Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:12 PM Dec 2013

2013 Remarkable Men - such as Ed Snowden, G. Greenwald, and let's not forget the founder Thomas

Jefferson, who helped make it all possible, and was immortalized by writing these lines - "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."

These words have the ring of a kind of mystical truth to them. They deserve to be immortalized.

America can be a great country once again! I believe that.

109 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2013 Remarkable Men - such as Ed Snowden, G. Greenwald, and let's not forget the founder Thomas (Original Post) quinnox Dec 2013 OP
Wait ProSense Dec 2013 #1
I think egg-nog is involved here...n/t monmouth3 Dec 2013 #2
no comment, except quinnox Dec 2013 #3
Save the faux outrage. last1standing Dec 2013 #4
What? ProSense Dec 2013 #6
He's so completely unremarkable NuclearDem Dec 2013 #9
LOL! ProSense Dec 2013 #12
Remarkable doesn't always necessarily mean good. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #17
"Blah, blah,... I hate anyone Obama hates, blah, blah..." last1standing Dec 2013 #10
WTF? ProSense Dec 2013 #14
Goodness gracious, ProSense Aerows Dec 2013 #18
Oh my ProSense Dec 2013 #19
I know Aerows Dec 2013 #20
LOL! ProSense Dec 2013 #21
Just pointing out facts, ma'am. Aerows Dec 2013 #22
Actually, I think ProSense Dec 2013 #25
I'm feeling pretty good Aerows Dec 2013 #27
Wait, ProSense Dec 2013 #29
You linked to your own post? Aerows Dec 2013 #33
Yes, ProSense Dec 2013 #35
Link to own post! NuclearDem Dec 2013 #43
"Link to own post!" ProSense Dec 2013 #47
Well that convinced me Aerows Dec 2013 #50
LOL! When obviously wrong, post a ROFL smilie! last1standing Dec 2013 #60
Does anybody believe people who use :rofl: are really laughing? bvar22 Dec 2013 #70
I think a lot of us Aerows Dec 2013 #74
disgusting isn't it? Turns my stomach VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #23
If you mean Aerows Dec 2013 #26
No that is not what I said is it? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #28
You said that it turned your stomach Aerows Dec 2013 #31
Yes it does turn my stomach to hear "this once great country" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #36
The best way to support Democrats Aerows Dec 2013 #38
as I said...plenty of places to criticize Obama on the internet VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #51
I'm a member of DU Aerows Dec 2013 #54
the site is about SUPPORTING Democrats.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #55
Well aren't you a wonderful DUer Aerows Dec 2013 #57
Yes I am!....You should subscribe to my newsletter.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #59
This view always astounds me treestar Dec 2013 #64
Then why do some Aerows Dec 2013 #69
No no no no no....you got THAT all backwards.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #83
Oh, I see Aerows Dec 2013 #86
NOOOOOO....that is not what I just said is it? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #88
Um, yeah Aerows Dec 2013 #90
by the way...I said "more than JUST her" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #91
I don't need to change what you said Aerows Dec 2013 #92
You didn't need to....but you did! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #94
Oh my Aerows Dec 2013 #98
Yup! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #100
please quote where I complained about support FOR Elizabeth Warren...vs what I really said.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #96
To be completely honest Aerows Dec 2013 #102
Phase 2 in the operation...."Bring up that you think the poster needs rest as they are upset" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #103
Merry Christmas, cher Aerows Dec 2013 #104
Right...exactly as I thought VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #105
Besides that wasn't an argument...that was just an exercise to see if you could "rile me up" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #107
"What the hell has happened to this great forum Democratic Underground, that this talk is even toler Hissyspit Dec 2013 #81
Yes I have..and NO it wasn't! Then....we were governed by Republicans VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #87
Um, not exactly. Hissyspit Dec 2013 #97
The level of vitriol for democrats and praise for Libertarians was NEVER like this! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #101
People were using terms like that in 2004 here, too. Hissyspit Dec 2013 #108
Not about Democrats...sorry. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #109
I wouldn't equate him to Jefferson, and I did not get that from the OP. However, he continued the sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #68
Agreed, quinnox. last1standing Dec 2013 #5
You said it! quinnox Dec 2013 #11
So we are full on Tyranny now? Is that what you are saying about America... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #24
I didn't stop criticizing government decisions the second Aerows Dec 2013 #30
And I never claimed he was perfect....but I also didnt call him a Tyrant either... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #32
I'm a Democrat Aerows Dec 2013 #37
Plenty of places on the Internet allow you to rant against President Obama aren't there? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #39
Oh, I'm sorry Aerows Dec 2013 #42
meanwhile you support calling him a tyrant and this country "once great" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #44
I'll repeat Aerows Dec 2013 #46
I'll repeat.....Being a Democrat means supporting them... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #61
I do like Elizabeth Warren quite a bit Aerows Dec 2013 #75
Maybe some NEED to be shamed... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #76
People need to be shamed Aerows Dec 2013 #77
No that is not what I said....but do realize that Martin O'malley is not perfect either right? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #78
What is wrong with Martin O'Malley? Aerows Dec 2013 #79
Well that AIN'T gonna happen if you cannot even get people at a place called VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #80
It certainly won't happen Aerows Dec 2013 #82
We are telling them to try being supportive...or consider they may not be a Democrat at all! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #85
Are you implying something? Aerows Dec 2013 #89
Why is everything about YOU? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #93
Since you keep replying to me? Aerows Dec 2013 #95
You replied to me first...and I keep trying to help you understand this conversation you joined. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #99
and its not just about criticism...its the terms "once great" and tyranny.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #41
Interesting narrative, sibling Aerows Dec 2013 #48
those two phrases WERE used on this thread...that YOU are supporting not criticizing VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #53
Illumination for you Aerows Dec 2013 #56
I am not your "bro" or your "sibling" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #62
Scathing Aerows Dec 2013 #71
but it's still not a tyranny treestar Dec 2013 #65
That's true Aerows Dec 2013 #72
I take your lack of understanding as proof I said something right. last1standing Dec 2013 #58
You said "tyranny" and I know what that means... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #63
I suggest you stop trying to force everyone to worship your idol. last1standing Dec 2013 #66
I don't have an idol...I have a President....a democratically elected one...by a majority vote VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #67
The last thing we should decide to do with the NSA issue is make it about people NoOneMan Dec 2013 #7
Xmas chum is here BeyondGeography Dec 2013 #8
Somehow I expected to see 2013 names! HereSince1628 Dec 2013 #13
Recommended. And a Merry Christmas to you, quinnox. nt DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2013 #15
Thanks, likewise! quinnox Dec 2013 #16
Oh man, quinnox, look what you did! NuclearDem Dec 2013 #34
LOL, I can't help it! quinnox Dec 2013 #40
Seems like it did Aerows Dec 2013 #45
Yep, I well remember, "Bush-bots" quinnox Dec 2013 #49
"the snowden saga" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #73
looks to me like someone spiked the punch at the cheerleaders' holiday party grasswire Dec 2013 #52
Merry Christmas, grasswire Aerows Dec 2013 #106
K/R Jack Rabbit Dec 2013 #84

