General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAP: Why Malaysia Airlines Jet Might Have Disappeared
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/why-malaysia-airlines-jet-might-have-disappearedWHY MALAYSIA AIRLINES JET MIGHT HAVE DISAPPEARED
By SCOTT MAYEROWITZ
Mar. 8, 2014 8:07 PM EST
NEW YORK (AP) The most dangerous parts of a flight are takeoff and landing. Rarely do incidents happen when a plane is cruising seven miles above the earth.
So the disappearance of a Malaysia Airlines jet well into its flight Saturday morning over the South China Sea has led aviation experts to assume that whatever happened was quick and left the pilots no time to place a distress call.
It could take investigators months, if not years, to determine what happened to the Boeing 777 flying from Malaysia's largest city of Kuala Lumpur to Beijing.
"At this early stage, we're focusing on the facts that we don't know," said Todd Curtis, a former safety engineer with Boeing who worked on its 777 wide-body jets and is now director of the Airsafe.com Foundation.
If there was a minor mechanical failure or even something more serious like the shutdown of both of the plane's engines the pilots likely would have had time to radio for help. The lack of a call "suggests something very sudden and very violent happened," said William Waldock, who teaches accident investigation at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, Ariz.
It initially appears that there was either an abrupt breakup of the plane or something that led it into a quick, steep dive. Some experts even suggested an act of terrorism or a pilot purposely crashing the jet.
"Either you had a catastrophic event that tore the airplane apart, or you had a criminal act," said Scott Hamilton, managing director of aviation consultancy Leeham Co. "It was so quick and they didn't radio."
MORE
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)They travel thousands of miles per hour.
Cha
(297,812 posts)Rest in Peace~
elleng
(131,203 posts)lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Cases terrorists want credit for their actions, and up to now that isn't happening
It is an awful accident. The only thing that can be said is that it appears to have happened so fast that hopefully there was no suffering for the passengers, though the families will suffer terribly
calimary
(81,527 posts)And there's a second report as well.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014749520
malaise
(269,219 posts)The plot thickens but we'll soon see them since there are CCTV tapes from the airport.
seattledo
(295 posts)This really is getting embarrassing.
Lex
(34,108 posts)It's weird there was no may-day call.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:16 AM - Edit history (1)
With no evidence, no crashed plane to look at, no CVR or FDR recovered and no radio calls, they got diddly at the moment.
If they seem to be grasping at straws its because that's all there is within reach.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Even with a total loss of power, they can pop out a ram air turbine to keep the thing going, if they can glide at all. It will provide hydraulic and electrical power on that model aircraft.
A complete lack of radio calls is unusual. Not impossible, but unusual.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,380 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)That post was.... premature. At best. No one knows why yet.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)violent" act? Unless you mean the security screenings were criminally inept.
My bet (and I've read extensively on airplane crashes), because of no pilot message, is an explosive device, aka, terrorism.
Lex
(34,108 posts)It's very odd.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Lex
(34,108 posts)Or a group. Or whether they are tall or short or medium height.
Logical
(22,457 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)mechanical or structural events that would prohibit them at least getting a mayday out.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)which has had battery problems but not any kind of in air disappearance like this one.
Does seem a strange event.
Maybe the passenger list will reveal more about who was on the plane for it to be a terrorist event.
Sad for all onboard though.
okaawhatever
(9,469 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)KoKo's post stated:
"It's a Boeing but seems to be an older model 777 not the Dreamliner" (The Dreamliner being the 787)
then continues with
"which has had battery problems..." (meaning the Dreamliner has had battery problems)
okaawhatever
(9,469 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Using a system that looks for flashes around the world, the Pentagon reviewed preliminary surveillance data from the area where the plane disappeared and saw no evidence of an explosion, said an American government official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the subject matter is classified.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Outside the aircraft. They are designed for instant depressurization and catastrophic failure. But even that would not instantly impact the pilot, giving them time for a mayday call but little else.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Even then it's not necessarily catastrophic.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Aloha Air Flight 243... Only one fatality and this was a severe mid-air decompression that landed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloha_Airlines_Flight_243
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Depressurization is certainly not a catastrophic event in and of itself. The structural integrity of the airframe is the primary requirement for keeping the plane from augering in.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Agence France-Presse ?@AFP 8m
#BREAKING: Malaysia probing possible terror link in jet mystery: minister
mokawanis
(4,453 posts)why aren't they finding debris in the ocean? Did the plane and every single thing on it just sink to the bottom?
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Not only do they not know the exact point of impact but they also are fighting the currents which carry away and disperse parts of the wreck.
