General Discussion

leftieNanner

(15,083 posts) Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:57 PM Jan 2014

Chris Christie GW Bridge - redacted emails?

Anybody else wondering whose name was redacted on the email chain regarding the GW Bridge closures in September?

Was it Chris Christie who said "Is it wrong that I'm smiling?" If the Bully in Chief's Deputy and others' emails were left intact, what would be the purpose of redacting any name unless it pointed a finger directly to the top of the food chain?

Just wondering.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chris Christie GW Bridge - redacted emails? (Original Post) leftieNanner Jan 2014 OP

I think it was Christie's name that was redacted Bjorn Against Jan 2014 #1

Is he really that much of a stupid blowhard? leftieNanner Jan 2014 #3

We usually don't get what we want, you know. Smoking guns are extremely rare in politics. randome Jan 2014 #2

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)

1. I think it was Christie's name that was redacted

Reply to leftieNanner (Original post)

Wed Jan 8, 2014, 04:32 PM

Jan 2014

I think they redacted it to send a message to the people testifying tomorrow to tell them "we already have the goods on your guy, if you try to lie and tell us under oath that he was not involved you will face perjury charges".

leftieNanner

(15,083 posts)

3. Is he really that much of a stupid blowhard?

Reply to Bjorn Against (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 8, 2014, 04:53 PM

Jan 2014

Not to realize that these things have a way of becoming public? And that many heads could roll over his pig (inference intended) headed vindictiveness?

Oh please, oh please, oh please...

randome

(34,845 posts)

2. We usually don't get what we want, you know. Smoking guns are extremely rare in politics.

Reply to leftieNanner (Original post)

Wed Jan 8, 2014, 04:35 PM

Jan 2014

But one can still hope, right?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]

Reply to this discussion