Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
George Orwell (Original Post) nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 OP
this could be a silent thread with lots of recs BelgianMadCow Mar 2014 #1
true nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #13
wow sad-cafe Mar 2014 #2
crunchy? hrmjustin Mar 2014 #5
using the OP's famous term sad-cafe Mar 2014 #7
I have never seen that. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #8
really? sad-cafe Mar 2014 #9
Maybe I just didn't notice. What did you version of crunchy mean? hrmjustin Mar 2014 #11
It predates The Great Mexico City Hail Storm pintobean Mar 2014 #16
oh I had forgotten that sad-cafe Mar 2014 #53
oh you have a list? hrmjustin Mar 2014 #55
That was before your time pintobean Mar 2014 #61
What was your DU screen name at that time? morningfog Mar 2014 #62
........ daleanime Mar 2014 #69
Heh, that explains the unmatched popularity of hippy punching Fumesucker Mar 2014 #3
They're really quite small in number n/t Oilwellian Mar 2014 #4
All the Republicans and 95% of the Democrats? Fumesucker Mar 2014 #6
"They" are small in number only if one doesn't count those who are jtuck004 Mar 2014 #10
The man understood the nature of society better than most. mountain grammy Mar 2014 #12
That he did nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #14
Orwell was a genius tea and oranges Mar 2014 #15
I have never seen or heard of this ending anywhere. Brigid Mar 2014 #37
Many people haven't tea and oranges Mar 2014 #42
OK, Brigid, Book in Hand (it wasn't hard to find after all) tea and oranges Mar 2014 #43
I have never seen a copy of 1984 that did not have the appendix whopis01 Mar 2014 #47
I'm sure you're right tea and oranges Mar 2014 #54
I have "The Principles of Newspeak" in my edition. Brigid Mar 2014 #52
Hardly Happy tea and oranges Mar 2014 #82
Thank you for this! (EOM) Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2014 #77
My man Orwell Jack Rabbit Mar 2014 #17
He was indeed nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #18
K&R friendly_iconoclast Mar 2014 #19
Yep libodem Mar 2014 #20
I will have to go look for that, sounds fascinating nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #21
Kick and recommended zeemike Mar 2014 #22
Where would I find his essays? I read 1984 because my sister and her friends were required to jwirr Mar 2014 #30
Here is one place on line... zeemike Mar 2014 #35
Read my sig, Zee. Seeking Serenity Mar 2014 #34
And it is a hell of a good sig line too... zeemike Mar 2014 #36
I don't think the quote in the OP is actually Orwell. Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #41
Searching it does come up as Orwell everywhere but things do spread like wildfire on the internet. cui bono Mar 2014 #79
That's an interesting quote. And proven to be true even here on DU. n/t cui bono Mar 2014 #75
Thanks, nadine... ReRe Mar 2014 #23
Yup nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #25
nope nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #27
Sure pinboy3niner Mar 2014 #28
Well, he might be such a very distant uncle nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #32
K&R Aerows Mar 2014 #26
So, what's the truth? Drunken Irishman Mar 2014 #29
"Those dedicated to twisting the truth to suit their own purposes Aerows Mar 2014 #39
Problem is, how do you know which truth is correct? OnlinePoker Mar 2014 #31
Evolution = truth Doctor_J Mar 2014 #50
But we have to tell both sides. Otherwise it wouldn't be fair. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #59
One person says water is wet, the other says water is dry. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #67
Empirical evidence ... Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2014 #78
Read my sig. That's one of his quotes. Seeking Serenity Mar 2014 #33
Yup. I have read some of his early fiction nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #46
My wife will be adding this quote to a notebook she has that have all kinds of quotes she finds diabeticman Mar 2014 #38
Except it's not George Orwell.... Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #40
read 840high Mar 2014 #56
+1...nt SidDithers Mar 2014 #68
Holy shit! That explains a few things. Watch for blind anger and vitriol. nt GoneFishin Mar 2014 #44
Some of us expect it anymore, sadly nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #45
, blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #48
K&R DeSwiss Mar 2014 #49
True, except people also hate falsehood. gulliver Mar 2014 #51
What, no kitty cat in that boat picture? LOL Corruption Inc Mar 2014 #57
K&R! What George said is becoming more obvious with every passing day. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #58
. Berlum Mar 2014 #60
The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those that speak it. SidDithers Mar 2014 #63
Once bitten, twice shy pintobean Mar 2014 #64
Called Orwell's base commander. Codeine Mar 2014 #65
SOP in these situations...nt SidDithers Mar 2014 #70
My favorite, by far. Brickbat Mar 2014 #71
Unlikely a writer of his skills would ever say "those that speak it." Brickbat Mar 2014 #66
The head librarian in this town nilesobek Mar 2014 #72
The rewriting of history nadinbrzezinski Mar 2014 #76
The Two Minutes of Hate lasted all day yesterday. bvar22 Mar 2014 #73
It is funny that a quote about truth Progressive dog Mar 2014 #74
The content is gold no matter if Goofy said it. TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #81
No It Isn't, it is meaningless Progressive dog Mar 2014 #84
K&R! colsohlibgal Mar 2014 #80
Good one! KamaAina Mar 2014 #83
Indeed. blackspade Mar 2014 #85
I think the argument then goes to "Who's Truth" demtenjeep Mar 2014 #86
 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
16. It predates The Great Mexico City Hail Storm
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:59 PM
Mar 2014

and the sad death of Jay Polk in Syria.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
10. "They" are small in number only if one doesn't count those who are
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:43 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:49 PM - Edit history (2)

more protective, want to save their Master's house from fire more than their own, or their neighbor's, here. One does that math and it is overwhelming.

