General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDon't Know If You Are Watching MSNBC Right Now But Important Stuff Here:
1) Governor Brewer of AZ just vetoed the Anti-Gay Bill !
But...
2) The reporter doing a live spot said (paraphrasing), that even many of the Republicans that voted for it were TAKEN ABACK by the viral nature of the reaction from citizens and businesses alike.
THAT is the recipe for making the 2014 Mid-Terms a WAVE election.
Use social media, traditional media, keep articles, videos, speeches, and anything else to whack these right-wing fuckwads up against the heads in 2014.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)I do not subscribe to the 'we're doomed in November' line, not at all....
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)Democrats are in the majority.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]TECT in the name of the Representative approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr]
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)The GOP is toast.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)the kind that stains their dentures.
Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)Thats it in a nutshell. Of course the libural media is claiming we could lose the Senate.
This is the list to remember:
-Government shutdown
-Voting over 40 times to repeal ACA
-Racist comments by various GOP governors/Rep's
-Voting against Women
-Suppressing voting rights
Keep this post as a reminder for future use. I hope we are not complacent this time. If we repeat 2010, well, you get the picture.
aquart
(69,014 posts)We need babysitters. We need employers on board with giving people time to vote.
We NEED employers to come out and swear a poll hero will not be penalized at work. Start the pressure now.
And we need people to give place to the frail voters who won't be able to hold out.
Beat the bastards with stamina, courage, and planning.
calimary
(90,020 posts)We need people with extra chairs. We need people willing to stand in line and be place-holders. We need people to come along to the lines of voters with bottled water and energy bars and umbrellas for shade if the sun's beating down on them all day and they have to stand for hours. We need people to go run errands, and take little old ladies and gents to the bathroom if they've had to wait for hours. We need people to run to the grocery store, or send out for a stack of pizzas so people stuck in line waiting to vote have something to snack on. Or donuts and coffee in the morning. We need people to help and assist and drive and PRESSURE, alright!!! PRESSURE employers to be extremely lenient on Election Day. It's the only patriotic thing to do.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)An inspired and informed citizenry supporting it's own electorate and electoral process against those who attack our democracy! This is the very definition of PATRIOTISM!
Personally I feel that "Voter Suppression" needs to be redefined as "Anti-Democracy" and tied as yet another boat anchor around the Republican Agenda in the same way it has been tied to being Anti-Gay, Anti-Woman and Anti-Latina. The way I see it, many Americans can and do argue against women's rights, equal rights for the LBGT and against immigration. Those who do argue this way support a losing argument both ethically and in elections. Voter suppression in all of it's forms is a direct attack on our democracy PERIOD. It will be tough for an any voter, regardless of prior party support, to find an argument for the "Anti-Democracy Party"!
chknltl
(10,558 posts)Voter suppression is a direct attack on our democracy from within PERIOD. I strongly believe that an informed American electorate will not stand for it. The Democratic Party has recently done well by exposing the Republican agenda as anti-woman, anti-LGBT and anti-immigrant. I believe it can be even better served by similarly exposing the Republican agenda as Anti Democracy. Using the media to call up brigades of citizens willing to support our electorate at Republican suppressed Polls is a great way to increase attention.
ReRe
(12,189 posts)... Republicans can't do this. They have no work ethic. That they are a bunch of lazy arses
is where we have them beat. Let's get his done!
elleng
(141,926 posts)If only Dem Party will help!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)postulater
(5,075 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)LGBT, women, homeless people, unemployed, underemployed. Backlash needs to occur. Let us get some these issues on the radar. MSM paid attention only when there was an uproar. Make it so.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)'cost us the election'? How long did you do the wrong thing out of fear you deemed 'pragmatism'?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I don't recall any Democrat saying that.
{Divisive even in victory.}
cui bono
(19,926 posts)first. Which means equal rights. So some thought it was okay to relegate LGBT to second class citizens until...
Gore1FL
(22,951 posts)I also remember the GOP successfully using it, with some success as a wedge issue in the last decade.
Because of a bigoted american society, many were afraid to champion it. Fortunately, society has changed to embrace equality. The politics are finally starting to catch up.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Yep...
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)maybe a link?
But that said (and forgive the very loose analogy) ... there is a difference in a fight to defend a right and a fight to advance a right. This was the former rather than the latter.
Example: this was a fight to defend the right to access; something that had already been granted; as opposed to (in Arizona) a fight for SSM, a right that hasn't been granted ... yet.
