Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 10:54 PM Mar 2014

AP: Why Malaysia Airlines Jet Might Have Disappeared

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/why-malaysia-airlines-jet-might-have-disappeared

WHY MALAYSIA AIRLINES JET MIGHT HAVE DISAPPEARED
By SCOTT MAYEROWITZ
— Mar. 8, 2014 8:07 PM EST

NEW YORK (AP) — The most dangerous parts of a flight are takeoff and landing. Rarely do incidents happen when a plane is cruising seven miles above the earth.

So the disappearance of a Malaysia Airlines jet well into its flight Saturday morning over the South China Sea has led aviation experts to assume that whatever happened was quick and left the pilots no time to place a distress call.

It could take investigators months, if not years, to determine what happened to the Boeing 777 flying from Malaysia's largest city of Kuala Lumpur to Beijing.

"At this early stage, we're focusing on the facts that we don't know," said Todd Curtis, a former safety engineer with Boeing who worked on its 777 wide-body jets and is now director of the Airsafe.com Foundation.

If there was a minor mechanical failure — or even something more serious like the shutdown of both of the plane's engines — the pilots likely would have had time to radio for help. The lack of a call "suggests something very sudden and very violent happened," said William Waldock, who teaches accident investigation at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, Ariz.

It initially appears that there was either an abrupt breakup of the plane or something that led it into a quick, steep dive. Some experts even suggested an act of terrorism or a pilot purposely crashing the jet.

"Either you had a catastrophic event that tore the airplane apart, or you had a criminal act," said Scott Hamilton, managing director of aviation consultancy Leeham Co. "It was so quick and they didn't radio."

