General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums2013 Remarkable Men - such as Ed Snowden, G. Greenwald, and let's not forget the founder Thomas
Jefferson, who helped make it all possible, and was immortalized by writing these lines - "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."
These words have the ring of a kind of mystical truth to them. They deserve to be immortalized.
America can be a great country once again! I believe that.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"2013 Remarkable Men - such as Ed Snowden, G. Greenwald, and let's not forget the founder Thomas Jefferson"
...you're equating Snowden and Greenwald to Thomas Jefferson?
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)I'm recognizing 2013 Remarkable Men, and also reminded of the remarkable men who created America and made this country possible. It is what it is.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)The OP named people he considers remarkable. It's not a contest.
I agree with him that all three are indeed remarkable in their own ways.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Save the faux outrage.
The OP named people he considers remarkable. It's not a contest."
An observation isn't "faux outrage."
I think this is "remarkable": http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024223859#post10
...in a WTF sort of way.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)You had nearly a new OP every day during the summer talking about him.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"He's so completely unremarkable"
You think the being the subject of an OP makes one "remarkable"?
Do you think Rand Paul is remarkable? Boehner.
Snowden fans are a trip.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Worthy of being remarked or noticed.
But hey, you managed to get Rand Paul in a post. Keep going, got ROFL smiley, that, and the free space.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)Or should that be "bleat, bleat, bleat..?"
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)are you going to sit here on Christmas Eve and claim you *DON'T* dislike anyone that says anything against the Obama Administration? It's okay, you don't *have* to admit it, but you have been very strident in your lack of affection for Snowden and Greenwald, and it isn't because they are both white men. The only thing they have in common is that they criticized a program being run under the, yes, I'll say it, Obama Administration.
Let me again put out a talking point fire before it starts - I hated this surveillance state bs under Bush. That does not mean I'm not allowed to dislike it under Obama, in fact, it says I stand on principle, not party or personality.
It's okay if you have no affiliation to principle or party and cleave only to personality. You don't care for Democratic Senators that criticize Obama, either, like Udall.
"It's okay if you have no affiliation to principle or party and cleave only to personality. You don't care for Democratic Senators that criticize Obama, either, like Udall. "
Too funny! Got any more?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)You don't like anyone that criticizes Obama, no matter how good in faith and how relevant those criticisms may be.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Just pointing out facts, ma'am. You don't like anyone that criticizes Obama, no matter how good in faith and how relevant those criticisms may be."
...you're engaging in a bit of personal fantasy. It's OK. It apparently makes you feel better.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Thank you for asking
"I'm feeling pretty good"
...me too. Humor helps: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024223859#post17
Aerows
(39,961 posts)"You linked to your own post?"
... I did. Don't ever let anyone tell you you're not astute.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)I only need Oathkeepers, Libertarian, racism, or a speech.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Not.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)Do I hear the bleating of sheep nearby?
"Baaaaaa! Baaaaaaa!"
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The first one to post cartoons as a rebuttal is essentially admitting that they can no longer defend their position in an intelligent manner, and are desperately hoping that no one at DU is smart enough to see through their clever deception.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)are being baited in this thread to lose our cool so we can get a hide. Stay strong, stay civil, stay honest.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and what is this "once" great nation....
What the hell has happened to this great forum Democratic Underground, that this talk is even tolerated is the better question in my book.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)"How dare anyone question the government because Obama is in office", then yes, people are going to question bad ideas. It doesn't matter if Santa Claus is president. The NSA would be widely criticized no matter who was in charge, because they are doing something that is illegal AND feel the need to lie about it.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)stop putting words into peoples mouths...that would improve this "once great" country!
I questioned the statement made on a "Democratic" Forum! Are we supposed to hate the "Democratic" President (Black White or any color) on Democratic Underground...
but of course the irony is lost on you...
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that people were questioning the state of the "country". Or did I get that wrong?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)that disgusts me!
Particularly on a forum that supposedly "supports" Democrats! It's starting to look like Yahoo comments.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)is to express exactly what we expect from the Democratic party. That makes for a strong, cohesive party. It is unfortunate that you don't feel that way.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you could try Duck Dynasty's website...I am sure they would appreciate that kind of criticism.
