Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 07:01 PM Dec 2013

Rabbi Sued After Baby Injured During Circumcision

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) – A local rabbi is being sued after allegedly botching a bris, the traditional Jewish circumcision ritual, and severing a newborn boy’s penis.

The incident detailed in the lawsuit happened at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Squirrel Hill within the last year.

--clip
Sometime during the bris, according to the lawsuit, Rosenberg severed the baby boy’s penis. The baby was rushed to Children’s Hospital, where doctors performed emergency microsurgery.

“If your finger, your thumb was cut off and was put back on, that is pretty exciting,” said renowned UPMC plastic surgeon Dr. Joe Losee.

--clip
But our sources say it took eight hours. The baby needed six blood transfusions and was hospitalized for nearly two months. Sources describe the reattachment procedure as successful.

more...

http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2013/12/27/rabbi-sued-after-baby-injured-during-circumcision/

61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rabbi Sued After Baby Injured During Circumcision (Original Post) Purveyor Dec 2013 OP
Just... Glassunion Dec 2013 #1
Guess the Rabbi isn't getting a tip. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #2
Barbaric either way... Lost_Count Dec 2013 #3
I hope the poor, terrorized child retains the right the sue the fuck out of these people for what Purveyor Dec 2013 #7
Who is "they"? Drahthaardogs Dec 2013 #17
The rabbi did it with the parents permission. Boudica the Lyoness Dec 2013 #43
Any other guys out there do involuntary crotch grab reading this? LittleBlue Dec 2013 #4
along with a gulp…. dhill926 Dec 2013 #35
Why can't males decide for themselves whether they want to be circumcised when they're adults? riderinthestorm Dec 2013 #5
Mostly, they should be able to Prophet 451 Dec 2013 #6
It just seems wrong to do cosmetic surgery on babies without their consent riderinthestorm Dec 2013 #18
I actually agree with you Prophet 451 Dec 2013 #40
Because few would actually do it LittleBlue Dec 2013 #12
What I don't get is that if this is a religious ritual to mark one as part of the tribe riderinthestorm Dec 2013 #21
What, not enough Bibi/Palestine/Gaza/West Bank 'news' lately? PCIntern Dec 2013 #8
Still making my 'rounds'...stay tuned! Purveyor Dec 2013 #9
We can see that...nt PCIntern Dec 2013 #10
Well I'm glad my threads are so eagerly awaited...indeed!~ Purveyor Dec 2013 #13
Into major schmuckery today, huh? HERVEPA Dec 2013 #38
Exactly... SidDithers Dec 2013 #15
It's better than the "look at me" gender wars threads. nt madinmaryland Dec 2013 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #22
Don't forget breastfeeding. nt tblue37 Dec 2013 #24
Indeed. Breast feeding is and should be controversial. Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #31
And yet one topic that is regularly presented as controversial. Because it was. On DU. Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #39
Thank you. Luminous Animal Dec 2013 #42
I'm to the point where I would support a cigarette smoking thread by The Straight Story!! madinmaryland Dec 2013 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #29
lol..nt Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #45
What an odd response. Scootaloo Dec 2013 #32
Oh REALLY? PCIntern Dec 2013 #47
Yeah. Your response is an odd one to a story about a guy getting sued for a botched circumcision Scootaloo Dec 2013 #49
that qualifies as more than 'injury'....imho spanone Dec 2013 #11
witch doctors and other non-physicians... waddirum Dec 2013 #14
yep. nt Demo_Chris Dec 2013 #20
All babies are injured during circumcision. Jester Messiah Dec 2013 #19
There are Jews who don't circumcise Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #23
If fewer Americans circumcise, will Jews be willing to maintain tradition? Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #26
My hunch is, some will, some won't. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #30
Agreed, oddly complicated issue...nt Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #34
I wish I could sue the doctor that cut several inches off doc03 Dec 2013 #27
A baby gets his penis cut off, and a surgeon finds it "exciting". Crunchy Frog Dec 2013 #33
"Any male who doesn’t circumcise, God says in Genesis, “that soul will be cut off from its people".. Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #36
I'm Jewish, and I find all of these jokes insulting... Nobody You Know Dec 2013 #41
I absolutely would not let anyone do that to my babies. Boudica the Lyoness Dec 2013 #44
Sorry, but the rabbi doesn't know his anatomy. Crunchy Frog Dec 2013 #48
nerves Jesus Malverde Dec 2013 #50
"babies do not have nerves in their penis until they are at least two weeks old" ZombieHorde Dec 2013 #54
There's less discomfort for the adults Crunchy Frog Dec 2013 #57
Yeah...no. Infants have nerves in their penises even at day 1. Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #56
While I won't wander into the religious aspects of the debate - Ms. Toad Dec 2013 #60
did the Rabbi have any medical background ? JI7 Dec 2013 #46
Holy Crap, and no pun intended! elleng Dec 2013 #51
I am against ANY form of genital mutilation unless it is requested by a sane adult loudsue Dec 2013 #52
Strongly agree. Oakenshield Dec 2013 #61
just for some perspective, here's a story about a baby drowned during baptism: unblock Dec 2013 #53
I think full immersion baptisms of infants should be banned as well. Crunchy Frog Dec 2013 #58
Male genital mutilation cutlture a.k.a. circumcision Harmony Blue Dec 2013 #55
if I have a boy wr will have it done Niceguy1 Dec 2013 #59
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
7. I hope the poor, terrorized child retains the right the sue the fuck out of these people for what
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 07:14 PM
Dec 2013

