General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMissoula files for eminent domain takeover of water system from Carlyle Group
Source: Missoulian
The city of Missoula filed for condemnation of Mountain Water Co. on Wednesday in District Court, seeking to take ownership of its public water system from The Carlyle Group.
This is something that we have not engaged in lightly, Mayor John Engen said at an afternoon news briefing in his office. Ive never imagined exercising the citys right of eminent domain in any circumstance, but I believe this is so important to the future of our community and the risks of not pursuing this avenue are too great.
... As part of its complaint, the city argues that Mountain Water ratepayers under private ownership are lining the pocketbooks of faraway investors. In the 2013 fiscal year, the Carlyle Groups three founders earned $750 million, or roughly more than $133,000 each per hour, and they had use of a private airplane valued at $1.1 million.
As a result of its focus on creating value for its investors rather than creating value for its customers and ratepayers, Carlyle Infrastructure is incentivized to operate the Water System in a manner that will achieve the maximum short-term economic return rather than to operate it for the long-term stability and security of the people of Missoula, reads the eminent domain complaint.
Read more: http://missoulian.com/news/local/missoula-files-for-eminent-domain-takeover-of-water-system/article_d7e7703e-ba9c-11e3-97ad-0019bb2963f4.html
Wounded Bear
(64,328 posts)Hey, a guy can hope.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)I say seize ALL if their assets and put them on trial for crimes against humanity.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)quote another disqusting waste of human filth.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)I'm very curious as I grew up there... off to Google
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)taking of a person's property by eminent domain so that the property could be
sold to a corporation for 'economic development'. The development project
fell through and the seized property is basically unused to this day.
http://m.theday.com/article/20130623/NWS01/306239947/1070/mobile&template=mobile
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)Maybe this represents the first shot in the Un-Privatization of America,
and a return of ownership of the necessities to The People from the For Profit Blood Suckers!
.
.
.
.
I hope so!
mattclearing
(10,109 posts)Would be nice to see a government buck the privatization trend.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)..the 3rdWay Reagan Democrats.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Losing = precedent.
Raksha
(7,167 posts)and the resources to pursue the case all the way up to the Felonious Five.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)to pay.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Based on what I read in the article, I don't believe they have a case unless Carlyle is so negligent that the public welfare is in jeopardy.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)the property in this case and that Missoula has tried this before and lost in the state courts.
Stuart G
(38,726 posts)leanforward
(1,134 posts)Keep in mind the old SecDef Rummy is at Carlyle Group. He'll put the screws to you. He did that to some service members related to the Mayaquez incident. Can you imagine the savings for the water users in Missoula? Even if the rates about the same, the money will stay local.
Kudos to the community leaders. These guys are truly community leaders.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Wow. For me, this is something that leaves me grasping for words that can convey what this can be.
A fight for drinking water in america. How basic does an issue come?
Carlyle v. life. BFEE! Rest in peace Bartcop
erronis
(23,882 posts)I wouldn't put it past these bastards to try to license the air after they gain all rights to the water.
1000words
(7,051 posts)just wait for the Water Wars.
Raksha
(7,167 posts)pnwmom
(110,261 posts)Hope it succeeds.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)This is part of supporting PBO and other dems. people are turning against the oliPUKES.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)alfredo
(60,301 posts)Land sitting on top a huge aquifer.
Arudhati Roy has written extensively of the thuggish behavior by the water speculators.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)If you trust a corporation to operate your water (education, defense, health care, etc) in an equitable fashion, you are a damned fool (or being bribed).
Corporations are proving themselves to be little more than a blight on the nation.
Hear me?
calimary
(90,021 posts)alfredo
(60,301 posts)Maybe they will do as the French and shut the nation down until someone listens. Naw, they are scared they will get downsized in retaliation.
LuvNewcastle
(17,821 posts)should only be owned by the public in that locality. They should never be bought or sold. Well, I suppose it could be sold by the public if they can get the permission of each and every person who lives there as well as everyone who will live there in the future.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)The public will eventually pay more for every service that is privatized.
Those old Reagan/Republican memes have been nurtured for a reason, "The government can't do anything right! Government is the problem."
How many times have we heard it? We have heard it on every TV channel and every internet group. They are setting us up for more thievery. We are fools if we allow it.
This is where the Obama Administration deserves severe criticism from Democrats for their position on charter schools. This is where they have adopted a Republican position. Siphoning public money away from public schools to private charter schools undermines public education.
Maybe the President had good intentions. But now that we all know he was wrong it is time to change directions. That is where criticism becomes a tool.
unionthug777
(740 posts)being a native.....not my favorite phrase. but, that's just me.
Duval
(4,280 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Pakid
(478 posts)of taking back our resources like water which we should own and not corporate America and it greedy investors
ashling
(25,771 posts)and needs to be seen.
alfredo
(60,301 posts)Our city council. They pumped millions into advertising against local ownership of our water. They blocked access to our meetings and had employees walking around with video cameras, sticking them in the faces of anyone speaking with the person next to them. I was followed by some of their goons when I was passing out Lit about local ownership.
