a Libertarian isn't he? Do you know any that aren't? I don't VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #164
This isnt about Snowden. Vilifying him is as nine. Are you trying to use misdirection to distract rhett o rick Dec 2013 #190
I have been posting on this thread all day...seems there are many who DO think it is ABOUT VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #191
I am not surprised that open-minded people would defend him against rhett o rick Dec 2013 #230
Open minded like Racist Libertarians are? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #232
Good grief! "Racist Libertarians"? Most open-minded people are not racist, but rhett o rick Dec 2013 #234
Again....prove to me that Libertarians aren't also racists... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #235
Once again you try to put words in my mouth. I have never claimed that Libertarians are or are not rhett o rick Dec 2013 #237
OH and what you "think" is not necessarily so is it? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #236
I am fed up with your discussion tactics. I DID NOT SAY SNOWDEN IS OR IS NOT rhett o rick Dec 2013 #238
No that is YOU projecting what I am doing...you know nothing of the sort... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #239
I find your obsession for Snowden strange. Do you even care about the NSA transgressions? nm rhett o rick Dec 2013 #240
I find your defense of him strange.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #242
My only "defense" is to question the conservative obsession to vilify him. rhett o rick Dec 2013 #243
Hate to burst your bubble...but not everyone who opposes Snowden are all Conservatives.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #244
You and Bill O'Reilly agree. nm rhett o rick Dec 2013 #247
So? Didn't I say not every one? That implies some are doesn't it? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #248
Go away. I think your favorite Faux News show is on. nm rhett o rick Dec 2013 #250
You first.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #251
You support centrists not Democrats. Centrists that see eye to eye with conservatives. rhett o rick Dec 2013 #252
No I support Democrats period... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #253
I guess it just never occurs to you that you could be the "Fringe" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #254
Why Edward Snowden Is the Definition of a Whistleblower rhett o rick Dec 2013 #241
He IS the definition of a coward...I will give you that. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #245
Well on that you and Fox News agree. nm rhett o rick Dec 2013 #246
and what is your point? This is what is wrong with your premise... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #249
and by the way....I am using actual statements made by Snowden to support my contentions VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #192
He's 29, for Chrissake! Demeter Dec 2013 #203
WTF does that mean? He has had the right to vote for over 10 yrs... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #223
For someone who doesn't like being "boxed" in enlightenment Dec 2013 #228
You don't seem to understand how I meant "boxed in" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #229
Oh and no I don't... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #231
Depends, does it not? Daniel Ellsberg is today pretty much considered a hero. WinkyDink Dec 2013 #114
Yes - and Ellsburg stayed in the United States and willingly faced prosecution George II Dec 2013 #120
That Was A Differnt Time... And The Government Back Then Screwed Its Own Pooch... WillyT Dec 2013 #122
"Obama Has Charged More Under Espionage Act Than All Other Presidents Combined" On the Road Dec 2013 #215
Excellent point. randome Dec 2013 #216
So has Ellsberg said he would have fled to China, Russia and begged Brazil for asylum? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #225
Yes, I believe that Snowden is a hero fasttense Dec 2013 #210
You just described EVERY Govt.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #226
Or without calling into question his MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #74
Maybe he is a Social Security hating NRA supporting Libertarian too... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #77
Now that you have exploded are you feeling better? MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #81
He is a freaking Social Security hating, Gun Humper....that speaks volumes to me... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #83
You left out racist that time. MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #85
that is because THAT is what I am using to prove he is... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #89
Not I, I am not the one that is flailing arms and gnashing of teeth MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #110
I am not flailing at all you must be projecting VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #124
I didn't defend him MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #126
Yes...either that or you jumped into the middle of a discussion to defend someone who WAS! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #138
Hey, VanillaRhapsody Maedhros Dec 2013 #128
uh no it doesn't he's a Libertarian isn't he? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #131
From the Republican playbook, Maedhros Dec 2013 #135
Yeah but I can prove he humps guns and hates social security... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #143
Do you understand how simply calling names Maedhros Dec 2013 #154
who is calling who names? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #156
Here's the difference, Maedhros. pnwmom Dec 2013 #200
you are nuts G_j Dec 2013 #196
Who cares if he is racist or not? ZombieHorde Dec 2013 #127
No they are not....it goes to motivation... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #133
His motivation is irrelevent. ZombieHorde Dec 2013 #140
Motivation is NEVER irrelevant... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #142
His motivation doesn't change what has been happening. ZombieHorde Dec 2013 #144
doesn't change what? That the capability exists? That is all he has said... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #146
Have you not been following the story? ZombieHorde Dec 2013 #159
still nothing from Snowden proving that it happened... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #160
I think the NSA confession, which resulted from Snowden's actions, ZombieHorde Dec 2013 #161
what "confession" are you talking about? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #168
The NSA admitted to spying on millions of Americans. ZombieHorde Dec 2013 #170
they admitted they could...they have access to to several huge privately owned servers... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #224
Dear Sir... BrainDrain Dec 2013 #211
You wrote this...and you think something is wrong with MY position? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #227
This message was self-deleted by its author BrainDrain Dec 2013 #212
Almost as tragic, yet much more irrelevant, than petulant snark. LanternWaste Dec 2013 #218
Wow, I think that's a new low. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #118
Quacking and walking and screen name n/t Aerows Dec 2013 #205
You should be careful Aerows Dec 2013 #204
He's a libertarian fronting for his libertarian buds. pnwmom Dec 2013 #197
Silly? Lifelong Dem Dec 2013 #214
is that the next Snowden straw man...? mike_c Dec 2013 #6
Its NOT a strawman...did he or did he not support the spying while George W. Bush was VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #14
I have no idea, nor do I think it's at all relevant.... mike_c Dec 2013 #18
Oh YES its relevant... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #20
ah-- now I feel all better that the NSA conducts warrentless universal surveillance... mike_c Dec 2013 #25
No it doesn't but I don't jump at the chance to make someone my hero.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #38
If a Libertarian gives me a million bucks MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #92
If a Libertarian gives you a million bucks....you can bet he expects something for it... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #93
A million bucks, no strings attached MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #95
A Libertarian would NEVER give you a dollar...much less a million of them... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #96
My dad's old, and he doesn't want the government to get MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #101
Who cares what your father does? I don't but Snowden thinks he doesn't deserve his VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #105
He didn't utter a word of complaint while Bush was in office. pnwmom Dec 2013 #201
and that is still utterly irrelevant to circumstances today.... mike_c Dec 2013 #221
It is completely relevant to the OP pnwmom Dec 2013 #233
It doesn't MATTER. People can see the light at any time. It's the seeing that matters, not the date. WinkyDink Dec 2013 #117
Congratulations! ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #13
actually if you never read what Snowden said about spying during those years... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #15
He didn't even get the information he did until AFTER 2009 so wouldn't have had it in ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #17
baloney...he thought people who leaked under a republican should be shot.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #26
Snowden IS NOT my hero. I am, if anything, on the fence regarding Snowden. My posting ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #39
apparently HE is you cannot stand by and let his "reputation" be sullied by the truth. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #40
I don't give a shit about his reputation. I do give a shit that I am being ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #44
You apparently give a shit about Snowden... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #49
Oh, Lord. Ok, there's no reasoning with you. I already said I don't give a shit about Snowden. ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #51
Actions speak louder than words don't they? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #52
+1 Phlem Dec 2013 #61
Are you calling me a Republican? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #62
Do whatever you want to do. You've just landed on full ignore. Phlem Dec 2013 #65
not a Princess or a Republican here...and that is sexist by the way! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #67
More like Snowden hit a nerve on you! cui bono Dec 2013 #153
Not at all...I am only replying to my responses... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #155
You made the claim that Snowden's actions were because of racism. The burden is on you to prove it. cui bono Dec 2013 #255
Yes and I stand by it...Suddenly he changed his mind about what should happen VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #256
Prove it. You prove nothing without evidence. cui bono Dec 2013 #257
Okay easy.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #258
That post was alerted on because you were being disruptive and behaving like a troll. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #181
NO it wasn't...I read it... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #182
Nope, the post you're referring to was alerted on because you were being disruptive and insulting. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #183
see the word "Republican" there...that was the dudes name... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #184
