Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT: The Line at the ‘Super PAC’ Trough
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/opinion/sunday/the-line-at-the-super-pac-trough.html?_r=0If you need something out of Washington and want to give a satchel of cash to a political candidate, no need to give it directly to the candidate. Federal law limits those contributions to $2,600 anyway. The thing to do is to give the money to the candidates super PAC, where no limits apply, to pay for attack ads against the candidates opponent.
Thats the path chosen by John Childs, a private-equity investor, who gave $250,000 to Senator Mitch McConnells super PAC, Kentuckians for Strong Leadership. (Could it have anything to do with Mr. McConnells staunch opposition to a tax increase on hedge fund managers, favored by President Obama and Democrats?) Joseph Craft, a billionaire coal executive, gave $100,000, and Donald Trump gave $50,000 to the same group.
...
This election year will be the moment when individual candidate super PACs a form of legalized bribery become a truly toxic force in American politics. The giant ideological super PACs formed by political operatives like Karl Rove spent hundreds of millions in 2012, but didnt produce the conservative revolution demanded by the big donors. So now the torrent of cash is heading toward smaller groups set up to promote a single candidate or, more often, to trash that candidates opponent.
Dozens of these groups have already been formed, and political professionals predict that virtually every Senate race this year, and many contested House races, will have one or more. They can accept unlimited contributions, and thanks to the Citizens United decision, such donations can come from unions and corporations, too. Strictly speaking, these groups can have no contact with the candidate, but that prohibition is a joke. Most of them use the same voter lists as the campaigns, make the same points in their ads, and often are run by cronies of the candidate.
Thats the path chosen by John Childs, a private-equity investor, who gave $250,000 to Senator Mitch McConnells super PAC, Kentuckians for Strong Leadership. (Could it have anything to do with Mr. McConnells staunch opposition to a tax increase on hedge fund managers, favored by President Obama and Democrats?) Joseph Craft, a billionaire coal executive, gave $100,000, and Donald Trump gave $50,000 to the same group.
...
This election year will be the moment when individual candidate super PACs a form of legalized bribery become a truly toxic force in American politics. The giant ideological super PACs formed by political operatives like Karl Rove spent hundreds of millions in 2012, but didnt produce the conservative revolution demanded by the big donors. So now the torrent of cash is heading toward smaller groups set up to promote a single candidate or, more often, to trash that candidates opponent.
Dozens of these groups have already been formed, and political professionals predict that virtually every Senate race this year, and many contested House races, will have one or more. They can accept unlimited contributions, and thanks to the Citizens United decision, such donations can come from unions and corporations, too. Strictly speaking, these groups can have no contact with the candidate, but that prohibition is a joke. Most of them use the same voter lists as the campaigns, make the same points in their ads, and often are run by cronies of the candidate.
And foreign-owned corporations, as we've seen just this past week.
http://www.standard.net/stories/2014/02/12/feds-mexican-tycoon-exploited-super-pacs-influence-us-elections
Apparently we're slow learners.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/10/canadian-foreign-donation-super-pac-restore-our-future
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 732 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT: The Line at the ‘Super PAC’ Trough (Original Post)
Scuba
Feb 2014
OP
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)1. K&R. Thank you.
Moyers: Why the First Issue Is Money in Politics
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024506165
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024506165
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)2. kick