General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you could create a new political party in the USA...
what would your platform be? Just curious what good ideas DU'ers might believe in. I'll go first.
1) All future elections are government financed/no private money is permitted/no lobbying is allowed.
2) Corporate government subsidies are for new technology only....
3) and so on..... add your own...
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Jamastiene
(38,206 posts)I'd go further and go for federal laws that legalize gay marriage. This pieced-together state by state stuff is too confusing and leaves gay couples who are married in one state totally unprotected in another state. What if they are traveling and get in a wreck in a place like NC? They'll end up with no rights even if their own home state would have allowed them rights.
If we can't treat all individuals, all people as fundamentally having equal human rights, then we have failed before we have started.
polichick
(37,626 posts)Adam051188
(711 posts)"The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissention, which in different ages & countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders & miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security & repose in the absolute power of an Individual: and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty." George Washington, September 19, 1796
polichick
(37,626 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)go west young man
(4,856 posts)go west young man
(4,856 posts)1)Complete restoration of the New Deal policies (40 hour work week, lunch and rest breaks, proper over time pay, minimum wage, guaranteed vacation and time off)
2)Yearly raise of the minimum wage to coincide with inflation.
3) A flat tax at 15%
4) Cut military funding by half
5) Funnel the military money into social programs, education, arts and humanities
TBF
(36,670 posts)Well that's a good way to kill off the poor ...
Adam051188
(711 posts)Not if the goverment had a minimum income for all citizens funded through publicly owned industries.
TBF
(36,670 posts)your definition of "fair". I don't think there's anything at all "fair" about some folks collecting millions of dollars while others are homeless and destitute. Flat tax only encourages more of that - an unfair advantage to those few who already have so much.
Seeing these types of arguments on DU makes me want to vomit. What has this site become?
Adam051188
(711 posts)Maybe you intended to reply to someone else? And bulimia is a serious condition, I hope you seek treatment.
TBF
(36,670 posts)is right off the Ron Paul website. Maybe you are lost?
Ron paul doesn't support a minimum income publicly.
The smilies on this site are the best, right?
TBF
(36,670 posts)but then I'm sure you know that.
And, yes, we do have good smilies.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)would more than enough make up the money for social programs and thereby eliminate poverty in the long run. Chomsky and Joseph Stiglitz even say this.
TBF
(36,670 posts)I would like to see the cite for Chomsky advocating a flat tax.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Adam051188
(711 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Back to the drawing board for you.
Adam051188
(711 posts)Which needs to be raised by the way. I mention a minimum income for all citizens earlier I believe? Change is scary, I know. I'll explain everything most thoroughly for you in small words after I become grand wizard of the rethuglican party, right?
lol.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)If you think those principles are important, why not work to get the Democrats to adopt them?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and NO I don't believe in the fucking "flat tax"! (That's how the Rich bamboozle teh poor.)
Adam051188
(711 posts)I'd b ok with a flat tax rate with no loopholes. Period. None. No deductables. No offshore accounts.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Please continue....?...
I can't refute non arguments
dionysus
(26,467 posts)revenue.
that's why it's been laughed out of the room by anyone who isn't a steve forbes style RWer.
Adam051188
(711 posts)I disagree. Just like everything else it would have to be done the right way. I think a lot of things would have to change drastically for it to work, but thats where we are as a civilization. Obama ran on "change" right?
Walk away
(9,494 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)results in a duopoly. You cant create a viable third party. The only thing you can do before restructuring the system is take over one of the existing members of the duopoly.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)That would be a great party.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)You're funny.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Adam051188
(711 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)how would I be the "projecting one"? Nor do I want to create a "new party"....perhaps you're projecting?
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #18)
Adam051188 This message was self-deleted by its author.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)frwrfpos
(517 posts)free trade, offshoring, the military, love droning people, and I called myself a Democrat, would I be a Democrat?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I am not the one that is saying that we need to kick out all the Democrats am I?
If YOU think that is what the party favors...then perhaps you are the one in the wrong party...
frwrfpos
(517 posts)then you would be in agreement with Republicans. The point is one cant agree with and support Republican ideas and policies and legitimately call themselves a Democrat.
If you agree with the positions I stated , perhaps it is YOU that is in the wrong party.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)left...then you are branded "not a Democrat" OR a Republican or some such rot. Even the President or Hillary Clinton...which is demonstrably laughable.
frwrfpos
(517 posts)We seem to disagree but Im really interested in what positions or policies are considered "far left" to you. Can you tell me what you consider to be "far left"?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)then you are probably it...
http://www.ontheissues.org/Barack_Obama.htm