"they" have done to him.

And no, the parents should NOT have the right to sue and reap a windfall. It is their fucking fault this barbarity took place in the first place.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
6. Mostly, they should be able to
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 07:13 PM
Dec 2013

In a very few cases, circumcision becomes medically necessary during childhood. For example, heavy scarring can make the foreskin too inflexible to be retracted.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
18. It just seems wrong to do cosmetic surgery on babies without their consent
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 08:59 PM
Dec 2013

Unless its medically necessary...

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
40. I actually agree with you
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 10:03 PM
Dec 2013

I'm British and very few people are circumcised here (and we have a statistically normal level of STDs). Barring medical necessity, I think it shouldn't be done on anyone below, say, 16.

EDIT: Actually, how old are kids when they have bar mitzvahs? 13, IIRC. So let's say it's a minimum of 13.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
12. Because few would actually do it
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 07:22 PM
Dec 2013

The only reason it's done is because babies can't articulate an objection.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
21. What I don't get is that if this is a religious ritual to mark one as part of the tribe
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 09:05 PM
Dec 2013

It would have far greater meaning and import if it was CHOSEN by men when they were able to make that informed choice.

Rather than have it done to unconsenting infants.

Fwiw I'm a firm believer that any cosmetic body modification wait til the child can make up their own mind. Including ear piercing

PCIntern

(25,490 posts)
8. What, not enough Bibi/Palestine/Gaza/West Bank 'news' lately?
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 07:17 PM
Dec 2013

So it's circumcision this week, is it? what's next: Paraphrasing Pat Buchanan?

just asking...

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
15. Exactly...
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 07:55 PM
Dec 2013

presstv and The Future of Freedom Foundation must not have anything anti-Semitic to bring to DU today.

Sid

Response to madinmaryland (Reply #16)

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
28. Indeed. Breast feeding is and should be controversial.
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 09:28 PM
Dec 2013

What are those women thinking? Feeding their baby? In public.

Personally, I find the mocking of the "controversy" pathetic.

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #28)

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
37. And yet one topic that is regularly presented as controversial. Because it was. On DU.
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 09:46 PM
Dec 2013

Perhaps we are all now good with it as we are with marriage equality. Thus, I'd like to see it dropped as a DU mocking meme.

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #37)

Response to madinmaryland (Reply #25)

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
49. Yeah. Your response is an odd one to a story about a guy getting sued for a botched circumcision
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 11:30 PM
Dec 2013

That's the context of my comment. What's yours?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
23. There are Jews who don't circumcise
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 09:15 PM
Dec 2013

not a majority, by any means, but I think there's more open-mindedness around not doing it than there used to be.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
26. If fewer Americans circumcise, will Jews be willing to maintain tradition?
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 09:26 PM
Dec 2013

The broader culture has undoubtedly influenced the increased questioning among American Jews about circumcision.

Since 1979, the national rate went down 10 percent overall (or 6 percentage points, to 58 percent). The region with the steepest drop by far was the West, where the overall percentage of newborns circumcised went down 37 percent, to 40 percent.

Especially in the Northeast and Midwest, circumcision has been the mainstream American thing to do. American Jews didn’t have to consider as a factor the possibility that their sons would stand out.

While it’s unclear if the rates will drop further, or rise, the mere possibility raises the question: Would this highly assimilated group of Americans, who in high numbers reject other barometers of religiosity like synagogue membership and belief in God, continue circumcising if they knew it would make their sons look different?

