General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmadaboutharry
(42,033 posts)are constant reminders of the ramifications of a stolen election.
LoZoccolo
(29,393 posts)BlueDemKev
(3,003 posts)...at the steps of the once-honorable Supreme Court.
polichick
(37,626 posts)marybourg
(13,640 posts)as his V.P nominee
LoZoccolo
(29,393 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)LoZoccolo
(29,393 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)LoZoccolo
(29,393 posts)BlueDemKev
(3,003 posts)...remember he did return to the Democratic fold after Obama was elected, and helped gain the crucial Republican support needed to pass the stimulus and he did support health care reform.
The thing about Lieberman is he loves to be in the spotlight and being a maverick allows him to do that. Regardless, he is a headache and I'll be glad to see him replaced with a more loyal Democrat this November.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)tinrobot
(12,061 posts)...nor would a VP Lieberman sit on the Judiciary committee.
Seems like a win-win to me.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)I did not watch the Monica Lewinski story, which apparently was Chinless Joe's greatest moment.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,696 posts)libtodeath
(2,892 posts)tkmorris
(11,138 posts)I expect he likely would have taken a "maintain the status quo" approach however. Replacing a Moderate with a Moderate, a Conservative with a more Conservative, and so on. Gore was always a compromiser, and Nader believed, rightly or wrongly, that that is no longer good enough.
Don't misunderstand, I am no fan of Nader's refusal to drop out in battleground states in 2000, but I can understand the point he was trying to make.
LoZoccolo
(29,393 posts)tkmorris
(11,138 posts)They are unprovable and subjective. Your OP is as much an example of this as my reply.
Al Gore is a good man. He should have won.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...until the SCROTUS stole if for Lt AWOL...
JVS
(61,935 posts)KG
(28,795 posts)what was the dem's excuse for losing the 2004 election?
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)Plus there was the media that cut all of Kerry's best sound bytes while cutting all of Bush's worst sound bytes.
Besides, Gore would have won his second term. And by the way, 9/11 probably wouldn't have happened, as Gore was used to taking Richard Clarke and his team seriously. Unlike Bush and Condi, who ignored them.
politicasista
(14,128 posts)MH1
(19,156 posts)thesquanderer
(13,005 posts)to answer your question about the "the dem's excuse for losing the 2004 election"
http://www.amazon.com/What-Went-Wrong-Ohio-Presidential/dp/089733535X
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Both clear as day, and to this day, still no-one prosecuted....
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)And now, here we are, almost 12 years later, having to defend President Obama. Talk about a waste of bandwidth!
mzmolly
(52,792 posts)scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)CrispyQ
(40,969 posts)Upton
(9,709 posts)politicasista
(14,128 posts)and in some ways Ms. Brazille.