General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTo those advocating US military intervention in the Ukraine: I guarantee you ...
that there's a recruiting office somewhere in your ZIP code. And if you can't find it, PM me and I will send you the requisite enlistment papers.
(But before you do, if you might allow this tired old fart to offer up a bit of wisdom based on personal experience ... getting in the middle of someone else's fucking civil war ain't all it's cracked up to be.)
jsr
(7,712 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)DhhD
(4,695 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)paleotn
(17,911 posts)...but I kinda doubt it. Maybe not physical preparations, but philosophical ones I sure, just like Syria. To borrow from Sun Tzu, you've got to "fight" a war in the "temples" before it's fought on the battlefield.
Berlin Expat
(950 posts)has been recounting various Russian atrocities that occurred here during the 1968 Warsaw Pact Invasion.
The Chairman of the Czech Foreign Affairs Parliamentary Commitee, Karel Schwarzenberg, straight-up said that Putin is pulling the same thing that Hitler did in both Austria and Czechslovakia. He pretty much said, publicly, Putin=Hitler.
The Poles are saying similar things as well.
Diclotican
(5,095 posts)Berlin Expat
To be fair - both the Czech and the polish do have some bad experience with the russians over the last couple of centuries... Even though it is a long time since 1968 Warsaw pact invasion - it gave the Czech some painfully wounds who is there, right under the surface for everyone who want to dig a meter down.... And they have never been given any apology for the treatment in the hand of the Russians either (who was the wast bulk of the armed forces from the Warsaw pact)..
I'm not sure if Putin is the same at Hitler - but I do understand, from a czech perspective about this case, it would be an experience they would not do twice - as Tczjekkia was treated pretty bad under the german control.... And experienced also a lot of hardship under Soviet control...
Diclotican
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)I'm always in awe of that man's powerful influence reaching across the centuries.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)It's interesting. Discussions about Ukraine and Russia are part of the current news environment. People are posting all sorts of OPs on the subject. And why would they not?
While you're correct that not many DUers are advocating a military response, a lot more DUers are concerned about that possibility. So, a couple of OPs have been written about whether or not the US would contemplate such a response. Why would such OPs not be justified, Steven?
If you find them unimportant and unjustified, that's fine. But, people will discuss what they wish to discuss on DU.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)There is one person here who supports military action out of tens of thousands of members.
That is not what I would consider 'support for this here on DU'. Do you consider it so?
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)...otherwise they're stuck trying to defend their indefensible positions.
There are a lot of tools in the United States' (and the Worlds') toolbox other than thermonuclear war.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)be alerted on if they manage to post on this forum.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)penetrate the bubble.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)...embarrass yourself further.
I don't really think you're a fan of Karl Rove. Just sayin...
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)W.T.F - Proud member of whatever term makes me seem less like the minority I represent.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)Let me give you a hint: extremists can't stand to hear opinions they don't like, so seek to remove all content that they have no answer for. Does that remind you of anyone, Sabrina?
I disagree with extremists. I think they are addicts of sanctimony and hate. They find no subtle problem that can't be reduced to "everything bad in the world is caused by the people I hate (which is more or less everyone who doesn't agree with me 100%) so removing them would fix all problems forever".
Never the less, I will defend to the death their right to voice their absurd opinions - subject to my responses correcting their logic, misrepresentations, creation of straw men, or (quite often) outright lies (especially about Democrats).
You also might re-read the rules of the Democratic Underground, which is pretty clear about allowing people to speak their minds, including the most whack-a-doodle nutcase extremists. Hell, you can say Stalin and Pol Pot were the most heroic politicians of the 20th century, and it's not something which should be alerted under D.U. rules.
In case you need some extra help, here's a little list I posted a while ago.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)This is an enormously critical situation. Instead of demeaning those who bother to comment on it, why not instead celebrate the good sense and solidarity of purpose (for once) being expressed? I find good sense and solidarity worthy of applause.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)foe.
Am I not allowed to discuss that?
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)even when you're essentially telling others to shut up, will not save you the discomfort of contrary responses, with which I totally agree btw.
malaise
(268,913 posts)IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)MineralMan
(146,286 posts)IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)it's really bizarre to see on DU.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)people to know that is where he stands. Who else? Feel free to PM me.
2banon
(7,321 posts)Here are a few OP's containing responses on the issue.
links: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=742961
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024589052
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024590563
there are more, but I've lost track at this point..
