An online presidential 2012 test - who is your candidate?

[cowcommander]

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/fullpage?id=15177995

Who did you get?

[Autumn]

1. I got Obama

The boxes I selected were all too conservative for my tastes but it was the closest to my beliefs. Basically BS choices.

[RainDog]

106. yes, that poll was b.s. in many ways

and shows how limited the choices are that are presented to the American people as feasible - but it's the candidates who are the ones who are limiting our choices.

I, of course, got Obama.

[Scuba]

124. Yep. I got BHO, with Huntsman and Romney trailing, but the survey is bogus....

for example, I'd like to repeal the Health Care Reform Act and replace it with Medicare for All. I'd also like to invest more in education, but none of it should go to charter schools.

Perhaps this is useful for some barely-engaged soul, otherwise it's BS.

[TBF]

130. Same answer - what a stupid survey. I cringed at most of the replies. nt

[kenfrequed]

137. I agree

Of course I got Obama first and Huntsman as second as well.

And I agree with you about the healthcare law. We should have a national program or medicare for all.

[subterranean]

148. The survey may be more useful for Republican voters.

And I bet that some of them may be surprised that Obama comes out on top based on their answers.
As for us DUers, the survey just reemphasized that despite Obama's shortcomings, he's still a better choice than any of the Republican candidates. But we already knew that (well, most of us, anyway).

[FedUp_Queer]

149. I thought the same thing.

It doesn't actually ask what you think. It asks which you chose of the candidates. I, too, cringed at many of the choices. I know my candidate would really be none of the above...which I think a lot of people would fall into.

[Sarah Ibarruri]

2. I got Barack. Not much other choice there, was there? nt

[golddigger]

3. Here's mine...

#1 Obama
#2 Paul
#3 Romney

[quakerboy]

37. Same. Obama

Apparently I agree with Paul when it comes to national security, Romney on education, and Obama on everything else.

However, the options on about half of the questions were almost offensively limited. Instead of finding an answer that I agreed with, I had to look for the least offensively wrong answer. That's how I ended up with Romney on one question. There was no good answer, but Romney's was the most vague. I am sure he did not mean it the way that I would mean the same phrase. There were a handfull of other answers where the choices came out "I agree with this 0%, this 0%, and this 10%, so I guess thats the one i pick, even though I dont really agree with it...". That a sad state of affairs. You would think that with as big a country as we have, there would be different candidates with different stances on various issues, but there is not. On several important issues, only slight shadings of 1 viewpoint are shared by every candidate available.

As to Paul, what can I say? When he agrees with me, he is right, no matter how wrong he is on virtually everything else. Of the current "major" candidates he is the closest to correct on foreign policy. Get our nose and our troops out of other peoples business and do it now, no more mucking about. That's just about the only thing he is correct on, but in that one arena, his proposed policy is better than Obama's.

[napoleon_in_rags]

98. Same, but my third was Bachmann. I wonder what that means. nt

[Muskypundit]

4. Those questions made me want to puke.

Just another testament as to how far to the middle Obama went.

[Shandris]

12. I'm somewhat inclined to agree.

I mean, when the outcomes can ONLY include Obama and then 7 crazy rightwingers, you're going to have a lot of interesting responses. But still...I got Obama (with his own picture), then NEWT GINGRICH?! How is that even possible?

[Muskypundit]

19. Just say he is invented

And ignore the whole thing XD

[karynnj]

23. I know how you feel - I got Obama, Huntsman, then Gingrich

So, I guess on some answers they took the version of Newt that was semi sane.

[AtomicKitten]

31. That's what I got too.

[karynnj]

50. I wonder how Gingrich would feel knowing this quiz leads to him having

more in common with Obama and Huntsman than Romney does! (I bet he likes that as little as we like getting him.)



Most questions had only one or at most two answers a Democrat was likely to chose.

[DCKit]

125. My #3 was PERRY!!!!

Jeebus, I could see Huntsman, he made it past the 6th grade.

[Confusious]

120. A stopped clock is right twice a day

He says so many crazy things, one has to loop around from the right, back to the left, and sound good to you, somewhat.

Even crazy people have moments of lucidity.

[joshcryer]

54. He started in the middle.

But people weren't paying attention.

[alp227]

68. yeah the health care q didn't even mention single payer!

[rbnyc]

135. I agree.

That was painful. For many of the questions, none of the answers were good. SUCKS!!!!

