Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did the USA face sanctions for illegally invading Iraq? (Original Post) quinnox Mar 2014 OP
That was different Fumesucker Mar 2014 #1
Yup, the hypocrisy is THAT blatant. n/t JimDandy Mar 2014 #2
Glad I'm not the only one that sees it quinnox Mar 2014 #10
No, but we SHOULD have. baldguy Mar 2014 #3
There was some talk about dropping the petrodollar 1000words Mar 2014 #4
What is the point in this line of discussion? cthulu2016 Mar 2014 #5
Just asking a question quinnox Mar 2014 #9
"Just asking a question". Yeah, right. jazzimov Mar 2014 #35
It does make listening to John Kerry argue the moral high ground hilarious davekriss Mar 2014 #32
Of course not malaise Mar 2014 #6
We are exceptional. L0oniX Mar 2014 #7
That was an exceptionally evil pack of neocons that invaded Iraq Whisp Mar 2014 #21
Yes. But the fact remains that our leaders ran amok and there was no international response. LiberalAndProud Mar 2014 #30
No, but our economy went in the toilet. Downwinder Mar 2014 #8
Well, ProSense Mar 2014 #11
Technically we did not go about it as brazen as Putin..please do not misunderstand me. Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #12
How do you think the vote to join the US would have gone down? grahamhgreen Mar 2014 #13
ha ha, probably not very well but good question. Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #15
Agreed. But our boys and girls have proven they are usually wrong. So I choose the least expensive grahamhgreen Mar 2014 #25
Oh I hope we do the smart thing..but we'll be a player on some level. Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #29
Really? LisaL Mar 2014 #16
One of the many distinctions is that we did not annex Iraq..that is important. Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #17
No, we just annexed their oil fields. grahamhgreen Mar 2014 #26
There are distinctions..and they do not amount to excuses for our horrific actions..sorry. n./t Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #28
Technically, Russia didn't annex Crimea either. cheapdate Mar 2014 #38
I think that's a stretch, considering his first moves and the control he will end up with. Jefferson23 Mar 2014 #39
No, but they should have. GeorgeGist Mar 2014 #14
The sanctions the US stated today were against individuals. Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #18
IOKIYAR. madinmaryland Mar 2014 #19
It should've. nt Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #20
Still the Russians should face sanctions treestar Mar 2014 #22
"we were fooled about WMD" Really? Not me, and not millions of others. quinnox Mar 2014 #46
+ millions. Truth. nationalize the fed Mar 2014 #50
Well as a country we were and that was the excuse treestar Mar 2014 #58
there was all this UN activity steve2470 Mar 2014 #23
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #41
Technically it wasn't illegal because they had approval from the security council davidn3600 Mar 2014 #24
Kind of yes. Kind of no. Mostly no. ConservativeDemocrat Mar 2014 #31
Wow, we actually have people defending the US invasion of Iraq here??? reformist2 Mar 2014 #27
Scary isn't it..... think Mar 2014 #34
Sad ain't it? Rex Mar 2014 #42
Nope. There are people pointing out history actually happened. jeff47 Mar 2014 #45
Who defended it? joeglow3 Mar 2014 #54
Who exactly would sanction the US? Our allies? cheapdate Mar 2014 #33
you forgot, where hundreds of thousands got killed and where the whole Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2014 #36
Putin lover!!!! Go back to Russia! Bonobo Mar 2014 #37
No silly, because we were on the side of goodness. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #40
Aren't we always. LisaL Mar 2014 #43
By definition. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #55
Remember Powell's UN performance? jeff47 Mar 2014 #44
What an incredibly low standard some DU'ers have if the Bush years are to guide KittyWampus Mar 2014 #47
Not in the normal sense of the word. NCTraveler Mar 2014 #48
no formal sanctions, just a destroyed economy, thousands dead and tens of thousands geek tragedy Mar 2014 #49
Why do you think that's "funny?" MADem Mar 2014 #51
America sucks is the point I think. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #52
Clever rationale for an additional Anschluss. LanternWaste Mar 2014 #53
american exceptionalism does not allow for that kinda nonsense. nt La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2014 #56
Do we have to use Bush as our model of acceptable behavior? nt hack89 Mar 2014 #57
its legality had not been adjudicated. Niceguy1 Mar 2014 #59
 

1000words

(7,051 posts)
4. There was some talk about dropping the petrodollar
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:27 PM
Mar 2014

Oh, right ... that was just before "shock and awe." Funny, that ...