MADem
(135,425 posts)I think y'all need to speak to MIRT--they cleared out a ton of shit. They must have been shovelling all last night.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)of our lurkers, trolls, and potentially ignorant passersby. Maybe even the silent DUer at risk from the forces of darkness to be found everywhere IRL. I find the OP timely and appreciate it. Just because there's not a general hue and cry for WAR! here, at least not as yet, doesn't detract from the value of the statement one whit.
madokie
(51,076 posts)The Wizard
(12,541 posts)We've heard enough from the chickenhawks. The assholes who thought invading and occupying Vietnam had no chance of going themselves. Funny how that happens. Punks like Bill Kristol would wet their pants if they had to spend a night in the NDP (night defensive position). And Ted Nugent would have been handed a PRC 25 radio, a compass, binoculars and a map, that is if he didn't have an "unfortunate accident" first.
smokey775
(228 posts)while supporting the war, he went on vacation to France.
2banon
(7,321 posts)I never thought I'd be reading and hearing this stuff again in my lifetime, after that catastrophic war.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)on the front lines.
malthaussen
(17,186 posts)Here's a sad thought too: I bet plenty of farts just as old as you are waving the flag and salivating at the thought of sending 19 year olds out to die. The difference? They managed to avoid the war.
-- Mal
paleotn
(17,911 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)intervention in Ukraine.
But criticizing Putin and calling for him to keep his hands off from Ukraine is completely justified.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)trying to make DU look bad. I hope they are the only one.
Here is the link to their loony OP:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024586432
I suppose it also disturbs me that even some of those clearly opposing war with Russia talk as if war with Russia is no bigger deal than war with Iraq - as if they don't have a clue
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)I agreed with the poster up until he or she said "If Russia uses force in the Ukraine, the US should be ready to respond with force." That part I disagree with. However I would support an aggressive non military reaction.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I set my watch by his "pearls of do do."
newthinking
(3,982 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)against the rules to call out specifics but you can easily find it for yourself.
pampango
(24,692 posts)(Not exactly a new idea for liberals. We almost always support non-violent solutions to international problems.) Criticizing Putin for doing it, but promoting that the US/EU intervene militarily is a biased proposal.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)Wonderful
beemer27
(460 posts)I wish that there had been someone to say that before we got into Vietnam. Those of us who paid the price for the lessons learned there can only hope that our leadership was paying attention. The MIC has fed too well and too often since then. It is time to cut them off. There is nothing for us to gain over there.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)It's easy to find places where we should intervene in the world. I suspect that the media (wholly owned by the MIC) wants to take steps to reduce those military cuts.
So, let's see what the Russians are up to.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)The proposed military cuts are what has generated all this Russian panic/concern.
The truth of the matter is the MIC doesn't have a reason to exist at this level. Not at a fraction of their present size. And they know the American people are asking about the size of the military.
So we can expect some very serious talking heads on the TV acting scared and telling us about the vast Russian nuclear arsenal. "Oh, my, how will we ever stay safe!"
BlueMTexpat
(15,366 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)Too bad we (the US) didn't learn the lesson very well.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)to have your boy come home in a box"- that line always sends a chill down my spine. It never changes.
smokey775
(228 posts)not those of us who have seen actual war up close and personal.
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)horrific!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)the other guests or moderators should ask them about their military service.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)If any of us had said a single word promoting war, I shudder to think of the consequences. Among many other things, General Omar Bradley was right about Nam: wrong time, wrong place, wrong war. People who think like Patton would bring on WWIII in a heartbeat. Then we could all go up in flames - but that would sure show the Ruskies!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)It matters little what you or me want. If they elites and those in the corridors of power want one, they'll get it.
We only do the dying, they do the enriching.
And if this goes real hot, them chicken hawks will get their chance to find out what you and I and others know. Unless they are lucky enough and draw a
RAMF (Rear Area Mother Fucker) assignment. Just in case the chicken hawks don't have a clue. Yes, the equivalent exists in Spanish.
Brother Buzz
(36,415 posts)REMF - Rear Echelon Mother-Fucker
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)watoos
(7,142 posts)of the people who orchestrated a coup on a democratically elected leader, it should be mandatory to see who these people are.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/loving-a-putsch-cheering-a-democratic-neo-nazi-coup-in-ukraine/5371232
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)While many of Globalresearch.ca's articles discuss legitimate humanitarian or environmental concerns, the site has a strong undercurrent of reality warping and bullshit throughout its pages, especially in relation to taking its news from "Russia Today", along with other unreliable and/or open sources.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Cannot escape a hard reality - there is no guarantee that a military intervention against Russia will be successful ... Russia is a bad mofo in conventional warfare, with boots on the ground and tanks on the street .... They are known to go hard and fast, and with little consideration for world opinion or human rights ...