[zipplewrath]

5. What was obvious

Was that there wasn't really a "candidate" for me. Most of the responses were to "timid" or soft and didn't go nearly far enough in one sense or another.

[IrishEyes]

6. Bachman

I answered opposite to what I believed. I got

1. Bachman
2. Santorum
3. Perry

I also feel sick that one of these people could be the nominee.

[quakerboy]

40. That would be very challenging to do

With so many wrong answers, how do you pick the most wrong?

[Hutzpa]

155. Good question?

nt.

[Delphinus]

126. Obama

was first, followed by Bachman and Paul. I was shocked at the two 'pubs!

[RKP5637]

7. I got Barack Obama. n/t

[subterranean]

8. I got Obama, but it showed Ron Paul's picture over Obama's name.

Did that happen to anyone else?

[RKP5637]

9. I got the same. (Ron Paul's picture over Obama's name) n/t

[The Genealogist]

14. Yes I got that too

A glitch or a Faux Snooze type "error?"

[LynneSin]

136. I had Newt's picture over Obama's name

I mean I have to be Obama since I am pro-choice, pro-education, pro-environment, pro-tax the billionaires, pro-gay marriage.

[gateley]

10. Obama - and I was honest in my responses, didn't try to Vote Obama. The

other options -- all of them -- were just too horrific to even consider.

Not GREAT options for us, either, but that's the reality of what we're dealing with at this time.

[one_voice]

11. Here's mine...

1. Obama

2. Huntsman

3. Perry---WTF?!?! Must have been the immigration question---I didn't really see a choice I liked.--I'm going to go scrub myself with bleach--just the thought of agreeing with Perry on anything makes me feel icky...

[tblue]

109. Obama, Huntsmam, Romney

Some of the questions had no answers that really suited me though.

[flor-de-jasmim]

118. Same for me - both the results and the critique.

[snooper2]

152. I feel better now with Obama, - Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman were runner-ups.

[redqueen]

156. Same here.

The answers showed just how fringe loony rightwing this country has become.

[justiceischeap]

13. Obama, Paul, Huntsman in that order. nt

[The Genealogist]

15. I got 1) Obama; 2) Huntsman 3) Paul

There were several questions in there that I saw no answer which i thought was good. I had to choose the least bad answer to make the quiz work.

[Luciferous]

16. Obama, Paul, Huntsman. I really didn't find answers I liked for

most of the questions though.

[styersc]

17. I got Obama.

I wonder what he would get if he took this survey.

[izquierdista]

18. I couldn't finish

When it got to "What can we do to strengthen security along the US-Mexico border?" there were only silly answers. Decriminalize drugs and take away the narcotrafficers source of income wasn't on the list.

[graywarrior]

38. Same here. Same question.

[Cherchez la Femme]

48. And stop predatory corporations/businesses

from hiring them below minimum wage.
Upgrade those jobs to a living wage -- for US citizens

[OswegoAtheist]

20. Stupid question: Should Gay Marriage be legal across the U.S.?

1. We must pass a Constitutional Amendment outlawing gay marriage
2. This should be up to the individual states
3. Traditional marriage is between a man and a woman, but I support civil unions
4. My views on gay marriage are evolving. But no law should ban gay marriage outright.

Where the fuck is the "Yes, it's a civil right for all Americans" option?

Oswego "Didn't bother finishing the test" Atheist

[tblue]

110. You're right but the answers were based on the candidates' stances.

And I guess no one would answer with a resounding yes. And that's a doggone shame.

[FreeState]

113. There are two GOP candidates that support Marriage Equality and zero Dems

Fred Kroger and Gary Johnson.

[sakabatou]

21. Obama

[silverweb]

22. Obama.

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Ron Paul was 2nd and Huntsman was 3rd.

[a kennedy]

24. Obama, Huntsman and Romney.....

yikes.

[TDale313]

25. Those were mine as well.

Oh, and the picture I had for Obama was Gingrich. SMH. Plus, I have to agree that the questions point out just how slanted to the right our options are.

[11 Bravo]

42. And mine.

[NavyDem]

64. And mine

I did not find an acceptable answer for border security. My thought is, take away the incentive by SEVERELY penalizing businesses that make exploitation of immigrant labor attractive.

I also did not like the education choices. My thougth being that we need to keep student to teacher ratio's lower, and invest heavily in PUBLIC schools.