That's why it feels that way. Because it is that way. And that's where the work has to be done...

tea and oranges

(396 posts)
15. Orwell was a genius
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 06:57 PM
Mar 2014

and one hell of a powerful writer.

1984 has a positive ending (often omitted from different editions of the book, never mentioned in the movie): The proles take over & create the type of society where there is academic discussion. We know this b/c 1984, it turns out, w/in the conceit of the novel, is just that - an academic publication detailing what went wrong back in 1984.

(OK, admittedly, the happy ending Does Not make it a comedy.)

tea and oranges

(396 posts)
42. Many people haven't
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:18 PM
Mar 2014

which is why I brought it up, give me some time to locate my copy & I'll give you the isbn & edition details.

It's the difference between despair & belief in the human spirit.

tea and oranges

(396 posts)
43. OK, Brigid, Book in Hand (it wasn't hard to find after all)
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:55 PM
Mar 2014

ISBN: 0-452-28423-6

This is the Centennial Edition, 2003, published by Plume/Harcourt Brace. Forward by Thomas Pynchon.

It includes a final chapter, or appendix, if you will, titled: The Appendix: The Principles of Newspeak.

This final chapter is the scholarly paper which dissects Newspeak, in which the reader is allowed to know what transpired. In the cited edition it is 15 pages of text.

whopis01

(3,919 posts)
47. I have never seen a copy of 1984 that did not have the appendix
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 10:22 PM
Mar 2014

While the movie did not include it I have never come across an edition of the book that omitted it. And while I obviously can't claim to have seen all versions I have several published over several decades.

tea and oranges

(396 posts)
54. I'm sure you're right
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 11:29 PM
Mar 2014

I've been remiss in assuming, since no one I've spoken w/ who has read the book seems to be aware of this Appendix & it's not in the movie, that it's been left out in some editions.

Foolish of me.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
52. I have "The Principles of Newspeak" in my edition.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 11:21 PM
Mar 2014

I guess I just didn't realize it implied a sort-of happy ending.

tea and oranges

(396 posts)
82. Hardly Happy
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:19 PM
Mar 2014

Was making a (OK, bad) joke about the classic definition of comedy, happy ending & all. A definition out of use today.

But the Appendix clearly indicates that society was able to bring itself out of the death spiral it was in & return to where an intellectual assessment of Newspeak is possible.


libodem

(19,288 posts)
20. Yep
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:32 PM
Mar 2014

We will need 'trigger' warnings for every subject that anybody has an emotional reaction to. NPR did a spot about it today. Effing tiresome.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
22. Kick and recommended
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 07:46 PM
Mar 2014

Orwell's essays are even better than his novel and should be mandatory reading for anyone who wants to write...he really understood things.

The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.

George Orwell

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
30. Where would I find his essays? I read 1984 because my sister and her friends were required to
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:43 PM
Mar 2014

read it in high school literature. They asked me to read it and help them understand it. What we all learned was that the book has an unforgettable plot that unfortunately has pretty much come true.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
35. Here is one place on line...
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:49 PM
Mar 2014
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks03/0300011h.html

And I still have not read them all, but I particularly like the ones dealing with the use of the English language.
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
41. I don't think the quote in the OP is actually Orwell.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:12 PM
Mar 2014

If it is in his work, I sure don't know where. Do you?

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
79. Searching it does come up as Orwell everywhere but things do spread like wildfire on the internet.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:00 PM
Mar 2014

I just put it in my sig line attributed to him so I hope so.

ReRe

(12,189 posts)
23. Thanks, nadine...
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:20 PM
Mar 2014

That is the dog's honest truth isn't it? Describes this country to a "T", and even to the divisions here on DU. People won't face the truth, the facts, but they will believe every word that drifts from certain lying lips.

Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #24)

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
32. Well, he might be such a very distant uncle
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:46 PM
Mar 2014

like your last name being Smith and you meeting another smith.



 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
29. So, what's the truth?
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:40 PM
Mar 2014

Because what we think is true is not what the right-wing tea-party nutsos think is true.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
39. "Those dedicated to twisting the truth to suit their own purposes
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:00 PM
Mar 2014

rarely recognize it."