How is calling the twice elected by the MAJORITY a tyrant and calling this country "once great"...going to bring party cohesion? Seriously?
Not to mention comparing Lord Edward Snowden to Thomas Jefferson....(who didn't run like a coward...but WAS risking everything including his life).
THAT makes me sick.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'm here to discuss politics and the Democratic Party. I'll discuss politics here to my heart's content, and if you don't care for my opinions, ignore is your friend.
Merry Christmas!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and I sure haven't seen much of THAT on DU lately!
I HAVE seen alot of hate though...
namely Tyranny and "Once great" just as the latest examples.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)schooling everyone and whatnot on how supportive they are or are not of Democratic politicians.
I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter so that I can learn to become as much of a Democrat as you are.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)it would make you a better Democrat too.
treestar
(82,383 posts)We are not outside the party expecting anything of it. We are part of it.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)do their darnedest to ostracize people that have a disagreement with a particular politician on a particular issue? I disagree with the Obama Administration on a couple of things - namely those involving the Patriot Act. I whole-heartedly agree with the Obama Administration on other things, such as equality, gay marriage and lessening our dependence on fossil fuels.
I don't have to support someone on every single thing to support them. I am part of the Democratic party, and it is upsetting when someone tells me I'm not because I don't support everything to the letter that Obama does. I'm not on the outside looking in, I'm on the inside, and I'm pointing out things that need improvement.
I hope you agree. Telling someone to basically fuck off and go to a Duck Dynasty website when they are as much of a Democrat as anyone here is wrong-headed. Why should I? I voted for Obama twice.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)otherwise...why is having the BOG necessary?
And besides this criticism is not just about YOU...get it? Look beyond yourself...Look at the big picture around here on DU.....look at this very thread for example...
"Tyranny" and "Once great country"
and that's just this one thread!!!!
That's not only tolerated...it happens all the time...and hordes pat those saying it on their backs...day in and day out!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Now we all need to see beyond ourselves once a handful of folks got called on their aggressive posting behavior.
Maybe you can complain some more that many DU posters support Elizabeth Warren. That is bound to win hearts and minds. Then you can tell the people that disagree with you to post somewhere else. That is an idea that will always be a winner.
I hope your playbook is just missing some pages and you really don't think those are great strategies.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you changing my words doesn't change the facts....
Aerows
(39,961 posts)it is. And I pointed that out. Feel free to edit your post, though, since we have DU3 everyone can see the edit
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)not once did you see me complain ABOUT support for Warren...
So you can start by pointing out just that ONE thing you changed about what I said...so none of what you say after holds any credence.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)You are the one that said it, right there for everyone to see. I don't have the power to edit your posts, only you can do that.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)I rewrote your post, did I?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and fabricated it out of whole cloth to boot.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)which was about support for ONLY Warren.
You bald faced lied.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I think maybe you should take a bit of a break and relax. You seem like a nice person, and I honestly wanted to dialogue with you, but I think this conversation is getting to be a bit much.
I hope that you have a very Merry Christmas, you and yours are well, safe and sound, and that you get all you hoped and dreamed of this coming year.
Yes, I'm retreating. I don't need this much conflict with a person on the internet on what should be the happiest night of the year. I'll tie up with you later, okay?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)More of that now?
Yeah I am on to it...
Not fooled for a moment!
NEXT
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I mean that sincerely. I'm not going to argue with you further. I hope you are blessed this season
.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)patterns are my thing...Believe me...I notice them. Its part of my training for my profession.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)enough to give ammunition to alert on.
But I got to practice on YOU!
Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)ated is the better question in my book."
You've only been here since 2012?
When I started reading this forum in 2003, there was plenty of talk like this, as it should be.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and this language and talk was about THEM!
Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)There was plenty of criticism of Democrats (who were also governing us), as was allowed both then and now.
As far as I am aware, Greenwald, Snowden and Jefferson are/were not Republicans (or Democrats).
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I might remind you on this thread..
"tyranny" and "once great country"
Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)In 2003, 2004 or 2005, one could certainly find posts with common ground with libertarians, as many of them were against Bush adminstration actions. Greenwald has said he is not a Libertarian (technically, big L means the official party, small L means the ideology). He is more accurately termed a civil libertarian, which is by no means the same thing. I have no idea if Snowden is a Libertarian or libertarian, but it is kind of besides the point, because he is being praised for his actions, not his party membership. Snowden supposedly wrote: The consent of the governed is not consent if it is not informed. You are surprised people would praise that here?
