Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:30 PM Mar 2014

What does a world without rape culture look like?

Is it even imaginable or attainable?

How would it affect the male/female sexual dynamic?

Would it mean that playing 'hard to get' would go away?

Where exactly do the boundaries lie? If the boundaries are personal, how do we define them universally?

156 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What does a world without rape culture look like? (Original Post) CFLDem Mar 2014 OP
well, when as you state a young mans libido is out of control, hence unable to control and the young seabeyond Mar 2014 #1
I don't know from 'dorks' Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2014 #11
i think by promoting the male sexuality thru the penis being its own identity with a brain, lol is seabeyond Mar 2014 #18
Well, obviously, both genders should be getting an Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2014 #36
hey dude.... seabeyond Mar 2014 #39
Heh. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2014 #42
that is my point. the story telling has to change. just your perspective seabeyond Mar 2014 #47
I'm pretty sure I never said mine had to be. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2014 #57
Or, lol, do not be so sensitive. I was not saying you personally seabeyond Mar 2014 #66
Rape is not about sex MissMillie Mar 2014 #143
+1 leftstreet Mar 2014 #146
+10 Cleita Mar 2014 #152
I'll go a bit further > what does a world without an accepted Culture of Violence look like? KittyWampus Mar 2014 #2
That is a pretty good extension. CFLDem Mar 2014 #4
That is what I believe as well. KittyWampus Mar 2014 #9
This get the red out Mar 2014 #151
and it hits me. your 'hard to get' no means yes??? fuckin for real? tell me with men being seabeyond Mar 2014 #3
Well Sea, CFLDem Mar 2014 #5
i want to know. when you say "hard to get" are you talking no means yes. simple enough. seabeyond Mar 2014 #7
No CFLDem Mar 2014 #12
the playing hard to get, no means yes is very common. especially with pua and mra seabeyond Mar 2014 #14
Sea CFLDem Mar 2014 #16
are you saying i slander you if i discuss pua and mra???? no. i will not take my statement that seabeyond Mar 2014 #17
You know exactly what you are doing. CFLDem Mar 2014 #19
yes. i did need clarification of the "playing hard to get". seabeyond Mar 2014 #22
to tuesday cause you self deleted. and i posted to you on your delete. seabeyond Mar 2014 #26
Yeah, good luck with all this. Stick a fork in me cause I am done. Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2014 #31
it sooo is. with you woman. i am off.... luvs you too. nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2014 #21
Query: What does "pua" mean? Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #68
Pick up artist... Google. Interesting group seabeyond Mar 2014 #70
Oh, *them* Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #72
"Pick Up Artist" I think. nt rrneck Mar 2014 #73
I guess I'm a little confused as well. thucythucy Mar 2014 #126
High school? Is that where you are? Scootaloo Mar 2014 #30
No the high school thing is part of Sea's slander campaign. CFLDem Mar 2014 #35
i asked. he said old enough to rent a car. what is that, 16 or 18. still highschool. nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #37
You have to be 21 to rent a car, unless you have a special arrangement snooper2 Mar 2014 #140
h. good and bad. consoling thinking highschool, boys that were responsible/respectful are dorks... seabeyond Mar 2014 #141
Like any number of aboriginal cultures prior to Western contact. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #6
damn you are smart. i love a good brain. seabeyond Mar 2014 #8
Intriguing CFLDem Mar 2014 #10
Judeo-Christian culture views women as chattels. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #29
look to current cultures that are matrileneal cally Mar 2014 #55
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #56
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #20
and then go over, over a couple decades of freedom and financial independence, women say no to seabeyond Mar 2014 #41
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #52
Just to clarify: are you stating it is the natural order for women to submit to men? antigone382 Mar 2014 #61
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #64
3-3 on your bullshit post. Should be an easy hide. Rw crap, garbage seabeyond Mar 2014 #75
This says it all about DU3 CFLDem Mar 2014 #82
Um, no. rrneck Mar 2014 #77
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #85
How does your reply square with the previous one? rrneck Mar 2014 #94
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #96
Men were designed to lead. rrneck Mar 2014 #100
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #103
. CreekDog Mar 2014 #78
Thank you creek. You are there.... Always. Appreciate. Nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #83
I say that we lose a few Tsiyu Mar 2014 #80
Natural order if mra or Eco psych fan, ya. And those two are about the same. Who were you? seabeyond Mar 2014 #62
I think that's unfair to EvoPsych Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #71
You really validated what I said. It is used by non religious to control, dominate women seabeyond Mar 2014 #74
Well, it's not my area Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #76
I am on my phone. I am not doing the linking. Scientists, biological scientists debunk ego psych. seabeyond Mar 2014 #79
I would agree with that Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #81
Ya. That. Phone, I can't do much. Nt seabeyond Mar 2014 #90
FYI Douglas Carpenter Mar 2014 #102
"I've never been kicked off"...yet cyberswede Mar 2014 #106
In parts of pre-Christian Europe and in some aboriginal cultures. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #50
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #45
Or they're not so "extremely submissive" as you may imagine. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #51
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #58
