Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,289 posts)
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 05:05 PM Feb 2014

Mozilla plans '$25 smartphone' for emerging markets (BBC)

Mozilla has shown off a prototype for a $25 (£15) smartphone that is aimed at the developing world.

The company, which is famed mostly for its Firefox browser, has partnered with Chinese low-cost chip maker Spreadtrum.

While not as powerful as more expensive models, the device will run apps and make use of mobile internet.

It would appeal to the sorts of people who currently buy cheap "feature" phones, analysts said.

Feature phones are highly popular in the developing world as a halfway point between "dumb" phones - just voice calls and other basic functions - and fully-fledged smartphones.
***
more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26316265

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mozilla plans '$25 smartphone' for emerging markets (BBC) (Original Post) eppur_se_muova Feb 2014 OP
Isn't the developing world more concerned about clean drinking water, medical care, Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #1
They also need communications, and cell phone use is already heavy there. eppur_se_muova Feb 2014 #2
That's the case in some very rural parts of the US too. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #3
Sure, but that doesn't mean they don't need phones and information. Cal Carpenter Feb 2014 #4

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
1. Isn't the developing world more concerned about clean drinking water, medical care,
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 05:09 PM
Feb 2014

stable governments, etc?

eppur_se_muova

(36,289 posts)
2. They also need communications, and cell phone use is already heavy there.
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 05:13 PM
Feb 2014

It turns out that installing cell networks is actually less resource-intensive than setting up landlines, and much of the developing world may actually never need landlines. I'm sure some Repugs will consider them "rich" because they have CELL PHONES OMG!!1! but the modern reality is that cellular is the most cost-effective way to expand communications.

We can work on more than one thing at a time. It is not an either/or world.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
3. That's the case in some very rural parts of the US too.
Sun Feb 23, 2014, 05:15 PM
Feb 2014

There are a few remote communities in California with no landlines, and quite a few in the Nevada desert.

Hell, there are communities in Nevada without connection to the power grid.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mozilla plans '$25 smartp...