And your post wasn't hidden because of that. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #187
Yes that is what the jury was voting on.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #188
I think you had the wrong word in quotation marks there: Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #119
the truth that he is a Libertarian that supported George Bush's spying and VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #123
Your post is very revealing. Maedhros Dec 2013 #129
Great Point... WillyT Dec 2013 #130
YOU are supporting a Social Security hating....Gun Humping Libertarian.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #134
I'm not supporting anyone. Maedhros Dec 2013 #137
Denial is not a river in Egypt... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #139
Well, you are putting up post after post Maedhros Dec 2013 #151
post after post because about a dozen snowden supporters are responding VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #152
I recommend an introductory course in Logic. Maedhros Dec 2013 #158
And you're supporting right wingers like Cheney, Peter King, John Woo, etc. neverforget Dec 2013 #147
You have never seen me on a thread doing that...but I HAVE seen you on one VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #149
Look in the mirror neverforget Dec 2013 #150
I am a racist because I hate racists? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #157
No. You accuse others of being Libertarians because they think what Snowden did was neverforget Dec 2013 #162
NO...I accused Snowden of being a Libertarian.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #165
Thanks for making my argument! neverforget Dec 2013 #166
You don't have one.....but thanks for the laugh... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #169
Seriously. Stop digging. Actually don't as you're comedy gold. neverforget Dec 2013 #171
You haven't made a single point so far....were you trying to? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #176
I made my point and you proved it. Thanks for playing. neverforget Dec 2013 #179
there was a point? Uh no...epic fail if you thought so.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #180
I explained it but you choose not to get it. neverforget Dec 2013 #186
Bingo! MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #220
I am beginning to think you are sick Jack Hollis Dec 2013 #194
Welcome to DU Jack Hollis. TBF Dec 2013 #209
How do you know that he wasn't trying before 2009, but wasn't able to get it? George II Dec 2013 #125
I don't know, and as I've said already in this USELESS thread, I don't give a shit! n/t ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #178
It's Called Having Your Eyes Opened, And Evolving... WillyT Dec 2013 #21
its called hypocrisy...I suggest you look it up! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #23
So President Obama Is A Hypocrite ??? WillyT Dec 2013 #29
Of course Obama is not a hypocrite. truedelphi Dec 2013 #45
Oh... Ok... I Stand Corrected... WillyT Dec 2013 #47
well it certainly shouldn't be blowing up the skirt of the dirty little turn coat should it? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #63
But the comment suggests the Snowden had the information during the White president's ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #24
No it isn't seems everything changed for him when the FIRST black man was elected... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #28
I have never even once raised within my own thoughts that Snowden's motives have/had ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #33
Just because YOU never thought of it...doesn't mean it is not true! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #60
There are many different strains of Libertarian Maedhros Dec 2013 #132
You were saying? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #16
See post #17. And, BTW, before you alert (if you haven't already), please understand... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #19
You see mine...while a White Republican President was in office...he thought VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #22
You're only speculating his motives. You even admit it: "Coincindence? I think not...." ... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #30
aren't YOU doing the same thing? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #31
besides...saying "I think not" is a figure of speech... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #32
It's cool, VanillaRhapsody. You are, of course, free to believe what you want. The only thing ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2013 #42
FACT is you don't know that they ARE doing it...only that they could.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #58
IMO, leaking info on the US Govt spying on it's own people is one thing. i can get behind that. dionysus Dec 2013 #174
Yeah, and while a white Republican was in office NuclearDem Dec 2013 #56
Oh yes and YOU know for a fact that Snowden is no longer a racist...is this your contention? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #59
I personally don't give a fuck whether Snowden is a racist or not. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #69
Do you give a fuck what he thinks about our Social Security system and the NRA then? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #71
How is that relevant to the NSA leaks? NuclearDem Dec 2013 #79
HINT he is a Libertarian... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #80
Still haven't answered my question. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #82
How do you feel about Rand Paul? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #84
Broken clock. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #86
Oh thats supposed to box me in huh...cause a Republican built the Interstate Highway System? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #88
Not even close. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #90
Where do I stand on it? Normally I don't stand on it...I am normally in a car... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #91
Alright, so you're a troll. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #94
because I ride in cars I am a troll? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #97
trying to box someone in with a stupid question...That makes YOU the troll! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #98
Whatever you say. Keep on trolling, VR. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #99
You are the troll...as I pointed out.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #100
Just what makes you so sure this is a black and white problem? A Simple Game Dec 2013 #76
BECAUSE he is a Social Security hating NRA supporting Libertarian... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #78
I think you need to look at a timeline. Seriously. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #102
a timeline to show he is a Libertarian hack? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #104
Yeah, you need to look at a timeline. Seriously. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2013 #107
I don't need a timeline to tell me that a Libertarian is racist...do you? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #141
The entire world doesn't revolve around Obama. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #54
and the entire world doesn't revolve around Snowden the asylum seeker! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #64
I never said it did. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #70
You want to see him forgiven... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #72
oh, god Doctor_J Dec 2013 #106
You've officially run out of excuses. /nt Marr Dec 2013 #163
After seeing all the Republicans' dirty politics for the last 14 years -- pacalo Dec 2013 #3
Not Old Codger Dec 2013 #4
Everything's a business model. 12ZTR Dec 2013 #7
Yep...and welcome to DU...n/t zeemike Dec 2013 #10
Why is Brazil spying on the US? baldguy Dec 2013 #8
It's no secret that everone spys on everyone - just ask Jonathan Pollard! George II Dec 2013 #9
And yet Snowdens fans express endless indignation because the US spies on foreign countries. baldguy Dec 2013 #11
no-- I'm indignant when the NSA spies on foreign CITIZENS, as well as upon... mike_c Dec 2013 #46
But you have nothing for the US Citizens who were spied upon by Brazil. baldguy Dec 2013 #53
huh? what on earth made you jump to that conclusion? mike_c Dec 2013 #136
Well, for one, we have no evidence that Brazil is spying on American citizens. Maedhros Dec 2013 #145
they don't want to admit that they are anti-govt...any govt! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #66
+1. n/t pnwmom Dec 2013 #198
I agree with Snowden. Uncle Joe Dec 2013 #27
Anytime... Uncle Joe, Anytime... Plus: WillyT Dec 2013 #37
That's interesting - from his behavior over the last several months.... George II Dec 2013 #213
I agree with him, too. He should be shot in the balls. randome Dec 2013 #103
Snowden is a modern day Paul Revere with a thumb drive... SidDithers Dec 2013 #35
Whether you mean't it or not that's almost if not the best post I've ever seen from you. n/t Uncle Joe Dec 2013 #43
What I find absolutely hilarious about this theatrical performance is the essential lie Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #48
Classic Thread Hi-Jacking... And... WillyT Dec 2013 #50
I wish I could believe that is an unintended consequence. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #68
OTOH... That Poster Keeps Kicking This Thread, Giving It More And More Visibility... WillyT Dec 2013 #75
Just a resident troll doing what they do best. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #189
k/r 840high Dec 2013 #55
Interesting that Brazil is not considering giving him asylum. jazzimov Dec 2013 #73
it shouldn't shock anyone... Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #109
exactly... iamthebandfanman Dec 2013 #195
Did Snowden read all my posts about it all being all about empire and hegemony (and the power that indepat Dec 2013 #87
I Did... WillyT Dec 2013 #108
I honestly if we have ever gone into another nation for any other reason? jwirr Dec 2013 #111
Snowden demonizing the United States to get asylum. gulliver Dec 2013 #112
"entire populations under an all-seeing eye": EVERY Pop star shows the Horus One-Eye. The Olympic WinkyDink Dec 2013 #113
I'd say any political or economic advantage gained Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #115
It's clear from the letter that Snowden desperately wants out of Russia Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #121
First you criticize him for accepting asylum in Russia, Maedhros Dec 2013 #148
The NSA apologists here never tire of making fools of themselves, do they? DesMoinesDem Dec 2013 #167
And They Feel So... I Dunno... "Boxed In" ??? WillyT Dec 2013 #172
What is wrong with supporting our elected government? treestar Dec 2013 #173
Well... You've Left Me Speechless... WillyT Dec 2013 #175
Why? You seem to take your own views for granted. treestar Dec 2013 #219
Willy T! 2banon Dec 2013 #177
LOL !!! WillyT Dec 2013 #185
I wanted to embed an image of a fiddler and piper chasing the banshee away 2banon Dec 2013 #193
So we're supposed to be surprised and outraged pnwmom Dec 2013 #199
K&R DeSwiss Dec 2013 #202
Any hard evidence to support this claim? DCBob Dec 2013 #206
We have to stop the NSA. another_liberal Dec 2013 #207
Those are the key words in that letter and TBF Dec 2013 #208
So how does that differ from EC Dec 2013 #217
An amazing amount of troll feeding going on in this thread - too many vanilla wafers hueymahl Dec 2013 #222
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
2. Actually it is about control of the Internet...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 05:15 PM
Dec 2013