Nonsense. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #60
My Lord, I hadn't considered that Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #69
Also the north eastern Native American tribes did not have rape as Squinch Mar 2014 #86
I'm skeptical. CFLDem Mar 2014 #93
It is from Squinch Mar 2014 #99
Sounds like an interesting chapter in history. CFLDem Mar 2014 #101
Astonishing. We were all taught "Plymouth Rock" and then immediately after that "Revolution." But Squinch Mar 2014 #105
And... Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #136
Can you imagine? It was the end of the world, for a whole culture full of people. Squinch Mar 2014 #147
Ah right Tux421 Mar 2014 #115
Welcome to DU. Enjoy your stay. It should help with those reading skills. Squinch Mar 2014 #116
Correct me if I'm wrong Tux421 Mar 2014 #117
I said north eastern tribes didn't. And then I gave my sources for that information. Squinch Mar 2014 #119
Oh come on Tux421 Mar 2014 #123
as offensive as your post is, juries won't hide it CreekDog Mar 2014 #124
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #127
what is your degree in? CreekDog Mar 2014 #128
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #130
i'm just wondering where you learned something as backwards as: CreekDog Mar 2014 #131
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #133
Just a guess but I imagine we won't be Squinch Mar 2014 #149
Tux has been tombstoned: previously banned. I was going to ask him who he used to be. Squinch Mar 2014 #155
You haven't read enough. And in your case, ignorance doesn't seem to be bliss, because, bro, Squinch Mar 2014 #142
Just a clarification Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #134
I am saying that, in the north eastern tribes, it simply wasn't used. There are scores Squinch Mar 2014 #144
It's convenient that all cultures idealized as exemplary of harmony and tranquility... lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #122
thanks Tux CreekDog Mar 2014 #129
Go back far enough and that's true of virtually every culture Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #135
A world without "rape culture" would be free of pedophiles! NoOneMan Mar 2014 #13
do you enjoy saying ridiculous things? bettyellen Mar 2014 #23
Did you miss today's circus? NoOneMan Mar 2014 #25
Yes, Why? Are you the head clown? bettyellen Mar 2014 #27
Basically, yes NoOneMan Mar 2014 #32
A bit of both, TBH Prophet 451 Mar 2014 #138
... lol ... Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2014 #33
Yes he does. That's his point. Sad, but true. Squinch Mar 2014 #87
Despite thousands of years trying to stop murders LittleBlue Mar 2014 #24
As noted above CFLDem Mar 2014 #28
I think it goes deeper than culture. Saw a nature show LittleBlue Mar 2014 #43
I suspect you are correct. nt CFLDem Mar 2014 #46
OMFG, is about all I can say... boston bean Mar 2014 #108
so... it is biology that makes men rape. damn... pathetic. not surprised. consistent seabeyond Mar 2014 #139
Men wouldn't use terms like "hard to get" in a world without rape culture BainsBane Mar 2014 #38
But then why do women play hard to get? CFLDem Mar 2014 #40
Are you talking about sex or dating? BainsBane Mar 2014 #44
Oh no I was talking about dating. CFLDem Mar 2014 #48
Cool BainsBane Mar 2014 #49
Well people do always want what they can't have. CFLDem Mar 2014 #53
You just answered your own question BainsBane Mar 2014 #54
I think the vast majority of men jamzrockz Mar 2014 #59
It's not just no-means-no. There's also the possibility that she doesn't yet know exactly what she enough Mar 2014 #65
"In fact, the idea that "men are only interested in one thing" is also part of rape culture." BainsBane Mar 2014 #67
playing "hard to get" boston bean Mar 2014 #63
Yes Boston Bean CFLDem Mar 2014 #84
And what does it have to do with rape culture? Ohio Joe Mar 2014 #88
That is one of the aspects here to discuss. CFLDem Mar 2014 #91
You brought it up... How do you fit it into rape culture? Ohio Joe Mar 2014 #95
How does it not fit into rape culture? CFLDem Mar 2014 #98
Asking a woman out more then one time is not a cornerstone of rape culture... Ohio Joe Mar 2014 #107
It is if she flat out rejects the initial advance. CFLDem Mar 2014 #109
And what? Playing hard to get is the encouragement? Women are making men go to far? Ohio Joe Mar 2014 #110
No CFLDem Mar 2014 #112
Again... Asking a woman out more then once has nothing to do with rape culture... Ohio Joe Mar 2014 #113
And yet I have clearly demonstrated that it does. CFLDem Mar 2014 #114
You brought it up, so you implied a connection. So spit it out already..... bettyellen Mar 2014 #97
This message was self-deleted by its author Adam051188 Mar 2014 #89
Such as? CFLDem Mar 2014 #92
Norman Lear had a sitcom with complete role reversal Beringia Mar 2014 #104
personal boundaries cannot, by definition be universal. they are not always the same for one person bettyellen Mar 2014 #111
wtf does "hard to get" have to do with rape. Starry Messenger Mar 2014 #118
Rape culture encompasses all aspects surrounding rape CFLDem Mar 2014 #120
They aren't suitors, they are rapists. Starry Messenger Mar 2014 #121
Finally someone gets it! CFLDem Mar 2014 #137
it has nothing to do with Niceguy1 Mar 2014 #154
I think part of sex ed should be a class on saying no, and understanding the word no Sarah Ibarruri Mar 2014 #125
And why do romance novels that women obsess over get a pass? davidn3600 Mar 2014 #132
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #145
You're going to say, "What about Elizabeth Hasselback??!11??1" again, aren't you? Squinch Mar 2014 #150
"They do it too!" is not a valid defense. For anyone over the age of 6, at least. n/t nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #156
A lot like what you'd get LadyHawkAZ Mar 2014 #148
This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles Mar 2014 #153
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
1. well, when as you state a young mans libido is out of control, hence unable to control and the young
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:33 PM
Mar 2014

