Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
dating age range formula (Original Post) arely staircase Feb 2014 OP
Not really fair to Yoda Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #1
how old is he? nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #2
800 and change Boom Sound 416 Feb 2014 #7
And there's only one other known member of his species, which Lucas didnt bother to name Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #19
Lol Boom Sound 416 Feb 2014 #22
poor yoda. nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #29
hahahaha. nt Cali_Democrat Feb 2014 #32
"When 900 years old you reach, look as good you will not." n/t BadgerKid Feb 2014 #46
Love knows no age Cali_Democrat Feb 2014 #3
an eighteen year old could go no lower than sixteen nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #6
Dating isn't exactly baking. rug Feb 2014 #4
Ding! Boom Sound 416 Feb 2014 #8
I am mediocre at dating but cant bake at all. arely staircase Feb 2014 #12
Well then, just pick someone and go out for a cookie and a cappucino. rug Feb 2014 #16
When i was in college i used to "wake and bake" Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #23
breakfast of champions arely staircase Feb 2014 #31
Explains my historic performance in the '88 Olympics Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #40
But what if I am dating a tart?? madinmaryland Feb 2014 #44
apple or strawberry? nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #48
Dammit! We have one apple tart left and my wife will kill me if I eat it!! madinmaryland Feb 2014 #49
I am 38. dilby Feb 2014 #5
you are in their range based on the formula arely staircase Feb 2014 #10
Yeah but I don't whip out a calculator. dilby Feb 2014 #17
I've always been attracted to women in their late 30s to early 50s. pangaia Feb 2014 #36
You need terms in the formula for wealth, fame, looks, coolness or lack thereof Fumesucker Feb 2014 #9
I don't have any of those things nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #14
Oh the way this works Blue_Adept Feb 2014 #11
I am 35 but 24 seems a bit low for me. Like to stick to my age range. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #13
yeah. I think the point is you should go no lower arely staircase Feb 2014 #18
Never liked clubs but always loved bars. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #24
I'm 31 and still drink and dance Cali_Democrat Feb 2014 #26
not that there is anything wrong with that arely staircase Feb 2014 #28
I'm 41 and a night of drinking and dancing still appeals to me kcr Feb 2014 #38
Be careful CJCRANE Feb 2014 #41
I am older than you, and 24 seems a bit high for me.. PowerToThePeople Feb 2014 #30
Oh my! hrmjustin Feb 2014 #34
Dating Range Formula--100 miles from home. panader0 Feb 2014 #15
I'm in a happy, fulfilling relationship with someone well out of that range. Codeine Feb 2014 #20
If that works for you...Go for it! CJCRANE Feb 2014 #21
just something I read arely staircase Feb 2014 #25
Well, thinking of my own group of friends CJCRANE Feb 2014 #39
Not everything is done with a formula. tammywammy Feb 2014 #27
And that they are both Jamaal510 Feb 2014 #33
Not always. tammywammy Feb 2014 #35
what if they were happy? treestar Feb 2014 #69
Rightwing churches preach this to their young men and women who can't find "christians" to date loudsue Feb 2014 #37
Elijah Muhammad was the only person I ever heard espousing that claptrap Brother Buzz Feb 2014 #42
In general, I do not care what people do BainsBane Feb 2014 #43
I've stayed out of the Woody/Mia/Dylan/Soon-Yi threads completely. Hidden them actually riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #45
thi has NOTHING repeat NOTHING arely staircase Feb 2014 #47
Then withdraw your question. As long as two consenting ADULTS are involved, age is irrelevant riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #53
you are the only person putting it in that context arely staircase Feb 2014 #55
Ok. So your motive is pure. I apologize nt riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #57
accepted nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #59
Thanks, good post. I enjoyed reading that. nt CJCRANE Feb 2014 #50
So what you're saying is that I should be dating someone who's either 39 or 114. WillowTree Feb 2014 #51
lol nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #52
lol. I never thought 95 was too old for me! treestar Feb 2014 #70
So I could date a 90 year old... Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #54
so that means you are either fifty two or 173 arely staircase Feb 2014 #60
Assuming both are adults, not really your business, is it? cthulu2016 Feb 2014 #56
both who? arely staircase Feb 2014 #58
So Betty White could date a 53 year old. nt valerief Feb 2014 #61
Easier formula, two consenting adults. morningfog Feb 2014 #62
I think that part goes without saying nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #63
And anymore need not be said. morningfog Feb 2014 #64
well if you are having a problem with the op arely staircase Feb 2014 #65
Crap! Guess I'll need a divorce LittleBlue Feb 2014 #66
yep. nt arely staircase Feb 2014 #67
Young men of 34 look out! treestar Feb 2014 #68
I don't think it matters. MadrasT Feb 2014 #71

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
19. And there's only one other known member of his species, which Lucas didnt bother to name
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:35 PM
Feb 2014

I hope Dagobah gets good porn.

dilby

(2,273 posts)
17. Yeah but I don't whip out a calculator.
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:34 PM
Feb 2014

I just go with what I am attracted to. Younger women do nothing for me, I have always been attracted to women in that late 30s to early 50s range even when I was 18.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
36. I've always been attracted to women in their late 30s to early 50s.
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:48 PM
Feb 2014

Still am.
Of course....I'm 70.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
9. You need terms in the formula for wealth, fame, looks, coolness or lack thereof
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:25 PM
Feb 2014

Those all play a part in people's perceptions.