MORE
68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AP: Why Malaysia Airlines Jet Might Have Disappeared (Original Post) Hissyspit Mar 2014 OP
Any meteor sightings? Even one the size of a golf ball could wreck the plane. JaneyVee Mar 2014 #1
This is so strange.. those poor People. May Cha Mar 2014 #2
Passport Theft Adds to Mystery of Missing Malaysia Airlines Jet. elleng Mar 2014 #3
Based on the recent events in western China, terrorism is a definite possibility. However, in most lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #4
That's the part that bothers me. calimary Mar 2014 #12
The two passengers checked in together and both were heading for Amsterdam malaise Mar 2014 #46
Grasping at straws to blame anyone but themselves seattledo Mar 2014 #5
What do you think happened? Lex Mar 2014 #6
Why would you say that? A HERETIC I AM Mar 2014 #7
Because it's an ususual mode of failure. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #28
+1, n/t RKP5637 Mar 2014 #29
That doesn't address the comment in post 5 A HERETIC I AM Mar 2014 #40
I don't think I followed the comment chain correctly. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #42
You said this in another thread. Why would you think the company would be responsible for a "very WinkyDink Mar 2014 #9
But usually the terrorist group wants recognition. Lex Mar 2014 #11
Who says it's a group? WinkyDink Mar 2014 #49
The point is exactly the same whether one Lex Mar 2014 #60
Ok,genius, what is your prediction so I can bookmark it. nt Logical Mar 2014 #16
There are extremely few... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2014 #24
Who are "themselves"? Jenoch Mar 2014 #47
It's a Boeing but seems to be an older model 777 not the Dreamliner KoKo Mar 2014 #8
I think you may be confusing the 777 with the 787. It was the 787 that had the battery problems. nt okaawhatever Mar 2014 #18
I think you should read KoKo's post again... cherokeeprogressive Mar 2014 #43
Oh, okay got it. Thanks nt okaawhatever Mar 2014 #44
No flash was seen dreamnightwind Mar 2014 #10
A Small Explosion, Like A Shoe Bomb, Likely Would Not Produce A Detectible Flash DallasNE Mar 2014 #35
Instant depressurization requires a big hole Major Nikon Mar 2014 #48
See this... Agschmid Mar 2014 #56
I'm familiar with it Major Nikon Mar 2014 #57
Just grabbed this off of Twitter. octoberlib Mar 2014 #13
Might be a dumb question but mokawanis Mar 2014 #14
They are searching a massive area and don't know exactly where it impacted. Gravitycollapse Mar 2014 #15
Thank you for that information mokawanis Mar 2014 #17
One of the safety experts said that if the plane broke up in the air the debris field could be okaawhatever Mar 2014 #22
500 mph at 35,000 feet go west young man Mar 2014 #33
Fuel tank explosion like TWA 800! nt Logical Mar 2014 #19
Sudden disappearance over water is rare, but it happened in the early days of the Comet FarCenter Mar 2014 #20
It happened just a few years ago with Air France 447. Gravitycollapse Mar 2014 #21
In that case, there was very bad weather; in this case, flying conditions were fine. FarCenter Mar 2014 #23
Actually, 447 crashed due to pilot error combined with mechanical malfunction... Gravitycollapse Mar 2014 #30
Why not "Ask The Pilot"? - Patrick Smith DinahMoeHum Mar 2014 #25
here's a list of possibilities: Deep13 Mar 2014 #26
How and why Lex Mar 2014 #31
gravity nt Deep13 Mar 2014 #36
How a plane crashed = gravity? Lex Mar 2014 #39
What can I say, I'm a Renaissance man. Deep13 Mar 2014 #62
Like Steven Wright? "The sign said 'Breakfast Anytime', so I asked for eggs during the Renaissance." WinkyDink Mar 2014 #65
Sarah Palin, is that you? WinkyDink Mar 2014 #50
She doesn't believe in gravity because it is only a theory. nt Deep13 Mar 2014 #63
To crash something needs to get in the way. There aren't many hard objects in the sky. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #58
yup, then it runs into the ground or sea. nt Deep13 Mar 2014 #61
What is strange is that if there was a mid-air explosion over water onenote Mar 2014 #27
A large swath of ocean Lex Mar 2014 #32
Did this happen in one of the "Bermuda Triangle" areas? RoverSuswade Mar 2014 #34
Maybe an invisible flying big foot from a UFO pulled it down. longship Mar 2014 #37
I was thinking that.... Madam Mossfern Mar 2014 #52
@AP: BREAKING: Malaysian air force chief says radar indicates missing Boeing 777 may have turned bac Hissyspit Mar 2014 #38
So now they're searching on the west coast of Malaysia, too. countryjake Mar 2014 #41
Seems to me it could be xfundy Mar 2014 #45
Recall the passenger list from the Chicago crash many years ago... PCIntern Mar 2014 #51
Malaysia Airlines has good safety record and is a fine airline mainer Mar 2014 #53
A few years back a 777 lost all nav and radio due to coffee spill AngryAmish Mar 2014 #54
The "text message type thingy" sounds like the transponder Major Nikon Mar 2014 #59
Putin FreeJoe Mar 2014 #55
Sarah Palin and Linseed Graham are already blaming.... RoverSuswade Mar 2014 #64
According to some in the Extreme CT camp Tsiyu Mar 2014 #66
The BBC is reporting some debris sightings (apparently a door has been spotted) anneboleyn Mar 2014 #67
They did find a door which looks like a cabin door Tsiyu Mar 2014 #68
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
1. Any meteor sightings? Even one the size of a golf ball could wreck the plane.
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 10:56 PM
Mar 2014

They travel thousands of miles per hour.

lostincalifornia

(3,639 posts)
4. Based on the recent events in western China, terrorism is a definite possibility. However, in most
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 11:09 PM
Mar 2014

Cases terrorists want credit for their actions, and up to now that isn't happening

It is an awful accident. The only thing that can be said is that it appears to have happened so fast that hopefully there was no suffering for the passengers, though the families will suffer terribly

malaise

(269,219 posts)
46. The two passengers checked in together and both were heading for Amsterdam
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 07:27 AM
Mar 2014

The plot thickens but we'll soon see them since there are CCTV tapes from the airport.

A HERETIC I AM

(24,380 posts)
7. Why would you say that?
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 11:41 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:16 AM - Edit history (1)

With no evidence, no crashed plane to look at, no CVR or FDR recovered and no radio calls, they got diddly at the moment.

If they seem to be grasping at straws its because that's all there is within reach.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
28. Because it's an ususual mode of failure.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:45 AM
Mar 2014

Even with a total loss of power, they can pop out a ram air turbine to keep the thing going, if they can glide at all. It will provide hydraulic and electrical power on that model aircraft.

A complete lack of radio calls is unusual. Not impossible, but unusual.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
42. I don't think I followed the comment chain correctly.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 02:36 AM
Mar 2014

That post was.... premature. At best. No one knows why yet.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
9. You said this in another thread. Why would you think the company would be responsible for a "very
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 11:46 PM
Mar 2014

violent" act? Unless you mean the security screenings were criminally inept.

