General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPresident Obama just called out Speaker Boehner over Payroll Tax Increase
Last edited Tue Dec 20, 2011, 05:36 PM - Edit history (1)
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/12/obama-team-urges-house-to-vote-on-payroll-tax-cut/1The Senate plan is "the only viable way to prevent a tax cut on Jan. 1," Obama said at the White House. "The clock is ticking. Time is running out."
In his brief remarks, Obama basically rejected House Speaker John Boehner's request that the White House support new House-Senate talks for a one-year extension of the payroll tax cut.
..."Let's not play brinksmanship," Obama said. "The American people are tired of it."
Thank you, Mr. President.
ETA: As pointed out below, the actual quote of the President in that USA Today story should read, "Right now, the bipartisan compromise that was reached on Saturday is the only viable way to prevent a tax hike on January 1st. Its the only one." Emphasis mine.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/20/remarks-president-payroll-tax-cut
Richardo
(38,391 posts):kick:
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)I know the president doesn't like to be harsh, but this is an excellent place to go a little over the top.
When you are right in every way on an issue and supported by amost the entire nation and the issue is THE SIZE OF EVERYONE'S NEXT PAYCHECK then go for it! Demonize the opponant. Fix blame harshly.
There's no danger of blow-back on this particular issue.
Cigar11
(549 posts)But its about FORKING TIME the President stop take SHEET fro these AzzHoles!
pnwmom
(110,264 posts)Read the whole article...
DURHAM D
(33,062 posts)Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)deacon
(5,967 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,967 posts)is to not play it. Boehner fought hard to get a Republican majority in the House and get elected Speaker. It's his responsibility to lead. The failings of members of Congress cannot and should not be perpetually dropped in Obama's lap. Furthermore, yeah, I think that everybody is sick and tired of all of this ridiculous "brinksmanship." Thank you, Mr. President!
GoCubsGo
(34,934 posts)And, good for him for doing so immediately after the Blubbering Human Cheeto spewed his BS.
11 Bravo
(24,313 posts)DURHAM D
(33,062 posts)"prevent a tax cut" should be "prevent a tax hike"
In the words of Pretty Woman Julia Roberts: Big mistake. Big mistake.
Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)I'll check the White House site, but you're right, that should be the other way around.
RobinA
(10,478 posts)When Obama originally went for this SS tax cut extension (in July or whatever) everybody complained that it was a backdoor attempt to gut social security by making the "social security is bankrupt" lie a reality by defunding it.
Why is this tax "cut" not still defunding social security? I, for one, am sticking to my original view that this so-called cut is bad for social security and should be done away with. No two months, no two years, get rid of it now and restore funding to SS.
Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)No gutting of Social Security is happening.
HuskiesHowls
(739 posts)Even if they are making up the shortfall from general funds--it won't take long until the Republicans take away that funding, and then SS WILL be in trouble!!
This "tax cut" was not a good idea. Do away with the cap on income, then there won't be any problems funding social security. I've even heard people in the 1% say that!!!
MH1
(19,170 posts)The tax rate should be permanently cut and the cap raised enough to achieve the necessary revenue. Doing so will lower taxes on lower income workers and slightly raise taxes on higher income workers. (Progressive, right?) But due to the recession now is not a great time to raise the cap. It can be done a year or two from now and if it's calculated right it can also extend SS solvency significantly past the current forecast.
tavalon
(27,985 posts)If we got rid of the cap, we could cut the rate anyway.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)so many credible people (credible to me anyway) argued in favor of the short-term cuts as stimulus that I was convinced. People that imo know the importance of Social Security. I'm still worried about long-term, however.
tavalon
(27,985 posts)That said, after some thought, I'm not for this "payroll tax relief". I feel like DC has once again wrestled the conversation back to what they want to talk about and in the way they want to talk about it. Yeah, so it isn't going to impact Social Security because it will come out of the general fund, whatever that amorphous thing is. I can guarantee our warmongering isn't coming out of the general fund. Leave the payroll tax and remove the cap, completely.
Yep, I said it.
Johnny2X2X
(24,243 posts)I think he needs to be even more forceful. State that they are putting special interests ahead of working people again and state that this is a blatant attempt to hurt the economy in 2012 in an effort to win the White House. People need to hear him call it like it is.
ChadwickHenryWard
(862 posts)The President is bending over backwards to give them concessions, and they are rejecting them in favor nothing. In what universe is that smart politics? The President is giving them everything they want; how can they possibly reject it? In exchange for sticking to their guns, they get increased taxes? How does that work for them?
Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)When you're a Republican and you've lost the WSJ editorial page and the National Review...