But then Snowden didn't object to it when that silly White Texan was in office!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
12. Well seems funny to me he was all about the spying when the White guy was in office
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:41 PM
Dec 2013

but sings a different tune when the first Black guy is....

If it walks and quacks like a duck...

Uncle Joe

(58,354 posts)
34. Do you believe Snowden believes that Obama will be President for life?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:00 PM
Dec 2013

Sometimes people don't make major life altering decisions in a snap, it takes time for the dawning of realization to take place.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
36. Do you think someone who leaks classified information is a hero?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:00 PM
Dec 2013

or should be shot in the balls as Snowden did?

Uncle Joe

(58,354 posts)
41. It depends on what the classified information was and to some degree the motivation for doing so
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:05 PM
Dec 2013

as to whether they're a hero or not.

I'm against capital punishment but you never answered my question.

"Do you believe that Snowden believes that Obama will be President for life?"

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
190. This isnt about Snowden. Vilifying him is as nine. Are you trying to use misdirection to distract
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 01:05 AM
Dec 2013

from the real problem? Do you support the strong armed authoritarian state? If so, how can you claim to be "politically liberal"??

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
191. I have been posting on this thread all day...seems there are many who DO think it is ABOUT
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 01:07 AM
Dec 2013

Snowden...they sure do defend his honor vigorously....

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
230. I am not surprised that open-minded people would defend him against
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 03:14 PM
Dec 2013

the spurious attacks by conservatives. Conservatives love strong, authoritarian states and spit on those that speak out for freedom and liberty.

The reason conservatives attack whistle-blowers, is because they dont like to upset the big daddy authoritarian leaders, like Clapper and Alexander. Therefore, they attack the messenger, because they cant deal with the message. The message that shakes their comfortable world of denial.

You imply that Snowden is racist. Even if he is racist, that doesnt excuse the NSA from violating our Constitutional rights.

Those that would detract us from investigating violations of the Constitution, align themselves with our enemy.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
232. Open minded like Racist Libertarians are?
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 03:16 PM
Dec 2013

Yeah REAAAAALLLL open minded!

Funny you seem to think that anyone who opposes Snowden MUST be a Conservative...even though you know many who have NEVER voted for a Republican or a Conservative or spouted Conservative talking points somehow must be one...without any evidence other than not being a Snowden fanboy!

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
234. Good grief! "Racist Libertarians"? Most open-minded people are not racist, but
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:05 PM
Dec 2013

nice strawman.

"Oppose Snowden". What does that even mean? Snowden pulled the curtain back on the NSA. If you "oppose" that, I would love to hear your rationalizations.

Again you are trying to put words into my mouth because you cant respond to what I do say.

Here's what I think: Those that disparage whistle-blowers do so because they support the corporations or authoritarian state. I think that those that disparage Snowden specifically, do so because they cant deal with the information that possibly their "god-like" devotion to the authoritarians like Clapper and Alexander is misplaced and that they are not looking out for out best interests.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
235. Again....prove to me that Libertarians aren't also racists...
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:07 PM
Dec 2013

I'll cue the Jeopardy theme song while I wait for you to think of one...

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
237. Once again you try to put words in my mouth. I have never claimed that Libertarians are or are not
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:20 PM
Dec 2013

racist. It is simply a distraction from investigating the NSA.

Your loyalty to the NSA is weird for a supposedly "politically liberal".

Conservatives hate whistle-blowers.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
236. OH and what you "think" is not necessarily so is it?
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:08 PM
Dec 2013

just because you THINK Snowden is not just another Libertarian racist...doesn't make it so...

Oh yeah and not JUST another Libertarian Racist...buy a Hypocrite too! He thought that people who have done what he did under George W Bush should be shot in the balls. Perhaps that's what makes him the coward that he is!

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
238. I am fed up with your discussion tactics. I DID NOT SAY SNOWDEN IS OR IS NOT
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:27 PM
Dec 2013

A LIBERTARIAN RACIST. I said it has nothing to do with the issue of whether the NSA is violating our Constitutional rights.

I give up trying to discuss with you.

We are in a class war and you seem to choose the side of the 1%.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
239. No that is YOU projecting what I am doing...you know nothing of the sort...
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:37 PM
Dec 2013

what you think I "seem to choose" is just your imagination....I think snowden is a hypocritical, racist Libertarian coward. And I have the evidence to back it up based on his statements...I don't "seem to think" it....I know it.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
242. I find your defense of him strange....
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 07:50 PM
Dec 2013

I find that the NSA transgression and Ed Snowden are not synonymous...I can seperate the two issues...why can't you?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
243. My only "defense" is to question the conservative obsession to vilify him.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 09:24 PM
Dec 2013

He may be all the things you claim to know for a fact. (I always discount arguments from anyone that claims that they know the facts) You only know what Bill O'Reilly told you. Your stance is the same as the Republicans. You hate Snowden and worship Clapper and Alexander. But even if he is a racist, what does that have to do with the NSA?

The main issue isnt that Snowden is a racist (as you claim to know for a fact) it's that the NSA may be taking great liberties with our security.

Those that vilify Snowden side with the conservatives and the authoritarian 1%.


 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
244. Hate to burst your bubble...but not everyone who opposes Snowden are all Conservatives..
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 09:35 PM
Dec 2013

this is where you go off the rails and why your defense is sooooo strange. You cannot seperated Snowden FROM the NSA....yet you will say it is not ABOUT Snowden. Incongruous.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
252. You support centrists not Democrats. Centrists that see eye to eye with conservatives.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 01:01 AM
Dec 2013

Centrists like Clinton that are in bed with Wall Street, love the Patriot Act and domestic spying.

We are in a class war, and you choose the wrong side.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
253. No I support Democrats period...
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 01:06 AM
Dec 2013

Conservatives and Republicans and Libertarians are the wrong side....I am none of those.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
254. I guess it just never occurs to you that you could be the "Fringe"
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 01:08 AM
Dec 2013

just like they have on the Right. That's a different perspective isn't it?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
241. Why Edward Snowden Is the Definition of a Whistleblower
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 07:16 PM
Dec 2013

David Sirota speaks to those that still are determined to kill the messenger:

Of course, there still remains a cottage industry of tough-talking saber rattlers slamming Snowden not merely for being in a foreign country, but more revealingly, for the disclosures themselves. These demagogues often invoke the age-old law-and-order cliches about classified information. Yet, based on what we now know, their criticism of Snowden actually puts them on the side of those who are systemically violating the very laws and constitution, which they purport to love.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/101681115
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
249. and what is your point? This is what is wrong with your premise...
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 10:17 PM
Dec 2013

You think everyone who disagrees with you is a Republican.....

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
192. and by the way....I am using actual statements made by Snowden to support my contentions
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 01:09 AM
Dec 2013

that he is just a racist Libertarian...

Supports Rand Paul
Hates Social Security
And a Gun humping NRA supporter...

What are the chances he is not also just another racist with an axe to grind?

If he doesn't matter....why do so many attempt to defend him from the fact that he is a racist Libertarian?

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
203. He's 29, for Chrissake!
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 07:25 AM
Dec 2013

Maturing rapidly, thanks to events....

...Something I think that the Snowden attackers will never do...(mature, or reach 29 without somebody taking them out for being sanctimonious assholes).

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
223. WTF does that mean? He has had the right to vote for over 10 yrs...
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 02:33 PM
Dec 2013

are you worshipping an adult or a child?

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
228. For someone who doesn't like being "boxed" in
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 02:54 PM
Dec 2013

your certainly like your boxes. Broad-stroke stereotypes that make it oh, so easy for you to draw specious correlations. Pulling the "racist" card every time someone does something you don't like is weak.

Supporting Rand Paul makes someone pretty foolish - but not necessarily racist.
Hating Social Security again is a foolish stance, but not necessarily racist.
Belonging to or supporting the NRA isn't something I would choose to do, but it doesn't necessarily make someone racist.