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
1. Wait
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:16 PM
Dec 2013

"2013 Remarkable Men - such as Ed Snowden, G. Greenwald, and let's not forget the founder Thomas Jefferson"

...you're equating Snowden and Greenwald to Thomas Jefferson?

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
3. no comment, except
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:21 PM
Dec 2013

I'm recognizing 2013 Remarkable Men, and also reminded of the remarkable men who created America and made this country possible. It is what it is.

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
4. Save the faux outrage.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:22 PM
Dec 2013

The OP named people he considers remarkable. It's not a contest.

I agree with him that all three are indeed remarkable in their own ways.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
6. What?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:25 PM
Dec 2013

"Save the faux outrage.

The OP named people he considers remarkable. It's not a contest."

An observation isn't "faux outrage."

I think this is "remarkable": http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024223859#post10

...in a WTF sort of way.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
9. He's so completely unremarkable
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:26 PM
Dec 2013

You had nearly a new OP every day during the summer talking about him.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. LOL!
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:29 PM
Dec 2013

"He's so completely unremarkable"

You think the being the subject of an OP makes one "remarkable"?

Do you think Rand Paul is remarkable? Boehner.

Snowden fans are a trip.



 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
17. Remarkable doesn't always necessarily mean good.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:32 PM
Dec 2013

Worthy of being remarked or noticed.

But hey, you managed to get Rand Paul in a post. Keep going, got ROFL smiley, that, and the free space.