Perhaps, that's what you recall?
plantwomyn
(877 posts)were ALWAYS Unconstitutional, they merely had yet to be recognized as such. DOMA was Unconstitutional at it's inception, it didn't suddenly become so. The Constitution already grants all of us equal protection and due process. But as I'm sure you know, we only truly have the Constitutional rights we can afford to protect. It has caused much pain and taken all too many years to repeal that Unconstitutional law. So IMHO we have been fighting all along for equality already granted by the Constitution and only now our efforts are coming to fruition.
BTW I remember the vocal disappointment of many here when neither Hillary nor Barack stood up for equality in 2008. We were told the equivalent to "get to the back of the bus". Then we were told to quiet down and back the nominee...or else. Ya that happened.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Since it is a fundamental right, the 14th Amendment requires the government to recognize that right and thus grant it to all people equally.
Since the right to marry is fundamental and must be granted to all people equally, the right to enter into a civil marriage with the person you love cannot be denied to an individual merely because that individual wants to marry a person of the same sex.
The right to a civil marriage with the person you love, regardless of race, religion, gender, etc. was insured when the 14th Amendment was passed. The government has no right to deny that right to anyone.
That's what I think.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and I absolutely agree.
That still doesn't change my statement.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)to serve openly in the military. I remember writing OPs about it and being attacked by some who stated 'it isn't the right time'.
How quickly we forget.
Airc, we expected DADT to be disposed of in Jan. 2009, instead we witnessed this DOJ fight against it. Thanks to all those who refused to accept that.
I was here.
I remember.
Sad for DU that so many were telling a large segment of our membership to Sit Down & Shut Up about your Rights.
In fact, many of DUs best & brightest got banned or forced to leave due to hostile environment over that very issue.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)in solidarity with them, would get your post hidden.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)A whole lot of times. We needed to "wait," "DU is more liberal than the rest of the nation," "LGBT issues are not important right now -- they' cost us ("Democrats"
elections."
I remember all of these statements and more. It's a fact.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)But that said (and forgive the very loose analogy) ... there is a difference in a fight to defend a right (e.g., the right for Black folks to vote in 1966) and a fight to advance a right (e.g., Black folks right to be free from discriminatory denial of access in employment, public accommodations, etc., in 1966).
This was a fight for the former rather than the latter ... this was a fight to defend the right to access; something that had already been granted; as opposed to (in Arizona) a fight for SSM, a right that hasn't been granted ... yet.
Perhaps, that's what you recall?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Right here on DU and it came from the Party Faithful. You can rationalize it all you want but LBGTQ advocates, REAL activists, were banned from this board during that time and this site is the poorer for it. I miss their voices. Unfortunately, the same people who were advocating that we put this issue on the back burner are still here, still posting their useless fanboy posts complete with endless links to nowhere and still trying like hell to get dissenters banned.
You don't have to take my word for it, there were plenty of people still here that remember those disgusting posts/threads and remember who started them.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)But none-the-less, can we celebrate this victory and now press the next fight?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Let's celebrate this victory and fight the next battle.
treestar
(82,383 posts)If we still had DADT, etc., and the court decisions made since then had not been made, it might well have been different now. Brewer is reacting after all of that.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)irisblue
(37,512 posts)but why did she wait so long to do the "the right thing for Arizona"? I ask in kindness, b/c MFM lived there. I cut some slack b/c of that. And I miss him. Image what he would say...
Cleita
(75,480 posts)West Hollywood. In a very gay neighborhood, the owner declared war on gays and had little signs on the tables an on his match books that stated a slur in slang, No......allowed. I can't remember if the word was fags or something else. He had to back off or have his license pulled among many other pressures he was subjected to. I believe the neighborhood of West Hollywood incorporated into a city, got a council and a mayor and passed laws against discrimination.
My point is there needs to be laws AGAINST all kinds of discrimination in public places. I think there should be national laws so states can't try to do this.
tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)I've been there a few times, never again (if it's still there).
Cleita
(75,480 posts)it's still hostile to gays.
tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)years. Barney died in 1968, 4 years after the sign became nationally famous. It was a slur, but misspelled in 'Get A Brain,Moran' fashion, it said 'Fagots Stay Out' and was one G short of the target.
Homophobes are always idiots. That was 30 years ago.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)foggy on the details. This is why it mystifies me that legislators are trying to do this in the 21st century.
mountain grammy
(29,035 posts)more than 30 seconds on the nightly "news" if at all. The internet has exposed the nuts to all and the backlash is happening.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Purple states have blue electorates and red executives / legislatures.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)lillypaddle
(9,606 posts)sing it!
LittleGirl
(8,999 posts)and stop giving the microphone to the right wing. Where are all of the liberals on the sunday shows?
Why isn't the DNC running ads in states trying to bad mouth the ACA?
The liberals have lost the battle on messaging and needs to get it back.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)LittleGirl
(8,999 posts)but they have lost the messaging and I'm sick of it.