You don't like the guy - that's fine. Stop there and no one would argue with your choice. But you can't do that; you have to find some super-special "my reasoning tops your reasoning" argument. The only problem is that your argument is flawed. You asked, up thread, if there was such a thing as a Libertarian who isn't racist. The answer to that question is yes, not no - so everything you claim from that point forward is built on a false premise.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
229. You don't seem to understand how I meant "boxed in"
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 03:10 PM
Dec 2013

or you are pretending not to...

I used that phrase to describe a technique to attempt to piss people off by making them answer irrelevant questions that tries to limit the answer the person can return. Often when they don't get their expected response...they claim you didn't answer them...Piss them off hoping they say something that can be alerted on in their frustration...

Yeah....I Know all about this...

I am still waiting to hear of one Libertarian that isn't racist...

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
231. Oh and no I don't...
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 03:16 PM
Dec 2013

I haven't had ONE of you return one name of a non-racist Libertarian...

This is why YOUR premise is false...

George II

(67,782 posts)
120. Yes - and Ellsburg stayed in the United States and willingly faced prosecution
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:20 PM
Dec 2013

It never ceases to amaze me that people compare Snowden, the gutless coward, to Daniel Ellsberg.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
122. That Was A Differnt Time... And The Government Back Then Screwed Its Own Pooch...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:27 PM
Dec 2013
Obama Has Charged More Under Espionage Act Than All Other Presidents Combined

The U.S. government charged former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden with three felonies, including two under the Espionage Act. He now becomes the eighth person to be charged under the Espionage Act under Obama, according to Firedoglake. That is more than double all previous presidents combined. Prior to Obama’s administration only three people who leaked information had been charged under the 1917 statute that was never really intended for leakers. The arguments that Obama uses now to use that statute to go after those who reveal information were first brought up by Ronald Reagan’s administration when it went after a Navy civilian analyst who leaked photographs to a British military magazine. But now the practice has become widespread.


Link: http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2013/06/22/edward_snowden_is_eighth_person_obama_has_pursued_under_espionage_act.html

And BTW... Ellsberg Disagrees With You:

Snowden made the right call when he fled the U.S.

Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/daniel-ellsberg-nsa-leaker-snowden-made-the-right-call/2013/07/07/0b46d96c-e5b7-11e2-aef3-339619eab080_story.html

On the Road

(20,783 posts)
215. "Obama Has Charged More Under Espionage Act Than All Other Presidents Combined"
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 10:52 AM
Dec 2013

If you think about that statement for any period of time and compare it with the size of intelligence efforts throughout US history, you will see it is just as ridiculous as his claim that he had the authority to wiretap the president.

I'm surprised he didn't leak the news about the secret FEMA camps. We could have a heads-up on that one, too.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
216. Excellent point.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 11:05 AM
Dec 2013
Not to mention that Obama expanded whistleblower protections. Whistleblowers get protections. Leakers get prosecuted. There is a difference.

Snowden had options but none of them involved being heroic. His real persona was on display when he was 26 and wrote that leakers should be shot in the balls.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
225. So has Ellsberg said he would have fled to China, Russia and begged Brazil for asylum?
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 02:36 PM
Dec 2013

and are you trying to say that THIS administration is more dangerous than what was going on under Nixon? Were you even alive then?

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
210. Yes, I believe that Snowden is a hero
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 09:02 AM
Dec 2013

We all know classifying information in the government is used more to protect politicians and the powers that be, to hide mistakes and cover up blunders, then to protect our nation or the people of this nation.

It's mostly a way of hiding information that the government does not want its citizens to know.

Very few classified documents should be classified at all.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
74. Or without calling into question his
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:58 PM
Dec 2013

racism, which you don't have evidence of and a flimsy connection at best, maybe he didn't have the opportunity until Obama was in office. I know the playbook. When the message is seems to show a chink in the aura, then call the messenger a racist. You're not the first to use this tactic.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
77. Maybe he is a Social Security hating NRA supporting Libertarian too...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:00 PM
Dec 2013

Fuck Ed Snowden and the horse he rode in on!

Libertarians for the most part are just racists afraid to call themselves Republicans!

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
81. Now that you have exploded are you feeling better?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:05 PM
Dec 2013

And really why the bestiality? Horses are apolitical.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
83. He is a freaking Social Security hating, Gun Humper....that speaks volumes to me...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:08 PM
Dec 2013

as it SHOULD to you...

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
85. You left out racist that time.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:09 PM
Dec 2013

You're slipping. How's the blood pressure? Whatever you do don't stroke out. That would be tragic.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
89. that is because THAT is what I am using to prove he is...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:13 PM
Dec 2013

how many Libertarians have you met that are not also Racist hmmmm?

Maybe its your stroke you should be concerned about?

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
110. Not I, I am not the one that is flailing arms and gnashing of teeth
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:02 PM
Dec 2013

you made a racist comment to point out that snowden is a racist, yet provide no proof. Now if you could have been able to omit the inference that he only did this because Obama is black', I may have not goaded you along. However you were fun to play with and you keep zinging comic gold. I appreciate your humoring me tonight.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
124. I am not flailing at all you must be projecting
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:34 PM
Dec 2013

because I am convinced he couldn't be the only Libertarian that I ever ran across that wasn't a racist.

YMMV I guess. But as far as flailing.... I am not the one defending the cowardly, Libertarian turn coat am I?

I am pretty damn satisfied with my contention.

Would like to see your proof that he is the only non-racist Libertarian though....you don't even have to flail this time...

go!

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
126. I didn't defend him
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:46 PM
Dec 2013

I just pointed out you made a racist comment. I added other more likely reasons for not reporting under bush. I don't know what he is. I know that he brought to light that something is wrong in America for those who did not listen before. Now if you feel the need to make it all about race instead of being spied on, well then that's on you. By the way the fucking libertarian and horse fucking are indeed flailing of arms. They mean nothing and have no impact on your original statement that this is all about race.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
128. Hey, VanillaRhapsody
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:57 PM
Dec 2013

Maybe Snowden didn't reveal the crimes at the NSA during Bush's tenure because he didn't start working for the NSA until 2009?

Snowden left the CIA in 2009 and began work for Dell, a private contractor, inside an NSA facility on a US military base in Japan .[15] Snowden remained on the Dell payroll until early 2013.[53] Persons familiar with the 2013 government investigation into Snowden's history said that Snowden had downloaded sensitive NSA material in April 2012.[54] NSA Director Keith Alexander has said that Snowden held a position at the NSA for the twelve months prior to his next job as a consultant,[55] with top secret Sensitive Compartmented Information clearances.[56] Snowden took a six-day Certified Ethical Hacker training course in 2010 in India.[57][58][59][60] USIS completed a background check on Snowden in 2011.[61]

Snowden described his life as "very comfortable", earning a salary of "roughly US$200,000".[62] At the time of his departure from the United States in May 2013, he had been employed by consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton for less than three months inside the NSA at the Kunia Regional SIGINT Operations Center in Hawaii,


From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden

That makes your whole "racist" argument appear kind of stupid.
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
131. uh no it doesn't he's a Libertarian isn't he?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:09 PM
Dec 2013

hates Social Security....check!
big gun humping NRA fan.....check!

and you think he is NOT a racist too?

You ever met one that wasn't? Cause I haven't....

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
135. From the Republican playbook,
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:13 PM
Dec 2013

you're a Liberal, right?

Hates America? Check.

Wants to destroy family values? Check.

Out to murder unborn children? Check.

Waging a war on Christmas? Check.

Wants to indoctrinate all of our children into the homosexual lifestyle? Check.

Can you see how assigning a label to someone and then using it to ascribe motivations and judge the worth of their character is wrong?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
143. Yeah but I can prove he humps guns and hates social security...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:18 PM
Dec 2013

can you prove those things about me?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
154. Do you understand how simply calling names
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:32 PM
Dec 2013

degrades the quality of a discussion board?

Can you bring some reasonable analysis to the table? Some give-and-take? Some open mindedness to certain concepts, such as "attacking the messenger doesn't do anything to refute the message?"

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
200. Here's the difference, Maedhros.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 05:11 AM
Dec 2013

Those things you listed about liberals are falsehoods.

Libertarian economic beliefs, stated truthfully, reveal their holders to be greedy, selfish pigs. Virtually nothing separates them from the economic policies of the worst of the teabaggers.

G_j

(40,367 posts)
196. you are nuts
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:49 AM
Dec 2013

I'm not a fan of Libertarians, but what makes you such an authority that you know every single one of them is a racist?
Insanity...