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
10. "Blah, blah,... I hate anyone Obama hates, blah, blah..."
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:28 PM
Dec 2013

Or should that be "bleat, bleat, bleat..?"

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
18. Goodness gracious, ProSense
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:38 PM
Dec 2013

are you going to sit here on Christmas Eve and claim you *DON'T* dislike anyone that says anything against the Obama Administration? It's okay, you don't *have* to admit it, but you have been very strident in your lack of affection for Snowden and Greenwald, and it isn't because they are both white men. The only thing they have in common is that they criticized a program being run under the, yes, I'll say it, Obama Administration.

Let me again put out a talking point fire before it starts - I hated this surveillance state bs under Bush. That does not mean I'm not allowed to dislike it under Obama, in fact, it says I stand on principle, not party or personality.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
20. I know
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:43 PM
Dec 2013

It's okay if you have no affiliation to principle or party and cleave only to personality. You don't care for Democratic Senators that criticize Obama, either, like Udall.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
21. LOL!
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:46 PM
Dec 2013

"It's okay if you have no affiliation to principle or party and cleave only to personality. You don't care for Democratic Senators that criticize Obama, either, like Udall. "

Too funny! Got any more?



 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
22. Just pointing out facts, ma'am.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:48 PM
Dec 2013

You don't like anyone that criticizes Obama, no matter how good in faith and how relevant those criticisms may be.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
25. Actually, I think
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:50 PM
Dec 2013

"Just pointing out facts, ma'am. You don't like anyone that criticizes Obama, no matter how good in faith and how relevant those criticisms may be."

...you're engaging in a bit of personal fantasy. It's OK. It apparently makes you feel better.




ProSense

(116,464 posts)
35. Yes,
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:58 PM
Dec 2013

"You linked to your own post?"

... I did. Don't ever let anyone tell you you're not astute.



last1standing

(11,709 posts)
60. LOL! When obviously wrong, post a ROFL smilie!
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:35 PM
Dec 2013

Do I hear the bleating of sheep nearby?

"Baaaaaa! Baaaaaaa!"

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
70. Does anybody believe people who use :rofl: are really laughing?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 08:07 PM
Dec 2013

The first one to post cartoons as a rebuttal is essentially admitting that they can no longer defend their position in an intelligent manner, and are desperately hoping that no one at DU is smart enough to see through their clever deception.


 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
74. I think a lot of us
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 08:22 PM
Dec 2013

are being baited in this thread to lose our cool so we can get a hide. Stay strong, stay civil, stay honest.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
23. disgusting isn't it? Turns my stomach
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:48 PM
Dec 2013

and what is this "once" great nation....

What the hell has happened to this great forum Democratic Underground, that this talk is even tolerated is the better question in my book.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
26. If you mean
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:52 PM
Dec 2013

"How dare anyone question the government because Obama is in office", then yes, people are going to question bad ideas. It doesn't matter if Santa Claus is president. The NSA would be widely criticized no matter who was in charge, because they are doing something that is illegal AND feel the need to lie about it.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
28. No that is not what I said is it?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:54 PM
Dec 2013

stop putting words into peoples mouths...that would improve this "once great" country!

I questioned the statement made on a "Democratic" Forum! Are we supposed to hate the "Democratic" President (Black White or any color) on Democratic Underground...

but of course the irony is lost on you...

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
31. You said that it turned your stomach
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:56 PM
Dec 2013

that people were questioning the state of the "country". Or did I get that wrong?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
36. Yes it does turn my stomach to hear "this once great country"
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:59 PM
Dec 2013

that disgusts me!

Particularly on a forum that supposedly "supports" Democrats! It's starting to look like Yahoo comments.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
38. The best way to support Democrats
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:03 PM
Dec 2013

is to express exactly what we expect from the Democratic party. That makes for a strong, cohesive party. It is unfortunate that you don't feel that way.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
51. as I said...plenty of places to criticize Obama on the internet
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:15 PM
Dec 2013

you could try Duck Dynasty's website...I am sure they would appreciate that kind of criticism.

How is calling the twice elected by the MAJORITY a tyrant and calling this country "once great"...going to bring party cohesion? Seriously?

Not to mention comparing Lord Edward Snowden to Thomas Jefferson....(who didn't run like a coward...but WAS risking everything including his life).