[RFKHumphreyObama]

26. My results

1. Obama
2. Huntsman
3. Paul

Which sounds about right.

[KamaAina]

27. Barack

followed by Newt (!) and Perry (!!)

[snooper2]

153. What the hell did you answer to get Perry? ROFL

You want to build a super duper double fence?

[KamaAina]

154. Actually, I think it was 2+2=5

[ScreamingMeemie]

28. I had to quit. The answers don't match my beliefs

Sorry.

[deutsey]

65. Yes...that was very aggravating n/t

[progressoid]

77. Sadly, me too. N/T

[Charlemagne]

29. I put in

The craziest, most draconian answers I could think of and I got Michelle Bachmann. There are people who really think like that???

[stevenleser]

102. Yes. Lots of them in the South and Midwest

I think some folks don't factor that into their political strategy.

[Ferret Annica]

30. Obama

But some of those questions were framed strangely.

[WI_DEM]

32. Obama, Huntsman & Paul

[aletier_v]

33. I got Huntsman, Ron Paul, and Romney

They didn't ask me if I'd vote for a mormon, though.

[Robb]

34. Wow. I'll admit I'm surprised.

...Who is "Jimmy McMillan?"

[McCamy Taylor]

35. Obama (of course) but how the hell did I get Bachman as second runner up?

How come there was no "Gay marriage is a right" response?

[LeftishBrit]

36. I did it just out of curiosity, though obviously I don't vote in the USA

I got President Obama unsurprisingly, followed by someone called Jon Huntsman. WHO is Jon Huntsman?

[racaulk]

39. I got (1) Obama, (2) Huntsman, and (3) Paul.

Although the question about gay marriage was total bullshit as none of the answers matched my beliefs. I had to choose the "evolving" response as it was the choice that was least offensive of those presented. Unfortunately, that has to be my choice in real life as well.

[aletier_v]

41. I chose civil union

I thought it was more positive than "evolving and against an outright ban".

[joshcryer]

53. Yeah, that one was stupid, but they apparently were using the candidates'...

...positions, at least, as far as I can tell. I chose "states rights" but even then I find that bullshit.

[Jim Lane]

43. I got Kucinich

But that's because I hacked the test to include sensible answers where all the ones offered were right-wing talking points.

[Generic Brad]

62. You beat the Kobayashi Maru

Live long and prosper with full Social Security and Medicare benefits.

[Jim Lane]

81. OK, I admit I had to look that one up.

I saw the 2009 movie but I'm not enough of a Trekker to have retained that detail.

Now, having read the Wikipedia article on it, I see that you have given me high praise, and I thank you!

[think]

63. +1 :D

[RebelOne]

44. My top candidate is Obana, #2 is John Huntsman and #3 is (god forbid) Newt Gingrich. n/t

[Bucky]

45. What the fuck...? I got Kim Jong-Un. Man, I hate online tests.

Is he even old enough to be president?

[JoePhilly]

46. I tried this 3 times ... and it crashed at the end each time.

I even switched browsers.

But based on the questions I saw each time ... I'm voting for Obama and not one of the GOP whack jobs.

[JoePhilly]

47. Do it again ... but this time pick the total opposite of what you really believe!!!!

I did it 3 times trying to be honest, and it crashed at the end each time.

And so, I tried one more time ... but this time, I picked the most evil right wing option I saw.

And of course THEN it worked!!!!

When I picked what I thought were the most evil right win positions ... the result was ....

1) Bachmann
2) Perry
3) Santorum

[aletier_v]

75. Okay, I buy Bachman and Santorum as most evil but Perry?

He doesn't have enough presence to be evil.

[JoePhilly]

139. My quess is the entire thing is biased depending on which quotes ...

they picked from the various candidates.

Perry has said all kinds of insane things.

[TheKentuckian]

49. Too many dumb as fuck responses

[Pigheaded]

51. Ron Paul

Weird I think

[joshcryer]

52. A lot of quitters.

Shame.

[Honeycombe8]

55. Obama. But the questions didn't speak to moderates...

I'm a moderate...left of center. My answers would've been between a couple of the choice answers given, but I had to select either a definite left or a definite right answer.

It wouldn't have changed the result. I just noticed that that poll would work only for those who are definitely left or right, but it's the middle ones that decide elections, isn't it? And the ones who are left or right don't really need to take a quiz, I think.

