General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMeet George Zimmerman: He Is the NRA
Daniel Gross
03/22/2012 3:10 pm
<...>
The shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman is a heartbreaking tragedy. But make no mistake, it is not a surprise that it happened in Florida, the NRA's closest thing to an armed utopia. In fact, much more so than any of the shills they had promoting their agenda in their big budget propaganda campaign, George Zimmerman is the embodiment of the gun lobby and its vision for America.
George Zimmerman is the NRA.
And now the NRA has made it abundantly clear that their vision is of an America that looks just like Florida, a nation where it's easy for criminals and dangerous people to get, carry and use guns -- a nation without any gun laws, where just about anybody can get a gun and use it anywhere. Their spokespeople use fear, bordering on paranoia to justify flooding our streets with armed and violent people, and the result is more tragedies like Trayvon Martin's.
The NRA is literally working to promote "George Zimmermans" to carry and use their guns in virtually every state across our nation.
Just days after the Trayvon Martin tragedy, the NRA was working on Capitol Hill to nationalize Florida's vigilante mentality. The gun lobby has gotten U.S. senators to introduce a bill that will force states like New York with strong gun laws to follow Florida's model of arming criminals and killers. Led by Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska), they call S.B. 2188, the National Reciprocity Act.
We call it the George Zimmerman Armed Vigilante Act.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-gross/george-zimmerman-nra_b_1372873.html
onehandle
(51,122 posts)RZM
(8,556 posts)I don't think a nut who shot a congresswoman and a terrorist who blew up a federal building are the kinds of people the NRA would put on their posters.
I think what you're arguing is that their behavior is typical of that of NRA members. I think very few members of the NRA shoot congresspeople or blow up buildings.
Or, you might be arguing that the NRA encouraged these people. I'm no expert on the NRA, but I don't think they encourage shooting politicians or committing acts of terrorism.
I'm not a member of the NRA and I don't own a gun. But I do believe that they don't encourage these kinds of crimes.
As for Zimmerman, I don't know, but he doesn't seem to me to be a 'responsible gun owner.'
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)McVeigh was a true anti-government, gun and explosives nut.
But it's also a bit like saying that Obama made it easier for the recent massacre in Afghanistan because he called Afghanistan 'the good war' and has continued to keep combat troops there.
I mean, I guess you could make the case, but I don't blame him for the massacre because I know he doesn't support that kind of thing and doesn't encourage the troops to behave that way.
Same thing with the NRA. By promoting gun ownership and pro-gun legislation they are keeping guns out there. But they don't support or condone any of the actions of these three (or at least two of them, though I doubt they would issue a statement in support of Zimmerman either).
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)They're so certain of their ideology about guns, that they can't tell when it undercuts their intentions. That is to say, the better ones of them are like that. They are absolutely certain that guns are such a good thing to have, and that the Second Amendment is such an unassailable idea, that they can't examine how it might actually play out badly in the real world.
Fact: nobody has really tried what they're doing. Historically, America was not really a gun-saturated society before liberals came around and ruined it. That's a myth. Old Western towns had people check their guns when they entered. The Second Amendment has never been legally interpreted the way they're insisting it be now. The guns today are technologically superior to anything in previous generations.
They can't honestly say they know what kind of society, what kind of conditions, they will create. The indications aren't good, but they're not interested in knowing that. They impugn and attack people who question it in any way, meaning that they're not willing to be found wrong; they'll only accept being proven correct.
I'll also add: gun marketing is definitely a huge part of the drive toward more guns and more legality, and less application of common sense regarding guns.
Those are the better ones. The worst ones are paranoid, Timothy-McVeigh, David Koresh nuts, who want to own guns because they have all kinds of unfounded fears and filled with rage looking for an excuse to create tragedy. As incidents like the Martin case begin to pile up, all of a sudden, the better ones are going to wake up and notice they're in bed with crazy rats.
Pacafishmate
(249 posts)That's just one of the costs that comes with civilization. There are nuts out there. There are better ways to deal with them than a blanket solution that restricts everyone.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)By definition.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Because they certainly live in constant fear.
Is fearful and unarmed any freer than fearful and armed?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)The most dangerous person there was the guy with the gun. The ignorant, racist, fearful guy with the gun.