THAT makes me sick.




 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
54. I'm a member of DU
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:18 PM
Dec 2013

I'm here to discuss politics and the Democratic Party. I'll discuss politics here to my heart's content, and if you don't care for my opinions, ignore is your friend.

Merry Christmas!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
55. the site is about SUPPORTING Democrats....
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:20 PM
Dec 2013

and I sure haven't seen much of THAT on DU lately!

I HAVE seen alot of hate though...

namely Tyranny and "Once great" just as the latest examples.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
57. Well aren't you a wonderful DUer
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:29 PM
Dec 2013

schooling everyone and whatnot on how supportive they are or are not of Democratic politicians.

I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter so that I can learn to become as much of a Democrat as you are.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
59. Yes I am!....You should subscribe to my newsletter....
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:34 PM
Dec 2013

it would make you a better Democrat too.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
64. This view always astounds me
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:40 PM
Dec 2013

We are not outside the party expecting anything of it. We are part of it.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
69. Then why do some
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:56 PM
Dec 2013

do their darnedest to ostracize people that have a disagreement with a particular politician on a particular issue? I disagree with the Obama Administration on a couple of things - namely those involving the Patriot Act. I whole-heartedly agree with the Obama Administration on other things, such as equality, gay marriage and lessening our dependence on fossil fuels.

I don't have to support someone on every single thing to support them. I am part of the Democratic party, and it is upsetting when someone tells me I'm not because I don't support everything to the letter that Obama does. I'm not on the outside looking in, I'm on the inside, and I'm pointing out things that need improvement.

I hope you agree. Telling someone to basically fuck off and go to a Duck Dynasty website when they are as much of a Democrat as anyone here is wrong-headed. Why should I? I voted for Obama twice.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
83. No no no no no....you got THAT all backwards..
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:09 PM
Dec 2013

otherwise...why is having the BOG necessary?

And besides this criticism is not just about YOU...get it? Look beyond yourself...Look at the big picture around here on DU.....look at this very thread for example...

"Tyranny" and "Once great country"



and that's just this one thread!!!!

That's not only tolerated...it happens all the time...and hordes pat those saying it on their backs...day in and day out!

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
86. Oh, I see
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:13 PM
Dec 2013

Now we all need to see beyond ourselves once a handful of folks got called on their aggressive posting behavior.

Maybe you can complain some more that many DU posters support Elizabeth Warren. That is bound to win hearts and minds. Then you can tell the people that disagree with you to post somewhere else. That is an idea that will always be a winner.

I hope your playbook is just missing some pages and you really don't think those are great strategies.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
88. NOOOOOO....that is not what I just said is it?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:14 PM
Dec 2013

you changing my words doesn't change the facts....

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
90. Um, yeah
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:16 PM
Dec 2013

it is. And I pointed that out. Feel free to edit your post, though, since we have DU3 everyone can see the edit

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
91. by the way...I said "more than JUST her"
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:16 PM
Dec 2013

not once did you see me complain ABOUT support for Warren...

So you can start by pointing out just that ONE thing you changed about what I said...so none of what you say after holds any credence.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
92. I don't need to change what you said
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:18 PM
Dec 2013

You are the one that said it, right there for everyone to see. I don't have the power to edit your posts, only you can do that.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
96. please quote where I complained about support FOR Elizabeth Warren...vs what I really said..
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:20 PM
Dec 2013

which was about support for ONLY Warren.

You bald faced lied.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
102. To be completely honest
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:24 PM
Dec 2013

I think maybe you should take a bit of a break and relax. You seem like a nice person, and I honestly wanted to dialogue with you, but I think this conversation is getting to be a bit much.

I hope that you have a very Merry Christmas, you and yours are well, safe and sound, and that you get all you hoped and dreamed of this coming year.

Yes, I'm retreating. I don't need this much conflict with a person on the internet on what should be the happiest night of the year. I'll tie up with you later, okay?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
103. Phase 2 in the operation...."Bring up that you think the poster needs rest as they are upset"
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:26 PM
Dec 2013

More of that now?

Yeah I am on to it...

Not fooled for a moment!

NEXT

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
104. Merry Christmas, cher
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:28 PM
Dec 2013

I mean that sincerely. I'm not going to argue with you further. I hope you are blessed this season .

