Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCOWARDLY Rand Paul CAVES, BOWS DOWN, & KISSES The Ring of Dick Cheney

The Rand Paul bullshit meter has exploded.....kiss Darth's ring mofu.....
On ABCs This Week, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) completely reversed course by claiming that Dick Cheney loves America, and that he never criticized the former vice presidents motives for invading Iraq.
Transcript:
KARL: So I want to turn to foreign policy, some tapes of you over the last few years have emerged recently. You were very critical of Dick Cheney. You suggested that he was opposed to going into Baghdad in 1991
~video clip~
PAUL: Dick Cheney then goes to work for Halliburton, makes hundreds of millions of dollars as CEO. Next thing you know, hes back in government its a good idea to go to Iraq.
~end of video clip
KARL: Do you really think that Cheney was motivated by his financial ties to Halliburton.
PAUL: Im not questioning his motives.
KARL: Sure looked like you were questioning his motives.
PAUL: Well, heres what Im questioning, I dont think Dick Cheney did it out of malevolence, I think he loves his country as much as I love the country
KARL: But you said we dont want our defense to be defined by people who make money off the weapons. Are you suggesting thats why we went to war in Iraq?
PAUL: No. No.
KARL: That our defense was being defined by people who make money off weapons?
PAUL: No. And thats why Im also saying that Im not questioning Dick Cheneys motives.
Theres a chance for a conflict of interest. At one point in time, he was opposed going into Baghdad. Then he was out of office and involved in the defense industry and then he became for going into Baghdad.
http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/week-transcript-ambassador-samantha-power/story?id=23293462&page=4
KARL: So I want to turn to foreign policy, some tapes of you over the last few years have emerged recently. You were very critical of Dick Cheney. You suggested that he was opposed to going into Baghdad in 1991
~video clip~
PAUL: Dick Cheney then goes to work for Halliburton, makes hundreds of millions of dollars as CEO. Next thing you know, hes back in government its a good idea to go to Iraq.
~end of video clip
KARL: Do you really think that Cheney was motivated by his financial ties to Halliburton.
PAUL: Im not questioning his motives.
KARL: Sure looked like you were questioning his motives.
PAUL: Well, heres what Im questioning, I dont think Dick Cheney did it out of malevolence, I think he loves his country as much as I love the country
KARL: But you said we dont want our defense to be defined by people who make money off the weapons. Are you suggesting thats why we went to war in Iraq?
PAUL: No. No.
KARL: That our defense was being defined by people who make money off weapons?
PAUL: No. And thats why Im also saying that Im not questioning Dick Cheneys motives.
Theres a chance for a conflict of interest. At one point in time, he was opposed going into Baghdad. Then he was out of office and involved in the defense industry and then he became for going into Baghdad.
http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/week-transcript-ambassador-samantha-power/story?id=23293462&page=4
Sen. Paul isnt a leader. He is a coward, who is saying whatever he has to say in order to win the Republican nomination in 2016. It is not surprising that Paul would completely take back his criticism of Cheney. Sen. Paul has to shake the perception within the Republican Party that the apple didnt fall too far from the fringe extremist tree. Rand Paul is behaving just like Mitt Romney did in 2012. Both men were/are consumed with their desire to be president. The Paul folks seem to believe that they can say whatever they have to in order to win the nomination, then do whatever they want.
The problem is that Pauls explanations are so convoluted that he is making it nearly impossible for anyone outside of his current base of support to take him seriously as a presidential candidate. It makes perfect sense for Rand Paul to bow down and kiss Dick Cheneys ring. It may be hard to believe for anyone outside of the Republican Party, but the Bush/Cheney foreign policy remains popular within the GOP.
cont'
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/04/13/cowardly-rand-paul-caves-bows-down-kisses-ring-dick-cheney.html
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
COWARDLY Rand Paul CAVES, BOWS DOWN, & KISSES The Ring of Dick Cheney (Original Post)
Segami
Apr 2014
OP
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)1. Oh my, what a fucking tool..where is his Dad? No comment from Ron?
Siwsan
(27,833 posts)2. I think his brain is controlled by whatever that is, living on top of his head
No doubt it is some alien life form.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)3. Phone call in the night?
Ya think maybe Cheney called the kid and invited the kid to go hunting?
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)4. Ron Paul Knows Where The Money Is
and it's in the extreme right wing. Kudos to Ayn Rand Paul's enterprising spirit! /sarc
Cirque du So-What
(29,703 posts)5. Crawfishin' & backpedalin'
Perhaps he received the neocon equivalent of a severed horse-head in his bed, something along the lines of a stay-out-of-small-planes warning. He's making no friends among the neocons, and this craven-cowardly gesture will not go over well with the teabaggers. What's a batshit-loony 'libertarian' to do?
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)6. Randroid = Republican Regular that plays a Libertarian on TV as a "hook"
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)9. Precisely
Last edited Sun Apr 13, 2014, 05:48 PM - Edit history (1)
Ayn Rand Paul is just another right wing tool.
Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)13. Been saying that for years as well...
Segami
(14,923 posts)7. "..Rand Paul is revealing himself to be a less intelligent version of Mitt Romney..."
"...Nothing Paul says can be trusted to stand the test of time. Sen. Pauls inability to keep his stories straight will be the downfall of his presidential ambitions in 2016..."
warrior1
(12,325 posts)8. Oh yes you did Rand
there's video tape of you doing that very thing.
butterfly77
(17,609 posts)10. As far as Detroit is concerned..
KISS OUR ASSES!
Cha
(318,868 posts)12. Stupid Libertarian wants Dick's blessing does he?
"Stand with rand
"
Blue Owl
(59,032 posts)14. What's with the crown of thorns?
n/t