General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRunning out of bullshit isn't the same thing as "being shut up".
So, there you go.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)It seems you never run out of bullshit.
nicely put!
love you too, cyberswede!
herding cats
(19,564 posts)It has no context if so, which makes it read like a reply to an ongoing discussion.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)to such a large number of conversations (and not just on DU) that it seems to me to be worth pointing out as a general observation.
herding cats
(19,564 posts)I almost posted a reply as an OP the other day and thought maybe you had that happen here.
Carry on.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)a wall?
Bryant
sibelian
(7,804 posts)...but I imagine that in the first case it might be that one's hypothetical advocate has failed to notice that their position isn't being lent the credence the advocate feels it deserves because their correpsondent actually already knows better and the advocate hasn't noticed, and in the second one's hypothetical advocate is up against someone who is just pig-ignorant and can't be bothered paying attention.
The difference would seem to me to depend largely on the advocate's perceptions of the correspondent, not the position advocated.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)they run out of bullshit, but when I give up arguing with someone, that's me refusing to bang my head against a wall.
Bryant
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I was more considering the possibility that it's easy to mistake uninformed ignorance for informed disagreement.