Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Woo shaming (Original Post) B2G Jan 2014 OP
Shame on woo! n/t ChisolmTrailDem Jan 2014 #1
lol Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #7
Poor Mason Woo! icymist Jan 2014 #55
What the hell is Woo? vi5 Jan 2014 #2
I don't think it's an acronym. Phlem Jan 2014 #6
Please don't tell me you're saying Homeopathy, Crystals are current science. HERVEPA Jan 2014 #11
If they weren't many others are... gcomeau Jan 2014 #13
No that's not what I'm saying. Phlem Jan 2014 #14
Well, your post was not clear to me. HERVEPA Jan 2014 #16
try re reading my post, I've updated it. Phlem Jan 2014 #17
OK. I reread it. HERVEPA Jan 2014 #19
If one believes you can dilute something out of existence and think the memory. Phlem Jan 2014 #22
Wow. So quick to reply to all my posts until this one. How very courteous of you. Phlem Jan 2014 #24
I am at work, actually, so can't always reply right away. HERVEPA Jan 2014 #26
I have PTSD since early child hood from an abusive stepfather Phlem Jan 2014 #29
Sorry about your PTSD HERVEPA Jan 2014 #30
Do you believe in work, HERVEPA? MrMickeysMom Jan 2014 #34
Read the frigging stream of posts HERVEPA Jan 2014 #62
"why don't just stick it…" ??? MrMickeysMom Jan 2014 #63
'Winning Others Over' according to the Gallup Business Journal icymist Jan 2014 #60
ideas considered irrational or based on extremely flimsy evidence or that appeal to mysterious... PeaceNikki Jan 2014 #23
You could say that about a lot so science. Cleita Jan 2014 #36
Look, don't pull me into this flame fest. I have no dog in this fight. I was just answering the ? PeaceNikki Jan 2014 #37
Well try a different definition. Cleita Jan 2014 #40
yes, I fucking said it was derogatory. PeaceNikki Jan 2014 #45
What issues do you have with quantum mechanics? n/t Gore1FL Jan 2014 #44
Perhaps that it's a decent model. Igel Jan 2014 #49
A decent model?!!! athena Jan 2014 #52
What would you say about quantum mechanics, again? athena Jan 2014 #48
Except that quantum physics actually makes testable predictions that are verified by experiment. Salviati Jan 2014 #54
Nobody has denied that. Cleita Jan 2014 #61
Alchemy used to be "woo" to most people, but now it's part of what we call chemistry. Electric Monk Jan 2014 #43
Neat! PeaceNikki Jan 2014 #46
Rather the contrary. Igel Jan 2014 #51
willful stupidity nt Deep13 Jan 2014 #53
World Of Outlaws icymist Jan 2014 #56
This Atman Jan 2014 #3
Woo should be ashamed! L0oniX Jan 2014 #4
He should, but he is probably a Republican, so he has no shame. RC Jan 2014 #42
If there is a hell I should burn in it WITH SHAME get the red out Jan 2014 #5
For Shame! Phlem Jan 2014 #8
Herbal tea is good. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #12
woo is me. nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #9
Woo should be shamed. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #10
I see nothing wrong with this store icymist Jan 2014 #59
But together, you've created something hilarious and true! reformist2 Jan 2014 #15
I believe you meant to say twoo. HERVEPA Jan 2014 #18
How could I miss that! lol reformist2 Jan 2014 #25
How about "woo shaming and consensus privilege"? n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2014 #20
Woosh! Puzzledtraveller Jan 2014 #21
OK, I'm a fan of some things that are scientifically proven but are being called Squinch Jan 2014 #27
And the biggest "woo" offender of all Phlem Jan 2014 #28
"Woo Shaming" is so excellent, that I just submitted it to Urban Dictionary. Thanks! Ian David Jan 2014 #31
Nice! B2G Jan 2014 #32
The first instance I could find of the phrase was a Facebook posting from 2012. Ian David Jan 2014 #35
Lol...I didn't Google it so I'm surprised B2G Jan 2014 #38
Pretty much. Just you and a couple others, as far as I can tell. n/t Ian David Jan 2014 #39
I prefer my woo in entertainment form. ProgressSaves Jan 2014 #33
I here ya B2G Phlem Jan 2014 #41
Shame on failed scientific experiments that created generations of heartbreak. sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #47
Can I buy you a beer? Drahthaardogs Jan 2014 #50
Why the fuck is everyone so infatuated with the Sham Woo guy madinmaryland Jan 2014 #57
Was it really that bad a movie? icymist Jan 2014 #58