Most certainly, Greenwald was much posted and praised here through much of the Bush administration.
People posted about tyranny and a "once great country" all the time during the Shrub years. Are you saying simply because we elected Barack Obama, those concerns are no longer valid? The Supreme Court make-up back then. They are pretty important. (Yes, I remember how bad it was then. Save yourself the trouble of lecturing me about that.)
It's true that DU is different these days, but I don't think it is for the reasons you think it is. Yes, it matters that most were battling an insane Republican administration then, and now many seem to believe, "o.k. a Democrat is President, so we don't have to worry about this stuff anymore," but there is nothing in the OP that seems foreign to the DU of ten years ago.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)And no...
"so we don't have to worry about this stuff anymore,"
Is NOT what is being said....but its NOT the only thing there is to worry about for one thing.
Jeebus...look at what Obama has accomplished....Look at how many issues he has even attempted to tackle.....even without taking into consideration the obstruction. It's amazing....I have been on this planet over half a century and I have NEVER seen anything like him. Not Jimmy Carter...and not Bill Clinton. So excuse me if I am sick up to here with hearing things like:
"Tyranny" and "once great country"
while he is still the President...its just too too much around here. For god's sakes...
Let's start with Lily Ledbetter straight out the damn gate!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)ideals of the FFs often flawed themselves AND condemned and wanted for treason, by insisting on telling the American people the TRUTH about what their government was up to.
You can't have a Democracy, and I'm sure Jefferson would agree, when the press is owned by Corporations (Jefferson had a lot to say about Corporations too btw) and REAL journalists are silenced even arrested and Trught Tellers, rather the violators of people's rights are the ones to be pursued.
Flawed as some of them were, the FFs had some incredible ideals for how a society should run.
And it didn't include 'secret courts' and 'secret mass warrants AFTER the fact. I believe they might not be surprised at how wrong things have gone. They didn't really have much faith that the greedy and the power seekers could be stopped. But they tried and did a pretty good job of holding them back for over 200 years now.
And I am certain they would approve of Snowden and Manning and Binney and Tice and all the other couragoues Whistle Blowers who insisted on shining a light on the wrong doing of those in power. After all, they did so themselves.
It's easy to tell when someone has done the right thing. All you have to do is look at who is calling them a traitor. You are known sometimes MORE by your enemies than your friends and sunshine is always the best disinfectant for a government that has gone out of control.
Despite the violations of the Constitution, the total disrespect for it, and their view that it is a 'quaint' document, it is still the law of the land and they are hampered still, to some extent by the vision the FFs had. And Snowden and Manning, Tice, Binney and since 2001, so many others.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)It's only through the service of those willing to stand up against the tyranny of the status quo that America can be great again.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)on Democratic Underground? Under a Democratic President no less...
You guys need to learn to use a dictionary...seriously.
Tyr·an·ny noun \ˈtir-ə-nē\
: cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others
: a government in which all power belongs to one person : the rule or authority of a tyrant
Aerows
(39,961 posts)a Democratic politician took office, and I don't think I'll quit criticizing them when there is an (R) in there either. Nor should I. Nor should anyone else be required to agree with what politician A says because of the (D) or (R) after their name.
I'd imagine Obama himself would be the first person to tell you he's not perfect.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Why do I have to keep reminding you people that THIS is Democratic Underground...with the express purpose of supporting Democrats...
It's not Snowden Underground....though you are welcome to start one!
tyranny
a : a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler; especially : one characteristic of an ancient Greek city-state
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I have the right, and the responsibility to criticize Democratic politicians that aren't living up to the ideals of our party. Obama will not be president forever. It is up to party members to express our hopes and dreams for the future of the party.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)How can you consider yourself Democrat if you don't support the Democratically TWICE elected DEMOCRAT President.
The people spoke...and they chose President Obama....by far...not once but twice...do you know how long its been since ANY President has done that?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I guess voting for the man twice isn't showing my support. I guess I'm supposed to stand by and say not a darn thing when the NSA over-reaches just because the politician I voted for is in office. Holy crap. I didn't realize that voting for someone meant that I had to fawn all over them like a Justin Beiber fan club member.
