General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHobby Lobby's Hypocrisy: The Company's Retirement Plan INVESTS in Contraception Manufacturers
Hobby Lobby's Hypocrisy: The Company's Retirement Plan Invests in Contraception Manufacturers
When Hobby Lobby filed its case against Obamacare's contraception mandate, its retirement plan had more than $73 million invested in funds with stakes in contraception makers.
By Molly Redden | Tue Apr. 1, 2014 3:00 AM PDT
Documents filed with the Department of Labor and dated December 2012three months after the company's owners filed their lawsuitshow that the Hobby Lobby 401(k) employee retirement plan held more than $73 million in mutual funds with investments in companies that produce emergency contraceptive pills, intrauterine devices, and drugs commonly used in abortions. Hobby Lobby makes large matching contributions to this company-sponsored 401(k).
Several of the mutual funds in Hobby Lobby's retirement plan have holdings in companies that manufacture the specific drugs and devices that the Green family, which owns Hobby Lobby, is fighting to keep out of Hobby Lobby's health care policies: the emergency contraceptive pills Plan B and Ella, and copper and hormonal intrauterine devices.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/04/hobby-lobby-retirement-plan-invested-emergency-contraception-and-abortion-drug-makers
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)I don't know how they could get around that - there are Mutual Funds set up to be run along "christian" principals i.e. no contraceptives or porn or anything like that. But they aren't competitive, compared to funds that are open to anyone.
But how would you feel if your company discontinued most mutual funds and replaced them with all "green" mutual funds, that performed slightly under regular funds, but avoided investing in securities of companies that were major polluters?
Bryant
mac56
(17,574 posts)and working openly to promote them, I would expect no less in in their selection of mutual funds. YMMV.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)And a company who did that would have to accept that a certain number of talented people wouldn't be willing to sacrifice their financial benefit to work at a "green" company. Truthfully Hobby Lobby should have a similar problem.
Bryant
bluemarkers
(536 posts)and let's not forget that Mr Lobby also imports all that cheap crap from China, and we we how The Communist Government there follows Christian ethics
I really wouldn't be surprised if SCOTUS rules in favor of Mr Lobby (he's such a fine fellow), but I've read several articles lately that Follow the Money. Apparently reconnecting actual people to Hobby Lobby would skirt around many protections of incorporation. Money > God to these gopers, so I really wouldn't be surprised if SCOTUS ruled against Mr Lobby.
I guess part of my brain is still in shock that rwnjs are even forcing this discussion on us. otoh, I feel the tea party's main objective was to divide and conquer ... have to give them props for that.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Although there were indications last week they were looking to rule favorably for hobby lobby but in a very very narrow way, which might be having their cake and eating it too.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)I'm certain the wingnuts on the SCOTUS can come up with a suitably tortured legal reason to allow HL to drop coverage because of its "beliefs", yet still be protected in all other ways. Just like Bush v. Gore 2000.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,047 posts)MatthewStLouis
(904 posts)They are all just a bunch of right-wing hypocrites.
It is likely all the products they sell (which their sanctimonious customers purchase) are made in China: A communist country that sanctions forced abortions.
Grins
(7,239 posts)That has enforced 1-child laws and has one of the highest rates of contraceptive use in the world.
That tacky crap you can buy at Hobby Lobby is mostly made in China, crap that China's government will tax in some form. In effect, Hobby Lobby's buying from China supports China's 1-child and contraceptive policies. It pays for those policies. And American who buy at H-L also support those policies.
And H-L will continue to buy from China, 'cuz profits mean more than sweet, sweet, Jebus.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)3catwoman3
(24,058 posts)How verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry interesting. What a bunch of phonies.
Fabulously hypocritical. Pfft.
Jeeze. It just keeps getting better with these zealots.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)and claim ignorance (bad PR)
MADem
(135,425 posts)using (and human-rights abusing) suppliers!
That's the next focus should they actually try to pull that shit! Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas, and all... (no disrespect to dogs, mind you).
hibbing
(10,109 posts)Thanks for finding this and posting it. This case scares the heck out of me, but as usual, money trumps any kind of "morals".
Peace
tea and oranges
(396 posts)the anti-woman agenda, the belief that xtian values trumps law, what really gets me is this new focus on emotion in law.
Stand your ground is based on the emotion of fear. Give me a break & prove the fear...
Hobby Lobby is based on "sincerely held religious beliefs". Ok, prove the sincerity...
The direction these laws take us is scaring the crap out of me! Who is allowed to have these emotions? How can they be judged? After all, Fred Phelps was sincere about his hateful beliefs, the KKK is now billing themselves as a xtian organization.
If Hobby Lobby has it's way, the ramifications could be horrific.
kpete
(72,026 posts)you are SO correct!
peace, kp
aikoaiko
(34,185 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)convictions. It is just a handy excuse to hide whatever their true motives are.
spooky3
(34,486 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024741559#post14
It was never about anything but money. Christians need to realize they have been conned by the right.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)benld74
(9,911 posts)their lawsuit was all about!!!!!
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)SunSeeker
(51,744 posts)Zambero
(8,974 posts)So "religious freedom" essentially means being able to interfere with the free choice of others, while making financial gains from the very products whose availability would be interfering with said religious freedom. You really can't make this stuff up.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Yeah right. Profit, mo money honey. Screw freedom.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Birth control but it is okay to purchase Viagra. It is okay for them to make money investing in companies who sells the products but the products are against their religious beliefs, yep, think I understand.
drm604
(16,230 posts)This is about attacking President Obama and his signature achievement.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)to spend holy $'s on them.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Ilsa
(61,700 posts)Reads DU or other sources of this news.
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)they would know there is nothing Jesus despises more than a hypocrite.