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
6. I don't think it's an acronym.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:09 PM
Jan 2014

It's a label used on people who believe in Pseudo Science. Never mind that fact that at some point in the past, a lot of our current science could have been labeled "woo". Homeopathy, Crystals, etc...

-p

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
11. Please don't tell me you're saying Homeopathy, Crystals are current science.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:12 PM
Jan 2014

You weren't saying that, right?

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
14. No that's not what I'm saying.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:15 PM
Jan 2014

Jeebus.

I have been into science for years and the one thing I know is you don't beat people over the head with it and scare them off. So fucking what if they're into "woo", I would embrace them and sink some "real" science in there too. We need more critical thinkers in this world and instead taking religions plan of attack, by hunting them down and recruiting them, a lot of scientifically minded people (especially here in DU) most feel intellectually superior by shaming and mocking them. Hence more people with religious propensities than critical thinking.

-p

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
16. Well, your post was not clear to me.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:20 PM
Jan 2014

That's why I asked the question. I wasn't sure. There are plenty of people on this site who believe they are real, especially the homeopathy ridiculousness.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
19. OK. I reread it.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:32 PM
Jan 2014

Nice, but I don't think you're going to be able to change minds whatever method is used. If one believes you can dilute something out of existence and think the memory of it being there can help you, I believe you are incapable of any logical or analytical thinking.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
22. If one believes you can dilute something out of existence and think the memory.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:36 PM
Jan 2014

So what are you saying exactly. That I think I can dilute religion with science?

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
24. Wow. So quick to reply to all my posts until this one. How very courteous of you.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:01 PM
Jan 2014

I answered your questions.

So this is your summation of me? "I believe you are incapable of any logical or analytical thinking."

How very typical. And a very shitty insult by my standards.

I believe for a self described logical, analytical, thinker that being closed minded is the antithesis discovery, which is Science.

Have a Nice Day.



-p

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
26. I am at work, actually, so can't always reply right away.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:23 PM
Jan 2014

I am having a difficult time following you.
I was describing homeopathy, and saying there was not hope for those who believe in it.
As I think I understand, you do not believe in it.
I was not taking any shots at you (unless you do believe in it, and I interpreted it wrong).
I think you need to grow a little thicker skin, by the way.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
29. I have PTSD since early child hood from an abusive stepfather
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:27 PM
Jan 2014

How thick does my fucking skin need to be?

and I knew it was going to be something like "I was on the can etc....."

-p

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
34. Do you believe in work, HERVEPA?
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:47 PM
Jan 2014

Or, were you contributing to someone's stress while getting paid for it?

I'll end this now to prevent you getting paid overtime…

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
62. Read the frigging stream of posts
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 12:39 AM
Jan 2014

I was trying to understand what he was saying, and of course had no idea of the PTSD until the last post.
So why don't you just stick it....

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
63. "why don't just stick it…" ???
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 12:47 AM
Jan 2014

It's late… and I think I've read quite enough frigging posts, thank you.