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
133. No they are not....it goes to motivation...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:11 PM
Dec 2013

and he hasn't proven anything HAS happened just that it could...

but he has cowardly tried to suck up to so far three other nations...

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
140. His motivation is irrelevent.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:15 PM
Dec 2013

The NSA has admitted to some of the things he said, and we are told some changes will be made, but we don't know if that will actually happen.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
146. doesn't change what? That the capability exists? That is all he has said...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:25 PM
Dec 2013

meanwhile he has taken up residency in Russia and begged for asylum in Brazil....and he offered his knowledge of US secrets to secure that asylum (they rightfully denied that request)

And he took his job TO steal govt secrets...

he hates social security and loves the NRA and guns....

but you want to praise him as a hero....

ends don't justify the means....

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
159. Have you not been following the story?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:35 PM
Dec 2013

The NSA has admitted to spying on Americans more than what most Americans find acceptable.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
160. still nothing from Snowden proving that it happened...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:36 PM
Dec 2013

the NSA is capable yes....they admit that...

but have they spied on YOU? You don't know...

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
161. I think the NSA confession, which resulted from Snowden's actions,
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:39 PM
Dec 2013

is pretty good evidence. Why would they confess to unpopular activity if they weren't doing it?

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
170. The NSA admitted to spying on millions of Americans.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:48 PM
Dec 2013

I forgot how many association leaps they admitted to, but it was more than most Americans found acceptable.

 

BrainDrain

(244 posts)
211. Dear Sir...
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 09:34 AM
Dec 2013

We of the National Security Agency would like to inform you that you have been spied upon. We have collected your private electronic correspondence without your consent and in secret. Please feel free to continue your life as if we don't exist and our activities are in no way shape or form either and infringement of your constitutional rights or an admission to breaking any laws we don't really care for anyway.

Your continued cooperation through delusional self-denial is appreciated.

Yours Truly,

The National Security Agency

Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #160)

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
218. Almost as tragic, yet much more irrelevant, than petulant snark.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 11:19 AM
Dec 2013

Almost as tragic, yet much more irrelevant, than petulant snark rationalized.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
204. You should be careful
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 08:27 AM
Dec 2013

about using that analogy. Because I'm seeing some walking and quacking

Your moniker is extremely interesting.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
6. is that the next Snowden straw man...?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:09 PM
Dec 2013

I don't believe Snowden was involved when "that silly white texan was in office." He began working for Dell on the NSA contract in 2009. He did work for the CIA as an IT consultant from 2007-2009, but would not have had access to the NSA document trove until acquiring his sysadmin credentials at Dell and NSA, presumbably.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
14. Its NOT a strawman...did he or did he not support the spying while George W. Bush was
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:43 PM
Dec 2013

in office Yes or No?

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
18. I have no idea, nor do I think it's at all relevant....
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:50 PM
Dec 2013

I mean, did you support them? Did you even know about them? Really, be honest, because if you can say that you knew about the NSA surveillance abuses that Snowden has revealed then the question becomes "why did you abet keeping them secret?"

But the point is that whether Snowden knew or even cared about NSA abuses while Bush was in the WH has exactly zero bearing on whether or not I and the rest of the world feel betrayed by THIS administration, whom we certainly did NOT believe would continue, expand, and defend those abuses.

You're right, it's not a straw man. It's a smoke screen. A shiny distraction that has no relevance to the actual truth of events at all.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
20. Oh YES its relevant...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:51 PM
Dec 2013
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/07/06/have-we-all-been-fooled-by-edward-snowden/

SNOWDEN: HOLY SHIThttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/washington/11iran.html?_r=1&hp

SNOWDEN: WTF NYTIMES

SNOWDEN: Are they TRYING to start a war? Jesus christ they’re like wikileaks

User19: they’re just reporting, dude.

SNOWDEN: They’re reporting classified shit

User19: shrugs

User19: meh

SNOWDEN: moreover, who the fuck are the anonymous sources telling them this?

SNOWDEN: those people should be shot in the balls.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
25. ah-- now I feel all better that the NSA conducts warrentless universal surveillance...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:55 PM
Dec 2013

...on private citizens without probable cause. That changes EVERYTHING.

Sheesh.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
38. No it doesn't but I don't jump at the chance to make someone my hero....
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:02 PM
Dec 2013

who opposes ANY form of American govt.

I don't support Libertarians...do you?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
93. If a Libertarian gives you a million bucks....you can bet he expects something for it...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:16 PM
Dec 2013

are you going to comply?

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
95. A million bucks, no strings attached
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:20 PM
Dec 2013

Suppose my dad is a Libertarian (he's not!) and he wants to give me a million. As a gift.

Should I take it?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
96. A Libertarian would NEVER give you a dollar...much less a million of them...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:23 PM
Dec 2013

its against their nature...

In fact the Libertarian Snowden thinks YOU shouldn't get Social Security!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
105. Who cares what your father does? I don't but Snowden thinks he doesn't deserve his
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 09:04 PM
Dec 2013

Social Security check...that's a fact!

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
201. He didn't utter a word of complaint while Bush was in office.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 05:27 AM
Dec 2013

He waited till Obama was President.

It is one thing to have revealed the US spying on its own citizens. But continuing to reveal how the US has been spying internationally crosses the line. Why do we have the CIA and the NSA? To spy. And all the other major countries do it, too.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
233. It is completely relevant to the OP
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 03:32 PM
Dec 2013

in which he is criticizing the US for trying to compete for economic and political power.

For some strange reason, he never found reason to criticize any Rethug for doing the same thing.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
117. It doesn't MATTER. People can see the light at any time. It's the seeing that matters, not the date.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:09 PM
Dec 2013
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
15. actually if you never read what Snowden said about spying during those years...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:43 PM
Dec 2013

then your post would be dumbest.

But here you go:
SNOWDEN: HOLY SHIThttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/washington/11iran.html?_r=1&hp

SNOWDEN: WTF NYTIMES

SNOWDEN: Are they TRYING to start a war? Jesus christ they’re like wikileaks

User19: they’re just reporting, dude.

SNOWDEN: They’re reporting classified shit

User19: shrugs

User19: meh

SNOWDEN: moreover, who the fuck are the anonymous sources telling them this?

SNOWDEN: those people should be shot in the balls.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/07/06/have-we-all-been-fooled-by-edward-snowden/
 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
17. He didn't even get the information he did until AFTER 2009 so wouldn't have had it in
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:50 PM
Dec 2013

order to NOT release it while shrub was in office (I presume your inferring that he would have sat on it to protect the White president).

So your statement is just a lot of anthropomorphized straw.

But whatever. I said what I think and I'm out.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
26. baloney...he thought people who leaked under a republican should be shot....
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:55 PM
Dec 2013

under the first black democrat...

he dithered!

Your hero is severely flawwed.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
39. Snowden IS NOT my hero. I am, if anything, on the fence regarding Snowden. My posting
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:02 PM
Dec 2013

history will bear out the fact that I have rarely, if ever, even commented on the issue. So, your labeling him as my hero is as big a fail as trying to advance this theory of yours that he was racially motivated.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
44. I don't give a shit about his reputation. I do give a shit that I am being
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:09 PM
Dec 2013

spied on by my government.

It's like the Klayman thing and the ruling by Judge Leon. I don't give a shit that it was Klayman that brought the suit. That doesn't negate the fact that what the NSA is doing is a treasonous violation against the 4th Amendment Constitutional rights of myself and all Americans.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
49. You apparently give a shit about Snowden...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:22 PM
Dec 2013

just because they CAN do it...doesn't mean they have spied on you does it? Snowden has provided NO evidence that it has happened...only that it could.

Sorry but I don't support those that leak classified information then run to China...Russia and even seek asylum in Brazil...offering to help them oppose us in trade.

I DO care that a person leaking who knows what to who knows where...He ran like the coward that he is!

Now he has made himself untouchable....even a country like Brazil holds no truck for him...

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
51. Oh, Lord. Ok, there's no reasoning with you. I already said I don't give a shit about Snowden.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:27 PM
Dec 2013

You have chosen to disgard that.

So, I'm out.

Have fun with your racial motivation theory. I don't really give a shit anymore.

Hopefully we'll run into each other on better ground next time.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
52. Actions speak louder than words don't they?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:30 PM
Dec 2013

I have a theory about most Libertarians which I believe is what Snowden is..They support legalizing Pot but are racists and want to end Welfare and Food Stamps for those who they perceive receive the bulk of those funds...Blacks (I know thats not true but try to convince a racist of it)....They are too cowardly to call themselves Republicans.