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
105. Right...exactly as I thought
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:31 PM
Dec 2013

patterns are my thing...Believe me...I notice them. Its part of my training for my profession.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
107. Besides that wasn't an argument...that was just an exercise to see if you could "rile me up"
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:32 PM
Dec 2013

enough to give ammunition to alert on.

But I got to practice on YOU!

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)
81. "What the hell has happened to this great forum Democratic Underground, that this talk is even toler
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:05 PM
Dec 2013

ated is the better question in my book."

You've only been here since 2012?

When I started reading this forum in 2003, there was plenty of talk like this, as it should be.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
87. Yes I have..and NO it wasn't! Then....we were governed by Republicans
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:13 PM
Dec 2013

and this language and talk was about THEM!

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)
97. Um, not exactly.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:20 PM
Dec 2013

There was plenty of criticism of Democrats (who were also governing us), as was allowed both then and now.

As far as I am aware, Greenwald, Snowden and Jefferson are/were not Republicans (or Democrats).

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
101. The level of vitriol for democrats and praise for Libertarians was NEVER like this!
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:23 PM
Dec 2013

I might remind you on this thread..

"tyranny" and "once great country"

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)
108. People were using terms like that in 2004 here, too.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:46 PM
Dec 2013

In 2003, 2004 or 2005, one could certainly find posts with common ground with libertarians, as many of them were against Bush adminstration actions. Greenwald has said he is not a Libertarian (technically, big L means the official party, small L means the ideology). He is more accurately termed a civil libertarian, which is by no means the same thing. I have no idea if Snowden is a Libertarian or libertarian, but it is kind of besides the point, because he is being praised for his actions, not his party membership. Snowden supposedly wrote: “The consent of the governed is not consent if it is not informed.” You are surprised people would praise that here?

Most certainly, Greenwald was much posted and praised here through much of the Bush administration.

People posted about tyranny and a "once great country" all the time during the Shrub years. Are you saying simply because we elected Barack Obama, those concerns are no longer valid? The Supreme Court make-up back then. They are pretty important. (Yes, I remember how bad it was then. Save yourself the trouble of lecturing me about that.)

It's true that DU is different these days, but I don't think it is for the reasons you think it is. Yes, it matters that most were battling an insane Republican administration then, and now many seem to believe, "o.k. a Democrat is President, so we don't have to worry about this stuff anymore," but there is nothing in the OP that seems foreign to the DU of ten years ago.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
109. Not about Democrats...sorry.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:55 PM
Dec 2013

And no...

"so we don't have to worry about this stuff anymore,"

Is NOT what is being said....but its NOT the only thing there is to worry about for one thing.

Jeebus...look at what Obama has accomplished....Look at how many issues he has even attempted to tackle.....even without taking into consideration the obstruction. It's amazing....I have been on this planet over half a century and I have NEVER seen anything like him. Not Jimmy Carter...and not Bill Clinton. So excuse me if I am sick up to here with hearing things like:

"Tyranny" and "once great country"

while he is still the President...its just too too much around here. For god's sakes...

Let's start with Lily Ledbetter straight out the damn gate!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
68. I wouldn't equate him to Jefferson, and I did not get that from the OP. However, he continued the
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:53 PM
Dec 2013

ideals of the FFs often flawed themselves AND condemned and wanted for treason, by insisting on telling the American people the TRUTH about what their government was up to.

You can't have a Democracy, and I'm sure Jefferson would agree, when the press is owned by Corporations (Jefferson had a lot to say about Corporations too btw) and REAL journalists are silenced even arrested and Trught Tellers, rather the violators of people's rights are the ones to be pursued.

Flawed as some of them were, the FFs had some incredible ideals for how a society should run.

And it didn't include 'secret courts' and 'secret mass warrants AFTER the fact. I believe they might not be surprised at how wrong things have gone. They didn't really have much faith that the greedy and the power seekers could be stopped. But they tried and did a pretty good job of holding them back for over 200 years now.

And I am certain they would approve of Snowden and Manning and Binney and Tice and all the other couragoues Whistle Blowers who insisted on shining a light on the wrong doing of those in power. After all, they did so themselves.

It's easy to tell when someone has done the right thing. All you have to do is look at who is calling them a traitor. You are known sometimes MORE by your enemies than your friends and sunshine is always the best disinfectant for a government that has gone out of control.

