General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPlease, if we are going to devolve into the "White Privilege" debate, can I first implore that we
have the "Class Warfare" discussion first.
Please consider that the real break is between "haves" and "have-nots", and there is nothing more than the "haves" would like is for the "have nots" to be torn between racial lines.
If we want to fight amonst ourselves, we are all bound to suffer, but if we realize that the real argument is the 99% (made up of all races, creeds, sexual orientations and lifestyles) fighting the 1%, we would be strengthened.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)We never fully benefit, so we need to talk about this now.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)And it is not a discussion that can be framed by others. It is not 'their' discussion. They've proved they don't want the truth to be heard. Even if such a truth is claimed to be biased by the speaker, who can say they don't have a bias?
Denying that it should be heard is biased in itself. It's time to get this going. Those who 'don't want to hear it' can continue living in the past. They are not changing a thing.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm always up for the discussion, and I'll be ready when they are if they ever are.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)The crux of the fight has been "it's class, not race". For several hundred replies.
I'm fairly sure this OP is well-intentioned, but it also seems rather redundant.
Texasgal
(17,236 posts)cannot handle a conversation on White Privilege. Good luck!
randome
(34,845 posts)It's always seemed amazing to me that so many non-blacks think they are experts in what it's like to be black.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)You define white privilege so you must know what it is to be me!
Here is a clew, you don't!
Squinch
(58,895 posts)are so obtuse about our OWN experience. Every time I see someone denying it, I think, "What the hell do you think is going on here? Are you, blind?"
Edited to add: see above.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)Just another way of saying "shut up, it's my turn first".
Which is the actual problem.
Squinch
(58,895 posts)never bring this up again. We're just not going there, no matter what you say your experience is."
Which is
gollygee
(22,336 posts)No.
that is exactly what i said.
Squinch
(58,895 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)and we'll get to them when we get ours? As a working class single white mother who doesn't have to worry about her son walking down the street, I say....ummmm...nope.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)privilege? Are we all going to get gigs on speaking tours or something?
Am I going to be less of a target for the police?
Will I be able to shop in peace?
Will I get to spend more time chatting and playing at work while someone else gets the job done?
Will it be easier to hail a cab at least?
Talk about whatever you like but that is all it is and is being substituted, I believe at least in some part to avoid and as a reaction to talk about class that impacts minorities even more than the dominant group and as such cannot be blown off to focus on anything. The number one tool of deprivation is poverty and limiting opportunity.
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)discussed. There are many posts and threads at DU about the 99% and inequality. It's not necessary to downgrade discussions of racism to raise the issue. Devolve, my ass.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And how the equal pay act was singed 50 years ago, blah blah blah.
Starry Messenger
(32,380 posts)The class warriors like to throw in the Margaret Thatcher Hail Mary pass and wedge class into there too.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)handmade34
(23,955 posts)it seems the "White Privilege" debate needs to be settled
derby378
(30,262 posts)At least that's the way I see it.
Cofitachequi
(112 posts)I was absolutely not suggesting that there is not a disparity.
The strength of the left has always been many divergent sides and experiences recognizing common solutions to injustice and standing up for each other.
The tone of this "discussion" threatens that history.
I will not answer anymore posts, nor read any.
You guys are doing exactly what they hope you will.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)It is sourced from the middle and upper class white community who directly benefits from scapegoating their racism in favor of an economic argument that is at face value less controversial and easier to rationalize within the schema of gross cognitive dissonance.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)BainsBane
(57,626 posts)The thing is, I have trouble believing those people (not saying the OP but rather people regularly hostile to discussions of racism and sexism) care much about class either. I think what they ultimately care about it themselves.
BainsBane
(57,626 posts)Rather than telling people not to talk about race (and gender), how about suggesting a discussion about how class intersects with race? Women and people of color on DU are told several times a day to keep quiet and let their betters decide what is important. Your post is going to be read in that context. Class is indeed important, but to pretend that race and gender are not--or that we should set them aside to talk about what you think is more important, is unrealistic. We can't put aside who we are. The fact is that sexism and racism affect our lives on a daily level. The more interesting and ultimately more productive discussion is about how race, class, and gender intersect.
To have a discussion exclusively about class, you would need to exclude the life experiences of the majority of the country from your discussion. Is that really what you want to do? Perhaps you could challenge yourself to think more comprehensively about the issue rather than condemning those of us who care about our own lives and those of the majority of Americans as playing into the hands of the 1 percent. In insisting people think only about the narrow frame you consider important, you don't leave much space for discussion.
I would also suggest you might think about what you mean when you say class. The one percent vs. the 99% are not classes. Those are catch-all terms that have come into currency in the media to talk about income disparity, but that 99 percent contains within it more than one class.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)When I was a kid, we couldn't join certain "country clubs" because we were Jewish. Some people are whiter than others.
BainsBane
(57,626 posts)The Irish weren't seen as white when they first came to the US but now are. We as Americans know what whiteness means in our current time and place. It's something we are so imbued with that it is almost instinctive.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)THEN we are allowed to talk about privilege.
Yeh yeh, sure.
fishwax
(29,346 posts)Also, whenever this perspective is voiced on DU, it seems to be geared towards the notion that mentioning and/or exploring white privilege is playing into the hands of the 1%/economic elite because it sows discord among natural allies in the 99%/working class. It seems to me, though, that the concept of privilege doesn't sow discord or distract from class conflict, so much as does the angry and defensive denial and distortion do.
It's similar to the "racism isn't the problem, talking about racism is the problem" canard.
Heidi
(58,846 posts)MrScorpio
(73,765 posts)I'm about a hair's breadth away from posting that puppy.
Needless to say, it would be very interesting if I were to do it.