Blue_Adept

(6,393 posts)
11. Oh the way this works
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:27 PM
Feb 2014

When I was thirty-eight, I dated someone fifteen years younger than me. That year was the deepest and most amazing relationship I ever had. I had moved on from my wife of thirteen years at that point and dated some, largely around the same age, but nothing connected like it did with her. It didn't work out in the end, but it made a huge change in my life.

End up reconnecting with a former high school classmate after that, which has worked out well for the last three years or so.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
18. yeah. I think the point is you should go no lower
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:34 PM
Feb 2014

But sure at thirty five I wouldn't have wanted to date (at least most) 24 year olds. I think of twenty four year olds as wanting to do their drinking while dancing at a club. Around thirty I quit going to clubs and started going to bars. I my forties my drinking is done in the restaurant where I am about to eat.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
28. not that there is anything wrong with that
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:39 PM
Feb 2014

I did at 31 too. But it just phased out organically to bars in my early thirties.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
20. I'm in a happy, fulfilling relationship with someone well out of that range.
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:35 PM
Feb 2014

Love and attraction aren't things that can be quantified and formulized.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
25. just something I read
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:37 PM
Feb 2014

I am not preaching it. Just thought it worthy of a lighthearted general discussion.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
39. Well, thinking of my own group of friends
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:53 PM
Feb 2014

some are with partners the same age and the others are within the range you mention.

There is one friend of a friend who is in his early forties but he always seems to pick someone in their early twenties (and has done since he was in his early twenties).

It's slightly amusing to the rest of us, i.e. that as he grows older, the age of his partners never changes, but we don't make too much of a big deal about it.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
35. Not always.
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:48 PM
Feb 2014

It could be two 16 year olds or a 17-16 relationship. That doesn't mean I think a 16 year old should date a 40 year old.

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
37. Rightwing churches preach this to their young men and women who can't find "christians" to date
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:49 PM
Feb 2014

That's what my fundamentalist extended family members are always telling me.

Brother Buzz

(36,382 posts)
42. Elijah Muhammad was the only person I ever heard espousing that claptrap
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 09:01 PM
Feb 2014

I suspect it was well received by 'the old farts' faction of the Nation of Islam.

BainsBane

(53,015 posts)
43. In general, I do not care what people do
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 09:04 PM
Feb 2014

As long as it's legal, it's their business. However, there are some exceptions, like taking up with the teenager sister of your children. Sure, it's legal and their right, but it also shows an incredible disregard for the well-being of the children and some serious boundary issues. Still their business, but it put me off his movies. Now underage is another story. The adult belongs in prison.

In terms of my own preferences, I prefer someone close to my own age. Yet for some reason the men most interested in me tend to be younger.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
45. I've stayed out of the Woody/Mia/Dylan/Soon-Yi threads completely. Hidden them actually
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 09:08 PM
Feb 2014

But I'll comment here.

My husband's oldest sister Terrie had a fling with her father's best friend when she was 19 years old. He was 39 divorced but with children - they all went on family vacations together etc. In fact her father was involved in many business dealings with his best friend. Everyone close as close as can be. Max had changed Terrie's diapers and been involved in every last bit of her life as "one of the family".

So clearly a "father figure" in every respect to Terrie.

When it was discovered, there was horror, shock, outrage. They broke it off and went separate ways for 20 years. Shamed by everyone. She took off for CA, as far from NY and her family and her love as she could get. Married (unhappily), had children, divorced. Estranged from her father and all the nattering nabobs of negativity.

They reconnected at her father's funeral and discovered they were still madly in love. Terrie was sooo scared to tell everyone that she and Max were done living a lie and were going to get married and live openly together. Screw the social conventions.

They've now been married for 20 years. Crazy in love with each other and grieving that they let others' get in the way of their lives, social convention, church etc. Max is now pushing 80 and they adore every last minute together.

I say "run" to happiness. You only get one life and if you find your love, RUN to them. Don't let anyone or anything stand in your way including age differences (as long as they are consenting adults).

I also know several pairs of first cousins who've married (none of them have children by choice).

The heart is a strange thing. There's no rhyme nor reason there. Age differences melt away and you're just left with two people who love each other.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
53. Then withdraw your question. As long as two consenting ADULTS are involved, age is irrelevant
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 09:32 PM
Feb 2014

Sometimes, even family relationships are irrelevant.

In the context of the family drama going on with Dylan's accusations against Woody, Mia's rage at Woody marrying Soon-yi, then posing a question like this at this moment is toxic. The insinuations about Woody Allen getting involved with a 19 yr old Soon-yi (and marrying her at age 28) are certainly relevant.

And drawing conclusions about WHY this question is being posed right now is certainly ripe for speculation as far as I can tell. Imho...

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
51. So what you're saying is that I should be dating someone who's either 39 or 114.
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 09:30 PM
Feb 2014

Which to choose........Which to choose.......

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
65. well if you are having a problem with the op
Fri Feb 7, 2014, 09:09 PM
Feb 2014

As I said it isn't something I am preaching but have often heard. I was kinda wanting feedback on if it fit into dating ranges people who wanted to comment were comfortable with. So far I think it has been a good and intertaining general discussion on dating - especially the DUrs whose prospects would range from 39 to over 100. Please take it in the spirit it was posted - to encourage a lighthearted discussion.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»dating age range formula