[Honeycombe8]

56. Also, we couldn't weight the questions...some meant little to me...

so I would vote for someone who didn't hold my view on that issue, since it's not as important to me as others. And I would hold one or two issues so important, that I wouldn't vote for someone who didn't hold my view on those issues, even if he held my views in all other respects.

[TheKentuckian]

117. None of the responses were left of center

If you occupy a mid-way spot between these positions then you are an arch conservative in the mold of Anthony Kennedy, stradling the line between right and reactionary, radical regressive.

[Honeycombe8]

166. Bullshit. I am a moderate. Rightwingers think I'm a flamin' liberal. Progressives think I'm an...

"arch conservative."

The truth is....I am a moderate. Definitely far left on some issues, right of center on one or two issues, and left of center on most issues. I am pretty much mainstream. More often than not, I end up voting for the one who wins. That's because I am mainstream America. There have been exceptions...Bush, for one, of course. But early on, for example, I decided to vote for Obama and poo pooed those notions that he couldn't win because of his race and experience. I knew that he could. Mainstream America was thinking like that.

I do not have a party affiliation.

[TheKentuckian]

168. If you even think most of the questions had a leftist response available then you're pretty far

right. If you occupy the middle ground between the options presented then you would be extremely conservative but be given an aura of moderation by contrasting one's self against reactionaries and radical regressives.

In most western democracies both parties would be to the right of of the prevailing conservative coalitions. Mid-way between them makes you fairly rabidly conservative from the jump.

[barbtries]

57. of course i got Obama

though some of the choices really sucked. for instance why can't i just say i support equal marriage rights for everyone.

[Denninmi]

58. WTF -- It gave me Rick Santorum.

I know how Charlie Brown felt when he kept getting lumps of coal.

No way I would vote for any of those R asses - but if I was forced to under penalty of death, it would be Huntsman.

Many of the questions were totally rigged -- no true choice -- for example, in the Gay Marriage question, full equality wasn't even offered as a choice.

Rig the questions, and you rig the results.

[Motown_Johnny]

167. Me too...

this makes no sense at all

[bluestate10]

59. Obama. nt

[killbotfactory]

60. It's basically batshit crazy lunacy vs. Obama.

Although on a couple issues, on which I really didn't agree with any choice, I chose an answer a republican gave.

[zappaman]

61. Michele Bachmann

Kidding!
Some guy named Barack Obama who lots of people in this forum seem to dislike.

[GReedDiamond]

66. When I answered by selecting the choices closest to...

...what I really believe, I got 1) Obama 2) Paul 3) Huntsman.

When I went back and answered with what I considered to be the most radical, far-right, lunatic-sociopath choices, I scored 1) Bachmann 2) Santorum 3) Perry.

What fun!

[JoePhilly]

140. When I picked the most insane, I got ...

1) Bachmann, 2) Perry, 3) Santorium

And I'm pretty sure that she is in fact the craziest of the bunch.

[center rising]

67. Obama, Huntsman, Paul in that order.

[zappaman]

71. Ditto. n/t

[alp227]

69. Obama, Paul, Romney.

[MrSlayer]

70. Obama, Huntsman.........and Perry. Stupid questions.

There was no answer for me on immigration or marriage equality but I'm guessing that no one running shares the same views I have on those particular issues. Even the Obama answers were sucky in several questions.

[jmowreader]

72. I got Obama, but I REALLY hated the same-sex marriage question

The least-offensive answer was "My views on gay marriage are evolving..." but I really wish they would have had a "Same-sex marriage should be legal. Period." answer.

That answer is to the left of everyone running for president including the incumbent, which may explain why it's not on there.

[Rochester]

73. I got Obama, but was surprised how close it was.

I agreed with Obama 4 times, with Huntsman 3 times, with Romney twice. The other two it didn't show me who I agreed with, it must have been someone else.

Obama's my guy naturally, but I guess Hunstman is perhaps the least objectionable of the R's.

[aletier_v]

76. Everyboody agrees with Romney at least twice :)

regardless of their answers.

[Tanelorn]

74. I got Obama, Perry , Huntsman

[aletier_v]

78. I retook it with the craziest answers and got Palin

Oops, no, I guess it's Bachmann.

Hard to tell the difference sometimes.

[progressoid]

79. Mike Gravel

[Politicalboi]

88. LOL!

I had no idea he was running this time. He must be a "stealth" candidate.