I’d bet my house on this: As America goes, so will circumcision. If America starts turning against this, give it one generation,” said Shira Stutman, rabbi at the millennial-focused D.C. synagogue, Sixth & I.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/if-fewer-americans-circumcise-will-jews-be-willing-to-stand-out/2013/12/25/f636b5d8-69be-11e3-8b5b-a77187b716a3_story.html

doc03

(35,299 posts)
27. I wish I could sue the doctor that cut several inches off
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 09:28 PM
Dec 2013

of mine but he died 60 years ago. I got short changed on that deal.

Crunchy Frog

(26,578 posts)
33. A baby gets his penis cut off, and a surgeon finds it "exciting".
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 09:35 PM
Dec 2013

And some DU "progressives" sniggering like it's some kind of schoolyard joke.

Sick society.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
36. "Any male who doesn’t circumcise, God says in Genesis, “that soul will be cut off from its people"..
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 09:44 PM
Dec 2013
A small but growing number of Jews are questioning the ancient ritual of circumcision

Wallach is among a small but growing number of Jews who are slowly altering what has for millennia been considered perhaps Judaism’s core rite. The Bible says an adult Abraham circumcised himself to mark the covenant between him, his descendants and God. Any male who doesn’t circumcise, God says in Genesis, “that soul will be cut off from its people; he has broken My covenant.”

Many of these Jews, according to rabbis and the ritual circumcisers known as mohels, are rejecting the classic festive circumcision ceremony, called a brit milah, or bris. For thousands of years, Jews have performed the ritual removal of the penile foreskin on the eighth day of a boy’s life, sometimes at the cost of death during periods of anti-Semitism.

A very small percentage, including Wallach, are not circumcising at all. Others, uncomfortable with the joyous, public ceremony around an intimate surgical procedure, are circumcising their sons in the hospital and crafting new baby-welcoming ceremonies days or weeks later for family and friends. Some are having no public service at all.

Meanwhile, there is an unprecedented level of debate among friends, grandparents and couples about whether to circumcise and how. Given that the topic merges sex, religion, identity, culture, gender equity, health politics and anti-Semitism, such discussions can grow intense or acrimonious.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/a-small-but-growing-number-of-jews-are-questioning-the-ancient-ritual-of-circumcision/2013/12/25/d24c5a4e-6403-11e3-aa81-e1dab1360323_story.html
 

Nobody You Know

(33 posts)
41. I'm Jewish, and I find all of these jokes insulting...
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 10:03 PM
Dec 2013

And find it a bit tragic. I, too, am a victim of a botched circumcision (the rabbi accidentally poked a second hole but it's been deemed surgically unneccesary to repair, just a bleed), but I am not complaining. My parents made the choice for me, and I appreciate it. I live with the minor scab.

I did that for my son, and I chose a rabbi that was the most experienced of all the rabbis locally (there are 3 mohels serving in my area) and he did a superb job. Explained the whole thing - babies do not have nerves in their penis until they are at least two weeks old, and my son cried, but not from the shock of the circumcision, but the equipment used is very cold (it's all metal, and you wouldn't want to stick that thing when it's cold on your body), but was immediately calmed by a drop or two of wine after the blessings. Rabbi also said Neosporin for the first three days will heal the scar, and boy it did - in three days it was all done.

My guess is the rabbi in the OP stuck the penis incorrectly in this device:



And chopped it off. You're only supposed to expose the foreskin, not the penis.

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
44. I absolutely would not let anyone do that to my babies.
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 10:37 PM
Dec 2013

I can imagine what my sons would say to me now (the oldest one is almost 40) if I told them I was going to force them to have their penis's cut to suit me. They love their 'as nature intended' willies.

I always say, "Do what you want with your own penis. Leave other people's alone".

Crunchy Frog

(26,578 posts)
48. Sorry, but the rabbi doesn't know his anatomy.
Sun Dec 29, 2013, 11:25 PM
Dec 2013

The newborn penis certainly does have nerves in it, and certainly does experience sensation, no matter how uncomfortable that fact may be from a religious perspective. This is backed up by plenty of scientific and histological studies. Also, if he didn't have nerves there, then how could he feel the cold? And if it's only the instruments being cold that bothers the baby, then why not just warm them up and solve the problem?

I would never trust a religious official to give accurate scientific information. I don't believe in creationism either.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
54. "babies do not have nerves in their penis until they are at least two weeks old"
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 01:33 AM
Dec 2013

This isn't true. Male babies have nerves in their penises. Saying otherwise is a bizarre claim. I am guessing it is a religious belief, but I don't really know the origin of this myth.