Thus where my theory points to Snowden....

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
61. +1
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:40 PM
Dec 2013

"Oh, Lord. Ok, there's no reasoning with you."

You've hit the invisible wall of reason and there is NO bipartisanship here!

We used to call them Republicans.

-p

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
62. Are you calling me a Republican?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:43 PM
Dec 2013

because that is an alertable offense apparently as I got alerted on for calling someone by their name...who's very name included that word....

So you make the call...should I or shouldn't I?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
67. not a Princess or a Republican here...and that is sexist by the way!
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:47 PM
Dec 2013

Yeah way to prove I hit a nerve..

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
153. More like Snowden hit a nerve on you!
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:30 PM
Dec 2013

Wow. Your posts in this thread are truly exceptional. Do you really not see how nonsensical everything you are saying is? You're not helping your hero with that lame "racism" excuse.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
155. Not at all...I am only replying to my responses...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:32 PM
Dec 2013

Lame?

point out another Libertarian who isn't racist...

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
255. You made the claim that Snowden's actions were because of racism. The burden is on you to prove it.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 01:22 AM
Dec 2013

Whether Libertarians as a whole are or are not racist is not the issue.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
256. Yes and I stand by it...Suddenly he changed his mind about what should happen
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 01:27 AM
Dec 2013

to those who leak classified information...right about the time that the first Black man was elected....

He is a Rand Paul following Libertarian.

2+2 still equals 4 last I checked.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
257. Prove it. You prove nothing without evidence.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 01:37 AM
Dec 2013

Others have posted that he did not suddenly change his mind when Obama was elected. Show that he has. You have to have the "2"s to add together if you want to get to "4".

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
258. Okay easy....
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 01:39 AM
Dec 2013
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/07/06/have-we-all-been-fooled-by-edward-snowden/

He also had no problem with Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program, saying:

SNOWDEN: these are the same people who blew the whole “we could listen to osama’s cell phone” thing the same people who screwed us on wiretapping over and over and over again [sic] Thank god they’re going out of business.
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
181. That post was alerted on because you were being disruptive and behaving like a troll.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:48 AM
Dec 2013

That post was simply the last straw.

The exact same behavior you're displaying here.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
182. NO it wasn't...I read it...
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:49 AM
Dec 2013

Because I don't support Snowden? That might be disruptive to your sensibilities....but that is all I have done...

I don't support Libertarians...I support Democrats.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
183. Nope, the post you're referring to was alerted on because you were being disruptive and insulting.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:51 AM
Dec 2013

At Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:49 PM you sent an alert on the following post:

Over and Over and Over IS a Demand "Republican"!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3928371

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

YOUR COMMENTS:

Not just this post in particular, but this poster has been aggressively trolling throughout the thread and denigrating other DUers who are doing little more than attempting to explain things to them.

Please kick them out of this thread.

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:55 PM, and voted 5-1 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Enough.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: Agree with alerter.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: I'd go even further than kicking them out of the thread and kick them off DU if I could. From many of their other posts I think they're a returning recidivist disruptor.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given

Thank you.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
187. And your post wasn't hidden because of that.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:55 AM
Dec 2013

It was hidden because you being disruptive and crossing the line into insulting and intentional agitating.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
188. Yes that is what the jury was voting on....
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:56 AM
Dec 2013

I called him "Republican" for short....and that's what the jury saw...




Don't tell me what I know to be a fact...I was there...

and as a matter of fact...you are trolling just for bringing it up and trying to silence me by idly threatening me....

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
119. I think you had the wrong word in quotation marks there:
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:17 PM
Dec 2013

There, I fixed it:

apparently HE is you cannot stand by and let his reputation be sullied by the "truth."

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
123. the truth that he is a Libertarian that supported George Bush's spying and
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:29 PM
Dec 2013

hates Social Security and is a Gun Humper...



and you DOUBT that he is a racist too?

It's not much of a leap if you ask me...


but if you want to believe he is the ONLY Libertarian that isn't racist...then I guess that is your version of the "truth"

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
129. Your post is very revealing.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:03 PM
Dec 2013

You posted:

baloney...he thought people who leaked under a republican should be shot....

nder the first black democrat...

he dithered!

Your hero is severely flawwed.


You are clearly projecting. Flip that around: VanillaRhapsody was outraged at warrantless surveillance when a rich white texan was president, but when the first black democrat does it, it's fine.
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
134. YOU are supporting a Social Security hating....Gun Humping Libertarian....
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:12 PM
Dec 2013

doesn't that sort of say something about YOU then...since you are using THIS theory?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
139. Denial is not a river in Egypt...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:15 PM
Dec 2013

or if you are not defending him then all you really want to do is step to me....

that makes you a troll doesn't it?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
151. Well, you are putting up post after post
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:29 PM
Dec 2013

of shrill nonsense.

Trolls seek to create an environment of shrill nonsensicality.

I would prefer the number of shrill nonsensical posts on DU to decline.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
152. post after post because about a dozen snowden supporters are responding
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:30 PM
Dec 2013

simultaneously...

geez how long have you been on DU?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
158. I recommend an introductory course in Logic.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:34 PM
Dec 2013

Would help you avoid using so many fallacies and would strengthen your ability to engage in good-faith debate.

Right now, you're just yelling at people.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
147. And you're supporting right wingers like Cheney, Peter King, John Woo, etc.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:25 PM
Dec 2013

What does that say about you?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
149. You have never seen me on a thread doing that...but I HAVE seen you on one
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:26 PM
Dec 2013

doing what I just accused you of!

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
162. No. You accuse others of being Libertarians because they think what Snowden did was
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:40 PM
Dec 2013

a service to this Country. I turned that around to show the shallowness and stupidity of that argument because the people you support are Cheney, Peter King, John Woo, etc because they agree with you. See how dumb that argument is?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
165. NO...I accused Snowden of being a Libertarian....
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:43 PM
Dec 2013

I accused them of supporting one...

see how dumb your argument is?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
180. there was a point? Uh no...epic fail if you thought so....
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:44 AM
Dec 2013

I am neither a racist nor a Libertarian...but the chances that Snowden isn't both of those....is slim and none.

That's my point...just out of curiosity...what did you think yours was?

Jack Hollis

(1 post)
194. I am beginning to think you are sick
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 03:45 AM
Dec 2013

I am 73 years old and come from a family of democrats all the way back to the civil war but I will be damned if I ever met one so full of hate and poison as you are. You are scary as hell.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
21. It's Called Having Your Eyes Opened, And Evolving...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:52 PM
Dec 2013

I believe President Obama went through a similar process when it came to Marriage Equality.

There are lots of things I used to believe that I no longer believe...

That can happen when presented with new information.


truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
45. Of course Obama is not a hypocrite.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:14 PM
Dec 2013

He is our first African American president. The likes of a Nelson Mandela, a champion of the poor, a scorner of the rich, tireless campaigner against dirty fuel and for "Clean Energy" like Natural Gas and Big Nuke plants, etc.

While Snowden is a dirty little turn coat who tried to expose some very serious goings on that we Americans probably don't have time to deal with, as our personal energy really should be spent admiring our First African American President!

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
24. But the comment suggests the Snowden had the information during the White president's
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:54 PM
Dec 2013

term and sat on it to protect that president, then only releasing it to damage a Black president.

It's just a dumb premise. Sorry.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
28. No it isn't seems everything changed for him when the FIRST black man was elected...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:56 PM
Dec 2013

you think that is a coincidence? I don't!

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
33. I have never even once raised within my own thoughts that Snowden's motives have/had
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:59 PM
Dec 2013

anything to do with race of concurrent presidents. Sorry.

But if you have any evidence to support your supposition, I'll gladly take a look.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
60. Just because YOU never thought of it...doesn't mean it is not true!
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:40 PM
Dec 2013

Libertarians are Pot smoking racists...

Snowden is a Libertarian... 2 + 2 still equals 4.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
132. There are many different strains of Libertarian
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:10 PM
Dec 2013

that span the political spectrum from Left to Right. You are drawing a caricature of Libertarians - a straw man, if you will - and then using it to ascribe motivations to Snowden.

That's as misguided as Republican caricatures of black welfare queens or freedom-hating Liberals.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
19. See post #17. And, BTW, before you alert (if you haven't already), please understand...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:51 PM
Dec 2013

that I was not calling you dumb. I said your comment was dumb.