RC
(25,592 posts)The DLC now, is what used to be main line Republicans.

Too many people still think being a Democrat means being Liberal or Progressive. Not necessarily any more.
There is plenty of proof right here on DU of that.
Actual Liberals have not lost the message. We are being drowned out by those that have no clue as to where the actual Center is.
LittleGirl
(8,999 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)A way of abandoning responsibility for self government. And insulting everyone else as if they can't make up their minds themselves and have to mindlessly follow what is said on the Sunday shows, etc. We have to be part of the messaging, not just sit there and criticize the way others do it. At least the others do it.
And the M$M has control over who goes on the shows. Why is Gramps McCain always on there? They want to promote what he says.
LittleGirl
(8,999 posts)why do the right wing always get the microphone. Where are the LIBERAL SHOWS? I don't care who owns the media, the wrong party (obviously) is getting their message out and the liberals are losing that right now.
benld74
(10,285 posts)it is discovered which group is responsible for almost identical bills in separate states around the same time. When THAT news comes out I HOPE it is SHOUTED across the rooftops by one and all. Gotta put lights on cockroaches when they attempt to scurry back into their crevases.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Volaris
(11,704 posts)The gen x-er's (well,most of us anyway) and the Millen's arent buying hate as as a tool of differentation anymore, and its going to KILL the reagan coalation version of the GOP.
Thank God.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)re-tackling reproductive rights, re-tackling voting rights.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)!
treestar
(82,383 posts)This law is so clearly unconstitutional, and they know it, but they are just desperate to attempt to be able to set the clock back. By now they know their efforts are futile in the long run.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)allan01
(1,950 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 26, 2014, 11:34 PM - Edit history (1)
when the nfl starts to take steps to move superbowl and businnesses threaten to leave and vote with their feet , youd better listen and when WE THE PEOPLE get angry against the very thing our fore fathers fought against , justice . thanks for postin.
on edit: the party of NO, was handed defeat by the people saying no to this .
The Wizard
(13,735 posts)bigotry is losing its appeal and the Reagan demographic is shrinking from attrition.
hatrack
(64,887 posts)But delighted to watch the continued shrinking of that particular demographic, of course.
''Use social media, traditional media, keep articles, videos, speeches, and anything else to whack these right-wing fuckwads up side the head in 2014.''
/fixedVinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)extending benefits to the unemployed. By Novemeber FIVE million will have been denied benefits. Oddly, the GOP must think these are all Democrats. You can bet that millions are Republicans and they are probably astounded and quite pissed that their own party has abandoned them and their families. That will have an impact on the 2014 elections.
Jasana
(490 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Stole it.
aquart
(69,014 posts)They made "liberal" an insult. Don't let them claim "conservative" or anything else. How about "$24 billion-wasting shutdown lover"? Or just "shutdown lover"? Or "billionaire's butt-kisser"?
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)alfredo
(60,301 posts)Recognize same sex marriage.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)"State lawmakers in Ohio withdrew legislation Wednesday that mirrors an Arizona bill that's come under fire for protecting those who assert their religious beliefs in refusing service to gays.
Republican state Rep. Tim Derickson and Democratic state Rep. Bill Patmon issued a joint statement citing concern over the bill's unintended consequences.
"The intent of (our bill) was to ensure Ohioans' religious freedom by protecting their ability to freely worship and preventing any laws from burdening the free exercise of religion," their statement said. "However, with the controversy that is occurring in Arizona, we feel that it is in the best interest of Ohioans that there be no further consideration of this legislation."
Debate on the bill has been indefinitely postponed, House Speaker William Batchelder's office said."
redqueen
(115,186 posts)Skittles
(171,710 posts)I WILL KICK YOUR POLITE ASS
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Democrats are going to win.
Where is everybody? This OP should have hundreds of recs!!!
AAO
(3,300 posts)DFW
(60,186 posts)When it talks loudly enough, even Jan Brewer listens.
It does not mean she has suddenly grown a conscience or a soul.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Now we need to put that energy into ensuring that our immigrant families, especially their children have the same protections under the law. We need to turn the Congress completely blue so we can get immigration reform.
debunkthis
(99 posts)I gave up on MSNBC when I caught them running a misleading version of a story regarding the austerity demonstrations in Greece a while back. Not saying they are anything like Faux Snooze in that regard, but disappointing none the less.
Good message in the post though.
Keeping fighting folks, we can win justice across many fronts if we stand together!
I'm talking general election numbers.
tridim
(45,358 posts)It is amplified by the Internet to the point that it can no longer be ignored.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)And now the bubble has exploded. Popcorn time!
indepat
(20,899 posts)brand of religiosity.