They are no pushovers - it will take more than a mere interventionist response to dislodge them - it will take total war, and the world could not survive all out war between Russia and the US.
Unless we are willing to wage complete war and risk everything - intervention against Russia will be unsuccessful ...
Ain't gonna happen, no matter how many sabres get rattled and chests get beaten ...
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)Blanks
(4,835 posts)But they call it 'The Great Patriotic War' and they lost 20 million people in the war. Every family lost relatives. The sacrifices that they made make the American sacrifices pale in comparison.
In their cities they fought street to street, house to house, inch by inch. They were our allies and they are very tough people. In fact, though American history tells us that the Americans won the war - the turning point was the battle of Kursk. We provided them with oodles of supplies, but they did the fighting, they made the sacrifices.
We should respect them.
WhiteTara
(29,703 posts)and done that. I hope you are well today and that you are never sent somewhere like that again!
Gman
(24,780 posts)Didn't think so.
MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)due to his brutal oppression of LGBT's in his country. I was among those criticizing him for that.
But it seems that the mood has changed and now suddenly a lot of people don't seem to want to criticize Putin anymore. Why? Does militarily intervening in another sovereign country get him off the hook for his brutal domestic policies?
With a very few exceptions the vast majority of us do not support US military intervention. I know I don't. But Putin is a bad person on any number of levels and I for one am not going to let up with my condemnation of his policies.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)3catwoman3
(23,971 posts)...I have long pondered. I feel much as you do - I would rather not have my taxes paying for war. Why doesn't that point of view matter just as much as that of those who wish to interfere with women's reproductive choices?
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Seems clear cut but maybe it isn't. There's no use in me trying to stop them from using my tax money for war. I'll hold on to my resentment about that. Personal health choices IMO is not on the same playing field. I'm not going to complain or revolt at the use of my tax money to pay for the health care of a drug addict or lung cancer victim of smoking or a vet who did what he was told to do. I don't know the answers or the right way of this matter only that I am determined to take a stand about war and peace. I've been a hippy, anti war and anti corrupt corporation since the days of Vietnam. Maybe it's a matter of how large the issue seems to the individual.
Skittles
(153,147 posts)yes INDEED
MisterP
(23,730 posts)iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)Russia is a large nation that's very involved with the world now...
there are plenty of ways to punish them without firing a shot... especially if Europe and the UN get involved as well...
personally I say everyone should squeeze them financially until the bread lines start to form again and putins dumbass is ban from politics.. but that's just me.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)over the Ukraine is batshit crazy.
vlakitti
(401 posts)The attempted whipped-up hysteria actually doesn't seem to be very effective these days.
More of a parody, actually, despite McCain and Lindsay being all over the loudmouth media mouthing the selfsame nonsense for the 8000th time this year.
In two weeks, this issue will reach "Benghazi!" level seriousness.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)Cheese4TheRat
(107 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Anyone else actually advocating that?
2banon
(7,321 posts)I won't id (please don't ask me to). I was stunned over the weekend to see/read calls for military action against Russia... but now I'm realizing it's on a small scale here i think..
As I write this response, I just heard on the radio a clip of McCain denouncing Russia, ending with "It Cannot Stand". ...
which reminds me that we have to hold war hawks in check even if they're in a minority.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Putin is a scumbucket's scumbucket, but going to war over the Ukraine? That would be Shrubya come again.
The diplomatic and economic toolboxes are opening as we speak, and though some may mock their use, they have a good track record. Putin is vulnerable to them, so they are the "hammer" for his "nail".
He didn't push so hard for three high-profile international events in a row in Sochi because he doesn't need money from, and influence over, the world community. He did so because he DOES need that money and influence.
Mkap
(223 posts)it's amazing how many people think that international politics is a dick measuring contest
Ohhhh boooohhooo we "don't look tough" compared to the rest of the world. SO what???? Fox news anchors with their five year old like maturity are clueless
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)TNNurse
(6,926 posts)John McCain, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush should go right now.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,173 posts)Just because those of us who are vocal about Russia's military incursion into Ukraine does not mean we automatically support US military intervention.
You're seriously strawmanning it.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)It's from "All Quiet on the Western Front." See the entire movie for further details.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Two nuclear powers mano a mano. The reich wing have been dyin for this forever! I mean...What could possibly go wrong?
The MIC would love it! Your kids die, theirs get even more rich!
And if Puttie goes all the way over the edge and decides to use those nukes..well...