Seriously?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I don't see you criticizing that! Evidently you support THAT!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I didn't realize that voting for someone meant that I had to fawn all over them like a Justin Beiber fan club member.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)at least some damn time! I haven't seen that on DU much...
Far as I can tell we might as well rename this Elizabeth Warren Underground because it seems that is the ONLY democrat some supposed Democrats support. JUST the one...
Aerows
(39,961 posts)and I'm not even going to be shy about that. I like the Governor of Maryland, Martin O'Malley, too. Both are solid Democrats. Why try to shame people into silence of Democratic candidates that they like just because they aren't your particular pick?
It seems like a self-defeating purpose to deride particular politicians when you are complaining that people are deriding ... a politician (Obama). What gives?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)to act like they do on a Democratic Underground forum..
That's what gives!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)for liking Elizabeth Warren and Martin O'Malley?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Jeebus...support of 2 democrats are not going to win us back the house...get my drift?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)and why is he a terrible Democrat, and Elizabeth Warren for that matter? Hell yes we need to get back the House, keep the Senate and increase the number of seats, but yelling at other Democrats that support Democrats isn't going to get the job accomplished.
You pretty much told me not to post here anymore because I had criticisms towards Obama. Telling Democratic party members that vote to essentially "fuck off" and join a Duck Dynasty forum (particularly hilarious since you are telling a gay woman that - PS, that's what that flag means) is counter productive to the mission of getting more Democrats elected. Much more so than critiquing already elected Democrats that can't run for another term (Obama).
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Democratic Underground to stop trashing Democrats and idolizing Libertarians...
THAT'S a fact!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)if you tell Democrats to stop posting here, either.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Because if you are implying that I am not a Democrat, you haven't woken up nearly early enough in the morning, my dear.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you might want to think about that...
everything I post...you somehow twist as being about YOU personally!
Guilty conscience?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)If you were replying to someone else, I wouldn't think it was about me.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but you are willfully trying not to.
Just trying to make me mad enough to say something you can alert on?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)And you complained that I put words in your mouth? Do point out where I used the word tyranny and the phrase "once great". I'll wait. This post doesn't count.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)get it?
and what is up with calling me "sibling" last I checked we are not related
Aerows
(39,961 posts)

VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)"dude"
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'm heartbroken.
treestar
(82,383 posts)that's hyperbole. The very fact you can publicly criticize them shows that.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)But notice I didn't proclaim it to be tyranny, either. I do think the NSA is over reaching, and I stand by that opinion. I also think it is appropriate on a Democratically leaning political forum to voice that opinion. If you don't speak up, you don't get heard.
You don't have to agree with me. I don't have to agree with you, either. That is the beauty of our political system.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)I could have said "the tyranny of the propagandists" and also been correct judging from your comments.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I suggest a dictionary....
a : a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler; especially : one characteristic of an ancient Greek city-state
last1standing
(11,709 posts)Obama is not the embodiment of democracy and progressive ideology does not change to suit Obama's whims. But you will never be able to understand that so goodbye.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)not once but TWICE. Which is VERY damn rare indeed....and I am so thankful that I voted for him
You however seem to think you voted for a Tyrant....shows what your judgement is worth huh?
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)BeyondGeography
(41,112 posts)Sleigh bells in the air...
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)But, I'll play...
Josh McCown not for being a quarterback of decent ability, but because as second stringer he stepped up and stepped down with a grace that's a worthy lesson.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)My words always seem to rub authoritarian types the wrong way!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)This is the same thing that irritated the shit out of me during the Bush presidency. He fucked something up, and people insisted it was the best thing that ever happened. No one is infallible, and the NSA shit impacts me because I'm in IT. I'm supposed to just STFU and STFD because the person I voted for might possibly be impacted if I show anything less than unfailing loyalty.
Screw that.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Unfortunately these types are not confined to one political party. The Snowden saga has proved that over and over again in 2013.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)has proven alot more on DU than you think!
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Whole lotta giggling and nonsense going on, for no apparent reason.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I don't know wtf is going on in this thread to provoke such vitriol, but may it be dispelled with Christmas joy.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Merry Christmas to all and may freedom ring in the New Year.