It took several days to find any evidence of the Air France 447 crash under similar circumstance. Even then they only found bits and pieces.
mokawanis
(4,453 posts)My heart goes out to the family and friends who are waiting for answers.
okaawhatever
(9,469 posts)scattered for ten miles. That's once they find the debris field to begin with. Since they last had coordinates at 35k feet, and traveling at a speed of over 500 mph the search radius will be huge. It seems they've found the oil slick so that will help. Also, the speed on impact determines how far into the ocean the aircraft goes. Obviously, the deeper into the water, the harder to locate.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)and not sure of the last position equates to small parts scattered over hundreds of miles and carried on the tide.
Logical
(22,457 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Metal fatigue caused the fuselage to suddenly rip open.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)However, another difference is that this plane disappeared over water that is about 60 to 75 meters deep.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Namely, iced over pitot tubes which gave invalid airspeed measurements causing the flight computers to go a bit wonky. But the pilots seem to have overcorrected, assuming the computers were still in anti-stall mode, and stalled the aircraft.
The weather was not out of the ordinary for that region of airspace.
DinahMoeHum
(21,815 posts)"I know people want answers right away, but. . .critically, in a case like this, what we have to do is step back and realize we are not going to get an answer right away. . ."
Deep13
(39,154 posts)1. It crashed.
seem to be part of the discussion as well.
Lex
(34,108 posts)Genius.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Deep13
(39,154 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)To drop out of the sky something needs to happen to the plane's structure or it's engines.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)onenote
(42,782 posts)there likely would be a visible debris field on the surface of the sea.
Lex
(34,108 posts)may be part of the problem in finding the debris immediately?
RoverSuswade
(641 posts)There are supposed to be 12 of them around the globe.
longship
(40,416 posts)You never know!
Madam Mossfern
(2,340 posts)sucked into another dimension.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)@AP: BREAKING: Malaysian air force chief says radar indicates missing Boeing 777 may have turned back
m.twitter.com/AP
countryjake
(8,554 posts)http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/se-asia/story/missing-malaysia-airlines-plane-flight-mh370-could-have-made-turn-back-a
"Our main focus is to find the aircraft. There is a possibility that the plane had to make an air turn back so we have to expand the search area," he said.
The search area had expanded to the west coast of Malaysia.
He said Malaysia's Department of Civil Aviation and the Royal Malaysian Air Force were looking into the reasons for the turn back, and would announce their findings later.
He also said he spoke to Singapore's Defence Minister Dr Ng Eng Hen on Saturday who agreed to deploy three Singapore vessels to help with the search.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)something more sinister than just a crash. Who was on the plane, for example.
PCIntern
(25,601 posts)there were some significant folk on that plane.
mainer
(12,033 posts)I've flown it to Kuala Lumpur and to Vietnam, and was very impressed. I know a lot of business travelers who like to use this airline.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Actually almost all electronics were lost. They had a back up text message type thingy (I'm not a pilot) and the 1st mate first punched in that they were hijacked, then later corrected that it was no radio.
So if ccaptain here lost all nav and radio he would have been flying blind at night. If he turned around and was looking for hime he could have flown into the sea or a mountain.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)It transmits a 4 digit octal code that identifies the aircraft to ATC. 3 codes are reserved for emergencies. One is hijack, one is comm failure, and one is for all other emergencies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder_%28aviation%29#Code_Assignments
FreeJoe
(1,039 posts)Aren't we supposed to blame everything on him now? That commie terrorist makes me so mad!!!
RoverSuswade
(641 posts)President Obama.
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)( I am not one of them in this instance anyway BTW, merely reporting ) there were 20 Chinese and Malaysian employees ( Freescale? ) - who were working on semiconductor research for the US - aboard that plane.
The day before the crash, Thanh Hoa ( in Viet Nam ) airport declared it would be closed for five days (this is a military-turning-civilian airport I believe and is near the flight path ) ostensibly due to foggy conditions.
The CTers here say the plane was hijacked to Thanh Hoa so the Freescale employees could be kidnapped and tortured for information.
According to this theory, the Chinese are responsible and neither the plane nor the passengers will ever be seen again. This is why no terrorist organization is claiming responsibility.
I think the plane is on the bottom of the ocean or in the jungle, but it does seem like a strange set of circumstances surrounding the way this all unfolded. Those poor passengers and their families suffer either way.
anneboleyn
(5,611 posts)Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)50 miles south of Tho Chu island, in the same area where some slicks were seen Saturday.
Some have debunked but this could be it.
Although many ships pass through here and could cause oil slicks so there is that, too.
I sure hope they find it soon.