men that do control their libidos are dorks, per your accessment

and you are not out of highschool yet.....

cfrl, over the months you have been here you have had a lot of smart people give you lots and lots of info, trying to guide and educate. and you yourself just said you and others your age cannot be educated. so why the hell are you asking this question to waste everyones time. you do not care.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
11. I don't know from 'dorks'
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:47 PM
Mar 2014

but I do think a young male's libido is a far stronger influence on his actions than a lot of people give it credit for. When folks talk about 'thinking with your little head, not your big one', it's not that far off the mark for many teen boys. Which, to my mind, says we've GOT to start educating boys about consent and thinking of women as full-fledged human beings BEFORE the hormones start raging, and not simply leave their middle and high school actions up to hormones, peer pressure, and crappy rape culture songs and movies that tell him the path to sexual gratification lies in sexual aggressiveness and assault.

Changing the 'now' is a lot tougher than changing the future by educating tomorrow's culture creators.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
18. i think by promoting the male sexuality thru the penis being its own identity with a brain, lol is
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:00 PM
Mar 2014

part of the problem. a guy wants it and all of society is talking about his oh so powerful sexuality that he cannot control, what do you expect. i have all my life watched boys this age well able to control their libido. what am i getting wrong?

and why do we ignore a girls libido at all cost. it is all about the guy. then we wonder when the guys act like it is all about them.

you do not think that sends a pretty bad message to the boys?

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
36. Well, obviously, both genders should be getting an
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:16 PM
Mar 2014

earlier and more complete education on consent, relationships, and intimacy. But if the goal is preventing rape, then it seems like you might want to focus more of the education on the gender responsible for committing the vast majority of rapes.

And btw, all those guys 'controlling their libido'? Probably masturbating like mad all the time you're not watching them. All while being told by many parents and religious figures that masturbation is a sin and something disgusting, which sets them up for a different set of warped ideas later in life. So if by 'controlling' you simply mean 'not raping women', then yeah, ok, they're 'controlling' it. Your mileage may vary, depending on just how much testosterone is coursing through each individual, of course.

Teen neural structures haven't finished developing in the teens, but the endocrine system is going full blast. (As an added bonus, men also get the joy of losing frontal lobe neurons faster as they age than women - the area of the brain that controls judgment. Now couple this with the fact that the vast majority of politicians are old men...kinda makes you wonder a bit why politics is generally such a mess...)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
39. hey dude....
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:20 PM
Mar 2014
And btw, all those guys 'controlling their libido'? Probably masturbating like mad all the time you're not watching them.


not gender specific.

truly. it is not. and that is where we can start with our education. the boys arent all that. girls are that too. not a gift or giving it away. more of an allowed balance instead of pure hype.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
42. Heh.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:23 PM
Mar 2014

Sure. But I can't speak from experience as a girl

And I think the notion of 'virginity' is overrated as well. It's merely a boundary condition, the 'first' time. But every single episode of sexual intimacy should be the result of a reasoned, shared decision on the part of each participant, from the first time to the last.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
47. that is my point. the story telling has to change. just your perspective
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:26 PM
Mar 2014

cannot be the only one out there, talked about and celebrated as the be all end all. and doing the exactly opposite with our girls sexuality. we create this we live.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
57. I'm pretty sure I never said mine had to be.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:42 PM
Mar 2014

Simply putting my own experience out there does nothing to preclude the experience of anyone else being put forth. I'm not censoring any female viewpoint. I'm not even dominating the conversation. Merely adding one extra thread to the tapestry. But don't worry. I'll simply stop posting comments on rape culture, since I don't fit the established site orthodoxy 100%. There are plenty of other worthwhile topics to pay attention to onsite.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
66. Or, lol, do not be so sensitive. I was not saying you personally
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:07 PM
Mar 2014

And I was exploring thought. I have appreciated your posts. Just not totally agreeing and shifting a bit in another direction for different perspective

I have been trying to get off du for hours. Now I am posting on a little phone so will probably be my last post.

All if us, and I meAn all of us need to shift the story. Not grandiose male sexuality to be all that the boy is and not ignore or hide girl sexuality to the point it is giving and a gift. I think when we normalize the two sexuality a bit we all will be more healthy

leftstreet

(40,030 posts)
146. +1
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 03:20 PM
Mar 2014

Thank you

One of the creepiest things about the rape culture discussions here is seeing how often threads are subtly hijacked for the sole purpose of linking sex with rape

Very

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
152. +10
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 04:13 PM
Mar 2014

There have been studies about this in the past. Do you know of any recent ones so this bogus argument can be put to rest?

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
2. I'll go a bit further > what does a world without an accepted Culture of Violence look like?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:35 PM
Mar 2014
 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
4. That is a pretty good extension.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:38 PM
Mar 2014

I would argue that the culture of accepted violence is at the heart of rape culture, amongst many other societal ills.

And that this culture arises out of the the tribalism that exists due to limited resources.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
3. and it hits me. your 'hard to get' no means yes??? fuckin for real? tell me with men being
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:36 PM
Mar 2014

out of control you are not now throwing in "'hard to get' " no means yes....

cause again, in this post, you would be advocating... fuckin pushing.... rape.

so PLEASE clarify.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
5. Well Sea,
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:39 PM
Mar 2014

since you are clearly not in high school yet, it means flirting.

And if you are in high school, you should know better.

😉

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
7. i want to know. when you say "hard to get" are you talking no means yes. simple enough.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:40 PM
Mar 2014

clarify

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
12. No
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:48 PM
Mar 2014

I mean literally playing hard to get.

What you are inferring is rape, plain and simple.

Now please erect your strawmen on someone else's hill, we're trying to have a conversation here.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
14. the playing hard to get, no means yes is very common. especially with pua and mra
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:52 PM
Mar 2014
 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
16. Sea
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:56 PM
Mar 2014

Please take your slander somewhere else.