[boxman15]

80. It always gets stuck on Rick Santorum while saying "Calculating..." at the top

Last edited Tue Dec 20, 2011, 02:00 AM - Edit history (1)

I'd imagine it would be something like

1. Obama
2. Huntsman
3. Paul

EDIT: Finally got it to work, not that anybody cares haha.

1. Obama
2. Paul
3. Romney

[garybeck]

103. I got the same problem. what a waste of time. n/t

[Tx4obama]

82. Number #1 = Obama :)

Number #2 was Huntsman
and I'm not saying who #3 was - LOL

[Politicalboi]

83. I got

Obama
Huntsman
Mittens

[Bjorn Against]

84. Only made it as far as the question on the Mexican border

I was unable to find an answer that I agreed with and it would not let me continue unless I picked something. Because I won't say I agree with something that I don't agree with I had to stop, I guess that means no candidate is a good match for me which is exactly how I feel. No matter who wins the next election I don't anticipate having anything to celebrate.

[Ms. Toad]

95. Same question on which there was absolutely no acceptable answer for me

And I have the same sense of discouragement.

[cascadiance]

169. The Mexican border question was clearly missing an option...

"The problem is the supply of jobs. We must prosecute those that hire illegals which would destroy demand for hiring of illegals and reduce the problem by making it less attractive for them to come over the border. We must also stop subsidizing big ag firms so that they don't "dump" farm products with corn, etc. below cost in to other countries that forces farmers there out of business and forces them to look for jobs up here instead."

If we had an answer like that and one for having a single payer option for health care amongst others, then we'd have a more interesting poll that would point to how a big chunk of Americans are UNREPRESENTED by what we have in Washington now and why Occupiers are out on the street everywhere.

[mrs_p]

85. It didn't work for me

And there were many questions that had all answers way too conservative.

[Jon Ace]

86. Obama then Huntsman (nt)

[elana i am]

87. obama, huntsman, paul

[slay]

89. I matched 8 with Obama, 2 with Ron Paul, and 1 with Romney

although to be fair - there is nobody to the left of Obama - and there desperately needs to be!

[Angry Dragon]

105. I thought there were only 10 questions...............

[slay]

108. No - 11

pretty sure

[slay]

111. this time i got 8 for Obama, 2 for Ron Paul, and one for... Rick Perry?

must have answered the romney one different.. some of those are terrible questions and show just how badly we need a truly progressive candidate.

[Angry Dragon]

114. I agree

It just goes to show the people should frame the answers and not the politicians

[mvd]

90. Obama, then Paul, then Romney

I got Paul for #3 because I want everyone out of Afghanistan and the defense budget cut significantly.

I got Romney on #9 for putting modify No Child Left Behind, but I'm not sure why.

Not enough liberal answers, though, and there was no outright pro-gay marriage rights answer.

[veganlush]

91. I got Obama, but..

...the picture showed Newt the fruit in the number one spot! The text said #1 Obama, #2 Romney, #3 Paul
but as mentioned, the picture in the number one spot, bigger than the other two, was Gingrich. WTF?

[aletier_v]

93. Maybe the picture was right but the text was wrong? :)

[blue_onyx]

92. Mine were...

1. Obama
2. Huntsman
3. Paul

[Ms. Toad]

94. Obama, Romney, Bachman

Several questions had no answer I found even close to acceptable. Very discouraging.

[DirkGently]

96. There were no intelligent policies on gay marriage, immigration, education, or healthcare.

Which apparently leads to Obama.











Sounds familiar, somehow.

[Modern_Matthew]

97. Your top candidate match is Barack Obama! Huntsman and Paul were runner ups. nt

[ellisonz]

99. Ron Paul.

[southmost]

100. obama by a landslide

but some questions really sucked

[ChadwickHenryWard]

101. More than half of those questions had no good answer.

I am even more discouraged about the slate of available candidates than before taking the quiz.

[Angry Dragon]

104. #1 Obama, #2 Huntsman, #3 Romney

With only 1 for each of the last two


I thought the answers did not give enough leeway, did not go far enough
so I agree with Autumn post #1

[tomg]

107. Every single choice I made

was my "least right leaning choice from all those folks." Nothing, save for withdrawal from Afghanistan and engagement with Pakistan, reflected the kinds of policies I would hope to be implemented. Typical was my choice on education: "NCLB has to be modified." I have no idea what that means, except that it is so vague I see a glimmer for it to be eliminated.

