General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClinton has largest recorded early primary lead in at least 30 years.
Hillary Rodham Clinton holds a commanding 6 to 1 lead over other Democrats heading into the 2016 presidential campaign, while the Republican field is deeply divided with no clear front-runner, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Clinton trounces her potential primary rivals with 73 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, reinforcing a narrative of inevitability around her nomination if she runs. Vice President Biden is second with 12 percent, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) is third with 8 percent.For 2016, Hillary Clinton has commanding lead over Democrats, GOP race wide open
Although Clintons favorability rating has fallen since she stepped down as secretary of state a year ago, she has broad Democratic support across ideological, gender, ethnic and class lines. Her lead is the largest recorded in an early primary matchup in at least 30 years of Post-ABC polling.
http://m.washingtonpost.com/politics/for-2016-hillary-clinton-has-commanding-lead-over-democrats-gop-race-wide-open/2014/01/29/188bb3f4-8904-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html
Damn she is kicking some ass.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)Those polls will tighten.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)This harkens back to 1984 when there was no question Walter Mondale would get the nomination. Many groups, just like the folks here pushed, back against that kind of inevitability. The AFL CIO pledged after that election never to endorse someone before the primaries were over again. Many of us in labor liked Gary Hart but our hands became tied.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Barack Obama didn't show up in the CNN poll until late October 2006.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Hasn't been a candidate so popular with her party's base in more than a generation.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)in a huge field.
Nothing to say another Barack Obama won't appear and immediately turn it into a contest.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)She was the front-runner before, and a dark horse appeared "out of nowhere."
It happened before and it could happen again. It all depends on the 1% wars, imo.
Logical
(22,457 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)The former president depicted in your icon would have brought her into his famous woodshed
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)Right after he got done escalating the war in Vietnam.
And frankly, our 60s era campus activists of the time would be taking all of us to the woodshed for completely ignoring the other not so nice things Johnson did while in office.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Yes, Johnson did a lot of not nice things, but on balance he advanced a liberal agenda that did much more good on balance.
However, Clintons did a lot to reverse the progress LBJ made.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)to "reverse the progress made by LBJ"?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)They basically led the charge to push the Democratic Party to the right and into the hands of Wall St.
nyquil_man
(1,443 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Shaping up quite nice don't you think?
nyquil_man
(1,443 posts)Let's just declare her the nominee right now!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)This monolith has a strange inevitability about it, I can't shake the feeling I've seen it before.
It's a feeling of DejaMoo.
Somewhere I've heard this bull before.
elfin
(6,262 posts)I would welcome her Presidency, albeit with reservations of her corporatist slant.
However, if something godawful should happen to her between now and then, we could be screwn.
Adore Joe, but age and past health crises would be very real problems.
I think it is too early for Warren, plus I think she is now in the right place at the right time.
We need more younger, energetic, experienced Progressives with national recognition on our bench.
May still be too early for the Castro guys, but I yearn for more national exposure for them.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)they will be called sell out corporatists here before their hand comes off the Bible.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)That's was the DLCers do. OURS.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Oh well.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Or possibly, simply not a fan of prophecy...
hughee99
(16,113 posts)since 2008. The plan to "clear the field" well in advance didn't go well then, I'm not convinced it will work this time either.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)So, apples oranges.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)This is an oranges / bigger oranges comparison.... and I'm still not sold on the idea that the size of your orange is a great indicator of anything this far away from the election.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)She was polling in the mid-30s, he was polling at about 20 percent. That is a significantly lesser advantage than the one that George Bush or Al Gore had in 1999-2000, or than Bob Dole had in 1995-1996. She did well over the first 9 months and by the fall of 2007 her lead was about 25 points.
Her current lead is 55-60 points. That is much more than Bush, Gore or Dole had.
I think that the race for the nomination will be between Clinton and former Montana governor Brian Schweitzer. I think that Biden, Warren and O'Malley will sit it out.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Always the bridesmaid, never the bride, lol.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)rocktivity
(44,572 posts)The 2016 GOP presidential candidate field is the poorest in 30 years.
rocktivity
StevieM
(10,500 posts)rocktivity
(44,572 posts)rocktivity