OnlinePoker

(6,127 posts)
31. Problem is, how do you know which truth is correct?
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:45 PM
Mar 2014

The pugs think their side is and we hate them for it. They hate our opinions even though we think we're correct. How do you determine what is truth and what isn't when you oppose the belief's of someone so diametrically opposed to you?

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
50. Evolution = truth
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 11:03 PM
Mar 2014

Global Climate Change = truth

Widest income disparity in a century = truth

Worst, least popular health care in the advanced world = truth

the truth is not subject to any versions, regardless of what Big Media says.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
67. One person says water is wet, the other says water is dry.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 09:45 AM
Mar 2014
Which one is telling the truth? Or is the truth somewhere inbetween?

One side says tax cuts for the 1% creates jobs, the other says they don't.

One side says a prosperous middle class and a living wage for everyone plus a social safety net leads to a dynamic capitalist economy, the other side says tax cuts for the 1% are better.

One side said WMD would be found in Iraq, the other says they wouldn't.



Which one is telling the truth? Or is the truth somewhere inbetween?

Time and again the conservative and RW experts are proven wrong. They live in a world of make believe. They believe in forcing their perception on everyone else regardless of the reality. It does work for a while but eventually reality bites back. It's better to work with the world as it is and try to make improvements instead of forcing a faith-based ideology onto it.

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
78. Empirical evidence ...
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 03:20 PM
Mar 2014

That's how you can discern, with a high degree of confidence, what is truth. The reactionaries have an aversion to empirical evidence. The Left, while perhaps having an agenda, does try and use empirical evidence to advance said agenda.

Seeking Serenity

(3,322 posts)
33. Read my sig. That's one of his quotes.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:47 PM
Mar 2014

From his 1947 essay "On Nationalism." (In my mind, it would have been better titled, "On Tribalism.&quot

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
38. My wife will be adding this quote to a notebook she has that have all kinds of quotes she finds
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:59 PM
Mar 2014

important.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
40. Except it's not George Orwell....
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:05 PM
Mar 2014

" No source for this quote among Orwell's writings has yet been located, and neither has any published source been found."

He did say this:
"The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable". The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Petain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality."

And this, since it is so oddly topical:
"Of course, fanatical Communists and Russophiles generally can be respected, even if they are mistaken. But for people like ourselves, who suspect that something has gone very wrong with the Soviet Union, I consider that willingness to criticize Russia and Stalin is the test of intellectual honesty. It is the only thing that from a literary intellectual's point of view is really dangerous."
Letter to John Middleton Murry (5 August 1944),
1944 was the year Stalin deported the Tatars from Crimea, resulting in today's trumpeted 'Russian Crimea, always Russian, always'.......so Orwell, he was not playing.

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
56. read
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 11:58 PM
Mar 2014

The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those that ...
www.quoteyard.com/the-further-a-society-drifts-from-truth-the-more-it-...‎
The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those that speak it. George Orwell ... Suggest a Revision,

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
49. K&R
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 10:58 PM
Mar 2014
- Concomitant with that quote is this one:

''The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.'' ~George Orwell


[center][/center]

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
58. K&R! What George said is becoming more obvious with every passing day.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:12 AM
Mar 2014

Stop contributing to it by saying this condition doesn't exist!

SidDithers

(44,333 posts)
63. The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:28 AM
Mar 2014

Last edited Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:03 AM - Edit history (1)

No source for this quote among Orwell's writings has yet been located, and neither has any published source been found. Earliest source found on the Web was in a February 14, 2011, post from Jsnip4 on the RealistNews.net forum: [3]. Prior to that, an opinion piece by Selwyn Duke dated May 6, 2009, which includes an alleged quote from Orwell, had used these words in the final paragraph, but did not give them as a quote and did not attribute them to Orwell.[4][5]

http://www.realistnews.net/Thread-realist-news-was-the-capital-gains-tax-just-removed-regarding-bullion
http://www.conservativecrusader.com/articles/stopping-truth-at-the-border-banning-michael-savage-from-britain
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/duke/090506


http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Orwell


People post all kinds of made-up shit on Facebook. Surely, a journalist wouldn't post something from Facebook without confirming it was accurate. Right?

Edit: bnw beat me to it upthread.

Sid

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
72. The head librarian in this town
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 12:42 PM
Mar 2014

has deemed 1984, "inappropriate," and removed from shelves. They have done the same thing with some books by Philip K. Dick, Kurt Vonnegut and many, many others.

The memory hole is a possible grim future for Orwell's signature story.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
73. The Two Minutes of Hate lasted all day yesterday.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 02:54 PM
Mar 2014

They had quite the festival,
naturally targeting Liberals, Pacifists, Anti-Interventionists,
and anybody who just wants more information before jumping in with the Freedom Bombs.


The "logic" is very simple:
[font size=3]Putin is BAD
so the other guys MUST be GOOD![/font]


 

demtenjeep

(31,997 posts)
86. I think the argument then goes to "Who's Truth"
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:09 PM
Mar 2014

seems to me that is the basis for many arguements

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»George Orwell