Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 11:03 PM Mar 2012

There is no federal control over increases in health insurance premiums

March 22, 2012
2012 Progress Report: Health Reform is Opening the Insurance Market and Protecting Consumers

http://www.healthcare.gov/law/resources/reports/rate-review03222012a.html

The Affordable Care Act?s Rate Review policies bring an unprecedented level of scrutiny and transparency to health insurance rate increases. They ensure that, in every state, every proposed increase of 10% or more is evaluated by independent experts to assess whether they are based on reasonable assumptions and sound data.

Rate review is expected to help moderate premium increases and provide consumers with greater value for their premium dollar. Additionally, health insurance companies must provide easy to understand information to their customers about their reasons for significant rate increases, as well as publicly justify and post on their website any unreasonable rate increases.

The Affordable Care Act?s Rate Review program started for most individual and small group plans on September 1, 2011.

Through March 10, 2012, 186 increases affecting more than 1.3 million people have been posted on companyprofiles.healthcare.gov. Each provides an explanation from the insurer, including the rate increases determined to be unreasonable rate increases.

States are taking a strong lead in reviewing proposed rate increases. Of the 186 requested increases posted on HealthCare.gov as of March 10, 2012, two-thirds (125 filings) of these are being reviewed by rate review programs in the states. Only one-third (61 filings) is under review by HHS.

In the 61 instances to date where HHS is charged with conducting reviews, the Department has completed 28 determinations. HHS has determined that 20 of the 28 proposed rate increases are unreasonable. The most common reason for this determination is that the proposal would result in projected medical loss ratios (MLRs) below the 80% applicable threshold.



Commentby Don McCanne of PNHP: The title of today's message, "Controlling costs through HHS rate reviews," is deliberately deceptive to make a point. Supposedly, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was designed to help control spending in health care, and the insurance premium Rate Review process was a component of cost containment. In fact, not only does the process have no impact on health care spending, it doesn't even have any federal control over increases in health insurance premiums.

ACA regulations require that any plan with premium increases of 10 percentor more be reviewed. Although states may have some influence over rate increases, the federal government has no authority to do anything about the increases other than expose the insurers to public ridicule.

In the last six months, 20 rate increases reviewed by the federal government have been found to be unreasonable, primarily because they exceeded the 20 percent of the premium that they could use for
administrative services and profits. Many of these insurers in the individual market will find that their inefficiencies are so great that they will be unable to comply with this requirement, so they really don't
need ridicule to drive home this point.

In the meantime, insurers will be able to increase their premiums 9.9 percent each year with no questions asked, at least not by the federal government. Compound that rate over several years, and then where will we be?

Obviously this ACA measure to "control costs" will have very little impact, if any, on insurance premiums and absolutely no impact on total health care spending.

There is a much more efficient model of health care financing that actually would slow the increase in health care spending while ensuring health care for everyone. Instead of playing ACA games, we should move forward with an improved Medicare for everyone.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There is no federal control over increases in health insurance premiums (Original Post) eridani Mar 2012 OP
Rec'd, A point most choose to blindly ignore to enable their partisan bickering just1voice Mar 2012 #1
Yes--please remember that insurance is not CARE n/t eridani Mar 2012 #2
That's one of the major points I'm concerned about latebloomer Mar 2012 #3
They can walk the line 100% anyway. All they have to do is increase the allowable charges. TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #4
 

just1voice

(1,362 posts)
1. Rec'd, A point most choose to blindly ignore to enable their partisan bickering
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 06:34 PM
Mar 2012

Meanwhile 10s of millions of Americans go without health care.

latebloomer

(7,120 posts)
3. That's one of the major points I'm concerned about
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 08:23 PM
Mar 2012

I am paying over $1700 in Cobra for a family of four- and our co-pays and deductibles are not low. My husband's unemployment doesn't even cover that amount. There seems to be absolutely no regulation- the insurance company can raise its rates every year without any interference whatsoever.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
4. They can walk the line 100% anyway. All they have to do is increase the allowable charges.
Mon Mar 26, 2012, 08:28 PM
Mar 2012

No worries about the MLR or getting bad mouthed by HHS. Hell, they have an anti-trust exemption and can cooperate to fix prices anyway.

Smoke and mirrors.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There is no federal contr...