Unless you really enjoy your timeouts. In that case, please continue. Be sure to use extra colorful language, too, so we don't waste the jury's time on nuances.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
17. are you saying i slander you if i discuss pua and mra???? no. i will not take my statement that
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:57 PM
Mar 2014

playing hard to get, no means yes is very much a pua and mra talking point.

hence, me asking for clarification from you

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
19. You know exactly what you are doing.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:01 PM
Mar 2014

We are trying to investigate what a world without rape culture entails so that we may better focus our efforts.

Please stay on that track please. Since you are obsessed with this aspect, what do you think flirting looks like in a non-rape culture world?

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
22. yes. i did need clarification of the "playing hard to get".
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:06 PM
Mar 2014

i am certainly not playing it out with you, lol. you are a kid. lol. but... i have never had any trouble flirting, kinda easy and a way to be, without feeling the need to be submissive or denigrate myself for a guys entertainment.

fliritn should have NOTHING to do with the rape culture and if your flirting does involve getting of or condoning, embracing or excusing rape, then.... wow. again. wtf???

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
26. to tuesday cause you self deleted. and i posted to you on your delete.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:09 PM
Mar 2014

explain to me what FLIRTING has to do with RAPE culture? please. cause again, i am right back to asking this poster, wtf???? clarification.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
31. Yeah, good luck with all this. Stick a fork in me cause I am done.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:13 PM
Mar 2014

Putting in a movie and enjoying my Life in The Real World. Life is good, sea

Response to seabeyond (Reply #17)

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
72. Oh, *them*
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:18 PM
Mar 2014

Yeah, familiar with them and their particular lunacy. Just hadn't seen it referred to that way before. Thanks for the clarification.

thucythucy

(9,074 posts)
126. I guess I'm a little confused as well.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:54 PM
Mar 2014

When I hear the phrase "playing hard to get" what I get is the mental image of someone who really is interested in sex, but pretends that she or he isn't. Hence "playing."

It seems to me that this can very easily get subsumed into a rapist's mindset, as in "she keeps saying no, but she's just 'playing hard to get.'" In other words, "Her 'no' really means 'yes'--I just have to keep at it."

You don't see how this might be a problem?

Really, I thought "playing hard to get" was pretty much old school. I mean, who pretends to not want sex, if they're with someone they like and they're horny? What's the point? Unless we're talking role playing, which is a whole other thing. But "playing hard to get?" No offense, but it just seems so 1950s.

Truly, no snark intended. I'm just puzzled.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
30. High school? Is that where you are?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:13 PM
Mar 2014

'Cause in the adult world, "no" means "no," and continued pestering isn't "flirting," it's harassment.

Frankly it should be that way in high school, too.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
35. No the high school thing is part of Sea's slander campaign.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:16 PM
Mar 2014

I'm currently working on my Master's.

And I agree, no means no, and there's a clear line for harassment/stalking.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
37. i asked. he said old enough to rent a car. what is that, 16 or 18. still highschool. nt
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:17 PM
Mar 2014
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
140. You have to be 21 to rent a car, unless you have a special arrangement
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 11:21 AM
Mar 2014

My first telecom job I was 20, and had to travel all over the country doing installs all the time..

Awesome getting paid for flying around on planes LOL-

The company had a special arrangement with Avis so the three of us 20 year olds could rent cars from them and the company had to pay for special insurance. After a while I learned you could usually get a free upgrade if you flirt a little

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
141. h. good and bad. consoling thinking highschool, boys that were responsible/respectful are dorks...
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 11:25 AM
Mar 2014

that makes a little more sense adding in immaturity.

not consoling to know adult... over 21, that there are some men that profess a young man that has integrity, to others with respect is considered a dork. and like a mature respectful young man would give a shit that this person thought he a dork.

thanks.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
6. Like any number of aboriginal cultures prior to Western contact.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:40 PM
Mar 2014

Or for that matter like the ancient Celts in pre-Christian Europe (where women were very much not subordinate to men but were frequently leaders and fought in battle).

What you refer to as the "male/female sexual dynamic" is very significantly the result of the fusion of Judeo-Christian morality (and its attendant ideas of female submission) and the Germanic custom of patrilineal inheritance that came to define European/Western culture in the post-Roman Middle Ages.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
10. Intriguing
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:43 PM
Mar 2014

It is always fun to imagine alternative histories. Kind of reminds me of that family guy episode where the modern world has flying cars and whatnot because it wasn't held back by judeo-Christian culture.

Which brings to mind, is rape culture an inherent part of judeo-christian culture?

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
15. Judeo-Christian culture views women as chattels.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:52 PM
Mar 2014

The answer to that is "yes". David and Bathsheba? Moses telling the Israelites to slaughter the Midianites and kill all the men but keep the virgin girls for themselves? Rape culture is inherently part of Judeo-Christian culture.

Response to CFLDem (Reply #10)

cally

(21,860 posts)
55. look to current cultures that are matrileneal
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:36 PM
Mar 2014

Rape culture does not exist. There is one in South America where the women are the ones to walk forward and greet visitors before the men. All property and status is matrileneal.

Response to cally (Reply #55)

Response to Spider Jerusalem (Reply #6)

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
41. and then go over, over a couple decades of freedom and financial independence, women say no to
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:23 PM
Mar 2014

submission and the mens world falls apart.

ya. we get it. men WANT women to be submissive to make their lives all that. biological? when they had the power, control and dominance.

now? no. and they are throwing fits.

btw... how many times have you been kicked off today?

Response to seabeyond (Reply #41)

antigone382

(3,682 posts)
61. Just to clarify: are you stating it is the natural order for women to submit to men?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:55 PM
Mar 2014

I just want to know precisely where you stand on that.

Response to antigone382 (Reply #61)

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
82. This says it all about DU3
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:34 PM
Mar 2014
Antigone: 61. Just to clarify: are you stating it is the natural order for women to submit to men?


