General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsunblock
(52,413 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)elleng
(131,240 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Or maybe the cartoon's author should go back to grammar school.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)give any US Senator the pay check for an E-2, hell I'll by nice an E-7, and watch them stammer.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,054 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,054 posts)calimary
(81,551 posts)I was gonna add something about the incorrect spelling of "received" that caught my eye, but hell, my computer won't even let me type it the wrong way!
lastlib
(23,346 posts)The Senator in question is obviously a Democrat, because a Repuglikan has no heart to fail.
(I'll let the non-nazis among us stew over what the second error is......)
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)It only took me five reads to see it, and I am usually one of the people who finds this sort of thing distracting.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)lame54
(35,336 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,054 posts)Really, it takes so little effort to be careful.
Think about it in terms of time. If it takes cartoon readers an extra two seconds to stumble over the two grammar / spelling errors at the rate of one out of every two readers, and the cartoonist hopes to have 10,000 readers, then that is 10,000 seconds, or about three hours wasted. If the cartoonist invest a minute checking the text and ten minutes running it by a couple of friends, that is a tremendous gain for very little investment of time.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)most of the folks who have read and seen this are laughing.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,054 posts)"she was an incisive critic"
synonyms: penetrating, acute, sharp, sharp-witted, razor-sharp, keen, astute, trenchant, shrewd, piercing, cutting, perceptive, insightful, percipient, perspicacious, discerning, analytical, clever, smart, quick;
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)... that too many readers will focus on the typos rather than the message, or will disregard or even disparage the message altogether.
----------------
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Hell, my head USUALLY knows better, while my fingers are kinda dumb.
The cartoon is classic! Luved it!
whopis01
(3,528 posts)in any way at all?
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,054 posts)whopis01
(3,528 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,054 posts)whopis01
(3,528 posts)There really is no need to be rude. It does very little aid the discussion.
I understood your point about all the lost time. However, for me, it still does not take away from the message at all. The communication of the idea is accomplished equally well with or without the mistake.
Would it have been better on the author's part to have not had the mistake there? Certainly, at least for aesthetic purposes. Would it have taken much more effort to eliminate it? No, likely it would not have. I agree with you in that sense. However I still stand by my assertion that it does not take away from the message.
I think back to when I was in grad school and worked with a post-doc who was from China. He struggled quite a lot with English (at least for the first couple years he was here) and he could be quite difficult to understand. However, he was quite brilliant and once he got his message across the prior difficulties in no way took away from it.
I realize that is a bit more of an extreme example than a simple misspelling. But I think the idea that communication is more than and quite separate from the medium holds true for it.
But in the end this is, of course, just my opinion.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Godwins law all over it you Nazi's.
-p
Bandit
(21,475 posts)$6.25 for my first paycheck..I think things are a lot different now though. lol
sad-cafe
(1,277 posts)or hero soldiers do not get the recognition they deserve
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,054 posts)raven mad
(4,940 posts)and this is a GREAT cartoon.............
stage left
(2,967 posts)Frankly the senior senator from SC isn't worth E-2 pay. Nor the junior one either.