Despite the violations of the Constitution, the total disrespect for it, and their view that it is a 'quaint' document, it is still the law of the land and they are hampered still, to some extent by the vision the FFs had. And Snowden and Manning, Tice, Binney and since 2001, so many others.



last1standing

(11,709 posts)
5. Agreed, quinnox.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:23 PM
Dec 2013

It's only through the service of those willing to stand up against the tyranny of the status quo that America can be great again.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
24. So we are full on Tyranny now? Is that what you are saying about America...
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:49 PM
Dec 2013

on Democratic Underground? Under a Democratic President no less...

You guys need to learn to use a dictionary...seriously.

Tyr·an·ny noun \ˈtir-ə-nē\
: cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others

: a government in which all power belongs to one person : the rule or authority of a tyrant

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
30. I didn't stop criticizing government decisions the second
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:55 PM
Dec 2013

a Democratic politician took office, and I don't think I'll quit criticizing them when there is an (R) in there either. Nor should I. Nor should anyone else be required to agree with what politician A says because of the (D) or (R) after their name.

I'd imagine Obama himself would be the first person to tell you he's not perfect.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
32. And I never claimed he was perfect....but I also didnt call him a Tyrant either...
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:57 PM
Dec 2013

Why do I have to keep reminding you people that THIS is Democratic Underground...with the express purpose of supporting Democrats...

It's not Snowden Underground....though you are welcome to start one!

tyranny
a : a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler; especially : one characteristic of an ancient Greek city-state

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
37. I'm a Democrat
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:02 PM
Dec 2013

I have the right, and the responsibility to criticize Democratic politicians that aren't living up to the ideals of our party. Obama will not be president forever. It is up to party members to express our hopes and dreams for the future of the party.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
39. Plenty of places on the Internet allow you to rant against President Obama aren't there?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:04 PM
Dec 2013

How can you consider yourself Democrat if you don't support the Democratically TWICE elected DEMOCRAT President.

The people spoke...and they chose President Obama....by far...not once but twice...do you know how long its been since ANY President has done that?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
42. Oh, I'm sorry
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:07 PM
Dec 2013

I guess voting for the man twice isn't showing my support. I guess I'm supposed to stand by and say not a darn thing when the NSA over-reaches just because the politician I voted for is in office. Holy crap. I didn't realize that voting for someone meant that I had to fawn all over them like a Justin Beiber fan club member.

Seriously?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
44. meanwhile you support calling him a tyrant and this country "once great"
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:08 PM
Dec 2013

I don't see you criticizing that! Evidently you support THAT!

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
46. I'll repeat
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:10 PM
Dec 2013

I didn't realize that voting for someone meant that I had to fawn all over them like a Justin Beiber fan club member.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
61. I'll repeat.....Being a Democrat means supporting them...
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:36 PM
Dec 2013

at least some damn time! I haven't seen that on DU much...

Far as I can tell we might as well rename this Elizabeth Warren Underground because it seems that is the ONLY democrat some supposed Democrats support. JUST the one...

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
75. I do like Elizabeth Warren quite a bit
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 08:42 PM
Dec 2013

and I'm not even going to be shy about that. I like the Governor of Maryland, Martin O'Malley, too. Both are solid Democrats. Why try to shame people into silence of Democratic candidates that they like just because they aren't your particular pick?

It seems like a self-defeating purpose to deride particular politicians when you are complaining that people are deriding ... a politician (Obama). What gives?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
76. Maybe some NEED to be shamed...
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 08:48 PM
Dec 2013

to act like they do on a Democratic Underground forum..

That's what gives!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
78. No that is not what I said....but do realize that Martin O'malley is not perfect either right?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 08:52 PM
Dec 2013

Jeebus...support of 2 democrats are not going to win us back the house...get my drift?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
79. What is wrong with Martin O'Malley?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:01 PM
Dec 2013

and why is he a terrible Democrat, and Elizabeth Warren for that matter? Hell yes we need to get back the House, keep the Senate and increase the number of seats, but yelling at other Democrats that support Democrats isn't going to get the job accomplished.