frwrfpos
(517 posts)his policies and actions are often the exact opposite of his speeches. Again, can you name positions that you personally consider "far left"?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)
Go there and read ALL that is said...see for yourself. You all claim to be the "free thinkers" and all...
http://www.ontheissues.org/Barack_Obama.htm
(psssst...denial is not a river in Egypt)
frwrfpos
(517 posts)lots of talk. His actions as President have been often the exact opposite of his speeches. e.g. the TPP, his drone program, right wing Republican appointments to agencies, Keystone pipeline, The Heritage foundations health care idea being implemented as forces mandates to buy garbage insurance, his disastrous education policies, ignoring Bush's war crimes, etc etc
the list goes on and on and on.
I think you may be the one in deep denial
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I did all the research for you...its there in Black and White...double dog dare ya! Or are you afraid to find you you are wrong and due for a paradigm shift? You see....you are not the starting line for what is Liberal.
frwrfpos
(517 posts)You did no research. You posted White House talking points
You are obviously incapable of honestly responding to what I post. Have fun posting White House talking points until you are blue in the face. It doesnt change the very right wing policies of this administration
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)those are ALL the issues....not just a few that certain Democrats care about.....And why I call that being myopic. Not seeing the big picture.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but that is all right there for you to see....its WHAT you are supposed to use to determine where someone stands on issues....What they have actually said and what they have actually done. Its called Historical FACTS.
frwrfpos
(517 posts)are from SOTU and debates. Obamas policies are decidedly right wing and cater to Republicans.
Your responses are hollow vacuum filled fluff that addressed nothing of what Ive posted.
and you still refuse to answer anything that ive asked.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)by any stretch of the imagination. They are NOT JUST from SOTU...you better go check yourself. It's a bald face lie...
frwrfpos
(517 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)because obviously, you don't. You purposely misdescribed that site and its intentions...
ALL of the issues are there....if you weren't so myopic...you could see that. THAT is called a big picture.
frwrfpos
(517 posts)blah blah blah..you have nothing and you refuse to answer anything..
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)what it was... obvious to anyone who has!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)actions are listed as well...
You are right...Denial runs deep in you....
Adam051188
(711 posts)But by all means continue diluting reasonable discussion with unreasonable accusations and nonsense.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)obviously.
Adam051188
(711 posts)I admit freely that I don't like unreasonable accusations and nonsense. But I put up with. Just because I think you're special
Very special
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Adam051188
(711 posts)<gets last word in>
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)examples - Chained CPI, war with Syria, TPP.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)












But let's start with Syria. Can we agree that initiating a war with Syria is an extreme far-right position?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Everyone gets just by just one issue and You get to be the judge.
This is another example of myopic thought....I gave you OVERALL score on EVERYTHING! You got one point.
Epic Fail.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Do you agree that you cannot determine if someone is Liberal or not based on just one issue?
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)an extreme, far-right position, yes?
Let's start there, then I'll answer your question
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and I am not biting....
Do you determine whether or not someone is Liberal by the sum of their beliefs...or just one?
My contention is the sum whole....you seem not to agree with that.
When you have created a graph that covers all the issues I presented and it comes to a different conclusion....let me know...otherwise...Epic Fail.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)one can get, lol.
You're fun
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)nice try but no sale...
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Determine if one is liberal/progressive.
That said, since the military budget is 60+% of the US budget, and every war we fight costs us dearly at home, it is a heavily weighted issue.
I would say if someone is pro-war (any of our current wars), especially if they are holding a position that is to the right of 80% of all Americans on attacking Syria.... It pretty much puts them out there on the wacko right fringe. Implementing the Republican plan for mandatory private insurance and Lilly Ledbetter and advocating for chained CPI and the TPP doesn't change that, in my view.
Although Lilly Ledbetter and govt loans for college were definitely solid liberal issues
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)this throw Democrats overboard because they don't live up to YOUR expectations is NOT productive...particularly the closer we get to November.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)a matter of tossing them over, but changing their minds
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)sorry....doesn't work like that. You will not transform the party into your dream team that quickly...but what you ARE doing is negatively influencing the mushy middle voters...
djean111
(14,255 posts)they are called a racist hater. THAT'S the purity purge that I see.....
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)what do you expect....flowers and candy for it?
I find that the ones doing the most whining about it are the ones that use pejoratives the most frequently themselves.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)GOP infiltrators
Here is the enemy.
http://www.thirdway.org/staff
Jonathan Cowan