[Ford_Prefect]

112. Many of the questions and answers seem driven by Headlines and Sound bites.

It seems to be one more example of the MSM pretending to offer choice. A real choice would involve using the issues to drive the candidates towards the results we need and want. Obama seems to do as little as he can (or worse) and the others want to do more to make things even worse than they are now.

I got Obama with a side of Paul and Romney (go figure that, eh?) The answers offered seemed like campaign quotes and often ignored central problems in the issues they addressed (Health Care, Education, Mexican border to name 3).

I feel like the patient who is told his chances of recovery are Slim and None. I'll vote for Slim. He's not really the guy to get the job done so we'll have to lean on congress harder. That and get Fox off the Air.

What we really need is a congress that is answerable to US. How we get that this time around as opposed to just trying to keep the loonies and shills out is hard to say, but I suspect it can be done.

[slay]

115. +1

indeed

[urbuddha]

116. Obama for me...

There wasn't any doubt.

[ObaMania]

119. Got Obama by a hair

Romney close runner up followed by Huntsman.

Sounds about right although I've always leaned more towards Huntsman.

[nxylas]

121. Obama by a wide margin

Followed by Paul and Gingrich. Seriously, Gingrich? I think that was a reflection of the lack of a good answer in many of the questions, rather than an indication that I have anything in common with The Mekon.

[Rhiannon12866]

122. Your top candidate match is Barack Obama!

Michele Bachmann and Mitt Romney were runner-ups.

But for only one question apiece.

[JCMach1]

123. Obama-Huntsman-Perry

Ewww on that last one...

[april]

127. Obama, Ron Paul,

[mmonk]

128. For some of those I wanted a none of the above as a choice.

[zipplewrath]

129. Yup

It was kind of indicative of how far right the politics have moved. Many questions only had right leaning answers to them.

[Laelth]

131. Obama.

Terrible questions. Very few answers I really liked. Shows how a liberal's policy preferences are not really available in the candidate choices we have. No real liberal option.

-Laelth

[dmr]

165. Yup! Totally agree

[NRaleighLiberal]

132. Obama, then Huntsman...then...gag! Perry!

Weird test.

[Historic NY]

133. What no one got Cain..........sheesh.........

[JustAnotherGen]

134. Rock Bama!

Followed by Huntsman and Romney.

I don't think the included Buddy Roemer as a candidate - because he's a Conservadem in Pub Clothing.

[Myrina]

138. Loaded questionnaire ...

All of the 'stances' had little caveats, none of which aligned with my beliefs.

Call me a 'fringe lefty', I guess.

[lobodons]

141. I got Warren

I don't need no stinkin test to know who the best person for the job is!!

[ooglymoogly]

161. +1 for the correct answer. nt

[dotymed]

142. I got Obama too, but i had to choose their "solutions" not mine. n/t

[geardaddy]

144. I got Obama

with Rick Perry (WTF?)
and Ron Paul (2xWTF?)

the questions were bogus.

[sarchasm]

145. 1. Obama

2. Huntsman
3. Paul

[mimitabby]

146. Obama... duh

[1monster]

147. I got Obama as #1 Choice, Ron Paul as #2, and John Huntsman as #3...

The problem is that on most of those questions, none of the given answers fit my feelings, convictions, or positions at all. And the closest second choice was a very far distant second.

Which is the way I feel about our choices for President. I wouldn't vote for Ron Paul or any of the Republicans at all, and Obama's positions and actions are too far away from mine for me to be comfortable, but his come closest (and that isn't very close at all).

[Maineman]

150. Elizabeth Warren, Obama, Kathleen Sebilius

[marlakay]

151. Got Obama here's the rest

Obama - 7
Huntsman - 1
Romney - 1

[PADemD]

157. Obama, Paul, Huntsman

[qb]

158. Obama: 8, Paul: 2 on foreign policy, Romney on modifying No Child Left Behind

[mlevans]

159. Obama, followed by Huntsman and Paul n/t

[ooglymoogly]

160. After looking over the first few pages....I clicked off the "survey"

It is a hokey, gerrymandered survey with O being the only "lesser of two evils" outcome possible for a democrat.

[JustABozoOnThisBus]

162. Huntsman (came in third), Mitt second, Obama first. nt

[GoneOffShore]

163. Obama - No surprise there

Huntsman - meh a Republic but not a totally crazy Repub

Paul - WTF!!

[SharonRB]

164. Obama

Then Huntsman and Gingrich.