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
5. What is the point in this line of discussion?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:28 PM
Mar 2014

Are you arguing that Russia should not because we didn't, or are you arguing nothing at all?

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
9. Just asking a question
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:32 PM
Mar 2014

And what is wrong with reflecting on recent history? I think it means something. I think I may start talking about the Iraq war and the USA more, its important to be reminded of this, I feel. It was only 10 years ago, that is a blink of the eye in history terms.

jazzimov

(1,456 posts)
35. "Just asking a question". Yeah, right.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:18 PM
Mar 2014

We have a different government now. Or do you think the sins of the fathers should be visited on the sons?

davekriss

(5,425 posts)
32. It does make listening to John Kerry argue the moral high ground hilarious
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:04 PM
Mar 2014

The rest of the world thinks so, too. This loss of moral positioning weakens our position in the world today and is a DIRECT RESULT of the war criminals that occupied the White House prior to Obama. Good ol' GWB and Cheney and Rumsfeld et al. - heck of a job there, guys!!

malaise

(296,098 posts)
6. Of course not
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:28 PM
Mar 2014

Only brown people were blown up - except of course for the military.
Bush, Cheney et al should have been locked up for war crimes but the West never commits war crimes - those freedom and democracy bombs just kill those who deserve to die.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
21. That was an exceptionally evil pack of neocons that invaded Iraq
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:15 PM
Mar 2014

with more than enough idiot stupid dumbfuck Dems that went along with the crime.

Basing the whole rest of ones life on the crimes of these people and transferring those crimes to all future admins is kinda evil in it's own way

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
30. Yes. But the fact remains that our leaders ran amok and there was no international response.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:01 PM
Mar 2014

One can argue that there should have been, but there wasn't.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
11. Well,
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:33 PM
Mar 2014

"Did the USA face sanctions for illegally invading Iraq?"

...two wrongs don't make a right. Besides the sanctions are: Weak! A joke! Russians are laughing!

Londongrad Dealmakers Face Sanctions Hit After $180 Billion Boom
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024680947

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
12. Technically we did not go about it as brazen as Putin..please do not misunderstand me.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:35 PM
Mar 2014

I am not defending Iraq..but we did not annex Iraq.

We destroyed it, true..made a hell hole, but there are differences.


We should have Bush/Cheney/Yoo and Addington at the ICC..but that is another story.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
15. ha ha, probably not very well but good question.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:56 PM
Mar 2014

My point was I don't believe Putin gets exonerated by our own miserable foreign policies,
there are important distinctions.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
25. Agreed. But our boys and girls have proven they are usually wrong. So I choose the least expensive
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:52 PM
Mar 2014

option - stay out of it

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
29. Oh I hope we do the smart thing..but we'll be a player on some level.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:59 PM
Mar 2014

You know and I know our history.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
17. One of the many distinctions is that we did not annex Iraq..that is important.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 09:00 PM
Mar 2014

I am by no means defending Iraq...not in any manner.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
26. No, we just annexed their oil fields.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:53 PM
Mar 2014
"Prior to the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq, US and other western oil companies were all but completely shut out of Iraq's oil market," oil industry analyst Antonia Juhasz told Al Jazeera. "But thanks to the invasion and occupation, the companies are now back inside Iraq and producing oil there for the first time since being forced out of the country in 1973."


http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2011/12/2011122813134071641.html

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
28. There are distinctions..and they do not amount to excuses for our horrific actions..sorry. n./t
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:57 PM
Mar 2014

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
38. Technically, Russia didn't annex Crimea either.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:24 PM
Mar 2014

They supported one side in a political dispute. The US and the west supported the other side. Leaving aside questions of the legality or propriety of the referendum, the people of Crimea voted to become an independent, sovereign nation.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
39. I think that's a stretch, considering his first moves and the control he will end up with.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 12:07 AM
Mar 2014
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
18. The sanctions the US stated today were against individuals.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 09:01 PM
Mar 2014

From what I have heard, Bush, Cheney and members of that administration have limited travel to certain places due to their legal status in those places. That's pretty much what happened to some Russians and Ukrainians today.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
22. Still the Russians should face sanctions
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:19 PM
Mar 2014

for invading Ukraine. At least we were fooled into thinking Saddam had WMD. Wrong, but it was the idea. Russia has nothing.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
46. "we were fooled about WMD" Really? Not me, and not millions of others.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:40 AM
Mar 2014