Matt Bennett

Nancy Hale

Jim Kessler
\
Gabe Horwitz
Lauren Oppenheimer

David Kendall

David Hollingsworth

David Brown

John Vahey

Alicia Mazzara

Elizabeth Quill

Jeff Okun-Kozlowicki

Kimberly Pucher

VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)do they hang around DU? Save for Manny I haven't seen anyone proclaim themselves such....but I have seen others accused of it often.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)
Not sure I like it too much. The tax issue was a trap. It only gave a flat tax question, kinda lame.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Drones, nsa, tpp, xl pipeline, sIngle payer, prosecuting corrupt bankers, and whistle blower status for manning and snowden, we are a good match.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)overall STILL a Liberal! Its called seeing the big picture...those aren't the ONLY issues are they?
djean111
(14,255 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)go west young man
(4,856 posts)Thanks for nothing as always.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)I like the public financing and universal healthcare (and non-profit!)
English would become the official language, all citizens must pass a written and oral test.
The environment would become as important and as much of a priority as the defense industry is today.
The USA would begin a new intensive, well-funded space technology program, with the aim of landing a man on Mars within 20 years.
We make an international statement that we once again respect all nations and countries sovereignty and borders. We apologize to the world for the Iraq invasion.
We make a new focus on new energy technology, including solar, and other green technologies, and try to make new discoveries as well.
We stop being a war-like nation, and announce we are now more interested in peace, prosperity for all countries, and diplomacy.
The USA stops all unauthorized spying, and a new focus on the rights and respect of civil liberties is implemented.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)your slip is showing...
quinnox
(20,600 posts)but I think everyone should be able to speak English in this country. It's not too much to ask of those who want to come here, in my opinion.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)they are still waiting for you to learn Lakota!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)lob1
(3,820 posts)go west young man
(4,856 posts)go west young man
(4,856 posts)required for high school graduation. English mandatory. Spanish or French required and a third as a non required minor although not as important as the first two. In order to bring us more into the world arena culturally.
I'd also like to see art and music programs receiving new enhanced government grants at schools. Our country needs a new age of enlightenment.
BenHoffman
(32 posts)The two parties could be easily fixed with publicly funded elections. That would put the power back in the hands of the people. We need to take back the House this fall and then push Democrats to legislate publicly funded elections.
RC
(25,592 posts)Redraw the voting districts to be square or rectangular. Each with approximately the same number of people in them. The only exception to shape would be State and national borders and the occasional river.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)Very cool idea, literally from outside the box.
Basic LA
(2,047 posts)I agree that Two polar opposite parties should be enough, Employer & Employee parties, or R's & D's. Let's just get the legal bribery & campaign costs out of it & emphasize that Dems are the party of Employees (previously known as Labor, Workers or Proletariats).
MrsKirkley
(180 posts)No more NAFTA, CAFTA, etc. and NO TPP!! It's either fair trade or no trade. Off-shoring jobs to the detriment of ones own country should be a crime.
frwrfpos
(517 posts)socialism is a pretty good system. I like all of the ideas on the website.
Disclaimer: this is the official website of the SWP of the USA
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)Glass Stiegel will be implemented, derivatives as well as hedgefunds will not be legal in this country.
The media (except for newspapers) will be public outlets with strict adherance to federal laws.
Trade treaties may not be called agreements and will need a two thirds majority in the house and senate only after a debate, which is open to the public.
Supreme court justices will be chosen by a panel of the two parties as well as independents.
Well, I could go on, but dreams don't help much, or do they?
go west young man
(4,856 posts)put a serious hurting on the US. News became opinion from that point on and music became generic due to Clear Channel. Our media became monopolized, our cable bills have risen and we got sold a crap war by the bastards. I would love to see the media broken up and required to report news instead of propaganda and opinion.
Adam051188
(711 posts)go west young man
(4,856 posts)Here's a few more..
1) Churches are taxed as business's. No free rides anymore.
2) Separation of church and state are tantamount and reimplemented.
3) No government money for charter schools, private schools or religious schools.
4) No prayer in schools or government buildings. They are strictly for learning and government business only.
5) Receipts that are counted for online voting machines.
RC
(25,592 posts)Only hand countable, paper ballots. You can use scanners, but the ballots must be hand marked and hand countable. Computer must never be the last word.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 9, 2014, 09:03 PM - Edit history (1)
break up monopolies and oligopolies and enact laws that make mergers and acquisitions exceedingly rare
socialize energy (natural monopoly)
add tariffs to create "fair trade" so jobs return to/don't flee the US
raise marginal tax rates precipitously after the first $1,000,000 earned
treat capital gains as income
eliminate tax loopholes for those who can afford to exploit them, that includes corporations
