Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 07:22 PM Feb 2014

Since 1988, every US president has been a Harvard or Yale grad.

[4] Beginning in 1988, every US president has been a graduate of Harvard or Yale. Beginning in 2000, every losing presidential candidate has been a Harvard or Yale graduate, with the exception of John McCain in 2008.

http://billmoyers.com/2014/02/21/anatomy-of-the-deep-state/


Just thought it was an interesting data point.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Since 1988, every US president has been a Harvard or Yale grad. (Original Post) El_Johns Feb 2014 OP
And some people here say white privilege doesn't exist seattledo Feb 2014 #1
? "Every President" includes Barack Obama, Harvard Law. El_Johns Feb 2014 #3
Maybe therein lies the problem. hobbit709 Feb 2014 #2
All Skull & Bones members, too, I bet! blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #4
Esp. the Harvard grads. Igel Feb 2014 #12
Down. MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #29
And half of all presidents since 1900 have been Ivy League graduates. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2014 #5
and Columbia... XRubicon Feb 2014 #6
Barack Obama, Harvard Law. Just sayin'. El_Johns Feb 2014 #7
Barack Obama Columbia undergraduate XRubicon Feb 2014 #8
Stand Columbia. El_Johns Feb 2014 #9
I did not know that Reagan went to either Harvard or Yale Jenoch Feb 2014 #10
That's why it says "since 1988". El_Johns Feb 2014 #11
I suppose the OP meant 'after' 1988 because Reagan was president for all of 1988. Jenoch Feb 2014 #13
'since' includes the meaning 'after,' so pointless comment. El_Johns Feb 2014 #14
When read since such and such date, Jenoch Feb 2014 #15
I think it has more to do with you conceiving of the year 1988 as a period beginning at the start of El_Johns Feb 2014 #16
If you tell someone you have worked for a particular business Jenoch Feb 2014 #17
Pointless argument. If I say "Blacks have been free since the Civil War" does that mean they were El_Johns Feb 2014 #19
Ok Forrest Jenoch Feb 2014 #20
This is an interesting fact fujiyama Feb 2014 #18
Exclusion is how our ruling class perpetuates itself. jsr Feb 2014 #23
Doesn't seem that interesting when you realize you're talking about three people onenote Feb 2014 #21
Yes, I noticed that too. And also their opponents, save McCain. The next election should be El_Johns Feb 2014 #22
It probably won't end until I become President. Throd Feb 2014 #24
lol El_Johns Feb 2014 #25
I can't wait! Iris Feb 2014 #35
Hillary can continue the streak madville Feb 2014 #26
Maybe voters see that as being "qualified" Malone Feb 2014 #27
As were Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt, JFK, probably some others... MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #28
Before JFK = DDE, West Point. After JFK = Johnson, Texas State Teachers College. El_Johns Feb 2014 #30
True... but still a huge percentage, if not 100% nt MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #31
Yes, a large proportion of Presidents have come from Harvard & Yale. But I think it would be El_Johns Feb 2014 #32
John Adams and John Quincy Adams, for two Retrograde Feb 2014 #33
BO is the 44th president. 8/44 went to Harvard, 5/44 went to Yale. GW Bush is on both lists. El_Johns Feb 2014 #34
 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
3. ? "Every President" includes Barack Obama, Harvard Law.
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 08:01 PM
Feb 2014
Only 3.8 percent of American families make more than $200,000 per year. But at Harvard University, 45.6 percent of incoming freshman come from families making $200,000 or more. A mere 4 percent of Harvard students come from a family in the bottom quintile of US incomes, and only 17.8 percent come from the bottom three quintiles.

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/10/immorality-college-admissions-2013102945841711416.html

Igel

(35,300 posts)
12. Esp. the Harvard grads.
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 08:40 PM
Feb 2014

Considering that Skull and Bones is at Yale.

Humorous, to imagine Columbia grad and Harvard Law student Obama heading up to New Haven, to enemy territory, for Skull and Bones.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
5. And half of all presidents since 1900 have been Ivy League graduates.
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 08:09 PM
Feb 2014

Harvard: Both Roosevelts, Kennedy, Bush II (MBA), Obama (Law)

Yale: Both Bushes, Taft, Ford, Clinton (Law)

Princeton: Wilson

of non-Ivy League graduates, two (Truman and Johnson) succeeded on the death of their predecessor (later winning election in their own right).

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
15. When read since such and such date,
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 09:02 PM
Feb 2014

I always have known that it starts with that year and not the next. I think it has more to do with people confusing election years with years served. Many years ago the USPS had to recall stamps honoring HHH because it was printd with VP 1964-1968. we did not have a VP in 1964 and he was VP into 1969.

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
16. I think it has more to do with you conceiving of the year 1988 as a period beginning at the start of
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 09:06 PM
Feb 2014

that year while the author conceives of it as a point that includes both beginning and end.

Neither is any more "correct" than the other & given the context, it's a pointless comment.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
17. If you tell someone you have worked for a particular business
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 09:12 PM
Feb 2014

since 2010, does that really mean you did not start work there until 2011?

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
19. Pointless argument. If I say "Blacks have been free since the Civil War" does that mean they were
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 09:21 PM
Feb 2014

free in 1861?