Nemed: Yes it is.


And it withstands a jury.

Wow. I hope the admins see this.

Good night everyone!

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
77. Um, no.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:27 PM
Mar 2014

The natural order of things is not female submission. Not at all, not even a little bit. Not even in the movie 300.

All the upper body strength in the world won't birth no babies. Men and women both contribute to the survival of the species equally but in different ways. Submission is not genetically determined. Period.

Response to rrneck (Reply #77)

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
94. How does your reply square with the previous one?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:57 PM
Mar 2014

antigone382 (3,557 posts)
61. Just to clarify: are you stating it is the natural order for women to submit to men? I just want to know precisely where you stand on that.

Nemed (8 posts)
64. Of course it is If it wasn't, Mother Nature herself would have given women more upper body strength, faster reflexes, better hand-eye coordination, etc.

It's the same in the animal kingdom, as others in this thread have observed.

Nemed (8 posts)
85. Equal but different Equal but different. Equal, but different.

Your responses are incoherent. Submission and equality are, like, not the same. Want to try again? It'll be fun.

Response to rrneck (Reply #94)

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
100. Men were designed to lead.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:20 PM
Mar 2014

How are men designed to lead? Some links to research to support that claim would be more helpful than you know.

Response to rrneck (Reply #100)

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
78. .
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:29 PM
Mar 2014
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:07 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Of course it is
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4756375

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Poster states outright in this post and others that it is natural for women to be submissive to men.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:22 PM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Read the thread. Hide
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This person is wrong. So wrong that I wish he could meet my beautiful 6 foot tall niece who throws shotput and plays the bari sax. She has strength, intelligence, ability and could survive and prosper in any situation.
But people are wrong here at DU all of the time (even me, gasp!). Just because a person makes stupid assumptions is no reason to hide him. Keep him out in the daylight and school him.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Nah. Don't have to put up with this crap on day 1 from this poster. Also, I thank the alerter for informing MIRT, because you just did.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see no personal attack here, just an opinion that the person who sent the alert disagrees with.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't agree with that poster and he is probably a troll, but I don't see where he violated any rules here. If he makes a pattern of just agitating, then I'm sure he won't last long here.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.




Juror 2 can't see why we can't hide sexist posts.
Juror 4 thinks the community standards only include personal attacks (obviously hasn't lost any precious time reading the rules...)
Juror 5 thinks it's a troll, thinks the post is wrong, but can't see why ANY of that would be reason to hide...reason to ban, yes, reason to hide, NO?

(and x2 for #5)

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
80. I say that we lose a few
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:32 PM
Mar 2014

we gain a few ....trolls that is.

Don't feed them.

But it's fun sometimes. In this case, there is nought but a knot in the cerebral regions...best to let the pitiful thing run about for a minute....


 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
62. Natural order if mra or Eco psych fan, ya. And those two are about the same. Who were you?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:01 PM
Mar 2014

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
71. I think that's unfair to EvoPsych
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:17 PM
Mar 2014

Granted, EvoPsych is largely speculative but it's appropriation by MRAs is largely a case of them reading what they want into the research.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
74. You really validated what I said. It is used by non religious to control, dominate women
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:20 PM
Mar 2014

Yes, it is putting out poor studies and the. Mra'rs using it as tools to denigrate and subjugate women. Most of us women simply are not gonna lay down passive allowing another controlling religion cause men feel the need to dominate women. Even with a poor interpreted "science"

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
76. Well, it's not my area
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:26 PM
Mar 2014

I'm about a year out on my Psych degree (out of six) and my area is Fornensic Psychology but EvoPsych researchers would argue that it's not their studies at fault, it's the way MRAs interpret them. I think the difference is important. We don't blame Darwin for white supremacists using a misinterpretation of evolutionary theory to claim black people are inferior.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
79. I am on my phone. I am not doing the linking. Scientists, biological scientists debunk ego psych.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:30 PM
Mar 2014

It is fail. There are many ways the studies are a fail and it is discussed often. One is they take what today is and the tel the story from beginning of time, guesses and making shit up to make it fit

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
81. I would agree with that
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:33 PM
Mar 2014

EvoPsych is, at best, wildly speculative and much of the theories amount to a wild ass guess.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
102. FYI
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:26 PM
Mar 2014
I was juror #1

On Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:09 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

It's the natural order
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4756200

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

So he is saying that by their very nature, women are inferior to men. I shouldn't be surprised anymore to see this kind of stuff here but I am.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:19 PM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I'm not sure if this poster is arguing that women are inferior to men. But they are clearly arguing that male dominance is nature. Clearly this is not an acceptable point of view here on DU
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Huh, I didn't know there were any real Neanderthals left. Or that they could type.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree with alerter.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't think he is referring specifically to women. I think he/she is making a macro-economic argument. I could be wrong on that, but the way this reads and going through the posts I think they are making a broad argument about capitalism, not women.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I read what the poster wrote, and it's not what the alerter claimed the poster wrote. I don't like being pushed around like that, or seeing the jury system abused.

Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No, that's not what the poster is saying at all...

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
50. In parts of pre-Christian Europe and in some aboriginal cultures.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:30 PM
Mar 2014

We know enough about the ancient Celts from Roman sources to know that women frequently took part in battle and acted as war leaders. There are very few documented instances of women in battle in post-Roman Europe.

And some aboriginal cultures prior to Western contact were quite significantly differently organised; see for instance the Iroquois, or the Hopi. Not all aboriginal cultures were fundamentally patriarchal. Assuming universality for a particular social organisation and the attitudes that tend to go along with it is a mistake.