enact laws that prevent states from competing in a race to the bottom by granting corporations tax free status for relocating
enact laws that tax corporations that want to move out of the US
raise the minimum wage to over $11 and hour
single payer health care
reallocate funds away from the military industrial complex to building infrastructure (roads, bridges, schools, green energy, etc..); the military gets what's left over
legalize marijuana
enact a STET tax
eliminate the Social Security cap and tie the contribution to income, not payroll (treating capital gains as income, of course)
socialize prisons
restore the power of the Supreme Court to it's original construct (limited)
enact laws that encourage voting including lengthening the time people have to vote
rewrite laws that criminalize blacks disproportionately
define white collar crime, criminalize it, and send criminals to prison (eliminate white collar prisons)
Adam051188
(711 posts)I like it. it's just a matter of how much you would work within the current system to accomplish your changes.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)Especially the capital gains idea. That alone would pay for all the social programs and educational programs we need and help our seniors to retire early and enjoy their golden years. Nice list.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)go west young man
(4,856 posts)Dig some Soul Train...the host used to make me laugh.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Because, in my opinion, no good idea we might conceive here would be even remotely possible in the current divided state of our country. Job one is to get people to stop clawing at each others' throats. Dancing helps.
So I was a bit serious in suggesting Dance Party!
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)He had some great ideas about how instead of companies being run by a board of directors, they should be run by employees. Every single employee should automatically have a vote in how the business or coop is run.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Without it, all we do is back peddle, for the most part. We know that most Americans
approve of many liberal policies, but we don't have them enacted.
It is a poison in our system.
longship
(40,416 posts)I am a Democrat, lifelong. If one does not like the Democratic Party one does not jump ship in the USA, where there are only two choices. Instead, one works within the party to change it from within, just like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson did for the Republican Party beginning in the late 70's.
It has to be done from the bottom up, precinct by precinct. They had churches all over the country cooperating and were very well organized. No delegate got elected/selected without passing the Jesus test.
We are in a living Hell now because those in the Democratic Party did not listen when many of us told them what we saw happening before our very eyes. We are paying now for the party's myopic view.
In the meantime, the Democrats look back at the days of Senators like Dirkson, Baker, and other intelligent, moderates and make the claim that there is a deal to be made.
It's an astounding situation. There is no dealing with people who know that they have God on their side.
But nobody is saying that. That's a shame.
CanonRay
(16,171 posts)First line on my platform; constitutional amendment making it law.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)go west young man
(4,856 posts)Schadenfreude tastes nastier when it comes back up.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)I want him to be ousted by the people he is persecuting, imprisoning, and killing.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)normal relations and help nations like Russia/Cuba, etc. to move more fully into the 21st century. The spreading of goodwill instead of denigration and embargos would do wonders for "our" image. Our own house isn't exactly in order you know?
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Iggo
(49,928 posts)Even if that makes me a fascist loving DUer.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)A nation that never learned to feed, clothe and shelter all its citizens has little claim to the word "liberty."
Distant Quasar
(142 posts)Employee representation on the boards of all publicly owned corporations might be a good place to start.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)1. Public financing of elections
2. Proportional representation
3. Dismantling of the National Security State
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)1) Medicare for All
2) Re-taxing the wealthiest at the Greatest Generation rate of 91%, or 74%.
3) Killing the TPP and withdrawing from our costly trade agreements.
4) Ending the wars and finding non-violent solutions to conflict like other adults.
5) Prosecuting torture and other war crimes committed by prior administrations.
6) Restoring Habeus Corpus and closing Gitmo.
7) Ending the war on drugs and supporting Cannabis legalization.
8) Curbing police brutality and the police state.
9) Protecting privacy, net neutrality and enshrining it into law.
10) Increasing the minimum wage to $15/hr. or more, breaking/unionizing up Walmart and neo-monopolies.
11) Prosecuting corrupt bankers and Wall Street personnel, reforming the Fed.
12) Supporting Move to Amend.
13) Passing card check, supporting unions
14) Supporting our teachers unions and public schools
15) Ending the privatization of schools, jails, and other public institutions.
BONUS - End all income tax on people, persons, and entities earning less than $250,000/year unless they are a subsidiary of a larger corporation. This is my response to Republicans who are always telling me that you can't raise taxes on corporations because they will just wind up charging the consumers more. Well, if that's the case, then there is no reason to tax us at all. It would be far easier for the IRS to monitor all entities with $250,000 income and above than to monitor 300 million Americans..... OK that, and a VAT tax, and some tariffs, etc.