General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhoop... There It Is... 'White House Viewed Surveillance Report As 'Liberal'' - Politico
Stone: White House viewed surveillance report as 'liberal'By DARREN SAMUELSOHN | Politico
1/24/14 2:00 PM EST
<snip>
A member of President Barack Obamas hand-picked surveillance review group said Friday the White House was swayed by U.S. intelligence officials sympathetic to the National Security Agency and ultimately viewed the groups findings as a liberal report.
University of Chicago law professor Geoffrey Stone said that, after receiving the surveillance groups report, Obama spent a month meeting with many of the same people we had met with at great length, members of the intelligence community, members of the intelligence committees from Congress largely on one side of the picture.
And instead of our report being truly understood as a middle ground, based upon taking into account all of those perspectives on both sides of the spectrum, I think the White House got moved by thinking of our report as a liberal report, Stone said.
Stone, speaking during a panel discussion at the National Press Club in Washington, said intelligence officials were pushing <Obama> and the White House generally more to what we can call the right.
<snip>
More: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2014/01/stone-white-house-viewed-surveillance-report-as-liberal-181849.html
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)It's a doop:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024397887
Without the Politico link.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Did a DU Search... That one did not come up.
villager
(26,001 posts)Say it ain't so!
RC
(25,592 posts)But once again...
Rex
(65,616 posts)I guess the country has to go to hell in a handbasket first before anyone will listen to the voice of reason.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)...ad human infinitum.
Rex
(65,616 posts)constantly reminding them of how fucked up the PTB have allowed this country to become a shell of it's former self. That income inequality is at an all time high, that we STILL need to prosecute SOMEONE for the illegal invasion of Iraq. We remind them of all their past failures and all we get for it is grief. Sometimes I think we SHOULD just shutup and let the country slide off into oblivion.
indepat
(20,899 posts)of national security is liberal, a dirty, slurring term used by conservatives to denigrate every opposing view held by their political enemies. Et to, Bruti?
Oscarmonster13
(209 posts)So the WH staff, etc...who are supposed to be "Democrats" and hand picked by our POTUS, and probably the Prez himself, thinks that a report on surveillance on citizens is "too liberal"
WTF did I just read? Does that mean that basically, nothing is going to be scrutinized, changed etc...because our POTUS believes differently than this report?
Heads up to all the people who say "It's okay, I trust Obama because he's on our side" (read:liberal, democrat, etc) and those who think we should not be worried at the data collection because it's "already done by corporations" or "if you aren't doing anything bad, you should have nothing to hide.."
THIS sets a horrific precedent, that ANY future leader can twist and use to his own ends. Just like we all were pretty upset at the original Patriot Act...THIS is where that led us....loss of civil liberties and then some.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)The people saying, "It's okay, I trust Obama because he's on our side" are NOT liberals, they're yellow-dog Democrats. Big BIG difference.
Oscarmonster13
(209 posts)I've never been that great with it... I guess I see things simply but that wasn't really my point, was it?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)....wouldn't it?
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)and 9-11 (by being weak on the Commies and Mooslimes) and endanger gay rights and lose elections and Social Security
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Fucking cognitively challenged liberals need not apply.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Latin, "Liber," A Free Man.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=liberal
Guess they've forgotten what that means.
Something they probably never knew:
"Liber" in Latin also means "Book."
So...Knowledge means Freedom.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Your OP reminds me of an important article that Corporate McPravda let drop from their fixed Foxward radar...
Connections Between Michael Hastings, Edward Snowden And Barrett BrownThe War With The Security State
By Christian Stork
WhoWhatWhy.com on Aug 7, 2013
At the time of his death in a mysterious one-car crash and explosion, journalist Michael Hastings was researching a story that threatened to expose powerful entities and government-connected figures. That story intersected with the work of two controversial government criticsthe hacktivist Barrett Brown and the on-the-run surveillance whistleblower Edward Snowden.
Any probe into Hastingss untimely death needs to take into account this complex but essential background.
But First, the Raw Facts
A little over 12 hours before his car was incinerated on an LA straightaway on June 18, 2013, Hastings sent out a short email headed, FBI Investigation, re: NSA. In it, he said that the FBI had been interviewing his close friends and associates, and advised the recipients including colleagues at the website Buzzfeed (It) may be wise to immediately request legal counsel before any conversations or interviews about our news-gathering practices or related journalism issues. He added, Im onto a big story, and need to go off the radat (sic) for a bit.
The next day, Hastings went off the radar permanently.
SNIP...
After whistleblower Snowdens bombshell revelations of dragnet surveillance by the National Security Agency (NSA), Hastings wrote an article on June 7 that referenced Brown for the first time since April 2012. Titled Why Democrats Love To Spy On Americans, it lambasted supposedly liberal Democrats for their Bush-like surveillance fixation and their unrelenting war on those who seek to expose the operations of the surveillance state:
(snip)
Barrett Brown, another investigative journalist who has written for Vanity Fair, among others [sic] publications, exposed the connections between the private contracting firm HB Gary (a government contracting firm that, incidentally, proposed a plan to spy on and ruin the reputation of the Guardians [Glenn] Greenwald) and who is currently sitting in a Texas prison on trumped up FBI charges regarding his legitimate reportorial inquiry into the political collective known sometimes as Anonymous.
The article ended with Perhaps more information will soon be forthcoming.
CONTINUED...
http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/08/07/connections-between-michael-hastings-edward-snowden-and-barrett-brown-the-war-with-the-security-state/
PS: So, civilians aren't in charge of the National Security State. What's that do to the Constitution, among other things, like the three parts of government?
G_j
(40,570 posts)they even infiltrated the hand picked review group!
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.