I wasn't fooled for a moment back then, and neither were millions of Americans who demonstrated against it.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
58. Well as a country we were and that was the excuse
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 04:22 PM
Mar 2014

and there were people who fervently believed it and their partisan had the WH. The Russians just blatantly are in there without any such threat to themselves.

steve2470

(37,481 posts)
23. there was all this UN activity
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:20 PM
Mar 2014
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_actions_regarding_Iraq

I don't remember any sanctions either. I'm really surprised there. I'm looking for any formal UN condemnation of the US.

Response to steve2470 (Reply #23)

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
24. Technically it wasn't illegal because they had approval from the security council
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:20 PM
Mar 2014

Yes it was under lies and false pretenses, but the US did get approval.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
31. Kind of yes. Kind of no. Mostly no.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:04 PM
Mar 2014

Bush twisted an interpretation of a previous Security Council sanction against Iraq into the "permission" he needed, however it was blatantly clear that most nations (including members of the security council) didn't agree with his strained interpretation.

What is true, however, is that unlike the Ukrainians, Saddam's regime was in the habit of committing genocide against its own people. So very few people, even the people saying that Bush didn't have the right to do what he did, were defending Saddam. Putin doesn't even have that to hang his cloak on.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
42. Sad ain't it?
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 01:07 AM
Mar 2014

Can you believe we have Bush defenders here? Don't really know how they survived this long on a liberal forum.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
45. Nope. There are people pointing out history actually happened.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:39 AM
Mar 2014

Even when that history isn't something we like.

The US got permission from the UN. We lied to get it. The people who did so should be in prison. But we got approval first.

Putin should have had the Crimeans formally ask him to send troops before he sent the troops. Then he'd have a similar fig leaf.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
33. Who exactly would sanction the US? Our allies?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:08 PM
Mar 2014

Developing nations? I think more countries probably need our money, business and trade more than we need theirs. Some countries did in fact take actions to hold US officials responsible for war crimes. Even some western countries (Spain or Italy I think charged Donald Rumsfeld with crimes.)

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
36. you forgot, where hundreds of thousands got killed and where the whole
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:21 PM
Mar 2014

fucking thing was based on bullshit to begin with

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
37. Putin lover!!!! Go back to Russia!
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:22 PM
Mar 2014

Is about the level of response I have come to expect.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
44. Remember Powell's UN performance?
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:37 AM
Mar 2014

We got permission from the UN before invading.

Sure, we lied to get it, but we still got it.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
47. What an incredibly low standard some DU'ers have if the Bush years are to guide
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:40 AM
Mar 2014

their opinions on what is "right or wrong".

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
48. Not in the normal sense of the word.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:41 AM
Mar 2014

I think the argument can be made that the citizens of the US faces sanctions of our own government over Iraq. We paid an extremely heavy price.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
49. no formal sanctions, just a destroyed economy, thousands dead and tens of thousands
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:42 AM
Mar 2014

grievously wounded, and our international standing at an all time low and our enemies having been strengthened by it



MADem

(135,425 posts)
51. Why do you think that's "funny?"
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:53 AM
Mar 2014

There's nothing funny about that mess.

It wasn't funny when Bush did it, it's not funny when Pootie, his soulmate, does it either.

And two wrongs don't EVER make a right.

I'd be interested in hearing what your point is, here.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
52. America sucks is the point I think.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 11:08 AM
Mar 2014

The far right thinks America can do no wrong (aka, American Exceptionalism), and some on the left think the US does nothing right (aka, America Sucks).

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
53. Clever rationale for an additional Anschluss.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 11:11 AM
Mar 2014

Clever rationale for an additional Anschluss.

And I can certainly understand that many people find things such as that 'funny.'

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
59. its legality had not been adjudicated.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 05:49 PM
Mar 2014

And dont forget we weren't the only ones....


United States (2004-2009)
United Kingdom (2004-2009)
Australia (2004-2009)
Poland (2004-2008)
Ukraine (2004-2008)
Georgia (2004-2008)
Bulgaria (2004-2008)
Denmark (2004-2007)
Italy (2004-2006)

Netherlands (2004-2005)
Spain (2004-2004)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did the USA face sanction...