I personally circumcision to be offensive, but I guess offense is irrelevant in both of our cases.

Crunchy Frog

(26,578 posts)
57. There's less discomfort for the adults
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 01:47 AM
Dec 2013

if they can convince themselves that the baby isn't feeling any pain. I don't think it's so much a religious belief as a comforting fairy tale.

In you're going to cut off part of your child's genitals, you'll feel much better about it if you believe there are no nerves in them. Or at least I know I would.

It's not just a religious myth either. Until recently, doctors were convinced that babies couldn't feel pain, and happily reassured new parents that there sons wouldn't suffer at all. They even carried out major surgeries (like heart surgery) with nothing but a paralytic, and nothing at all for the pain that they didn't believe existed.

Ms. Toad

(33,999 posts)
60. While I won't wander into the religious aspects of the debate -
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 02:34 AM
Dec 2013

Your rabbi is wrong about this:

"babies do not have nerves in their penis until they are at least two weeks old, and my son cried, but not from the shock of the circumcision, but the equipment used is very cold (it's all metal, and you wouldn't want to stick that thing when it's cold on your body)"

That was the line which was used to justify medical circumcision without anesthesia, as well, and has been thoroughly debunked.

"Circumcision is painful surgery and appropriate intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia is required."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577918

"Male circumcision should be performed by trained and competent practitioners, by using sterile techniques and effective pain management. Analgesia is safe and effective in reducing the procedural pain associated with newborn circumcision; thus, adequate analgesia should be provided whenever newborn circumcision is performed."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22926175

With local anesthesia, 6.5% of infants under a week still experienced pain which was "NIPS > or =2 . . . a painful procedure"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223238

elleng

(130,744 posts)
51. Holy Crap, and no pun intended!
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 12:23 AM
Dec 2013

Thank goodness my grandson's procedure was done in the hospital, w/o ritual. It was done voluntarily, daughter & son in law not practicing any religious anything. I didn't ask, but obviously there's a reason they elected to do this.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
52. I am against ANY form of genital mutilation unless it is requested by a sane adult
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 12:30 AM
Dec 2013

for their OWN body, and not for anybody else's body. Parents, religions, society....NOBODY....has the right to make that kind of decision for a baby, a child, a teen. Only an adult should have the authority and CHOICE about what to do with their own bodies. Genital mutilation should be a CHOICE an adult makes.

Oakenshield

(614 posts)
61. Strongly agree.
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 06:56 AM
Dec 2013

It should be a no-brainer. Would you want someone to start cutting away at you without your explicit consent? I should freaking hope not!

unblock

(52,126 posts)
53. just for some perspective, here's a story about a baby drowned during baptism:
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 12:38 AM
Dec 2013

i don't go around calling anyone else's religious/traditional rituals barbaric and i would appreciate it if others would kindly refrain from insulting those of us who view this tradition as important. babies don't consent to many, many things and parents are called upon to do what they believe to be in their best interests in many contexts every day. those here you would never consider circumcision for themselves or their sons are more than welcome to express their view that this tradition/procedure is not for them, but please don't insult me and my wife, my parents, my grandparents, and my ancestors going back many generations, based on your intolerance for the traditions of others.




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1298129/Baby-dies-minutes-immersed-times-baptism.html

Priest accused of drowning six-week-old boy during a BAPTISM as family looked on
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
UPDATED: 07:37 EST, 28 July 2010

A priest has been accused of accidentally drowning a six-week-old boy as he baptised him in Moldova.

Witnesses claimed the baby died after Father Valentin failed to cover his mouth and nose when he immersed him in water three times.

Film shot by relatives shows the youngster moving after being taken out of the font, but then suffering difficulty breathing as he is dressed.

Twenty minutes later, he started bleeding from his nose and mouth and died.

...

Doctor Sergiu Raileanu, who examined the tiny tot, confirmed that the baby had drowned.

Police said they have launched a manslaughter investigation. If found guilty, the priest faces up to three years in jail.

Crunchy Frog

(26,578 posts)
58. I think full immersion baptisms of infants should be banned as well.
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 01:54 AM
Dec 2013

I don't care about the tradition. It's obviously unsafe for the babies.

This is not the first such incident that I've read about.

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
55. Male genital mutilation cutlture a.k.a. circumcision
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 01:43 AM
Dec 2013

is only prevalent in the United States. Outside of the U.S. it isn't as common thankfully.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rabbi Sued After Baby Inj...