The thing is, in high crime areas, the RW would rather write the people off and let them be afraid than actually help them. A major component extremist RW dogma is "the govt can't help you or protect you". High-crimes areas validate that view, even though they're generally created by RW economic policies. The only options the RW offers to those people is A) get a gun, or B) be killed. And if you don't get a gun, then it's your own damn fault if you get killed. It never occurs to them. as it does to rational people, that guns are a big part of what makes these people's homes "high crime areas".
hack89
(39,171 posts)ok - sorry for the confusion.
What makes an area a high crime area is criminals. So why not solve the real problem? In the mean time, since criminals will always get guns let law abiding citizens obtain the means to protect themselves.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)So...yep, big difference.
hack89
(39,171 posts)drug cartels ship illegal drugs across the border by the truck load but that would be impossible with guns and ammo. Yup.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)But the fetishists who want to argue pro-gun stuff after the slaughter of an innocent get no seat at my table.
hack89
(39,171 posts)to push their political agenda? Are they OK?
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Of course it's ok for "gun grabbers" to use the death of an innocent to push their political agenda, an agenda that would result in fewer people killed senselessly. Did you want them to use no examples, to be strictly hypothetical? That doesn't make sense on its face. It's stories like this that highlight the need for gun control. You can't just talk about gun control in a vacuum. So it surprises me to see that you appear to be so far gone that you can't allow for gun control advocates to use actual examples when advocating for gun control.
hack89
(39,171 posts)the present laws are working just fine. Every year there are fewer gun deaths - even as there are more guns and laxer laws.
So I question the mind set that more guns are automatically bad. The facts show that in reality American's can be trusted with guns. The facts show that a tiny minority of gun owners ever use their weapons to hurt others.
I would like to see gun control advocates to be honest. To admit that perhaps the real issue is criminals carrying out criminal acts. To not smear as right wing fanatics the 99.999..% of gun owners that will never harm anyone. To understand that disarming the law abiding is simply political theater aimed at a politically correct demographic.
In my 50 years of life, the odds of me being shot have never been lower. Gun violence is at historic lows and still declining. So I question the "need" for more gun control. This incident is classic gun control politics - sensationalize a single tragedy while ignoring the big picture.
I'm really not trying to jump in the whole debate, but the drug cartels get their guns primarily from the United States.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Johnny Rico
(1,438 posts)But there's a lot of paperwork, and costs have skyrocketed since the absurd '86 ban on new manufacture of machine guns.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)shraby
(21,946 posts)It begins with the word "civil". The carrying and usage of guns and the mayhem that erupts too many times is the antitheses of "civil" behavior.
DonP
(6,185 posts)>sarcasm on>
What's wrong with you? This is no time for logic and reasoned discussion. There's a chance to score cheap, ignorant points preferably before all the facts become available. All you need to form an opinion are a few poorly written and even more poorly sourced news reports. Everybody know they must be right.
Quick, jump on the bandwagon while it's rolling downhill and you can blame the whole state of Florida as well as people that have nothing to do with the crime and smear a few others along the way.
Then a week or two later move on to the next big thing.
<sarcasm off>
Good post, well made points. Thanks for injecting reason into the discussion.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)The checks come in just that much faster from their paranoid sheep when acts of violence occur.
McVeigh is applicable. He lived at gun shows and was crazy about the 2nd amendment.
To quote a poster in freeperville, 'That poor railroaded boy.'
RZM
(8,556 posts)One the quote of one anonymous Freeper.
If you want to argue that their fundraising spikes when gun nuts kill a bunch of people in cold blood, then provide a link that shows that.
I'll bet that their funding does spike after cases like the 'Wichita Horror' and other famous home invasion scenarios. But that's a reaction against the murderers, not a favorable response to their actions.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)But when there is violence, the calls for gun controls come out, and so do the NRA's fundraising letters.
Simple math.
They love their freaks.
McVeigh was a member.
RZM
(8,556 posts)When calls for gun control spike, NRA funding probably spikes too. That makes sense.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Please cite your evidence or retract your false stereotype.
safeinOhio
(32,674 posts)warning website for the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
http://www.knightriderskkkk.com/http://www.knightriderskkkk.com/
3/4 down the page
Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
Officially Endorses The NRA and Supports all
Their efforts to Protect Our Second Amendment
Rights.
God Bless Us All in our time of need.
RZM
(8,556 posts)Nor do I care. The KKK is a tiny fringe presence at this point. The only time they make news is when 5 of them march down the street and they are outnumbered 10-1 by counter-protesters. They are a stupid joke. Maybe he doesn't think they even warrant a comment.
I don't know though, you'd have ask him.
