Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Self-Insure (Original Post) PumpkinAle Mar 2014 OP
Do you mean... cyberswede Mar 2014 #1
Self insurance means that the company acts as the insurance company in paying bluestate10 Mar 2014 #10
Moving to a self-Insured plan is not a bad thing by itself. M0rpheus Mar 2014 #2
Thank you PumpkinAle Mar 2014 #3
If you have any ongoing health issues that are currently covered... M0rpheus Mar 2014 #6
Thanks and nope not yet. PumpkinAle Mar 2014 #13
It means that the Company is going to keep your premiums and pay your claims. Loudly Mar 2014 #4
It's a pretty common thing for companies with more than several hundred employees. Hoyt Mar 2014 #5
Years ago, my husband's employer was self-insured. Blue Diadem Mar 2014 #7
Thank you everyone for your answers PumpkinAle Mar 2014 #8
not pertinent to your post handmade34 Mar 2014 #11
Hmmmmmmmm beer PumpkinAle Mar 2014 #14
excellent brew handmade34 Mar 2014 #16
Lucky, lucky you PumpkinAle Mar 2014 #17
Some companies self insure and have done so well before the ACA. bluestate10 Mar 2014 #9
My employer does this Freddie Mar 2014 #12
Thanks - I do have one question PumpkinAle Mar 2014 #15
Most large employers use a third party administrator Freddie Apr 2014 #18
Thank you again PumpkinAle Apr 2014 #19

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
1. Do you mean...
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 09:20 PM
Mar 2014

your company is no longer going to provide health insurance as a benefit of employment? And that employees will need to purchase their own insurance?

Companies usually do things that are good for the company; if it's also good for the employees, it's usually just a side-effect.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
10. Self insurance means that the company acts as the insurance company in paying
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 10:23 PM
Mar 2014

benefits. A company doing self insurance works well if most employees are healthy and few big claims are filed. Self insurance can be a disaster if one or more employee becomes seriously ill, requiring expensive long term hospitalization.

M0rpheus

(885 posts)
2. Moving to a self-Insured plan is not a bad thing by itself.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 09:28 PM
Mar 2014

Your company will be paying all the claims with the insurance company as the recordkeeper.

This can result in lower costs generally, but all it takes is a few big claims for the company to decide to pass some of those costs to you via higher premiums.
It can also allow more/less flexibility in what's covered as your company makes the decision, since they're ultimately footing the bill.

It's a double edged sword. Whether it's good for the employee ultimately depends on whether your company is making the switch to provide better care, save money or, both.

PumpkinAle

(1,210 posts)
3. Thank you
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 09:34 PM
Mar 2014

they have openly said they want to save money while continuing to offer health benefits.

So we will see.

M0rpheus

(885 posts)
6. If you have any ongoing health issues that are currently covered...
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 09:44 PM
Mar 2014

You'll want specifics from the administrator on continuation of care so there aren't any surprises.

Ask all the questions you can think of and take note of anything that might be a potential problem for you, just in case you need to follow up.

Do you know who the administrator of the plan is/will be? - Just a question to satisfy my curiosity.

 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
4. It means that the Company is going to keep your premiums and pay your claims.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 09:34 PM
Mar 2014

They are attempting to cut out the insurance company profit.

If they are doing business in multiple states, they may also find it useful in standardizing benefits across the organization which dealing with different state-regulated insurers might not be able to accomplish for them.

Chances are that they will be using a third-party administrator to process claims, however.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. It's a pretty common thing for companies with more than several hundred employees.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 09:40 PM
Mar 2014

How good it is for you depends on who they choose to administer the plan, and what deductibles, coinsurance, and other restrictions they stick on employees.

Often employees won't see a lot of difference from a fully insured plan. Usually some insurance company carries the risk above what the company is willing to assume (like when a bunch of employees get very sick during the year). Essentially the company has enough employees to take some of the risk, and avoid the insurance company making as much profit.

I worked for a self insured company that had a very good plan. If you had good insurance before, the self-insured plan will probably be good unless the employer has become greedy.

Good luck.

Blue Diadem

(6,597 posts)
7. Years ago, my husband's employer was self-insured.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 09:52 PM
Mar 2014

I don't know if all plans work the way ours did, but his company used health insurance companies to handle the claims. Each year we'd receive our insurance cards for whatever plan they'd gone with and it was no different for us from regular health insurance. We had 80/20 for years then they went to HMO's until the company closed in the late 90's.

PumpkinAle

(1,210 posts)
8. Thank you everyone for your answers
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 09:56 PM
Mar 2014

I am still skeptical because the premiums were very high before and the coverage not that good.

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
11. not pertinent to your post
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 10:25 PM
Mar 2014

but your name made me think of this awesome stuff...


[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
9. Some companies self insure and have done so well before the ACA.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 10:16 PM
Mar 2014

If the prospect of employee claims is low, and serious illness isn't highly probable, self insurance allows a company to earn money on money that would have been paid for premiums. The move could be political, or it could be due to economics.

Freddie

(9,259 posts)
12. My employer does this
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 10:47 PM
Mar 2014

I'm benefits admin. Started it 2 years ago after being with a BC PPO for many years. BC still administers, employees still get cards from them, they really see no difference. It's done through a 3rd party administrator. They also keep a catastrophic component in case someone needs a heart transplant or such. Has (supposedly) kept our premiums from rising as much as they are somewhat "eliminating the middleman". Very common with large employers like school districts.

PumpkinAle

(1,210 posts)
15. Thanks - I do have one question
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 11:14 PM
Mar 2014

who gets to see the actual medical ailments that would require procedures, time-off, etc.

I am thinking if someone say had cancer - could the company know and then decide they don't really need that person?

Freddie

(9,259 posts)
18. Most large employers use a third party administrator
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 06:29 AM
Apr 2014

I know my bosses don't see names on the reports.
However I do understand your concern and I think there is potential for abuse. A relative of mine was mysteriously let go after she had expensive surgery; her employer was self-insured and we both think that was the reason. Ask these questions to your HR people if you can.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Self-Insure