I've said some dumb things, also. We all do.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
22. You see mine...while a White Republican President was in office...he thought
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:53 PM
Dec 2013

people who did what he did should be shot in the balls...

When the first Black President is elected.....He thinks HE should leak classified information...

Coincindence? I think not....

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
30. You're only speculating his motives. You even admit it: "Coincindence? I think not...." ...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:57 PM
Dec 2013

Keyword being "think".

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
32. besides...saying "I think not" is a figure of speech...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:59 PM
Dec 2013

perhaps that is where you go off the rails in the first place....taking things at face value!

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
42. It's cool, VanillaRhapsody. You are, of course, free to believe what you want. The only thing
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:06 PM
Dec 2013

I give a crap about is that my government is spying on me.

Whether what Snowden did was right or wrong, I'm not sure in my own mind. But I do know that what the NSA is doing is treason and that agency should be disbanded and thrown in the trash can of history.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
174. IMO, leaking info on the US Govt spying on it's own people is one thing. i can get behind that.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:04 AM
Dec 2013

going to a Chinese controlled territory and then Russia, leaking stuff on what we do to other countries, is the big no-no.

spying isn't cool, but every country that can afford an intelligence agency has one, and spies on friend and foe alike.

the ramifications of the latter are not clear, but I don't hold snowden in the "sweet bebe jesus" category that some folks here do.

truth is we don't know what information he had, or who he gave it to. I'd highly doubt china and Russia hasn't gotten it or tried to get it.

supposedly greenwald is sitting on all of it. who the hell knows.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
56. Yeah, and while a white Republican was in office
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:36 PM
Dec 2013

I was a vicious homophobe, misogynist, omnivore, Christian free-marketeer.

People change over time, and not everything everyone does has to relate to who is in the White House.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
69. I personally don't give a fuck whether Snowden is a racist or not.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:53 PM
Dec 2013

Though I see no evidence he is or ever was except for the straw man you've thrown up here.

If a black gay atheist socialist had leaked the documents instead of a straight white libertarian, I would feel the same way about both the leaker and the leak.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
71. Do you give a fuck what he thinks about our Social Security system and the NRA then?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:56 PM
Dec 2013
SNOWDEN: save money? cut this social security bullshit

User11: hahahayes

User18: Yeah! Fuck old people!

User11: social security is bullshit

User11: let’s just toss old people out in the street

User18: Old people could move in with [User11].

User11: NOOO

User11: they smell funny

SNOWDEN: Somehow, our society managed to make it hundreds of years without social security just fine

SNOWDEN: you fucking retards

SNOWDEN: Magically the world changed after the new deal, and old people became made of glass

SNOWDEN: yeah, that makes sense

User11: wow

User11: you are just so fucking stupid

SNOWDEN: yeah, [User11]. and you’re quite a gem

User19: and magically, life expectancy has doubled in the last 100 years.funny how that works.

SNOWDEN: [User19], you don’t think modern medicine has something to do with that? no? it’s social security? wow. I guess I missed that.

User11: hurr wait a second, life expectancy has shot up in recent times along with the dissolution of the communal family unit in exchange for the nuclear family

User11: gee i guess we might need to create a safety net for the sudden glut of helpless elderly????

SNOWDEN: they wouldn’t be fucking helpless if you weren’t sending them fucking checks to sit on their ass and lay in hospitals all day

User11: you are so goddamned stupd*pid

User11: PUT OLD PEOPLE TO WORK IN THE FIELDS

SNOWDEN: my grandmother is eighty fucking three this year, and you know what? she still supports herself working as a goddamned hairdresser



“Fuck old people”? An objectivist view if ever there was one. The other issue is the Second Amendment:

User: the restrictions were made to appease the conservatives to get another bill passed. fucking cons.

SNOWDEN: See, that’s why I’m goddamned glad for the second amendment. Me and all my lunatic, gun-toting NRA compatriots would be on the steps of Congress before the C-Span feed finished.
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
79. How is that relevant to the NSA leaks?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:02 PM
Dec 2013

Hint: it's not.

What you're doing here is a textbook example of the poisoning the well fallacy. His views on the president or social security have absolutely nothing to do with the NSA disclosures, and you're trying to discredit him on a completely unrelated topic.

But tell me, do you like the interstate highway system?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
80. HINT he is a Libertarian...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:04 PM
Dec 2013

I cannot think of one Libertarian that turned out not to be racist...have you?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
88. Oh thats supposed to box me in huh...cause a Republican built the Interstate Highway System?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:11 PM
Dec 2013

You do understand it was built FOR the military not you or I right?

pfffffffftttttt!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
91. Where do I stand on it? Normally I don't stand on it...I am normally in a car...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:15 PM
Dec 2013

where is it that you are standing exactly?

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
94. Alright, so you're a troll.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:18 PM
Dec 2013

Just what I always thought.

If you're not willing to answer a basic question after the person you're debating with has given you the same courtesy, that makes you a troll.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
97. because I ride in cars I am a troll?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:25 PM
Dec 2013

so I suppose that is what you call everyone that disagrees with you that huh?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
98. trying to box someone in with a stupid question...That makes YOU the troll!
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:26 PM
Dec 2013

by definition...

besides...just because you didn't like the answer...doesn't mean there wasn't one...just sayin'

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
100. You are the troll...as I pointed out..
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:31 PM
Dec 2013

you weren't asking a non pertinent question...you were asking one trying to trick me into a response...which didn't happen...that is the epitome of troll.

That makes YOU the troll not me!


So keep on Trolling yourself!

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
76. Just what makes you so sure this is a black and white problem?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:59 PM
Dec 2013

Why can't it be a Republican vs. Democrat bias? Everyone expects Republicans to spy and cheat, I was not surprised that Bush did it, I was surprised a Democratic Constitutional scholar didn't stop it.

Southerner vs. Northerner bias?

Maybe it just took him that long to gather the information?

So Snowden made remarks in what is one of the worlds best read newspaper that didn't make an admission to what he was or was going to do; in fact he implied just the opposite. Wow, I'm surprised.

Maybe he wanted to give President Obama time to clean up the mess and when the President didn't, then he acted.

I don't know what is the truth, and until Snowden tells us, neither do you. But do I think it is about black and white? Not likely.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
78. BECAUSE he is a Social Security hating NRA supporting Libertarian...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:01 PM
Dec 2013

how many of ^^^ those do you know who aren't also racists?

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
107. Yeah, you need to look at a timeline. Seriously.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 09:12 PM
Dec 2013

Then come back and once again spout off about how Snowden didn't reveal *'s spying... as IF he had the chance. Look at a timeline. Here's a little fact... a timeline isn't biased. A timeline isn't partisan. And lastly, a timeline can't distinguish a libertarian from a fascist from a racist from a butterfly. It just shows what happened and when.

Educate thyself; it keeps you from looking silly, if not dumb.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
70. I never said it did.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:54 PM
Dec 2013

The only thing I care about regarding Snowden is his freedom from malicious prosecution by the US for what he did. I personally don't care about his motives or his background. What he leaked is more important.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
72. You want to see him forgiven...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:58 PM
Dec 2013

its not malicious if he is in fact guilty!

He is a Social Security hating...NRA supporting Libertarian...FUCK HIM!

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
106. oh, god
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 09:07 PM
Dec 2013

i suppose racism made the president pass insurance mandates, and is making him pass the TPP, and is the reason we still torture people, and the reason he didn't prosecute the banksters, and the reason he supported Blanche Lincoln...

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
3. After seeing all the Republicans' dirty politics for the last 14 years --
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 05:16 PM
Dec 2013

& there's no doubt about it that GWB escalated the underhandedness -- it's the economic spying, social control, & power over American consumers, employees, patients, etc., that concerns me most about this mass spying.

 

12ZTR

(92 posts)
7. Everything's a business model.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:17 PM
Dec 2013

Spying is the ultimate in insider trading. How many large & small business conversations, including illegal deals, have been listened to so the few can benefit financially?

Ask Reps & Dems in Congress if they know anything about insider trading.
Does anyone think that they aren't being robbed at every available opportunity?

George Carlin said it well:

"By the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head with their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table has tilted folks. The game is rigged and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care! Good honest hard-working people; white collar, blue collar it doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on. Good honest hard-working people continue, these are people of modest means, continue to elect these rich cock suckers who don’t give a fuck about you….they don’t give a fuck about you… they don’t give a FUCK about you."