Pacafishmate
(249 posts)Osama bin Laden once said that something should be done about climate change. Does that somehow mar the reputation of groups working to stop it? Please think before you post.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)So much for the sanctity of "States Rights". Will keep an eye on how this is progressing.
K Gardner
(14,933 posts)belcffub
(595 posts)Tragedy has been and will always be with us. Somewhere right now, evil people are planning evil things. All of us will do everything meaningful, everything we can do to prevent it, but each horrible act cant become an axe for opportunists to cleave the very Bill of Rights that binds us. America must stop this predictable pattern of reaction. When an isolated terrible event occurs, our phones ring demanding that the NRA explain the inexplicable. Why us? Because their story needs a villain.
That is not our role in American society and we will not be forced to play it.
Now, if you disagree thats your right, I respect that, but we will not relinquish it, or be silenced about it, or be told do not come here, you are unwelcome in your own land.
Extremist Makeover Homeland edition
I love this clip... but to get to the meat go to 7:00
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Why are you shilling for this rightwing merchant of death organization?
belcffub
(595 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)People here are armed and itching to get a chance to shoot somebody. It's almost a sickness - classes to learn to shoot people, licensing of guns out the wazoo, gun permits for this, gun permits for that, the psychotic Stand Your Ground Law, which should be called, Shoot Whoever the F You Want law. It's a psychotic state, based on sick right wing ideology.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Violent Crime Rate per 100,000 in 1990 was 1,220.9. In 2010 the rate was 542.9
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/FSAC/Menu/Crime-Trends/Violent-Crime.aspx
Looks like Florida has been getting safer and safer for the average citizen.
Can you show an increase in the number of gun deaths in Florida due to this law?
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)with that crime drop in 2011 throughout the U.S., nor does the Florida law allowing murder have anything to do with the drop of crime in the entire U.S. in 2011, nor does gun ownership have anything to do with the crime drop in the U.S. in 2011.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/24/us/24crime.html
The number of violent crimes in the United States dropped significantly last year, to what appeared to be the lowest rate in nearly 40 years, a development that was considered puzzling partly because it ran counter to the prevailing expectation that crime would increase during a recession.
In all regions, the country appears to be safer. The odds of being murdered or robbed are now less than half of what they were in the early 1990s, when violent crime peaked in the United States. Small towns, especially, are seeing far fewer murders: In cities with populations under 10,000, the number plunged by more than 25 percent last year.
hack89
(39,171 posts)You said that Florida is a dangerous place because of the proliferation of guns and their lax gun laws. I pointed out that during the past 20 years of increased gun ownership and laxer gun laws Florida has become safer.
In other words your perception does not match reality.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)laws.
What you're stating makes no sense, is illogical, and is intended only and exclusively to support your beloved gun ownership stance.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I am saying that more gun ownership and "pro-murder laws" has not increased gun violence.
Can you show me where our present gun laws have increased gun deaths?
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)What's your political affiliation?
Whom did you vote for in the past 4 presidential elections?
What liberal causes do you support?
As is clear, I'm having serious doubts about which side of the fence you're on, so pony up.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Clinton x2, Gore and Obama
Abortion, marriage equality, all civil liberties (including 2A)
I could give a shit what you think.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)but the conversation always seems to veer off into 2A issues.
There have to be laws defining self defense - SYG is certainly appropriate in many instances. If there is ambiguity in the laws that can be removed then it should be done.
BiggJawn
(23,051 posts)Rub it in your face, Nope, not BLUE enough, off to Freeperville with you!
Fuck dat.
Oh- before you accuse me of being a stealth freeper,
Socialist Democrat
Carter X2
Mondale
Dukakis
Clinton X2
Gore
Kerry
Obama X2 (Forgot that I'm going again for him this year)
Marriage equality, Right to Chose, The environment, No-Kill shelters, and Veterans (oh, sorry, those guys are murderers, right?)
Logical
(22,457 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)(paraphrasing what I believe his point is..)
Logical
(22,457 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Then we see eye to eye on the issue.
Logical
(22,457 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)it will not force NY to change their gun law for their residents. The law says that if a visitor to NY has a valid CCW from another state then it is valid in NY. That person still has to follow NY law as it pertains to concealed carry.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)can you show me that?
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Florida law allows murderers to run free?
Wrong about what exactly?
hack89
(39,171 posts)that's what I am talking about.
Zimmerman should be in jail. The law is a bad law. But it has nothing to do with the National Reciprocity Act.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Both promote the murder of humans.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)It's like people in the U.S. losing weight, and you attributing it to tomatoes being more expensive in Delaware.