You pretty much told me not to post here anymore because I had criticisms towards Obama. Telling Democratic party members that vote to essentially "fuck off" and join a Duck Dynasty forum (particularly hilarious since you are telling a gay woman that - PS, that's what that flag means) is counter productive to the mission of getting more Democrats elected. Much more so than critiquing already elected Democrats that can't run for another term (Obama).

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
80. Well that AIN'T gonna happen if you cannot even get people at a place called
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:04 PM
Dec 2013

Democratic Underground to stop trashing Democrats and idolizing Libertarians...

THAT'S a fact!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
85. We are telling them to try being supportive...or consider they may not be a Democrat at all!
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:11 PM
Dec 2013
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
89. Are you implying something?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:15 PM
Dec 2013

Because if you are implying that I am not a Democrat, you haven't woken up nearly early enough in the morning, my dear.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
93. Why is everything about YOU?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:18 PM
Dec 2013

you might want to think about that...

everything I post...you somehow twist as being about YOU personally!

Guilty conscience?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
95. Since you keep replying to me?
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:19 PM
Dec 2013

If you were replying to someone else, I wouldn't think it was about me.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
99. You replied to me first...and I keep trying to help you understand this conversation you joined.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:21 PM
Dec 2013

but you are willfully trying not to.

Just trying to make me mad enough to say something you can alert on?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
48. Interesting narrative, sibling
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:12 PM
Dec 2013

And you complained that I put words in your mouth? Do point out where I used the word tyranny and the phrase "once great". I'll wait. This post doesn't count.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
53. those two phrases WERE used on this thread...that YOU are supporting not criticizing
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:16 PM
Dec 2013

get it?

and what is up with calling me "sibling" last I checked we are not related

treestar

(82,383 posts)
65. but it's still not a tyranny
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:42 PM
Dec 2013

that's hyperbole. The very fact you can publicly criticize them shows that.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
72. That's true
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 08:18 PM
Dec 2013

But notice I didn't proclaim it to be tyranny, either. I do think the NSA is over reaching, and I stand by that opinion. I also think it is appropriate on a Democratically leaning political forum to voice that opinion. If you don't speak up, you don't get heard.

You don't have to agree with me. I don't have to agree with you, either. That is the beauty of our political system.

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
58. I take your lack of understanding as proof I said something right.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:34 PM
Dec 2013

I could have said "the tyranny of the propagandists" and also been correct judging from your comments.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
63. You said "tyranny" and I know what that means...
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:38 PM
Dec 2013

I suggest a dictionary....

a : a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler; especially : one characteristic of an ancient Greek city-state

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
66. I suggest you stop trying to force everyone to worship your idol.
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:42 PM
Dec 2013

Obama is not the embodiment of democracy and progressive ideology does not change to suit Obama's whims. But you will never be able to understand that so goodbye.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
67. I don't have an idol...I have a President....a democratically elected one...by a majority vote
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:44 PM
Dec 2013

not once but TWICE. Which is VERY damn rare indeed....and I am so thankful that I voted for him

You however seem to think you voted for a Tyrant....shows what your judgement is worth huh?

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
13. Somehow I expected to see 2013 names!
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 06:29 PM
Dec 2013

But, I'll play...

Josh McCown not for being a quarterback of decent ability, but because as second stringer he stepped up and stepped down with a grace that's a worthy lesson.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
40. LOL, I can't help it!
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:04 PM
Dec 2013

My words always seem to rub authoritarian types the wrong way!

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
45. Seems like it did
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:09 PM
Dec 2013

This is the same thing that irritated the shit out of me during the Bush presidency. He fucked something up, and people insisted it was the best thing that ever happened. No one is infallible, and the NSA shit impacts me because I'm in IT. I'm supposed to just STFU and STFD because the person I voted for might possibly be impacted if I show anything less than unfailing loyalty.

Screw that.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
49. Yep, I well remember, "Bush-bots"
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:12 PM
Dec 2013

Unfortunately these types are not confined to one political party. The Snowden saga has proved that over and over again in 2013.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
52. looks to me like someone spiked the punch at the cheerleaders' holiday party
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 07:15 PM
Dec 2013

Whole lotta giggling and nonsense going on, for no apparent reason.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
106. Merry Christmas, grasswire
Tue Dec 24, 2013, 09:31 PM
Dec 2013

I don't know wtf is going on in this thread to provoke such vitriol, but may it be dispelled with Christmas joy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2013 Remarkable Men - suc...