Have a nice "stick it", then…

icymist

(15,888 posts)
60. 'Winning Others Over' according to the Gallup Business Journal
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 08:54 PM
Jan 2014

Woo stands for winning others over. You enjoy the challenge of meeting new people and getting them to like you. Strangers are rarely intimidating to you. On the contrary, strangers can be energizing. You are drawn to them. You want to learn their names, ask them questions, and find some area of common interest so that you can strike up a conversation and build rapport. Some people shy away from starting up conversations because they worry about running out of things to say. You don't. Not only are you rarely at a loss for words; you actually enjoy initiating with strangers because you derive satisfaction from breaking the ice and making a connection. Once that connection is made, you are quite happy to wrap it up and move on. There are new people to meet, new rooms to work, new crowds to mingle in. In your world there are no strangers, only friends you haven't met yet -- lots of them.

http://businessjournal.gallup.com/content/721/Woo.aspx

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
23. ideas considered irrational or based on extremely flimsy evidence or that appeal to mysterious...
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:36 PM
Jan 2014

woo-woo

Woo-woo (or just plain woo) refers to ideas considered irrational or based on extremely flimsy evidence or that appeal to mysterious occult forces or powers.

Here's a dictionary definition of woo-woo:

adj. concerned with emotions, mysticism, or spiritualism; other than rational or scientific; mysterious; new agey. Also n., a person who has mystical or new age beliefs.

When used by skeptics, woo-woo is a derogatory and dismissive term used to refer to beliefs one considers nonsense or to a person who holds such beliefs.

Sometimes woo-woo is used by skeptics as a synonym for pseudoscience, true-believer, or quackery. But mostly the term is used for its emotive content and is an emotive synonym for such terms as nonsense, irrational, nutter, nut, or crazy.

http://www.skepdic.com/woowoo.html

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
37. Look, don't pull me into this flame fest. I have no dog in this fight. I was just answering the ?
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:54 PM
Jan 2014

kthxbai

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
40. Well try a different definition.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:58 PM
Jan 2014

Mine is that it is a derogatory term coined to make followers of certain spiritual practices and healing methods that are not mainstream look like they are crazy. Unless people are directly affected or harmed by the followers of such beliefs and practices they should mind their own business.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
45. yes, I fucking said it was derogatory.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jan 2014

Did you miss that part?

Jesus Christ, that's why these flames keep going. People like you are looking for a fight.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
49. Perhaps that it's a decent model.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 07:41 PM
Jan 2014

That makes accurate predictions and allows us to explain and extend phenomena that otherwise doesn't seem to have a good explanation.

Or perhaps that we don't fully understand it, in that just being able to describe and predict doesn't constitute "understanding."

I go one step further than most. We shame creationists and anti-evolutionists. I consider that to be a variety of "woo."

Some want to hold other forms of "woo" in high honor. This I find difficult to understand.

athena

(4,187 posts)
52. A decent model?!!!
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 07:49 PM
Jan 2014

Clearly, you haven't even taken an undergraduate-level course in quantum mechanics. It's an outrageous understatement to say that quantum mechanics "allows us to explain and extend (sic) phenomena that otherwise doesn't (sic) seem to have a good explanation." Moreover, it is not true that "we don't fully understand" quantum mechanics. You may not understand it, but that doesn't mean we don't understand it.

The current problem in theoretical physics is that whereas three out of the four fundamental forces (the electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces) can be understood quantum mechanically, the fourth force (gravity) currently is not. The goal of the best theoretical physicists in the world today is to come up with a quantum mechanical model of gravity. So it's completely nutty to claim that quantum mechanics is what is unsatisfactory in physics.

Quantum mechanics is a mathematical theory. You can't claim to understand it or know anything about it based on a few lay-person books or movies. Such books and movies generally aim to demonstrate how "cool" quantum mechanics is. They are not intended to give you the impression that quantum-mechanics is not a rock-solid part of physics.

athena

(4,187 posts)
48. What would you say about quantum mechanics, again?
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 07:39 PM
Jan 2014

Do I understand you correctly to be claiming that quantum mechanics is somehow woo-woo or new age? If so, you're wrong. Quantum mechanics is one of the most mathematical, most rigorous, and most successful areas of physics. You use it whenever you check your phone, microwave your food, or get an MRI. You see evidence of it whenever you look at a fluorescent lamp through a diffraction grating. Just because some of its mathematical conclusions appear unintuitive doesn't mean it's woo-woo or new-age.