The entire nation has had a decrease in crime recently. That has nothing to do with the sale of guns. Guns have never ceased selling rampantly in this country thanks to the NRA and gun-lovers like you.
The entire nation has had a decrease in crime recently. That has nothing to do with Florida having a law allowing murderers like Zimmerman to go free.
I keep having to repeat the same thing over and over. Cease with the lack of logic.
hack89
(39,171 posts)so what exactly is the issue?
I agree that the law needs to be changed. But apart from that, Florida gun laws have not led to any harm.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)has no explanation as of yet. This decrease took place last year.
You're so desperate to defend guns, that you'll introduce gun ownership as the reason for anything good that happens.
The way you carry on, I'm getting the feeling you think of guns as a talisman of sorts, conferring good luck on whoever carries them.
hack89
(39,171 posts)the lowest rates of violence in 50 years. You need to educate yourself. You have never been safer.
Here are the facts:
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)Please stop the bs. I don't know if you believe that I'm going to believe gun-lovers' bs.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I gave you the link.
Nice graph here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13799616
These are hard facts. You can't refute them. I am sure you will ignore them.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I am merely pointing out that more guns and laxer gun laws have not led to more deaths. That's all.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)gun crimes are so low.
Stop the bs.
hack89
(39,171 posts)violent crime is at a 50 year low.
If you disagree, then show me the real numbers.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Ever been to Sweden? Finland? Japan?
I have and I feel MUCH safer there. I don't fear being shot in cold blood while walking down the street because some NRA nut feels like he wants to go human hunting.
If you look at the gun murder rate in those countries and compare them to 'Murka, I'm sure 'Murka has a much higher rate. Those countries actually provide access to affordable healthcare as well. 'Murka is most definitely not the greatest country on earth.
USA! USA! USA!
hack89
(39,171 posts)there has been exactly one murder in my town of 17,000 in the 12 years I have lived here.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)You should ask Trayvon how safe he feels. Oh, he's dead. You can't.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)All you know is what living in a high gun crime country is like, and to you that's your normal.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I have seen every part of the globe both good and bad.
And I still don't feel endangered. Why should I when no one around me is getting shot. One murder in 12 years - and that was a love triangle gone bad.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)You were born while he was stationed abroad.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)what a surprise.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)why would a military father be significant?
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)However, the main issue in all this, is that you refuse to accept that people like you have turned this country into a high-gun-crime country.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I was still exposed to different people and cultures.
Gun crime is at a 50 year low - and still declining. We are on the right path.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)in another country.
Such as the difference between a yellow pasteurized cheese food, and a queso manchego from Albacete.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)I lived in a Japanese house in a Japanese neighborhood with Japanese neighbors. My daughter was born in a Japanese hospital. You don't have to live on base and many don't.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)You were in the employ of the U.S.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I was expose to Japanese civil live. I know what daily life in Japan is like. I talked everyday to my Japanese friends.
You make yourself look foolish going to such extremes to avoid admitting there is another side to the story. You simply look close minded.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)But you are still dodging.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)You seem to agree with the OP that the National Reciprocity Act will force New Jersey to adopt Florida gun laws. Can you show me in the actual law how that is possible?
Can you actually answer a direct question with a direct answer? No more emotional rants - I have asked a simple question. Please Google the law and answer my question.
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)It's a gun-crime ridden country thanks to you people and the NRA. I've said this, and I will merely continue to repeat this. Everything else you bring up fails to address this. The End.
hack89
(39,171 posts)you keep avoiding that very basic question. Don't you think your credibility is damage by your refusal to address hard facts that challenge your pronouncements? You seem so sure of yourself yet cannot offer any supporting facts just emotional rants. Why is that?
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)2) Trying to give guns credit for the 2011 drop in crime rate.
I have responded to you that guns have CREATED crime, not lessened it.
As you seem hell-bent on giving guns credit for peace, when guns have created crime, and you have nothing else to say, I will not respond to you again.
Speak to someone else.
Thanks.
hack89
(39,171 posts)I am saying that more guns did not create more crime. Do you agree? If not, can you show real status that prove a link between increased crime and increased guns?
apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)is allowed to get in the way of the Almighty Gun and its right wing lobby. Facts don't matter much to our "pro gun Democrats."
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)LynneSin
(95,337 posts)or some similar site
Initech
(100,068 posts)Flame away.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Try the Gungeon