My bet (and I've read extensively on airplane crashes), because of no pilot message, is an explosive device, aka, terrorism.

Lex

(34,108 posts)
60. The point is exactly the same whether one
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:22 PM
Mar 2014

Or a group. Or whether they are tall or short or medium height.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
24. There are extremely few...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:29 AM
Mar 2014

mechanical or structural events that would prohibit them at least getting a mayday out.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
8. It's a Boeing but seems to be an older model 777 not the Dreamliner
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 11:44 PM
Mar 2014

which has had battery problems but not any kind of in air disappearance like this one.

Does seem a strange event.

Maybe the passenger list will reveal more about who was on the plane for it to be a terrorist event.

Sad for all onboard though.

okaawhatever

(9,469 posts)
18. I think you may be confusing the 777 with the 787. It was the 787 that had the battery problems. nt
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:11 AM
Mar 2014
 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
43. I think you should read KoKo's post again...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 02:45 AM
Mar 2014

KoKo's post stated:

"It's a Boeing but seems to be an older model 777 not the Dreamliner" (The Dreamliner being the 787)

then continues with

"which has had battery problems..." (meaning the Dreamliner has had battery problems)

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
10. No flash was seen
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 11:55 PM
Mar 2014
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/09/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-flight.html?hp&_r=0

Using a system that looks for flashes around the world, the Pentagon reviewed preliminary surveillance data from the area where the plane disappeared and saw no evidence of an explosion, said an American government official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the subject matter is classified.


DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
35. A Small Explosion, Like A Shoe Bomb, Likely Would Not Produce A Detectible Flash
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:38 AM
Mar 2014

Outside the aircraft. They are designed for instant depressurization and catastrophic failure. But even that would not instantly impact the pilot, giving them time for a mayday call but little else.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
57. I'm familiar with it
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 09:36 AM
Mar 2014

Depressurization is certainly not a catastrophic event in and of itself. The structural integrity of the airframe is the primary requirement for keeping the plane from augering in.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
13. Just grabbed this off of Twitter.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:00 AM
Mar 2014
https://twitter.com/AFP

Agence France-Presse ?@AFP 8m
#BREAKING: Malaysia probing possible terror link in jet mystery: minister

mokawanis

(4,453 posts)
14. Might be a dumb question but
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:01 AM
Mar 2014

why aren't they finding debris in the ocean? Did the plane and every single thing on it just sink to the bottom?

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
15. They are searching a massive area and don't know exactly where it impacted.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:04 AM
Mar 2014

Not only do they not know the exact point of impact but they also are fighting the currents which carry away and disperse parts of the wreck.

It took several days to find any evidence of the Air France 447 crash under similar circumstance. Even then they only found bits and pieces.

okaawhatever

(9,469 posts)
22. One of the safety experts said that if the plane broke up in the air the debris field could be
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:25 AM
Mar 2014

scattered for ten miles. That's once they find the debris field to begin with. Since they last had coordinates at 35k feet, and traveling at a speed of over 500 mph the search radius will be huge. It seems they've found the oil slick so that will help. Also, the speed on impact determines how far into the ocean the aircraft goes. Obviously, the deeper into the water, the harder to locate.

 

go west young man

(4,856 posts)
33. 500 mph at 35,000 feet
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:05 AM
Mar 2014

and not sure of the last position equates to small parts scattered over hundreds of miles and carried on the tide.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
20. Sudden disappearance over water is rare, but it happened in the early days of the Comet
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:17 AM
Mar 2014
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Comet#Operational_history

Metal fatigue caused the fuselage to suddenly rip open.
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
23. In that case, there was very bad weather; in this case, flying conditions were fine.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:28 AM
Mar 2014

However, another difference is that this plane disappeared over water that is about 60 to 75 meters deep.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
30. Actually, 447 crashed due to pilot error combined with mechanical malfunction...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:49 AM
Mar 2014

Namely, iced over pitot tubes which gave invalid airspeed measurements causing the flight computers to go a bit wonky. But the pilots seem to have overcorrected, assuming the computers were still in anti-stall mode, and stalled the aircraft.

The weather was not out of the ordinary for that region of airspace.

