General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBelgianMadCow
(5,379 posts)but the occasional kick,
for truth
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)sad-cafe
(1,277 posts)you just find all sorts of crunchy stuff
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)sad-cafe
(1,277 posts)trying to relate
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I have read it too many times to count.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)and the sad death of Jay Polk in Syria.
sad-cafe
(1,277 posts)add it to the list.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)Does this have any meaning for you?

morningfog
(18,115 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Doesn't feel that way sometimes...
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:49 PM - Edit history (2)
more protective, want to save their Master's house from fire more than their own, or their neighbor's, here. One does that math and it is overwhelming.
That's why it feels that way. Because it is that way. And that's where the work has to be done...
mountain grammy
(29,035 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)tea and oranges
(396 posts)and one hell of a powerful writer.
1984 has a positive ending (often omitted from different editions of the book, never mentioned in the movie): The proles take over & create the type of society where there is academic discussion. We know this b/c 1984, it turns out, w/in the conceit of the novel, is just that - an academic publication detailing what went wrong back in 1984.
(OK, admittedly, the happy ending Does Not make it a comedy.)
Brigid
(17,621 posts)tea and oranges
(396 posts)which is why I brought it up, give me some time to locate my copy & I'll give you the isbn & edition details.
It's the difference between despair & belief in the human spirit.
tea and oranges
(396 posts)ISBN: 0-452-28423-6
This is the Centennial Edition, 2003, published by Plume/Harcourt Brace. Forward by Thomas Pynchon.
It includes a final chapter, or appendix, if you will, titled: The Appendix: The Principles of Newspeak.
This final chapter is the scholarly paper which dissects Newspeak, in which the reader is allowed to know what transpired. In the cited edition it is 15 pages of text.
whopis01
(3,919 posts)While the movie did not include it I have never come across an edition of the book that omitted it. And while I obviously can't claim to have seen all versions I have several published over several decades.
tea and oranges
(396 posts)I've been remiss in assuming, since no one I've spoken w/ who has read the book seems to be aware of this Appendix & it's not in the movie, that it's been left out in some editions.
Foolish of me.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)I guess I just didn't realize it implied a sort-of happy ending.
tea and oranges
(396 posts)Was making a (OK, bad) joke about the classic definition of comedy, happy ending & all. A definition out of use today.
But the Appendix clearly indicates that society was able to bring itself out of the death spiral it was in & return to where an intellectual assessment of Newspeak is possible.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Let's hear it for the prophet Eric Blair.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)We will need 'trigger' warnings for every subject that anybody has an emotional reaction to. NPR did a spot about it today. Effing tiresome.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)Orwell's essays are even better than his novel and should be mandatory reading for anyone who wants to write...he really understood things.
George Orwell
jwirr
(39,215 posts)read it in high school literature. They asked me to read it and help them understand it. What we all learned was that the book has an unforgettable plot that unfortunately has pretty much come true.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And I still have not read them all, but I particularly like the ones dealing with the use of the English language.
Seeking Serenity
(3,322 posts)It's from the same essay.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)If it is in his work, I sure don't know where. Do you?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I just put it in my sig line attributed to him so I hope so.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)ReRe
(12,189 posts)That is the dog's honest truth isn't it? Describes this country to a "T", and even to the divisions here on DU. People won't face the truth, the facts, but they will believe every word that drifts from certain lying lips.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #24)
Name removed Message auto-removed
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Disown him just because he and mom always liked Mika best.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)like your last name being Smith and you meeting another smith.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Because what we think is true is not what the right-wing tea-party nutsos think is true.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)rarely recognize it."
OnlinePoker
(6,127 posts)The pugs think their side is and we hate them for it. They hate our opinions even though we think we're correct. How do you determine what is truth and what isn't when you oppose the belief's of someone so diametrically opposed to you?
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Global Climate Change = truth
Widest income disparity in a century = truth
Worst, least popular health care in the advanced world = truth
the truth is not subject to any versions, regardless of what Big Media says.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)One side says tax cuts for the 1% creates jobs, the other says they don't.
One side says a prosperous middle class and a living wage for everyone plus a social safety net leads to a dynamic capitalist economy, the other side says tax cuts for the 1% are better.
One side said WMD would be found in Iraq, the other says they wouldn't.
Which one is telling the truth? Or is the truth somewhere inbetween?
Time and again the conservative and RW experts are proven wrong. They live in a world of make believe. They believe in forcing their perception on everyone else regardless of the reality. It does work for a while but eventually reality bites back. It's better to work with the world as it is and try to make improvements instead of forcing a faith-based ideology onto it.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)That's how you can discern, with a high degree of confidence, what is truth. The reactionaries have an aversion to empirical evidence. The Left, while perhaps having an agenda, does try and use empirical evidence to advance said agenda.
Seeking Serenity
(3,322 posts)From his 1947 essay "On Nationalism." (In my mind, it would have been better titled, "On Tribalism."
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)"the hanging" is like a most.
diabeticman
(3,121 posts)important.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)" No source for this quote among Orwell's writings has yet been located, and neither has any published source been found."
He did say this:
"The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable". The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Petain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality."
And this, since it is so oddly topical:
"Of course, fanatical Communists and Russophiles generally can be respected, even if they are mistaken. But for people like ourselves, who suspect that something has gone very wrong with the Soviet Union, I consider that willingness to criticize Russia and Stalin is the test of intellectual honesty. It is the only thing that from a literary intellectual's point of view is really dangerous."
Letter to John Middleton Murry (5 August 1944),
1944 was the year Stalin deported the Tatars from Crimea, resulting in today's trumpeted 'Russian Crimea, always Russian, always'.......so Orwell, he was not playing.
840high
(17,196 posts)The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those that ...
www.quoteyard.com/the-further-a-society-drifts-from-truth-the-more-it-...
The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those that speak it. George Orwell ... Suggest a Revision,
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)
- Concomitant with that quote is this one:
[center]
[/center]gulliver
(13,985 posts)So this quotation is useless for discerning truth.
Corruption Inc
(1,568 posts)Rec'd!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Stop contributing to it by saying this condition doesn't exist!
Berlum
(7,044 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:03 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.realistnews.net/Thread-realist-news-was-the-capital-gains-tax-just-removed-regarding-bullion
http://www.conservativecrusader.com/articles/stopping-truth-at-the-border-banning-michael-savage-from-britain
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/duke/090506
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Orwell
People post all kinds of made-up shit on Facebook. Surely, a journalist wouldn't post something from Facebook without confirming it was accurate. Right?
Edit: bnw beat me to it upthread.
Sid
pintobean
(18,101 posts)for some, doesn't apply.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Got a non-denial denial.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Brickbat
(19,339 posts)nilesobek
(1,423 posts)has deemed 1984, "inappropriate," and removed from shelves. They have done the same thing with some books by Philip K. Dick, Kurt Vonnegut and many, many others.
The memory hole is a possible grim future for Orwell's signature story.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Is already happening
bvar22
(39,909 posts)They had quite the festival,
naturally targeting Liberals, Pacifists, Anti-Interventionists,
and anybody who just wants more information before jumping in with the Freedom Bombs.

The "logic" is very simple:
[font size=3]Putin is BAD
so the other guys MUST be GOOD![/font]
Progressive dog
(7,603 posts)is apparently falsely attributed.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)Progressive dog
(7,603 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,276 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)That may become my next sig line.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)seems to me that is the basis for many arguements