I hope there hasn't been such tactics there.
Grins
(9,459 posts)That's a typo. Take out the decimal point.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Although I doubt anyone here needs any reminding--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlyle_Group#Political_figures
Our good friends--
James Baker III (after Herr Kissinger, one of the most vile creatures to walk this earth.)
Raygun
Bush the Elder
Bush the Little
Frank Carlucci
Richard Darmen
John Major..
Oooppsssiee.....
And ARBUUUUSTO !!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbusto_Energy
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)might have had something to say to some of those
pangaia
(24,324 posts)with his terrible swift sword.
I have always wanted to use the word 'smitten." Finally got a chance to.
colsohlibgal
(5,276 posts)We need to focus a lot more on local and state issues, this kind of action is the way to start taking our nation back from the ruling class.
It will take a long, long time but we have to stay at it.
idendoit
(505 posts)drm604
(16,230 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 3, 2014, 10:04 PM - Edit history (1)
Nearly every one is an ignorant, nasty, negative right-wing criticism. Not just criticism of the takeover attempt, but nasty ignorant trashing of the mayor and liberals, and *shock* at the idea that a government could possibly be successful at running a utility (something that is actually very common in this country). I have to wonder if Mountain Water, The Carlyle Group, or their PR people aren't paying people to post.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)why wouldn't they?
LuvNewcastle
(17,821 posts)cheapest water and sewer rates in the region. So yes, it can be done and done very well. I pay less than $30 per month for my water, sewer, and garbage collection.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)They offered $65 million and Carlyle wants $120 million. If Missoula wins, they'll get it for fair market value which will likely be some value in between.
Based on what is in the article, I think Missoula will lose unless they can prove that Carlyle is grossly negligent in maintaining the water system and they have to take over to protect the public. The fact that Carlyle makes money is irrelevant.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)
- If they're not afraid and not wanting to just sit on their asses and wait for some corrupted elected official to do something they have no intention of doing.
If change is to come, we will have to bring it......
K&R
[center]
[/center]
''Whomever's in-charge, gets to define everybody else.'' ~Paul Cienfuegos, Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund
BlueMTexpat
(15,690 posts)and still love the place. I was also born and raised in Montana, although I haven't lived there for eons. I still have lots of family and close friends there and visit as often as I can.
The takeover of Missoula's water system occurred after my departure (no correlation - LOL) and I am glad to see city officials taking a stand on this issue.
Carlyle no less! I cannot stand war criminal Rumsfeld at all; the same for anything or anyone to do with him. Ironically, Rummy's wife was actually born in MT. In the category of things-you-probably-didn't-want-to-know-and-could-care-less-about, here is some info: http://marriage.about.com/od/politics/p/donrumsfeld.htm
Not Sure
(735 posts)The town of Blue Mound, a suburb of Fort Worth, has been dealing with a substandard water system owned and run by a private company for some time now. Each attempt to bring the water system up to snuff has failed. The owner does not want to upgrade the system so the town has tried legal action, even condemnation. Last I heard, two state representatives put forth legislation to allow the city to take over the water system. Naturally, Governor Perry opposed the measure and it did not become law.
Good luck, Missoula. I hope you fare better than Blue Mound.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)I went to Mountain Water's website and looked at their water quality reports - they have very good water, better than I have in northern NJ. I compared what they would have charged me to what the Town of Parsippany in NJ charged me on my last bill and Mountain Water would have been 50% cheaper.
Not Sure
(735 posts)In Blue Mound, the water is provided by nearby Fort Worth, so the water quality isn't part of the equation. The water delivery system doesn't provide enough pressure to the fire hydrants for them to be effective. This affects everyone's insurance rates including the city itself.
It's possible that similar problems plague Missoula apart from the quality of the water.
vanlassie
(6,248 posts)"PG&E indicted on criminal charges by federal grand jury in connection with San Bruno explosion." ...
Following their investigations, state and federal regulators concluded that flawed record keeping and lax maintenance efforts were the primary contributors to the gas pipeline explosion."
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_25471302/pg-e-indicted-criminal-charges-by-federal-grand
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Wow...lot's of government haters there.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... almost no chance of making this stick IMHO. And while I do wish them luck, I would ask a simple question: how did Carlyle gain control of their water system to begin with?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)He's probably shitting blood in his outrage as we speak.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Maineman
(854 posts)The Blue Flower
(6,492 posts)"Carlyle Infrastructure is incentivized to operate the Water System in a manner that will achieve the maximum short-term economic return rather than to operate if for the long-term stability and security of the people of Missoula."
Why did they not see this going in?
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)The issue the judge will consider is how they are actually operating the system.
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)Let me tell you how it will be
There's one for you, nineteen for me