Response to Spider Jerusalem (Reply #6)

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
51. Or they're not so "extremely submissive" as you may imagine.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:32 PM
Mar 2014

Fun fact: part of the reason for the declining birthrate and declining marriage rates in Japan? Women refusing to accept the idea that having children should mean their careers are over and their job is now to raise a family.

Response to Spider Jerusalem (Reply #51)

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
69. My Lord, I hadn't considered that
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:14 PM
Mar 2014

No, I'm not taking the piss. That confluence of factors had literally never occurred to me before. And I'm a Luciferian Satanist, I'm well aware of the faults of Judeo-Christian morality.

Squinch

(59,254 posts)
86. Also the north eastern Native American tribes did not have rape as
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:44 PM
Mar 2014

part of their cultures when Europeans arrived. Europeans were astonished that rape was not even committed on enemies during war.

I don't know about Midwest or Western tribes. For all I know it is true of them too.

Now, after exposure to RAPE CULTURE, there is a higher incidence of rape of Native American women than the national average.

Squinch

(59,254 posts)
99. It is from
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:18 PM
Mar 2014

"Before 1776: Life in the American Colonies" by Robert Allison of Harvard. A fabulous Great Courses course, highly recommended. I happen to be working through it now and just learned this.

It comes from the fact that war among the native tribes was primarily for the purpose of getting captives to add to the tribe to replace family members lost to disease or misfortune. They took the captives and adopted them into their families. The idea of rape during war was abhorrent to them because, for all they knew, they were raping a new sister or daughter.

Here's another reference: http://www.historiann.com/2008/04/07/rape-still-a-powerful-weapon-of-war/

And google is your friend. I'm sure you can find more.

Squinch

(59,254 posts)
105. Astonishing. We were all taught "Plymouth Rock" and then immediately after that "Revolution." But
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:32 PM
Mar 2014

between them was 150 years that included the bloodiest war in US history (King Philip's War), a period where Europeans were a weak player in a complicated native political arena, the invention of capital and the corporation, the social and economic change of the sugar trade that make the Industrial Revolution look like a contract negotiation, an earlier revolution against England where the English administration was jailed and then stuck on a boat and told not to come back...

Amazing stories!

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
136. And...
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 04:38 AM
Mar 2014

...it all happened in the immediate aftermath of a plague that must have seemed like armageddon to the Native American people. It apparently wiped out 96% of humans in Mass. alone and is reckoned to have killed 90% of the Native population all told. By the time Columbus turned up, it was like something from The Walking Dead but without zombies.

Squinch

(59,254 posts)
147. Can you imagine? It was the end of the world, for a whole culture full of people.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 03:20 PM
Mar 2014

And at the risk of sounding trollish, which I sincerely do not mean to do, it might be a source of white privilege: I read some sermon from the time (and I don't think I could find it again, so I can't back this up with a source or link) but it talked all about how God had cleared the land for the arriving Europeans, scattering anyone who was in their way, so their "holy" experiment of Puritanism could take place.

Possible roots for Manifest Destiny, which was an infinitely sucky concept.

 

Tux421

(6 posts)
115. Ah right
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:14 PM
Mar 2014

So the Native Americans didn't rape anyone....they just kidnapped women from other tribes and "adopted" them into their families as wives.

The logical contortions some people will go through to paint Native Americans as "noble savages" and Europeans as the villains all the time is amazing.

I'm sure Thomas Jefferson thought Sally Hemings was one of the family too!

 

Tux421

(6 posts)
117. Correct me if I'm wrong
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:28 PM
Mar 2014

But you said the Native American tribes did not have rape as part of their culture when Europeans arrived, even during war. You then went on to say that they went to war to capture women from other tribes, which they then "adopted" into their families as wives, which is basically another way of describing rape. Or is it somehow not rape because they waited until the fighting was over to divide the "spoils of war" amongst themselves? Or is kidnapping women from other tribes somehow OK if your tribe is low in numbers due to disease?

What did I miss?

Squinch

(59,254 posts)
119. I said north eastern tribes didn't. And then I gave my sources for that information.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:32 PM
Mar 2014

I would recommend you do some reading about it before you get mad at me, and before you draw conclusions that are not accurate about what was meant by "adopted."

Have a nice stay.

 

Tux421

(6 posts)
123. Oh come on
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:42 PM
Mar 2014

Are you that naive? What do you think was meant by "adopted"? You think the women just willingly jumped into the arms of their loving "liberators"?

I've already done some reading, and I know how it worked. People like you just like to whitewash Native American history, and portray them as being more peaceful and noble than they really were. I suppose it's a necessary psychological defense mechanism for a lot of people. How else can they justify their hatred of Europeans, if they can't convince themselves that Europeans were somehow worse than everyone else?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
124. as offensive as your post is, juries won't hide it
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:49 PM
Mar 2014

a small, but decisive number of jurors only hide when there are swear words, so if one can manage to post bigotry using Oxford English, it will probably get left alone.

Response to CreekDog (Reply #124)

Response to CreekDog (Reply #128)

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
131. i'm just wondering where you learned something as backwards as:
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 11:03 PM
Mar 2014
"bigotry" does not mean "offensive"

Response to CreekDog (Reply #131)

Squinch

(59,254 posts)
149. Just a guess but I imagine we won't be
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 03:23 PM
Mar 2014

bothered for long by our angry new friend.

Sadly you are right about juries.

Squinch

(59,254 posts)
155. Tux has been tombstoned: previously banned. I was going to ask him who he used to be.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 06:52 PM
Mar 2014

Had a very familiar way about him.

Squinch

(59,254 posts)
142. You haven't read enough. And in your case, ignorance doesn't seem to be bliss, because, bro,
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 03:10 PM
Mar 2014

you seem mad.