I'm sure many are unable to understand the message or as the saying goes: "Let Them Die Dumb."

George II

(67,782 posts)
9. It's no secret that everone spys on everyone - just ask Jonathan Pollard!
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:30 PM
Dec 2013

For any country in this day and age to express indignation about being spied upon is hypocritical.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
11. And yet Snowdens fans express endless indignation because the US spies on foreign countries.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 06:39 PM
Dec 2013

Why is that, do you think?

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
46. no-- I'm indignant when the NSA spies on foreign CITIZENS, as well as upon...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:15 PM
Dec 2013

...U.S. citizens, indiscriminately and without probable cause. It is perfectly legitimate for rival nations, or governments hostile to one another, to collect intelligence regarding industrial and military capacity, troop deployments, and policy making. But hoovering up ALL the private communications of innocent private citizens is not the same thing at all. It's Orwellian.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
53. But you have nothing for the US Citizens who were spied upon by Brazil.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:32 PM
Dec 2013

Talk about Orwellian. How doublethink is that?

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
136. huh? what on earth made you jump to that conclusion?
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:13 PM
Dec 2013

I think all such surveillance is equally threatening, regardless of who benefits or their motives.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
145. Well, for one, we have no evidence that Brazil is spying on American citizens.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:22 PM
Dec 2013

We only have evidence of the NSA doing so.

Also, there is absolutely no reason to believe taht Brazil has the technical capability to duplicate the NSA's spying operations, nor the influence needed to make the major wireless carriers knuckle under to their demands.

Your argument is, frankly, quite ridiculous.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
37. Anytime... Uncle Joe, Anytime... Plus:
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:01 PM
Dec 2013
My act of conscience began with a statement: "I don't want to live in a world where everything that I say, everything I do, everyone I talk to, every expression of creativity or love or friendship is recorded. That's not something I'm willing to support, it's not something I'm willing to build, and it's not something I'm willing to live under."


Also from his letter.






George II

(67,782 posts)
213. That's interesting - from his behavior over the last several months....
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 10:32 AM
Dec 2013

...it seems that he doesn't want "to live in a world where everything that I say, everything I do, everyone I talk to, every expression of creativity or love or friendship is NOT recorded"!

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
103. I agree with him, too. He should be shot in the balls.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:55 PM
Dec 2013

Actually, I don't. He was an idiot when he said that stupid thing. And he's an idiot now for leaking information that has nothing to do with what he said was his most important concern: spying on Americans.

It should be clear to anyone that his main purpose in life has become to damage the country as much as possible.

Every country spies on every country in an attempt to gain advantage, economic or otherwise.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
48. What I find absolutely hilarious about this theatrical performance is the essential lie
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:18 PM
Dec 2013

that there is more to this soap opera than the elite being caught with their hand in the cookie jar and canary feathers still clinging to their faces.

Here you've had one of the most prolific "If you don't love the President, you're a racist!" posters to spend two hours writing the same non-argument 16 times. Each of them ignoring every fact surrounding this issue while trying to change the focus by screaming about people's imagined motivations, Snowden's, yours, and anybody else that doesn't agree with this week's narrative.

We created the terrorists to replace the Communists. The Sheeple must be kept distracted and scared, otherwise they might notice where they are and see where they're headed.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
50. Classic Thread Hi-Jacking... And...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:25 PM
Dec 2013

It does NO FAVORS in the ACTUAL fight against racism.

If everybody is a racist... then nobody is a racist.




 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
75. OTOH... That Poster Keeps Kicking This Thread, Giving It More And More Visibility...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:59 PM
Dec 2013

So there's that.



And according to some estimates... we're gonna have two more years of bear poking.


 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
189. Just a resident troll doing what they do best.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:59 AM
Dec 2013

I really need to learn not to feed them sometimes

jazzimov

(1,456 posts)
73. Interesting that Brazil is not considering giving him asylum.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 07:58 PM
Dec 2013
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/17/us-usa-security-snowden-brazil-idUSBRE9BG15920131217

(Reuters) - Brazil says it is not considering granting asylum to Edward Snowden even after the former U.S. National Security Agency contractor offered on Tuesday to help investigate revelations that the NSA has spied on Brazilians and their president.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
109. it shouldn't shock anyone...
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:00 PM
Dec 2013

believe it or not, the Brazilian government (just like everyone else) DOES have some close secrets they don't want getting out, either...

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
195. exactly...
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 04:40 AM
Dec 2013

nobodys hands are clean in the world...
which is why im okay with international spying...
itd be naïve to not do , imho...

its the domestic parts that bother me...

indepat

(20,899 posts)
87. Did Snowden read all my posts about it all being all about empire and hegemony (and the power that
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 08:10 PM
Dec 2013

goes with those)?

gulliver

(13,180 posts)
112. Snowden demonizing the United States to get asylum.
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:04 PM
Dec 2013

I called this out a while back. Snowden doesn't know if his Russian asylum is going to last beyond its initial one year. As he gets closer and closer to the deadline, he will sell out the United States more and more to save his own ass. In this case, Snowden is trying to enrage the people of Brazil against the United States in an effort to force the hand of its leaders. I hope all Brazilians are catching a strong whiff of rodent from his general direction.

I expect this little shit to keep putting our country down to anyone who will listen right up until they drag him screaming out of Russia on his way to prison.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
113. "entire populations under an all-seeing eye": EVERY Pop star shows the Horus One-Eye. The Olympic
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:04 PM
Dec 2013

mascot was an odd Cyclopean entity. TPTB are FAR more sinister than most think.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
115. I'd say any political or economic advantage gained
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:06 PM
Dec 2013

is minimal at best...But if it is strictly economic/political, then the overwhelming majority of the data must relate to China, then...I don't think they've even been mentioned so far...


Ultimately, I think the surveillance is for the sake of surveillance...If information is an alternate 'currency', then the NSA are simply obsessive-compulsive greedy hoarders...

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
121. It's clear from the letter that Snowden desperately wants out of Russia
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 10:24 PM
Dec 2013

You can see it in his groveling. It's hilarious.

As if the US country is the only country to conduct espionage for political advantage.

What did Snowdenwald have to say about Brazilian espionage? As if that wasn't for political advantage?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/brazil-admits-it-spied-on-u-s-diplomats

Crickets?

Thought so.





 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
148. First you criticize him for accepting asylum in Russia,
Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:25 PM
Dec 2013

then you criticize him for seeking an alternative.

I tell ya, the guy can't win.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
219. Why? You seem to take your own views for granted.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 11:27 AM
Dec 2013

The NSA is supposed to be doing things no one knows about. When we found out, it wasn't anything Verizon didn't already have. For the most part, they may be doing what they are supposed to do.

You have worked yourself up into such a state you can't even consider that.

There is a whistleblower statute - name another country that even has such a thing.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
177. Willy T!
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:32 AM
Dec 2013

My god Laddie look what you have gone and done now! You've gone and let the Banshee loose!

I think it's time to whip out the fiddle and the pipes, to chase it away.... far, far away...




 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
193. I wanted to embed an image of a fiddler and piper chasing the banshee away
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 03:30 AM
Dec 2013

first of all I couldn't find quite the right image, but even so, I don't know how to embed images on du3 !

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
199. So we're supposed to be surprised and outraged
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 05:06 AM
Dec 2013

because the US, like every other country, is jockeying for power in the larger world?

I'm glad that Snowden brought to light the spying the US was doing on its own citizens.

I do not applaud him for his continued focus on US spies doing the international spying we always knew they were doing -- and that all the other major countries do, too.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
207. We have to stop the NSA.
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 08:51 AM
Dec 2013

If we can't do so, our freedom of association and, perhaps, freedom of action soon are going to disappear.

TBF

(32,053 posts)
208. Those are the key words in that letter and
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 08:54 AM
Dec 2013

he is 100% spot on in that letter. Snowden is a hero in my book. He's a very smart man and I imagine he knew he was taking an incredible risk doing this.

hueymahl

(2,495 posts)
222. An amazing amount of troll feeding going on in this thread - too many vanilla wafers
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:31 PM
Dec 2013

Hero or villain, it does not really matter. The information exposed is the story. The unconstitutional acts are the story. The quasi police state is the story. The messenger is not the story.

BTW, I personally think Snowden is a hero, not that it matters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Case You Missed This N...