DinahMoeHum

(21,815 posts)
25. Why not "Ask The Pilot"? - Patrick Smith
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:31 AM
Mar 2014
http://globalnews.ca/video/1196335/interview-pilot-patrick-smith-comments-on-missing-malaysian-plane


"I know people want answers right away, but. . .critically, in a case like this, what we have to do is step back and realize we are not going to get an answer right away. . ."
 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
65. Like Steven Wright? "The sign said 'Breakfast Anytime', so I asked for eggs during the Renaissance."
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:14 PM
Mar 2014

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
58. To crash something needs to get in the way. There aren't many hard objects in the sky.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 09:39 AM
Mar 2014

To drop out of the sky something needs to happen to the plane's structure or it's engines.

onenote

(42,782 posts)
27. What is strange is that if there was a mid-air explosion over water
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:34 AM
Mar 2014

there likely would be a visible debris field on the surface of the sea.

RoverSuswade

(641 posts)
34. Did this happen in one of the "Bermuda Triangle" areas?
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:24 AM
Mar 2014

There are supposed to be 12 of them around the globe.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
38. @AP: BREAKING: Malaysian air force chief says radar indicates missing Boeing 777 may have turned bac
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:54 AM
Mar 2014

@AP: BREAKING: Malaysian air force chief says radar indicates missing Boeing 777 may have turned back

m.twitter.com/AP

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
41. So now they're searching on the west coast of Malaysia, too.
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 02:12 AM
Mar 2014
Missing Malaysia Airlines plane: Flight MH370 could have made a turn back, says Hishammuddin
http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/se-asia/story/missing-malaysia-airlines-plane-flight-mh370-could-have-made-turn-back-a

"Our main focus is to find the aircraft. There is a possibility that the plane had to make an air turn back so we have to expand the search area," he said.

The search area had expanded to the west coast of Malaysia.

He said Malaysia's Department of Civil Aviation and the Royal Malaysian Air Force were looking into the reasons for the turn back, and would announce their findings later.

He also said he spoke to Singapore's Defence Minister Dr Ng Eng Hen on Saturday who agreed to deploy three Singapore vessels to help with the search.

PCIntern

(25,601 posts)
51. Recall the passenger list from the Chicago crash many years ago...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:09 AM
Mar 2014

there were some significant folk on that plane.

mainer

(12,033 posts)
53. Malaysia Airlines has good safety record and is a fine airline
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 09:04 AM
Mar 2014

I've flown it to Kuala Lumpur and to Vietnam, and was very impressed. I know a lot of business travelers who like to use this airline.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
54. A few years back a 777 lost all nav and radio due to coffee spill
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 09:21 AM
Mar 2014

Actually almost all electronics were lost. They had a back up text message type thingy (I'm not a pilot) and the 1st mate first punched in that they were hijacked, then later corrected that it was no radio.

So if ccaptain here lost all nav and radio he would have been flying blind at night. If he turned around and was looking for hime he could have flown into the sea or a mountain.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
59. The "text message type thingy" sounds like the transponder
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 09:50 AM
Mar 2014

It transmits a 4 digit octal code that identifies the aircraft to ATC. 3 codes are reserved for emergencies. One is hijack, one is comm failure, and one is for all other emergencies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder_%28aviation%29#Code_Assignments

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
66. According to some in the Extreme CT camp
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:36 PM
Mar 2014

( I am not one of them in this instance anyway BTW, merely reporting ) there were 20 Chinese and Malaysian employees ( Freescale? ) - who were working on semiconductor research for the US - aboard that plane.

The day before the crash, Thanh Hoa ( in Viet Nam ) airport declared it would be closed for five days (this is a military-turning-civilian airport I believe and is near the flight path ) ostensibly due to foggy conditions.

The CTers here say the plane was hijacked to Thanh Hoa so the Freescale employees could be kidnapped and tortured for information.

According to this theory, the Chinese are responsible and neither the plane nor the passengers will ever be seen again. This is why no terrorist organization is claiming responsibility.

I think the plane is on the bottom of the ocean or in the jungle, but it does seem like a strange set of circumstances surrounding the way this all unfolded. Those poor passengers and their families suffer either way.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
68. They did find a door which looks like a cabin door
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 08:52 PM
Mar 2014

50 miles south of Tho Chu island, in the same area where some slicks were seen Saturday.
Some have debunked but this could be it.

Although many ships pass through here and could cause oil slicks so there is that, too.

I sure hope they find it soon.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AP: Why Malaysia Airlines...