Buzz off.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
134. Just a clarification
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 04:26 AM
Mar 2014

I'm sure I'm just being dense but you're not saying that rape was actually unknown among the Native Americans at the time, right? Just that it was a relatively rare crime, correct? As I said, I'm sure this is just me being dense but I've learned that if I'm unclear on something, it's best to just ask for clarity.

Squinch

(59,254 posts)
144. I am saying that, in the north eastern tribes, it simply wasn't used. There are scores
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 03:15 PM
Mar 2014

of captive accounts from the 1600's, and the warfare with the natives in New England was very well documented. The women they captured simply were not raped. And there is no account of any rape observed or heard of among the natives by the captives or those who dealt with the natives. Nada.

And, contrary to what the angry newbie is insisting, the adoption wasn't just a fancy name for rape. The women who were adopted were adopted as sisters or children, NOT "wives." They then had all the rights of native born tribes people, and married or not according to the same customs as everyone else in the tribe.

And again, I am talking about New England tribes.

ETA: this is not to say they were all sweetness and light. The captive accounts are FULL of accounts of killing babies and new mothers and the injured or sick so they don't slow overland travel, bashing people's heads in, and beating the prospective "adoptees" with sticks in gauntlets as a form of welcome. But no rape.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
122. It's convenient that all cultures idealized as exemplary of harmony and tranquility...
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:39 PM
Mar 2014

... left no written record.

They did leave lots of cannibalized bones though.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
135. Go back far enough and that's true of virtually every culture
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 04:29 AM
Mar 2014

We like to imagine cannibalization was some rare and terrible thing but the fact is, it's somethign which people occasionally had to resort to when times were especially hard. Also, we don't know the circumstances in which that occured. For all we know, that could have been their way of honouring the dead.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
13. A world without "rape culture" would be free of pedophiles!
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:49 PM
Mar 2014

If we hated child rapists even more, they just wouldn't exist!

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
32. Basically, yes
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:15 PM
Mar 2014

Today a rich as fuck Du Pont heir got off for raping his 3-year old daughter. Either this is proof of a 2-tier justice system, or its proof of "rape culture". Funny thing is, the people who think its all about "rape culture" don't want to so much as mention 1) he is a Du Pont heir, and 2) all sorts of child rapists get tossed in jail all the time

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
138. A bit of both, TBH
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 04:42 AM
Mar 2014

I think it's mostly proof of a two-tier justice system but I'm prepared to accept that rape culture (a term I usually dislike) played some role in it.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
24. Despite thousands of years trying to stop murders
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:07 PM
Mar 2014

there are still murders. And people still justify murder. Look at Trayvon, he was blamed for his own murder.

What is called "rape culture" is just the human drive to commit certains crimes that have plagued us since the beginning of mankind, and will continue to plague us for the rest of our existence. Asking why we can't stop "rape culture" is the same as asking why we can't stop committing crimes altogether (and justifying those crimes).

We can have varied degrees of success, but to describe a crime as part of a culture that can be ended is a fundamental misunderstanding of human beings. Lofty ideals tell us that our superior ability to reason makes humans superior to animals. Having the ability to reason does not make someone reasonable.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
28. As noted above
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:12 PM
Mar 2014

I think we can tie rape culture to the culture of violence that also encourages murder and other crimes of power.

So in that case, perhaps all we can hope for is the minimization of rape culture.
😒

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
43. I think it goes deeper than culture. Saw a nature show
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:24 PM
Mar 2014

a few months ago that showed a female lion straying too far into another pride's territory. The lioness was chased down by the much larger males, who forced her to the ground with the threat of violence. The narrator said that "having his way with her" was the price she had to pay in order to escape alive. It was plainly a rape, quite shocking to watch.

This behavior crosses species. We didn't teach culture to lions any more than they taught us. I think rape culture is the inaccurate description of something else, far more insidious and deeper within us, and impossible to stamp out.

boston bean

(36,922 posts)
108. OMFG, is about all I can say...
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:43 PM
Mar 2014

but lions... lions... and tigers and bears... and don't forget bonobo's.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
139. so... it is biology that makes men rape. damn... pathetic. not surprised. consistent
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 11:15 AM
Mar 2014

BainsBane

(57,721 posts)
38. Men wouldn't use terms like "hard to get" in a world without rape culture
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:18 PM
Mar 2014

They would understand that no means no and consent must be enthusiastic. They wouldn't see women as prey to be conquered but instead as friends and partners with full rights to express their desires.

Here are some steps to do away with rape culture. All it requires is caring enough about rape victims to take a few steps to diminish a culture than enables rapists and blames victims. m .
http://www.thenation.com/article/172643/ten-things-end-rape-culture

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
40. But then why do women play hard to get?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:21 PM
Mar 2014

I know several women who have admitted to using such tactics to keep the guy hanging on edge and to see how hard the guy is willing to work for them.

How do we educate women that such tactics only plays into rape culture?

BainsBane

(57,721 posts)
44. Are you talking about sex or dating?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:25 PM
Mar 2014

The fact is men like a challenge. Most men devalue women who they think are easy. There are all kinds of penalties in this society for women who like sex. Since women don't want to be devalued or cast aside, they often make a point of waiting to have sex.

If you think a woman who tells you she doesn't want to have sex is "playing hard to get," that's a rather serious problem on your part. She says no, that's it. You can either wait until she's ready or find someone else.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
48. Oh no I was talking about dating.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:27 PM
Mar 2014

I emphatically agree with you on the no means no part.