If I say, "The US has been the dominant world power since 1945" is my meaning specifically that they became the dominant power in 1945, or that they've been the dominant power since the end of WW2?

The "meaning" is not inherent in the word "since," but rather in whether the time in question is conceived of as a point or a period, and the general context.

If you conceive of 1988 as a period of time, then you think "from the beginning of that period".

If you conceive of it as a point in time, then you think "after that point".

A year can be conceived of either way.

Neither is more correct than the other, and given the context in the OP, the meaning is quite clear and the comment pointless.

and that's all I have to say about that.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
20. Ok Forrest
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 09:31 PM
Feb 2014

I would say the U.S. was the dominent world power for all of 1945.

The were many blacks that were free in the U.S. in 1861, but the Civil War was several years, not a particular year. You are right that this has gone on long enough.

fujiyama

(15,185 posts)
18. This is an interesting fact
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 09:18 PM
Feb 2014

and I think this elitism plays a part in the increasing economic (and political) inequality we're dealing with.

Certain professions are virtually closed off to those who don't go to an elite university (investment banking and high end law firms won't even look at applicants regardless of their GPA if haven't attended a particular Ivy League school). Now I understand people have various biases for fellow alum, but we're seeing a lot of people basically pulling in fellow "elites" and kicking the ladder after they get to the top. It creates a bizarre incestuous atmosphere (especially in power centers of DC and NYC). And since these schools' price tags are increasingly out of reach for most Americans this problem is simply reinforcing itself.

Granted, it can be debated how much value investment bankers and corporate lawyers bring to society in the first place (I'd say very, very little). But this is the crux of the problem - many of these graduates are indeed brilliant (of course there are exceptions - look at the previous president!) - but are doing very little to actually contribute to society. They're sucked into Wall Street or K street because the money is great and they work "hard" but they are basically parasites, producing no product and a service of questionable good (if not outright evil as in the case of CDOs).

jsr

(7,712 posts)
23. Exclusion is how our ruling class perpetuates itself.
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 10:31 PM
Feb 2014

Merit is mostly an illusion in the Ivy League.

onenote

(42,701 posts)
21. Doesn't seem that interesting when you realize you're talking about three people
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 09:45 PM
Feb 2014

Clinton 1993-2001
Bush- 2001-2009
Obama 2009-2017

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
22. Yes, I noticed that too. And also their opponents, save McCain. The next election should be
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 10:00 PM
Feb 2014

interesting.

But you forgot Bush Sr, a very important part of the mix....1989-93.

Malone

(39 posts)
27. Maybe voters see that as being "qualified"
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 10:48 PM
Feb 2014

Maybe part of being "qualified" for the job in the mind of the populace is graduating from some hard to get in elitist school.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
28. As were Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt, JFK, probably some others...
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 11:05 PM
Feb 2014

they tend to accept very, very driven students who are quite bright, generally affable, and have great connections.

My sister went to Harvard*, I think it's a fantastic school. But the "inbreeding" that's happening in the top 0.001% with respect to these schools is a problem.




*Unlike many of her classmates, she's dedicated her life to helping others - cancer victims and their families, and mentally ill people in prison among others.

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
30. Before JFK = DDE, West Point. After JFK = Johnson, Texas State Teachers College.
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 12:45 AM
Feb 2014

Before TR = McKinley, 1 term at Allegheny College. After TR = Taft, Yale.

Before FDR = Hoover, Stanford. After FDR = Eisenhower, West Point.


The only similarity to the present situation is that FDR had 4 terms, so you could say it was 4 terms for Harvard.

Bush 1 through Obama = 7 terms for Harvard & Yale.

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
32. Yes, a large proportion of Presidents have come from Harvard & Yale. But I think it would be
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 01:24 AM
Feb 2014

interesting to look at when. I can't remember any other 7 terms of Harvard & Yalies.

In fact, here is the list of Presidents who attended Harvard & Yale; though they are the universities the largest number of presidents attended, it seems the dominance is a recent phenomenon.

Harvard University

John Adams
John Quincy Adams
Rutherford B. Hayes (Law School)
Theodore Roosevelt
Franklin D. Roosevelt
John F. Kennedy
George W. Bush (Business School)
Barack Obama (Law School)


Yale University

William Howard Taft
Theodore Roosevelt
Gerald R. Ford
Bill Clinton
George H. W. Bush
George W. Bush

http://www.presidentsusa.net/collegelisting.html

Retrograde

(10,136 posts)
33. John Adams and John Quincy Adams, for two
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 01:31 AM
Feb 2014

both Harvard, and William Taft, Yale (his father founded Skull and Bones).

 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
34. BO is the 44th president. 8/44 went to Harvard, 5/44 went to Yale. GW Bush is on both lists.
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 03:38 AM
Feb 2014

40% of the Yalies have been President since 1988 & 25% of the Harvardites. Furthermore the last 7 terms (26 years) have been Yale/Harvard.


Harvard University

John Adams
John Quincy Adams
Rutherford B. Hayes (Law School)
Theodore Roosevelt
Franklin D. Roosevelt
John F. Kennedy
George W. Bush (Business School)
Barack Obama (Law School)


Yale University

William Howard Taft
Gerald R. Ford
Bill Clinton
George H. W. Bush
George W. Bush

http://www.presidentsusa.net/collegelisting.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Since 1988, every US pres...