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
54. Except that quantum physics actually makes testable predictions that are verified by experiment.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 08:33 PM
Jan 2014

So there's that...

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
61. Nobody has denied that.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 09:30 PM
Jan 2014

However, think about it. You present the concepts of multiple universes. We only see one. You say there are nine to eleven dimensions. We experience three or four. There are branes. What? So you can see how exotic this is. So you put it through rigorous tests to prove it. However many concepts that are considered woo have not been given the same proof testing.

Remember the sciences of astronomy, mathematics, chemistry etc. all came from what started out as mystical thought and attempts to practice magic. My point is that if people want to believe in what you want to label magical thinking, let them. Why make fun of them unless they are hurting you?

Igel

(35,300 posts)
51. Rather the contrary.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 07:49 PM
Jan 2014

People like Newton believed in alchemy. They developed methods to test it, to try to improve it. But what alchemy was after, the claims it made, the predictions it made, all failed. That this went on for centuries before observation and prediction were considered important enough to count for much of anything is truly impressive.

Alchemy died. The methods that were finally responsible for its death lived on because what they produced was rigorous, predictive, and observationally grounded. They were not, however, derived from alchemy itself.

Similarly, astronomy grew out of the corpse of astrology, but it took a rethinking of the entire meaning of the observations to reach that observation. Astrology lives in, rather unchanged since before astronomy really established itself. Astronomy, however, has produced some rather startling insights.

It's rather like saying we get broccoli from dirt, so nutritionally there's no difference between the vitamin content of broccoli and clay.

get the red out

(13,461 posts)
5. If there is a hell I should burn in it WITH SHAME
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:06 PM
Jan 2014

I take Glucosamine for my joints and believe in a higher force both.

I drink herbal tea also. I know I am an embarrassment to liberals everywhere, simply an uneducated horror story of a pseudo-person.

I also live in the south.

I've come clean.......

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
12. Herbal tea is good.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:13 PM
Jan 2014

I am currently enjoying a cup of Masala chai tea.

I, however, don't believe that it can cure anything that ails me.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
27. OK, I'm a fan of some things that are scientifically proven but are being called
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:23 PM
Jan 2014

"woo" here.

But that phrase is seriously hilarious!

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
28. And the biggest "woo" offender of all
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:23 PM
Jan 2014

Albert Einstein:

“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”

-p

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
31. "Woo Shaming" is so excellent, that I just submitted it to Urban Dictionary. Thanks!
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:39 PM
Jan 2014

Submission under review

Your entry is under review by editors.

Woo Shaming

Definition: The justifiable ridicule of those so ignorant of how the Universe really works, that they subscribe to nonsense such as homeopathy and crystal power.

Example: There are some things that are so patently absurd as to be unworthy of arguing against; those who believe in these things are lost beyond redemption, and the only thing left to do is engage in woo shaming.

by Ian David on Jan 6, 2014

tags: Science, Pseudoscience, Alternative Medicine, Education, Woo, Homeopathy, Derp, Reality, Medicine, Skepticism, Skeptic, Alt Med

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
35. The first instance I could find of the phrase was a Facebook posting from 2012.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:51 PM
Jan 2014

Someone accusing someone of "woo shaming" someone else over body modifications.

FWIW, I don't think body modifications are woo. They're either art or fetish, unless you think they give you super powers or something.

 

ProgressSaves

(123 posts)
33. I prefer my woo in entertainment form.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:47 PM
Jan 2014

Dished out by greats like George R. R. Martin and not by Dr. Smith that claims to cure headaches by burning sage and drawing pentagrams on my back with needles.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
41. I here ya B2G
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:59 PM
Jan 2014

On a lighter note, my 2nd grader asked Santa for a Chemistry set, a lab coat and goggles for Christmas. Santa delivered 3 different chemistry sets and a Snap Circuits Jr and her lab coat and goggles. It's so fun to do experiments with her and she is so stoked. I'm just the happiest dad around I can't put it in words.

Science Rocks!



-p

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Woo shaming