BainsBane

(57,721 posts)
49. Cool
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:29 PM
Mar 2014

The rest of my post stands then. I think you know it's true that men devalue women they think are easy. It's also a weird thing where some will start to lose interest as soon as the woman becomes interested. Of course these are men women shouldn't waste their time on, but it can take time to learn that lesson. People seem intent on making the whole thing harder than it needs to be.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
53. Well people do always want what they can't have.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:33 PM
Mar 2014

I also think it's because people are trying to protect themselves from rejection.

But the dating game also adds to the thrill when you find someone likes you back.

BainsBane

(57,721 posts)
54. You just answered your own question
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:36 PM
Mar 2014

Men do it too. It just doesn't involve waiting for sex for men. It's manifested in other ways. That has to do with the sexist culture that tells women they are sluts if they have sex like men do, and men don't usually want women they perceive that way as partners.

 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
59. I think the vast majority of men
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:49 PM
Mar 2014

understand when a woman is playing hard to get and when they are done with you. For one, they stop picking up the phone, the voice and facial expression changes. I think playing hard is just as vital as an animal's mating dance. It gauges the man's level of desire for the woman

enough

(13,727 posts)
65. It's not just no-means-no. There's also the possibility that she doesn't yet know exactly what she
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:06 PM
Mar 2014

wants in any given situation. She's still figuring it out. And if the man is interested in anything other than just the "one thing," he will also be figuring it out simultaneously.

That's why I agree with your original idea that the term "hard to get' would not be used in a world without rape culture. In that world, all human (including sexual) interactions would presume that both parties are human and both constantly experiencing all the ambivalence and change that humanity entails.

In fact, the idea that "men are only interested in one thing" is also part of rape culture. It is the other side of the coin of the notion of women "playing hard to get."

BainsBane

(57,721 posts)
67. "In fact, the idea that "men are only interested in one thing" is also part of rape culture."
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:08 PM
Mar 2014

Excellent point, and a good way to show how rape culture hurts men as well.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
91. That is one of the aspects here to discuss.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:52 PM
Mar 2014

I would wager some other members think it is something impacted by rape culture.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
98. How does it not fit into rape culture?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:14 PM
Mar 2014

A man continuing to advance despite a woman's initial rebuff to dating is arguably one of the most egregious examples patriarchal entitlement that makes the cornerstone of rape culture.

Ohio Joe

(21,897 posts)
107. Asking a woman out more then one time is not a cornerstone of rape culture...
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:42 PM
Mar 2014

I have no idea what the hell you are thinking and it is probably best I don't.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
109. It is if she flat out rejects the initial advance.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:43 PM
Mar 2014

This is why we need better education about rape culture.

Ohio Joe

(21,897 posts)
110. And what? Playing hard to get is the encouragement? Women are making men go to far?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:45 PM
Mar 2014

Someone stop me... I really don't want to go through this crap yet again today.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
112. No
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:48 PM
Mar 2014

Rape culture emboldens men to go too far.

In a world without rape culture, men would accept rejection and move on to greener pastures instead of feeling entitled to second try.

Ohio Joe

(21,897 posts)
113. Again... Asking a woman out more then once has nothing to do with rape culture...
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:52 PM
Mar 2014

I'm so done with this game.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
114. And yet I have clearly demonstrated that it does.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:56 PM
Mar 2014

To which you side step by reverting to your original argument.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
97. You brought it up, so you implied a connection. So spit it out already.....
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:14 PM
Mar 2014

enough of these bullshit games. Explain your OP claiming a connection between the two.
Because if this isn't referring to PUA the "you know she wants it" argument, I don't know what it is.

Response to CFLDem (Original post)

Beringia

(5,476 posts)
104. Norman Lear had a sitcom with complete role reversal
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:31 PM
Mar 2014


It was interesting, but got very low ratings.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_That_Glitters_%28TV_series%29


All That Glitters is an American situation comedy television series by producer Norman Lear. It consisted of 65 episodes and aired between April 18 and July 15, 1977 in broadcast syndication. The show, a spoof of the soap opera format, depicted the trials and tribulations of a group of executives at the Globatron corporation. The twist of the series was that it was set within a world of complete role-reversal: Women were the "stronger sex," the executives and breadwinners, while the "weaker sex" – the men – were the secretaries or stay-at-home househusbands. Men were often treated as sex objects.
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
111. personal boundaries cannot, by definition be universal. they are not always the same for one person
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:47 PM
Mar 2014

do you even understand what they are? it seems you do not.

Starry Messenger

(32,380 posts)
118. wtf does "hard to get" have to do with rape.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:31 PM
Mar 2014

Rape is a hate attack against someone, not sex.

 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
120. Rape culture encompasses all aspects surrounding rape
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:34 PM
Mar 2014

including overzealous suitors who think no means anything other than no.

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
154. it has nothing to do with
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 04:51 PM
Mar 2014

It in the normal context. For women playing hard to get is like a cat *the woman) toying with a mouse (the men)

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
125. I think part of sex ed should be a class on saying no, and understanding the word no
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:51 PM
Mar 2014

Perhaps there is a communication problem. Some people aren't saying it firmly enough, and some people might not understand the word no. Perhaps the class could be titled, "What does the word NO mean?"

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
132. And why do romance novels that women obsess over get a pass?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 11:08 PM
Mar 2014

The "bodice rippers" that usually have borderline rape in them or have love triangles.

Look how popular 50 Shades of Grey are with women. Men are not buying this rape fantasy junk.

Response to davidn3600 (Reply #132)

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
148. A lot like what you'd get
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 03:22 PM
Mar 2014

if you put Mosuo culture in a bowl with an atheist meeting and a liberal helping of bonobos, and stirred vigorously.

Response to CFLDem (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What does a world without...