Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
8. I used to have satellite,
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 09:03 PM
Feb 2014

but I would lose reception every time there was rain or heavy cloudy skies, so I had to switch to cable.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
14. Me too. Horrible reception from DirecTV and obscenely bad customer service.
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 10:38 AM
Feb 2014

Never again going with a dish.

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
3. It appears the regulators have already given an unofficial wink and a nod on this merger
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 07:52 PM
Feb 2014

Consumer viewers will see higher rates and many current employees will lose their jobs. It is disgusting if this is allowed to happen.

trublu992

(489 posts)
4. What the hell are susposed to about this
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 07:53 PM
Feb 2014

I cancel cable but then they jack up my internet bill! They're pushing for that revolution everyone is talking about

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
7. Yes, I was paying $49 for Internet plus $22 for local channels only, and then
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 08:26 PM
Feb 2014

when I dropped TV, they upped my Internet, first to $72 and then to $75.

I still feel good about not paying for cable, though.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
5. The Comcast-Time Warner behemoth would be in a position to dictate terms to programmers
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 07:55 PM
Feb 2014

I doubt there are any cable channels that could survive with access to only 43% of households, a lot of them in smaller markets.

Holly_Hobby

(3,033 posts)
9. We cut the cord, no cable tv here
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 09:25 PM
Feb 2014

It was topping $170/month, what a rip. We kept the wifi box at $40/month, bought over the air antennas, a Roku box for streaming, an Ooma box for phone and a Chromecast to cast anything to the tv. We're also Amazon prime members for movies. Nobody needs cable tv anymore.

Holly_Hobby

(3,033 posts)
11. From the wifi box from our old cable tv provider
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 09:29 PM
Feb 2014

We originally had cable tv, wifi and phone through our cable provider. Sent everything back except the wifi.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
12. Then the exact same monopoly/market dominance issues apply.
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 11:08 PM
Feb 2014

You think that frugal content pipeline is going to hold in this anti - net neutrality, monopoly environment?

There is no cable cut, the very same one is in use to a temporary advantage in an evolving technological landscape. They can and will adjust because they can now handle that traffic any way they prefer, including blocking it all together or too slow for functionality or requiring you to purchase the content from them to stream it or charging more for Internet alone than bundled with TV.

Holly_Hobby

(3,033 posts)
13. I agree.
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 10:37 AM
Feb 2014

When that happens, I'll cut the cord to the internet too. I'm 58 and lived without it for the first 40 years of my life, I'll go back to the old way of writing checks and buying stamps. I'm a dinosaur, my cell phone isn't smart, and I lived without a cell phone for most of my life too. It's younger people who will have a difficult time, and they're going to get screwed big time. There is nothing we can do about it except complain and reject their services.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Disgusting: This Is What ...